[ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 320.

Fermin AK

member

Activity: 266

Merit: 10

Presale is live!

Quote from: huutertools on March 05, 2018, 01:37:22 PM

Quote from: jonnytracker on March 05, 2018, 01:29:56 PM

Quote from: aveon on March 05, 2018, 12:58:44 PM

Quote from: wissy on March 05, 2018, 12:12:18 PM

Quote from: king_of_alts on March 05, 2018, 06:27:53 AM

Quote from: Piggy on March 05, 2018, 06:19:57 AM

Instead of relaying on somebody else telling you if an ico is good or not, just read the information available about the team, project. Everybody is going to have different opinions, use your brain

That's of course the best way to do it but many people like to hear a second opinion or maybe some simply don't have the time or will to do this research.

Thats why you need to find a trusted reviewer if you dont have time to do a research about a project your self. There is not hard to find someone, who you share an opinion with and trust his judgement.

I would say if you are interested in the project, you have to have time to research it, because if your investment into something is just based on somebody else's review, that's stupid. The only person to blame for bad investing has to be self

Yes it is best suggested to do your own research in investment programs, you cannot held resposible to any news agency. I participated in a scam project which CoinTelegraph was paid to published. Any project can pay to publish in major news circles. So in the end we better rely on our own judgement

At the end everyone has to decide by themselves. Sometimes with smaller investment I just tried it. But in larger invests I did a long research that it is not a scam.

Of course the best thing is that each one draw their own conclusions, but there is not always time to look for the information. Besides, it is always good to have the opinion of others.

huutertools

newbie

Activity: 90

Merit: 0

Quote from: jonnytracker on March 05, 2018, 01:29:56 PM

Quote from: aveon on March 05, 2018, 12:58:44 PM

Quote from: wissy on March 05, 2018, 12:12:18 PM

Quote from: king_of_alts on March 05, 2018, 06:27:53 AM

Quote from: Piggy on March 05, 2018, 06:19:57 AM

Instead of relaying on somebody else telling you if an ico is good or not, just read the information available about the team, project. Everybody is going to have different opinions, use your brain

That's of course the best way to do it but many people like to hear a second opinion or maybe some simply don't have the time or will to do this research.

Thats why you need to find a trusted reviewer if you dont have time to do a research about a project your self. There is not hard to find someone, who you share an opinion with and trust his judgement.

I would say if you are interested in the project, you have to have time to research it, because if your investment into something is just based on somebody else's review, that's stupid. The only person to blame for bad investing has to be self

Yes it is best suggested to do your own research in investment programs, you cannot held resposible to any news agency. I participated in a scam project which CoinTelegraph was paid to published. Any project can pay to publish in major news circles. So in the end we better rely on our own judgement

At the end everyone has to decide by themselves. Sometimes with smaller investment I just tried it. But in larger invests I did a long research that it is not a scam.

jonnytracker

sr. member

Activity: 672

Merit: 261

Quote from: aveon on March 05, 2018, 12:58:44 PM

Quote from: wissy on March 05, 2018, 12:12:18 PM

Quote from: king_of_alts on March 05, 2018, 06:27:53 AM

Quote from: Piggy on March 05, 2018, 06:19:57 AM

Instead of relaying on somebody else telling you if an ico is good or not, just read the information available about the team, project. Everybody is going to have different opinions, use your brain

That's of course the best way to do it but many people like to hear a second opinion or maybe some simply don't have the time or will to do this research.

Thats why you need to find a trusted reviewer if you dont have time to do a research about a project your self. There is not hard to find someone, who you share an opinion with and trust his judgement.

I would say if you are interested in the project, you have to have time to research it, because if your investment into something is just based on somebody else's review, that's stupid. The only person to blame for bad investing has to be self

Yes it is best suggested to do your own research in investment programs, you cannot held resposible to any news agency. I participated in a scam project which CoinTelegraph was paid to published. Any project can pay to publish in major news circles. So in the end we better rely on our own judgement

aveon

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

Quote from: wissy on March 05, 2018, 12:12:18 PM

Quote from: king_of_alts on March 05, 2018, 06:27:53 AM

Quote from: Piggy on March 05, 2018, 06:19:57 AM

Instead of relaying on somebody else telling you if an ico is good or not, just read the information available about the team, project. Everybody is going to have different opinions, use your brain

That's of course the best way to do it but many people like to hear a second opinion or maybe some simply don't have the time or will to do this research.

Thats why you need to find a trusted reviewer if you dont have time to do a research about a project your self. There is not hard to find someone, who you share an opinion with and trust his judgement.

I would say if you are interested in the project, you have to have time to research it, because if your investment into something is just based on somebody else's review, that's stupid. The only person to blame for bad investing has to be self

wissy

full member

Activity: 658

Merit: 102

Quote from: king_of_alts on March 05, 2018, 06:27:53 AM

Quote from: Piggy on March 05, 2018, 06:19:57 AM

Instead of relaying on somebody else telling you if an ico is good or not, just read the information available about the team, project. Everybody is going to have different opinions, use your brain

That's of course the best way to do it but many people like to hear a second opinion or maybe some simply don't have the time or will to do this research.

Thats why you need to find a trusted reviewer if you dont have time to do a research about a project your self. There is not hard to find someone, who you share an opinion with and trust his judgement.

belechau

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 100

Quote from: Genesis07 on March 05, 2018, 10:32:49 AM

Quote from: levyashin on March 05, 2018, 08:04:59 AM

I don't care an article is paid or not, it can't tell something it is not available.

In crypto, every content is paid. But i always prefer written content in prestigious websites.

i also intend to give credit to unbound known people who are reviewing an ico. like some youtubers like crypto.lark for example.

We can still count on credible articles and evaluations nowadays, unfortunately there are people trying to profit from our need for information, and some profit on the laziness of many, who do not do their own review. Every user should have their own evaluation of each project and extract complements from certain other work

Genesis07

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 10

Quote from: levyashin on March 05, 2018, 08:04:59 AM

I don't care an article is paid or not, it can't tell something it is not available.

In crypto, every content is paid. But i always prefer written content in prestigious websites.

i also intend to give credit to unbound known people who are reviewing an ico. like some youtubers like crypto.lark for example.

areschen

full member

Activity: 392

Merit: 100

Quote from: viljy on March 05, 2018, 02:57:46 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on March 05, 2018, 01:14:20 AM

Quote from: belechau on March 04, 2018, 05:53:50 PM

Quote from: cantdecide on March 04, 2018, 05:36:33 PM

Quote from: cmg12 on March 04, 2018, 04:05:28 PM

Quote from: niklasmato on March 04, 2018, 02:30:31 PM

Quote from: BY_ATOM on March 04, 2018, 01:44:01 PM

Quote from: Genesis07 on March 03, 2018, 06:06:09 PM

Quote from: helloal on March 03, 2018, 05:41:42 PM

Quote from: cmg12 on March 03, 2018, 04:00:42 PM

Quote from: Genesis07 on March 03, 2018, 03:20:58 PM

i read the whitepaper now like 100 pages so far and i must say, damn, i feel like becoming a medicine student. there are so many special words from the medicine sector, like health marker and more stuff like that, which i cant pronounce. really, this should be easy to understand >< i have a very hard time ><

Haha, is it really that complicated? Maybe I will try to finaly read it

It’s not that hard if English is your first language.
It was quite an interesting read for me.

really Oo?

well, english is like my second motherlanguage and i had somehow a hard time to read it, especially those unfamiliar words from the medical sector.

By the way, I did not find information about what language will be used in the provision of Advisory services. I believe that this project should be multilingual.

I believe it will be in a later stage.. the scientific language in most health cases is English anyway, so I wouldn't worry about this right now.

Latin is the most popular and most used in medical sphere

Yes, but just to describe a illness or condition by it's latin name, not more. For the rest other languages are used of course.

it would be much easier for Team to initially work on a single language platform, replicate its functionalities in new languages according to their deployment in these specific locations, although there is a distinction between the Nationalities of each Council member and the Developer team

I think something like that is happening, but of course I am not sure. But I assume they start with English probably and then go over to give other languages as possible options, which would make sense. You could even implement a google translate function if needed in the first step until there are accurate translations for the cases.

Localization in other languages is necessary, otherwise this platform will simply not be used by those whose language is not represented there. And automatic translation here will not work. Since no double interpretations or translation errors are unacceptable in the field of medicine. Therefore, developers will be forced to make high-quality localization in different languages.

Localization in other languages is relatively easy. but if we want to integrate with some local common used APPs，this is a huge work

hicaribou

hero member

Activity: 815

Merit: 502

Quote from: Genesis07 on March 05, 2018, 09:38:15 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Frank37 on March 05, 2018, 08:32:06 AM

Quote from: omwibya on March 05, 2018, 07:29:12 AM

Quote from: king_of_alts on March 05, 2018, 06:27:53 AM

Quote from: Piggy on March 05, 2018, 06:19:57 AM

Instead of relaying on somebody else telling you if an ico is good or not, just read the information available about the team, project. Everybody is going to have different opinions, use your brain

That's of course the best way to do it but many people like to hear a second opinion or maybe some simply don't have the time or will to do this research.

if you don't have time to do research on what you're gonna be spending your money on, then you are gonna lose it all very soon.

Not necessarily, if you have friends, you can also save a lot of work, when you divide the research, because everyone has a slightly different specialization.

Well I think peer review and consultations would be an ideal must do strategy before investing in any crypto projects.

people should be generally aware where to invest with their own money in doing their own research on a project. but some people are just dumb and hop on every hype train ><"

If you dont have enough time to do a research but you want to invest your money, just find a professional person to do that for you.
There are a lot of options and ways, you can try to look at Genesis Vision (you can invest your money to be traded by professional trader that you trust).
And also if its about ehfirst whitepaper, if maybe you have a friend who have a lot of experience in this field, you can ask him to read and explain it to you, he can even be interested too.
The thing is just dont do it carelessly.

Genesis07

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 10

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Frank37 on March 05, 2018, 08:32:06 AM

Quote from: omwibya on March 05, 2018, 07:29:12 AM

Quote from: king_of_alts on March 05, 2018, 06:27:53 AM

Quote from: Piggy on March 05, 2018, 06:19:57 AM

Instead of relaying on somebody else telling you if an ico is good or not, just read the information available about the team, project. Everybody is going to have different opinions, use your brain

That's of course the best way to do it but many people like to hear a second opinion or maybe some simply don't have the time or will to do this research.

if you don't have time to do research on what you're gonna be spending your money on, then you are gonna lose it all very soon.

Not necessarily, if you have friends, you can also save a lot of work, when you divide the research, because everyone has a slightly different specialization.

Well I think peer review and consultations would be an ideal must do strategy before investing in any crypto projects.

people should be generally aware where to invest with their own money in doing their own research on a project. but some people are just dumb and hop on every hype train ><"

Frank37

sr. member

Activity: 770

Merit: 250

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: omwibya on March 05, 2018, 07:29:12 AM

Quote from: king_of_alts on March 05, 2018, 06:27:53 AM

Quote from: Piggy on March 05, 2018, 06:19:57 AM

Instead of relaying on somebody else telling you if an ico is good or not, just read the information available about the team, project. Everybody is going to have different opinions, use your brain

That's of course the best way to do it but many people like to hear a second opinion or maybe some simply don't have the time or will to do this research.

if you don't have time to do research on what you're gonna be spending your money on, then you are gonna lose it all very soon.

Not necessarily, if you have friends, you can also save a lot of work, when you divide the research, because everyone has a slightly different specialization.

kohanvn

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

There are some advantages of having EHF token.

Time by time, when eHealth First must take strategic decisions regarding the Project operations, the company could bring these decisions to a vote with EHF token holders. A voting process will be installed on EHF-based smart contract.

levyashin

sr. member

Activity: 980

Merit: 276

$CYBERCASH METAVERSE

I don't care an article is paid or not, it can't tell something it is not available.

In crypto, every content is paid. But i always prefer written content in prestigious websites.

saintkamei

member

Activity: 210

Merit: 10

Quote from: viljy on March 05, 2018, 02:57:46 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on March 05, 2018, 01:14:20 AM

Quote from: belechau on March 04, 2018, 05:53:50 PM

Quote from: cantdecide on March 04, 2018, 05:36:33 PM

Quote from: cmg12 on March 04, 2018, 04:05:28 PM

Quote from: niklasmato on March 04, 2018, 02:30:31 PM

Quote from: BY_ATOM on March 04, 2018, 01:44:01 PM

Quote from: Genesis07 on March 03, 2018, 06:06:09 PM

Quote from: helloal on March 03, 2018, 05:41:42 PM

Quote from: cmg12 on March 03, 2018, 04:00:42 PM

Quote from: Genesis07 on March 03, 2018, 03:20:58 PM

i read the whitepaper now like 100 pages so far and i must say, damn, i feel like becoming a medicine student. there are so many special words from the medicine sector, like health marker and more stuff like that, which i cant pronounce. really, this should be easy to understand >< i have a very hard time ><

Haha, is it really that complicated? Maybe I will try to finaly read it

It’s not that hard if English is your first language.
It was quite an interesting read for me.

really Oo?

well, english is like my second motherlanguage and i had somehow a hard time to read it, especially those unfamiliar words from the medical sector.

By the way, I did not find information about what language will be used in the provision of Advisory services. I believe that this project should be multilingual.

I believe it will be in a later stage.. the scientific language in most health cases is English anyway, so I wouldn't worry about this right now.

Latin is the most popular and most used in medical sphere

Yes, but just to describe a illness or condition by it's latin name, not more. For the rest other languages are used of course.

it would be much easier for Team to initially work on a single language platform, replicate its functionalities in new languages according to their deployment in these specific locations, although there is a distinction between the Nationalities of each Council member and the Developer team

I think something like that is happening, but of course I am not sure. But I assume they start with English probably and then go over to give other languages as possible options, which would make sense. You could even implement a google translate function if needed in the first step until there are accurate translations for the cases.

Localization in other languages is necessary, otherwise this platform will simply not be used by those whose language is not represented there. And automatic translation here will not work. Since no double interpretations or translation errors are unacceptable in the field of medicine. Therefore, developers will be forced to make high-quality localization in different languages.

Usually, with traditional business it is the other way round. Focus on specific market with a specialized product and organically spread from there. To do localization with only proof of concept will stretch the team too far. Let that be the question for much later which can be implemented on a phase by phase basis.

omwibya

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

Quote from: king_of_alts on March 05, 2018, 06:27:53 AM

Quote from: Piggy on March 05, 2018, 06:19:57 AM

Instead of relaying on somebody else telling you if an ico is good or not, just read the information available about the team, project. Everybody is going to have different opinions, use your brain

That's of course the best way to do it but many people like to hear a second opinion or maybe some simply don't have the time or will to do this research.

if you don't have time to do research on what you're gonna be spending your money on, then you are gonna lose it all very soon.

cantdecide

full member

Activity: 336

Merit: 112

Quote from: Axcel-m on March 05, 2018, 04:57:08 AM

Quote from: king_of_alts on March 05, 2018, 04:52:49 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on March 05, 2018, 03:46:38 AM

Quote from: cevap on March 05, 2018, 03:22:37 AM

Quote from: ImTotya on March 04, 2018, 02:23:01 PM

Quote from: Korsakopf on March 04, 2018, 07:40:08 AM

I think there should be either a video explaining the project in layman terms or a short whitepaper that explains the basic principles of the project. But i do believe they should keep the current whitepaper. Clearly a lot of work has gone into it and people who have enough experience and knowledge in the medical sector will be able to judge the project on all the details.

Here's their youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDOXlcfFnSTVRlkqy8kojWA There is all the necessary information about the project. Both short and long videos)

We need more reviews from trusted sources since it hard to go trough the whole white paper. They need to find a way to reach all the readers and viewers to make sure they maximize their investors base.

which are the trusted sources, most news articles are paid and they only review it

That's true. I think many people would like a video summary from a third party. Maybe some well-known ICO review channel.

But most times they are also not indipendent. They also need the information from the developers and stay in contact with them. And the effort is much to create these videos.

Yep, I also would be carful about video reviews. A lot of youtuber promising much but just telling you stuff which is written in the whitepaper or on the website anyways. There are too many selfproclaimed experts out there, hard to find really good ones (still there are some good channels out there, but these are always telling you anyways to research on your own too).

king_of_alts

member

Activity: 476

Merit: 10

Quote from: Piggy on March 05, 2018, 06:19:57 AM

Instead of relaying on somebody else telling you if an ico is good or not, just read the information available about the team, project. Everybody is going to have different opinions, use your brain

That's of course the best way to do it but many people like to hear a second opinion or maybe some simply don't have the time or will to do this research.

Piggy

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 1416

Instead of relaying on somebody else telling you if an ico is good or not, just read the information available about the team, project. Everybody is going to have different opinions, use your brain

helloal

full member

Activity: 252

Merit: 100

Quote from: sambuki on March 05, 2018, 05:46:11 AM

Quote from: Axcel-m on March 05, 2018, 04:57:08 AM

Quote from: king_of_alts on March 05, 2018, 04:52:49 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on March 05, 2018, 03:46:38 AM

Quote from: cevap on March 05, 2018, 03:22:37 AM

Quote from: ImTotya on March 04, 2018, 02:23:01 PM

Quote from: Korsakopf on March 04, 2018, 07:40:08 AM

I think there should be either a video explaining the project in layman terms or a short whitepaper that explains the basic principles of the project. But i do believe they should keep the current whitepaper. Clearly a lot of work has gone into it and people who have enough experience and knowledge in the medical sector will be able to judge the project on all the details.

Here's their youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDOXlcfFnSTVRlkqy8kojWA There is all the necessary information about the project. Both short and long videos)

We need more reviews from trusted sources since it hard to go trough the whole white paper. They need to find a way to reach all the readers and viewers to make sure they maximize their investors base.

which are the trusted sources, most news articles are paid and they only review it

That's true. I think many people would like a video summary from a third party. Maybe some well-known ICO review channel.

But most times they are also not indipendent. They also need the information from the developers and stay in contact with them. And the effort is much to create these videos.

To find an independent party which make honest ICO's reviews will be so hard. Self research is the best way to be used in this business and we can use as more sources as possible before making the final decision.

The sooner people realise that there are no truly independent reviewers, the better. No one is immune to the allure of free money, and all a dev team needs to do is to promise some ‘compensation’ to reviewers in exchange for an extra positive spin.

sambuki

newbie

Activity: 238

Merit: 0

Quote from: Axcel-m on March 05, 2018, 04:57:08 AM

Quote from: king_of_alts on March 05, 2018, 04:52:49 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on March 05, 2018, 03:46:38 AM

Quote from: cevap on March 05, 2018, 03:22:37 AM

Quote from: ImTotya on March 04, 2018, 02:23:01 PM

Quote from: Korsakopf on March 04, 2018, 07:40:08 AM

I think there should be either a video explaining the project in layman terms or a short whitepaper that explains the basic principles of the project. But i do believe they should keep the current whitepaper. Clearly a lot of work has gone into it and people who have enough experience and knowledge in the medical sector will be able to judge the project on all the details.

Here's their youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDOXlcfFnSTVRlkqy8kojWA There is all the necessary information about the project. Both short and long videos)

We need more reviews from trusted sources since it hard to go trough the whole white paper. They need to find a way to reach all the readers and viewers to make sure they maximize their investors base.

which are the trusted sources, most news articles are paid and they only review it

That's true. I think many people would like a video summary from a third party. Maybe some well-known ICO review channel.

But most times they are also not indipendent. They also need the information from the developers and stay in contact with them. And the effort is much to create these videos.

To find an independent party which make honest ICO's reviews will be so hard. Self research is the best way to be used in this business and we can use as more sources as possible before making the final decision.

Topic: [ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 320. (Read 97848 times)