I think there should be either a video explaining the project in layman terms or a short whitepaper that explains the basic principles of the project. But i do believe they should keep the current whitepaper. Clearly a lot of work has gone into it and people who have enough experience and knowledge in the medical sector will be able to judge the project on all the details.
Here's their youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDOXlcfFnSTVRlkqy8kojWA There is all the necessary information about the project. Both short and long videos)
Topic: [ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 322. (Read 97848 times)
i read the whitepaper now like 100 pages so far and i must say, damn, i feel like becoming a medicine student. there are so many special words from the medicine sector, like health marker and more stuff like that, which i cant pronounce. really, this should be easy to understand >< i have a very hard time ><
Haha, is it really that complicated? Maybe I will try to finaly read it It’s not that hard if English is your first language.
It was quite an interesting read for me.
really Oo?
well, english is like my second motherlanguage and i had somehow a hard time to read it, especially those unfamiliar words from the medical sector.
thats right, also a doctor suggests a surgical procedure and i think it's helpful to get a second opinion as to if it's really necessary.
second opinion is a must. I heard many cases where a particular doctor gets greedy and opt the patient for unnecessary surgeries which eventually leads to degradation of health rather than betterment.
That's a good point. eHealth could show the patients different ways of treatment. Doctors might try to talk patients into the most profitable treatment for themselves.
Implementing this feature to ehealth can give a little boost to project, I think they should focus on what they planned in the first place, as far as i can see they have so much to do.
that may be, but I'm sure word travels around and maybe a rating system will be in place. so you don't have to go to a bad doctor. also, second opinions will be possible right?
Of course second opinions can differ from the first one, when human factor involved in any situation, errors should be considered on every step.
By concentrating efforts on what they have already planned, it is certainly the best decision to make, since the Team has drawn up a long roadmap, and to divert its ways now, would really be detrimental to the project
A few years ago, they proposed a surgery that I thought was not necessary. I went to another doctor and he told me it was better not to do it. I decided not to have a surgery. 15 years later I am perfectly well.
thats right, also a doctor suggests a surgical procedure and i think it's helpful to get a second opinion as to if it's really necessary.
second opinion is a must. I heard many cases where a particular doctor gets greedy and opt the patient for unnecessary surgeries which eventually leads to degradation of health rather than betterment.
That's a good point. eHealth could show the patients different ways of treatment. Doctors might try to talk patients into the most profitable treatment for themselves.
Implementing this feature to ehealth can give a little boost to project, I think they should focus on what they planned in the first place, as far as i can see they have so much to do.
that may be, but I'm sure word travels around and maybe a rating system will be in place. so you don't have to go to a bad doctor. also, second opinions will be possible right?
Of course second opinions can differ from the first one, when human factor involved in any situation, errors should be considered on every step.
By concentrating efforts on what they have already planned, it is certainly the best decision to make, since the Team has drawn up a long roadmap, and to divert its ways now, would really be detrimental to the project
thats right, also a doctor suggests a surgical procedure and i think it's helpful to get a second opinion as to if it's really necessary.
second opinion is a must. I heard many cases where a particular doctor gets greedy and opt the patient for unnecessary surgeries which eventually leads to degradation of health rather than betterment.
That's a good point. eHealth could show the patients different ways of treatment. Doctors might try to talk patients into the most profitable treatment for themselves.
Implementing this feature to ehealth can give a little boost to project, I think they should focus on what they planned in the first place, as far as i can see they have so much to do.
that may be, but I'm sure word travels around and maybe a rating system will be in place. so you don't have to go to a bad doctor. also, second opinions will be possible right?
Of course second opinions can differ from the first one, when human factor involved in any situation, errors should be considered on every step.
thats right, also a doctor suggests a surgical procedure and i think it's helpful to get a second opinion as to if it's really necessary.
second opinion is a must. I heard many cases where a particular doctor gets greedy and opt the patient for unnecessary surgeries which eventually leads to degradation of health rather than betterment.
That's a good point. eHealth could show the patients different ways of treatment. Doctors might try to talk patients into the most profitable treatment for themselves.
Implementing this feature to ehealth can give a little boost to project, I think they should focus on what they planned in the first place, as far as i can see they have so much to do.
that may be, but I'm sure word travels around and maybe a rating system will be in place. so you don't have to go to a bad doctor. also, second opinions will be possible right?
Of course second opinions can differ from the first one, when human factor involved in any situation, errors should be considered on every step.
thats right, also a doctor suggests a surgical procedure and i think it's helpful to get a second opinion as to if it's really necessary.
second opinion is a must. I heard many cases where a particular doctor gets greedy and opt the patient for unnecessary surgeries which eventually leads to degradation of health rather than betterment.
That's a good point. eHealth could show the patients different ways of treatment. Doctors might try to talk patients into the most profitable treatment for themselves.
Implementing this feature to ehealth can give a little boost to project, I think they should focus on what they planned in the first place, as far as i can see they have so much to do.
that may be, but I'm sure word travels around and maybe a rating system will be in place. so you don't have to go to a bad doctor. also, second opinions will be possible right?
thats right, also a doctor suggests a surgical procedure and i think it's helpful to get a second opinion as to if it's really necessary.
second opinion is a must. I heard many cases where a particular doctor gets greedy and opt the patient for unnecessary surgeries which eventually leads to degradation of health rather than betterment.
