[ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 431.

levyashin

sr. member

Activity: 980

Merit: 276

$CYBERCASH METAVERSE

Quote from: zgrdyg on January 29, 2018, 03:38:49 PM

Quote from: levyashin on January 29, 2018, 03:29:14 PM

Quote from: zgrdyg on January 29, 2018, 03:06:32 PM

I read a onepager in one of the upcoming ICOs, now i know we have a 300 paged whitepaper, brochures and presentations in ehealth, maybe a summerized whitepaper should be good for everyone:) 300 page is a lot for some of us.

Btw. I am ok with 5 eth. minimum cap on the private sale phase. Devs want to attract bigger investors so 5 eth is quite normal i think.

Actually, it is more than normal. I saw 80-100 eth minimum for even pre-sale.

So for private sale 5 eth minimum is not a high number even it is a very low number.

By the way, i think brochure can be used as a summary of the whitepaper.

but a project with a aim of 2025, i think big investors won't invest 80 or 100 eth for a idea.
I was thinking about a 30 paged whitepaper, brochure seemed shallow to me.

I don't think 5 eth is really anything for big investors. Yes, it is a long-term project but regardless of it, if big investors believe their vision they can invest way more than 5 eth.

Amelie Poulain

full member

Activity: 518

Merit: 101

found short, but today's EHF eHealth video review:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inCdq_8mx1Y

rjp55

sr. member

Activity: 798

Merit: 250

CurioInvest [IEO Live]

Quote from: BY_ATOM on January 29, 2018, 03:40:48 PM

Quote from: Altcoinrusher on January 28, 2018, 05:34:13 PM

Quote from: CryptoCutie on January 28, 2018, 02:55:50 PM

The Team Gain more and more. Now 20 Team Members from 8 countries. Thats great to see that in the news today.

Good to know that! It significantly increases the likelihood of the project being implemented earlier that expected.

This is good news for companies and investors! If the company will implement its plans faster than indicated in the roadmap it will only be a big plus!

a diversified nationality team structure is always good i think, when expansion needed these people can bring onboard their country's best in their areas. Good job.

Herad Hedid

member

Activity: 182

Merit: 11

Altair VR. Next-gen Blockchain VR Wikipedia

Quote from: zgrdyg on January 29, 2018, 03:38:49 PM

Quote from: levyashin on January 29, 2018, 03:29:14 PM

Quote from: zgrdyg on January 29, 2018, 03:06:32 PM

I read a onepager in one of the upcoming ICOs, now i know we have a 300 paged whitepaper, brochures and presentations in ehealth, maybe a summerized whitepaper should be good for everyone:) 300 page is a lot for some of us.

Btw. I am ok with 5 eth. minimum cap on the private sale phase. Devs want to attract bigger investors so 5 eth is quite normal i think.

Actually, it is more than normal. I saw 80-100 eth minimum for even pre-sale.

So for private sale 5 eth minimum is not a high number even it is a very low number.

By the way, i think brochure can be used as a summary of the whitepaper.

but a project with a aim of 2025, i think big investors won't invest 80 or 100 eth for a idea.
I was thinking about a 30 paged whitepaper, brochure seemed shallow to me.

You are right maybe it would have been better for them to built an alpha of the platform in advance. This would create a lot more confidence.

BY_ATOM

full member

Activity: 406

Merit: 107

Quote from: Altcoinrusher on January 28, 2018, 05:34:13 PM

Quote from: CryptoCutie on January 28, 2018, 02:55:50 PM

The Team Gain more and more. Now 20 Team Members from 8 countries. Thats great to see that in the news today.

Good to know that! It significantly increases the likelihood of the project being implemented earlier that expected.

This is good news for companies and investors! If the company will implement its plans faster than indicated in the roadmap it will only be a big plus!

zgrdyg

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 105

Quote from: levyashin on January 29, 2018, 03:29:14 PM

Quote from: zgrdyg on January 29, 2018, 03:06:32 PM

I read a onepager in one of the upcoming ICOs, now i know we have a 300 paged whitepaper, brochures and presentations in ehealth, maybe a summerized whitepaper should be good for everyone:) 300 page is a lot for some of us.

Btw. I am ok with 5 eth. minimum cap on the private sale phase. Devs want to attract bigger investors so 5 eth is quite normal i think.

Actually, it is more than normal. I saw 80-100 eth minimum for even pre-sale.

So for private sale 5 eth minimum is not a high number even it is a very low number.

By the way, i think brochure can be used as a summary of the whitepaper.

but a project with a aim of 2025, i think big investors won't invest 80 or 100 eth for a idea.
I was thinking about a 30 paged whitepaper, brochure seemed shallow to me.

levyashin

sr. member

Activity: 980

Merit: 276

$CYBERCASH METAVERSE

Quote from: zgrdyg on January 29, 2018, 03:06:32 PM

I read a onepager in one of the upcoming ICOs, now i know we have a 300 paged whitepaper, brochures and presentations in ehealth, maybe a summerized whitepaper should be good for everyone:) 300 page is a lot for some of us.

Btw. I am ok with 5 eth. minimum cap on the private sale phase. Devs want to attract bigger investors so 5 eth is quite normal i think.

Actually, it is more than normal. I saw 80-100 eth minimum for even pre-sale.

So for private sale 5 eth minimum is not a high number even it is a very low number.

By the way, i think brochure can be used as a summary of the whitepaper.

ImTotya

jr. member

Activity: 168

Merit: 4

Quote from: cantdecide on January 29, 2018, 07:48:02 AM

Quote from: omwibya on January 29, 2018, 07:41:24 AM

Quote from: CryptoCutie on January 29, 2018, 06:47:15 AM

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

there's no need to go into the hardware business at least at this point.there are other companies that are doing it and it's better to focus on something.

That is of course true, but on the other hand it would maybe not harm to make partnerships with some hardware companies to get a better working eco system afterwards for software and hardware, if this is possible.

I believe that from the beginning you need to develop a software platform. And then move on to hardware reference.

zgrdyg

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 105

I read a onepager in one of the upcoming ICOs, now i know we have a 300 paged whitepaper, brochures and presentations in ehealth, maybe a summerized whitepaper should be good for everyone:) 300 page is a lot for some of us.

Btw. I am ok with 5 eth. minimum cap on the private sale phase. Devs want to attract bigger investors so 5 eth is quite normal i think.

Bolovich

member

Activity: 224

Merit: 10

Quote from: hanshammer on January 29, 2018, 02:51:09 PM

Quote from: king_of_alts on January 29, 2018, 06:18:56 AM

Quote from: matjas on January 29, 2018, 05:09:44 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on January 29, 2018, 04:00:49 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on January 29, 2018, 03:02:28 AM

Quote from: the_lovely on January 29, 2018, 02:26:59 AM

Quote from: alphashotgun on January 29, 2018, 02:23:46 AM

is there anybody willing to make a partnership to reach the min invest?

since I can't afford the min im willing to do that

I do not understand why the minimum is so high. First its whitelist, next high minimum, wonder what will be the next big requirements

Well I think 5 ETH is high, but way better then 10 ETH before. Still I think there are a lot of people who are willing to put in 5 ETH in projects, even more.
But yes, to spread the tokens more it would be better if they would make a minimum of 0.5ETH or at least 1 ETH.

It's a private round, majority of ICOs have higher min contributions at this stage probably because this round is mainly for institutional investors and whales. I'm sure during the main ICO the requirements will be much lower.

This is the reason. They want to attract bigger investors in this private sale round. Bigger investors also get bigger discounts.

On of the biggest problems with huge investors is that many of them just dump a token after it hits exchanges. They are just in for the discount.

I don't know if having high minimuns is a good idea because as you have said the big investors just dump a token after it hits exchanges.

hanshammer

member

Activity: 280

Merit: 22

The Future of Sports is Fan Controlled

Quote from: king_of_alts on January 29, 2018, 06:18:56 AM

Quote from: matjas on January 29, 2018, 05:09:44 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on January 29, 2018, 04:00:49 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on January 29, 2018, 03:02:28 AM

Quote from: the_lovely on January 29, 2018, 02:26:59 AM

Quote from: alphashotgun on January 29, 2018, 02:23:46 AM

is there anybody willing to make a partnership to reach the min invest?

since I can't afford the min im willing to do that

I do not understand why the minimum is so high. First its whitelist, next high minimum, wonder what will be the next big requirements

Well I think 5 ETH is high, but way better then 10 ETH before. Still I think there are a lot of people who are willing to put in 5 ETH in projects, even more.
But yes, to spread the tokens more it would be better if they would make a minimum of 0.5ETH or at least 1 ETH.

It's a private round, majority of ICOs have higher min contributions at this stage probably because this round is mainly for institutional investors and whales. I'm sure during the main ICO the requirements will be much lower.

This is the reason. They want to attract bigger investors in this private sale round. Bigger investors also get bigger discounts.

On of the biggest problems with huge investors is that many of them just dump a token after it hits exchanges. They are just in for the discount.

Amelie Poulain

full member

Activity: 518

Merit: 101

Quote from: the_donald on January 29, 2018, 01:52:34 PM

Quote from: aveon on January 29, 2018, 01:16:34 PM

Quote from: ParRus on January 29, 2018, 12:23:10 PM

Quote from: batako on January 29, 2018, 10:34:39 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on January 29, 2018, 07:48:02 AM

Quote from: omwibya on January 29, 2018, 07:41:24 AM

Quote from: CryptoCutie on January 29, 2018, 06:47:15 AM

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

there's no need to go into the hardware business at least at this point.there are other companies that are doing it and it's better to focus on something.

That is of course true, but on the other hand it would maybe not harm to make partnerships with some hardware companies to get a better working eco system afterwards for software and hardware, if this is possible.

Making partnership with hardware vendor sure will make a win-win solution for both sides.

I don't know if there are suitable partners, this whole area is not simple and requires special knowledge. Everything will depend of eHealth team, of the ability to find suitable partners afrer ICO.

Let's just wait fot their collaboration with software manufacturers and see the result. In case of success, the devs will probably turn into some hardware staff. However, it is way too early now to even project that

collaborations can be expected later on in this field. this project is gonna take a long time to develop. only after can they start considering hardware development.

I agree, it's too early to talk about this at this stage. Now for eHealth team need focus at ICO program, this will determine the further development.

pizza_dev

newbie

Activity: 98

Merit: 0

Quote from: haxllega on January 29, 2018, 02:02:23 PM

Quote from: Gamerate on January 29, 2018, 12:00:04 PM

Quote from: Piggy on January 29, 2018, 10:01:24 AM

Quote from: belechau on January 29, 2018, 09:45:44 AM

Ehealth needs a Country with regulatory gaps to get Operations started, of course the project has potential anywhere in the world and you can get to it with ease, but you have to start in a country with fewer restrictions

I think when you start a project like this you simply have to comply with the rules, otherwise it will never be accepted.

Current rules in most countries allow many functions of project, and current trend to make medicine more digital helps it in future too.

It helps a lot to make the whole process more efficient and faster. I think many countries think about using their healthcare systems on the blockchain.

I think it will get even more popular in the future.

niklasmato

sr. member

Activity: 616

Merit: 263

Quote from: aveon on January 29, 2018, 01:56:58 PM

Quote from: the_donald on January 29, 2018, 01:52:34 PM

Quote from: aveon on January 29, 2018, 01:16:34 PM

Quote from: ParRus on January 29, 2018, 12:23:10 PM

Quote from: batako on January 29, 2018, 10:34:39 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on January 29, 2018, 07:48:02 AM

Quote from: omwibya on January 29, 2018, 07:41:24 AM

Quote from: CryptoCutie on January 29, 2018, 06:47:15 AM

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

there's no need to go into the hardware business at least at this point.there are other companies that are doing it and it's better to focus on something.

That is of course true, but on the other hand it would maybe not harm to make partnerships with some hardware companies to get a better working eco system afterwards for software and hardware, if this is possible.

Making partnership with hardware vendor sure will make a win-win solution for both sides.

I don't know if there are suitable partners, this whole area is not simple and requires special knowledge. Everything will depend of eHealth team, of the ability to find suitable partners afrer ICO.

Let's just wait fot their collaboration with software manufacturers and see the result. In case of success, the devs will probably turn into some hardware staff. However, it is way too early now to even project that

collaborations can be expected later on in this field. this project is gonna take a long time to develop. only after can they start considering hardware development.

Yes, that's what I thing in case of a long-term project. Maybe in the future, they will not need any collaboration at all since they will have all the needed specialists and assets within

There will be a need for devices to interpret all the data... the AI will be Able to analyze, and the blockchain used for storing.. but you need a device which takes the measurements.

haxllega

full member

Activity: 392

Merit: 100

Quote from: Gamerate on January 29, 2018, 12:00:04 PM

Quote from: Piggy on January 29, 2018, 10:01:24 AM

Quote from: belechau on January 29, 2018, 09:45:44 AM

Ehealth needs a Country with regulatory gaps to get Operations started, of course the project has potential anywhere in the world and you can get to it with ease, but you have to start in a country with fewer restrictions

I think when you start a project like this you simply have to comply with the rules, otherwise it will never be accepted.

Current rules in most countries allow many functions of project, and current trend to make medicine more digital helps it in future too.

It helps a lot to make the whole process more efficient and faster. I think many countries think about using their healthcare systems on the blockchain.

aveon

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

Quote from: the_donald on January 29, 2018, 01:52:34 PM

Quote from: aveon on January 29, 2018, 01:16:34 PM

Quote from: ParRus on January 29, 2018, 12:23:10 PM

Quote from: batako on January 29, 2018, 10:34:39 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on January 29, 2018, 07:48:02 AM

Quote from: omwibya on January 29, 2018, 07:41:24 AM

Quote from: CryptoCutie on January 29, 2018, 06:47:15 AM

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

there's no need to go into the hardware business at least at this point.there are other companies that are doing it and it's better to focus on something.

That is of course true, but on the other hand it would maybe not harm to make partnerships with some hardware companies to get a better working eco system afterwards for software and hardware, if this is possible.

Making partnership with hardware vendor sure will make a win-win solution for both sides.

I don't know if there are suitable partners, this whole area is not simple and requires special knowledge. Everything will depend of eHealth team, of the ability to find suitable partners afrer ICO.

Let's just wait fot their collaboration with software manufacturers and see the result. In case of success, the devs will probably turn into some hardware staff. However, it is way too early now to even project that

collaborations can be expected later on in this field. this project is gonna take a long time to develop. only after can they start considering hardware development.

Yes, that's what I thing in case of a long-term project. Maybe in the future, they will not need any collaboration at all since they will have all the needed specialists and assets within

the_donald

full member

Activity: 588

Merit: 100

Quote from: aveon on January 29, 2018, 01:16:34 PM

Quote from: ParRus on January 29, 2018, 12:23:10 PM

Quote from: batako on January 29, 2018, 10:34:39 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on January 29, 2018, 07:48:02 AM

Quote from: omwibya on January 29, 2018, 07:41:24 AM

Quote from: CryptoCutie on January 29, 2018, 06:47:15 AM

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

there's no need to go into the hardware business at least at this point.there are other companies that are doing it and it's better to focus on something.

That is of course true, but on the other hand it would maybe not harm to make partnerships with some hardware companies to get a better working eco system afterwards for software and hardware, if this is possible.

Making partnership with hardware vendor sure will make a win-win solution for both sides.

I don't know if there are suitable partners, this whole area is not simple and requires special knowledge. Everything will depend of eHealth team, of the ability to find suitable partners afrer ICO.

Let's just wait fot their collaboration with software manufacturers and see the result. In case of success, the devs will probably turn into some hardware staff. However, it is way too early now to even project that

collaborations can be expected later on in this field. this project is gonna take a long time to develop. only after can they start considering hardware development.

bitcoin-shark

hero member

Activity: 2968

Merit: 605

Quote from: viljy on January 29, 2018, 08:00:35 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on January 29, 2018, 06:38:45 AM

Quote from: Piggy on January 29, 2018, 01:46:34 AM

Quote from: Frickeladm on January 29, 2018, 01:03:17 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on January 28, 2018, 07:09:47 PM

Quote from: aveon on January 28, 2018, 03:34:49 PM

At times the WP seems to be very general, and I want more specific. They want to cooperate with different software developers but do not give any precise info. To understand the whole system, I need more detailed info, because I do not get if it is just a future intention or a certain plan

Since a developers isn't hired yet, we are yet to see technical details in whitepaper.

Can agree, after read through the WP there are not much details about lots of the stuf they want to do. Give us more examples guys!

You can ask a question to the team if you have a specific question.

Is it just a software platform or you are manufacturing equipments like those japanese pulse analyser to measure health. Which I forgot the name will update when I do

There are no devices there. There will be a database of medical knowledge, a patient's medical history, available to any doctor and probably the most neural network for diagnosis, as well as remote diagnostics, probably based on some test with questions.

so there will be no devices the project will be developed only at the software level
which will be based on a database, the patient's earlier symptoms and a few test questions, then elaborated by an ai, maybe later they will make partnerships with companies for the hardware...

aveon

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

Quote from: ParRus on January 29, 2018, 12:23:10 PM

Quote from: batako on January 29, 2018, 10:34:39 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on January 29, 2018, 07:48:02 AM

Quote from: omwibya on January 29, 2018, 07:41:24 AM

Quote from: CryptoCutie on January 29, 2018, 06:47:15 AM

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

there's no need to go into the hardware business at least at this point.there are other companies that are doing it and it's better to focus on something.

That is of course true, but on the other hand it would maybe not harm to make partnerships with some hardware companies to get a better working eco system afterwards for software and hardware, if this is possible.

Making partnership with hardware vendor sure will make a win-win solution for both sides.

I don't know if there are suitable partners, this whole area is not simple and requires special knowledge. Everything will depend of eHealth team, of the ability to find suitable partners afrer ICO.

Let's just wait fot their collaboration with software manufacturers and see the result. In case of success, the devs will probably turn into some hardware staff. However, it is way too early now to even project that

niklasmato

sr. member

Activity: 616

Merit: 263

Quote from: matjas on January 29, 2018, 08:17:49 AM

Quote from: Axcel-m on January 29, 2018, 07:55:25 AM

Quote from: Yasemin on January 29, 2018, 07:48:42 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on January 29, 2018, 04:00:49 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on January 29, 2018, 03:02:28 AM

Quote from: the_lovely on January 29, 2018, 02:26:59 AM

Quote from: alphashotgun on January 29, 2018, 02:23:46 AM

is there anybody willing to make a partnership to reach the min invest?

since I can't afford the min im willing to do that

I do not understand why the minimum is so high. First its whitelist, next high minimum, wonder what will be the next big requirements

Well I think 5 ETH is high, but way better then 10 ETH before. Still I think there are a lot of people who are willing to put in 5 ETH in projects, even more.
But yes, to spread the tokens more it would be better if they would make a minimum of 0.5ETH or at least 1 ETH.

Isnt 10 ETH minimum investment usually for private investors? And why did Ehealth change it to 5 ETH? It is more friendly for traders

Very high requirements. But I can understand your approach to avoid the smaler investors and to force the bigerone to get in counntact with you before the huge amount of invest.
Will there be other requirenemts for small investors in future?

There are different requirements for other stages. I haven't found min investment, but prices and discounts (if any) are in the whitepaper.

The 5eth is only for the pre-ico according to what I've read.

Topic: [ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 431. (Read 97848 times)