Topic: [ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 370. (Read 97848 times)

take a look at their team on the website. 21 team member from 8 countries. They can and they will make the people healthier!

The Ehealth Team has longevity as the main objective in its project, and everything to go right, the branch of Medicine is very much targeted today and accompanied, mainly, by the People of greater purchasing power, many already look for a way to embark on Blockchain and follow promising project like Ehealth.

Hope you'll make people healthier!

Yep, we think so

In our view, partial solutions (telemedicine or blockchain, or uberized health care only), changing separate aspects, can't solve key health care problems and substantially improve this area of our life.

To make a real change and inplement complex valuable eco-system, we need to include in EHF many different features:
- AI and ML;
- NLP;
- blockchain and mixed model of health data storage;
- telemedicine and expert teams.

That's a point.

Secondly, we believe, health care system users / consumers, healthy people and patients must hold the rights to deal with their confidential health data.
It includes the right to share these data with appropriate insurance companies / HMOs / hospitals and clinics / doctors / relatives / health and dietary consultants etc.

We completely understand the investors want to make a profit ASAP.

And as you could see, the project has multiple milestones.
So the first alpha version (MVP) will be available less than 2 years after the project launch.
And sells will start much earlier than 2025

It means, EHF has a complex vision and plans its activity for many years ahead.
And it means also, there will be achievements after 2-3-4-5-6 years of project development + marketing activities / promotions + sells within the next 7 years.

Are these good indicators for investors?

Thanks for your comment!

this is why they will be doing multiple rounds of fundraising with a huge gap in between.

I just looked through all those other health projects and they have much less worked out agenda than this one. But staying alert is a good thing anyways

if you dont run out of money meanwhile. thats why long projects need a really solid foundation and good longterm planning. review, rework, reproduce.

Hi everyone!

Nickolay Kryuchkov:
What are the best features of EHF Project and ICO?

Watch the video
https://youtu.be/hdMMmX8pWvY

We are considering all your questions here and we'll be making the answers and comments soon.

Have a nice weekend!  

If you make money, there is always competition...but less likely with bigger projects.
we will see once we see results

Competition is necessary for the end user as it keeps them motivated to progress.

Competition is something that can't be avoided. At the end, which is more useful will win.

But in the end eHealth will not take their focus on the complete health industry. There are so different approaches in health management for examble in industrial countries.

Competiton is something you can expect from health industry in the blockchain. It is very normal.

It is healthy and necessary. I am trusting ehealth will rise the challenge and will execute way better than the others.

What do you mean by SENS?

Did we got any infos so far if eHealth has a direct connection to SENS?

I've done a review in the last few days, and there are really a lot of health-related issues, but I have not found any that have the Ehealth features in many projects, nor is there any real usefulness for tokens created, some tokens, or related to what they try to apply. That's the differential I see in Ehealth, real and useful application, useful and promising token, and spanning the world with ease

It's not only that they are medical professionals. They also respond quickly to inquiries. For example, the white paper link wasn't working so I applied for access to Gdrive for my mail address and they mailed me a new link minutes later.

Especially in this sector you need a very good team with a great variety in the medical sector. I think there are not many projects out there with such a great team.

you have to be conservative in a field where every move can have such an impact on someone's life. slow and steady wins the race.

Competition is always good, but quality wins the game. If eHealth will be consistently doing what they planned to, I think they'll be fine. Besides, it's true that healthcare is conservative, that's why doing things slower might be better than doing them faster. Higher chance to succeed, imo.