That's a good point. eHealth could show the patients different ways of treatment. Doctors might try to talk patients into the most profitable treatment for themselves.
Implementing this feature to ehealth can give a little boost to project, I think they should focus on what they planned in the first place, as far as i can see they have so much to do.
jep thats a good idea of use and the dividends are calculated solely on the basis of net profit of the Project.
I think there will be many investors who would want to invest in this project because of this feature alone. Sharing dividends is really a good thing and a sign of respect for the investors.
Has this been confirmed yet? Will there be dividends for token holders?
jep thats a good idea of use and the dividends are calculated solely on the basis of net profit of the Project.
I think there will be many investors who would want to invest in this project because of this feature alone. Sharing dividends is really a good thing and a sign of respect for the investors.
jep thats a good idea of use and the dividends are calculated solely on the basis of net profit of the Project.
thats right, also a doctor suggests a surgical procedure and i think it's helpful to get a second opinion as to if it's really necessary.
second opinion is a must. I heard many cases where a particular doctor gets greedy and opt the patient for unnecessary surgeries which eventually leads to degradation of health rather than betterment.
That's a good point. eHealth could show the patients different ways of treatment. Doctors might try to talk patients into the most profitable treatment for themselves.
thats right, also a doctor suggests a surgical procedure and i think it's helpful to get a second opinion as to if it's really necessary.
second opinion is a must. I heard many cases where a particular doctor gets greedy and opt the patient for unnecessary surgeries which eventually leads to degradation of health rather than betterment.
That's a good point. eHealth could show the patients different ways of treatment. Doctors might try to talk patients into the most profitable treatment for themselves.
Time will tell! But as supporter of ehealth project, I have to believe that the team will do their best to make the project success. So far so good!
I think a simple regular news updates would suffice for the community. Communication is very important for every project.
It doesn’t have to be often, even monthly would be good during periods with no major updates. Newsletters are great ways to provide updates.
If nothing else, people can forget about the ICO if there are no regular news out there. You need to keep your potential investors updated in any case thats how they feel in touch with your project.
that's why a media presence is so important. it's gets eyeballs on the project.
To be constantly kept on the radar for the coming months if not to say years it's crucial for EHF to do more or less continously marketing and keep the community updated, e.g. as someone already said with regular newsletters.
Yep, can just agree. At least a weekly update would be cool to show and inform about what the team is doing currently.
Good afternoon, everybody! I was glad to find that project! i have been reading the white paper for a while already - it is so thoroughly written it is fantastic! such a pleasure to stumble upon a real project dealing with real problems in the real world!! thank you guys for taking care!
then start to save money and invest into ehealth
and be rich in a couple of years when their projects start to fruit.This project started in December and is slowly getting attention, that is what we want, people that are interested in the health part of the crypto economy, but i hope all understand that this is a long term project, and that they are willing to hold for at least 3 years, the roadmap is very long.
thats right, also a doctor suggests a surgical procedure and i think it's helpful to get a second opinion as to if it's really necessary.
second opinion is a must. I heard many cases where a particular doctor gets greedy and opt the patient for unnecessary surgeries which eventually leads to degradation of health rather than betterment.
Good afternoon, everybody! I was glad to find that project! i have been reading the white paper for a while already - it is so thoroughly written it is fantastic! such a pleasure to stumble upon a real project dealing with real problems in the real world!! thank you guys for taking care!
then start to save money and invest into ehealth
and be rich in a couple of years when their projects start to fruit. 
Time will tell! But as supporter of ehealth project, I have to believe that the team will do their best to make the project success. So far so good!
I think a simple regular news updates would suffice for the community. Communication is very important for every project.
It doesn’t have to be often, even monthly would be good during periods with no major updates. Newsletters are great ways to provide updates.
If nothing else, people can forget about the ICO if there are no regular news out there. You need to keep your potential investors updated in any case thats how they feel in touch with your project.
that's why a media presence is so important. it's gets eyeballs on the project.
To be constantly kept on the radar for the coming months if not to say years it's crucial for EHF to do more or less continously marketing and keep the community updated, e.g. as someone already said with regular newsletters.
Yep, can just agree. At least a weekly update would be cool to show and inform about what the team is doing currently.
thats right, also a doctor suggests a surgical procedure and i think it's helpful to get a second opinion as to if it's really necessary.
You should have some inclination to medicine in order to fully understand the white paper, but if you can grasp what the project is trying to achieve such as being a collection of medical records that can determine cure to common illness.
Its normal with most of the projects, you need some existing knowledge to completely understand them since they can be quite specific and i think eHealth is still quite easy to understand compared to some other ones.
Yeah, such marketing tools should be easy to comprehend to make it more effective to its target audiences. Imho.
Video is the best media to be used. Health is a hard subject and watching the explanation via videos will make it a bit easier.
yep, most projects these days should do video instead of articles, or at least more video to complement articles.
Jump to: