[ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 432.

ParRus

full member

Activity: 490

Merit: 104

Quote from: batako on January 29, 2018, 10:34:39 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on January 29, 2018, 07:48:02 AM

Quote from: omwibya on January 29, 2018, 07:41:24 AM

Quote from: CryptoCutie on January 29, 2018, 06:47:15 AM

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

there's no need to go into the hardware business at least at this point.there are other companies that are doing it and it's better to focus on something.

That is of course true, but on the other hand it would maybe not harm to make partnerships with some hardware companies to get a better working eco system afterwards for software and hardware, if this is possible.

Making partnership with hardware vendor sure will make a win-win solution for both sides.

I don't know if there are suitable partners, this whole area is not simple and requires special knowledge. Everything will depend of eHealth team, of the ability to find suitable partners afrer ICO.

MandatoryOption

member

Activity: 546

Merit: 12

Quote from: aveon on January 29, 2018, 11:54:43 AM

Quote from: Je.hitler on January 29, 2018, 11:41:54 AM

Quote from: batako on January 29, 2018, 10:34:39 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on January 29, 2018, 07:48:02 AM

Quote from: omwibya on January 29, 2018, 07:41:24 AM

Quote from: CryptoCutie on January 29, 2018, 06:47:15 AM

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

there's no need to go into the hardware business at least at this point.there are other companies that are doing it and it's better to focus on something.

That is of course true, but on the other hand it would maybe not harm to make partnerships with some hardware companies to get a better working eco system afterwards for software and hardware, if this is possible.

Making partnership with hardware vendor sure will make a win-win solution for both sides.

Of course it will be win-win, but at the beginning it will be needed a platform that gives good results and only then to expand to hardware area.

Again, no concrete info about cooperation with hardware devs in the WP. They will probably only keep that idea in mind so far

About what kind of hardware are you talking? I think I missed that part.

Gamerate

member

Activity: 88

Merit: 10

Quote from: matjas on January 29, 2018, 08:17:49 AM

Quote from: Axcel-m on January 29, 2018, 07:55:25 AM

Quote from: Yasemin on January 29, 2018, 07:48:42 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on January 29, 2018, 04:00:49 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on January 29, 2018, 03:02:28 AM

Quote from: the_lovely on January 29, 2018, 02:26:59 AM

Quote from: alphashotgun on January 29, 2018, 02:23:46 AM

is there anybody willing to make a partnership to reach the min invest?

since I can't afford the min im willing to do that

I do not understand why the minimum is so high. First its whitelist, next high minimum, wonder what will be the next big requirements

Well I think 5 ETH is high, but way better then 10 ETH before. Still I think there are a lot of people who are willing to put in 5 ETH in projects, even more.
But yes, to spread the tokens more it would be better if they would make a minimum of 0.5ETH or at least 1 ETH.

Isnt 10 ETH minimum investment usually for private investors? And why did Ehealth change it to 5 ETH? It is more friendly for traders

Very high requirements. But I can understand your approach to avoid the smaler investors and to force the bigerone to get in counntact with you before the huge amount of invest.
Will there be other requirenemts for small investors in future?

There are different requirements for other stages. I haven't found min investment, but prices and discounts (if any) are in the whitepaper.

Min investment in pre-ICO and later will be price of one token.

Gamerate

member

Activity: 88

Merit: 10

Quote from: Piggy on January 29, 2018, 10:01:24 AM

Quote from: belechau on January 29, 2018, 09:45:44 AM

Ehealth needs a Country with regulatory gaps to get Operations started, of course the project has potential anywhere in the world and you can get to it with ease, but you have to start in a country with fewer restrictions

I think when you start a project like this you simply have to comply with the rules, otherwise it will never be accepted.

Current rules in most countries allow many functions of project, and current trend to make medicine more digital helps it in future too.

Frickeladm

jr. member

Activity: 182

Merit: 1

Quote from: viljy on January 29, 2018, 08:00:35 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on January 29, 2018, 06:38:45 AM

Quote from: Piggy on January 29, 2018, 01:46:34 AM

Quote from: Frickeladm on January 29, 2018, 01:03:17 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on January 28, 2018, 07:09:47 PM

Quote from: aveon on January 28, 2018, 03:34:49 PM

At times the WP seems to be very general, and I want more specific. They want to cooperate with different software developers but do not give any precise info. To understand the whole system, I need more detailed info, because I do not get if it is just a future intention or a certain plan

Since a developers isn't hired yet, we are yet to see technical details in whitepaper.

Can agree, after read through the WP there are not much details about lots of the stuf they want to do. Give us more examples guys!

You can ask a question to the team if you have a specific question.

Is it just a software platform or you are manufacturing equipments like those japanese pulse analyser to measure health. Which I forgot the name will update when I do

There are no devices there. There will be a database of medical knowledge, a patient's medical history, available to any doctor and probably the most neural network for diagnosis, as well as remote diagnostics, probably based on some test with questions.

but how do you tie in the coin? Or any kind of trading? On one hand you have a lot of personal medical data and on the other hand....the coin? so you would sell your medical data and business are paying for it in EHF? I dont get the concept completley. Transferring the data over blockchain is a very good idea but how to get a financial system involved? That is something iam not getting from the wp in detail.

aveon

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

Quote from: Je.hitler on January 29, 2018, 11:41:54 AM

Quote from: batako on January 29, 2018, 10:34:39 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on January 29, 2018, 07:48:02 AM

Quote from: omwibya on January 29, 2018, 07:41:24 AM

Quote from: CryptoCutie on January 29, 2018, 06:47:15 AM

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

there's no need to go into the hardware business at least at this point.there are other companies that are doing it and it's better to focus on something.

That is of course true, but on the other hand it would maybe not harm to make partnerships with some hardware companies to get a better working eco system afterwards for software and hardware, if this is possible.

Making partnership with hardware vendor sure will make a win-win solution for both sides.

Of course it will be win-win, but at the beginning it will be needed a platform that gives good results and only then to expand to hardware area.

Again, no concrete info about cooperation with hardware devs in the WP. They will probably only keep that idea in mind so far

Je.hitler

member

Activity: 154

Merit: 10

Quote from: batako on January 29, 2018, 10:34:39 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on January 29, 2018, 07:48:02 AM

Quote from: omwibya on January 29, 2018, 07:41:24 AM

Quote from: CryptoCutie on January 29, 2018, 06:47:15 AM

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

there's no need to go into the hardware business at least at this point.there are other companies that are doing it and it's better to focus on something.

That is of course true, but on the other hand it would maybe not harm to make partnerships with some hardware companies to get a better working eco system afterwards for software and hardware, if this is possible.

Making partnership with hardware vendor sure will make a win-win solution for both sides.

Of course it will be win-win, but at the beginning it will be needed a platform that gives good results and only then to expand to hardware area.

batako

sr. member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 252

Quote from: cantdecide on January 29, 2018, 07:48:02 AM

Quote from: omwibya on January 29, 2018, 07:41:24 AM

Quote from: CryptoCutie on January 29, 2018, 06:47:15 AM

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

there's no need to go into the hardware business at least at this point.there are other companies that are doing it and it's better to focus on something.

That is of course true, but on the other hand it would maybe not harm to make partnerships with some hardware companies to get a better working eco system afterwards for software and hardware, if this is possible.

Making partnership with hardware vendor sure will make a win-win solution for both sides.

Jay2408

full member

Activity: 518

Merit: 101

🚀🚀 ATHERO.IO 🚀🚀

Quote from: Piggy on January 29, 2018, 10:01:24 AM

Quote from: belechau on January 29, 2018, 09:45:44 AM

Ehealth needs a Country with regulatory gaps to get Operations started, of course the project has potential anywhere in the world and you can get to it with ease, but you have to start in a country with fewer restrictions

I think when you start a project like this you simply have to comply with the rules, otherwise it will never be accepted.

When looking at around 30 pages of their whitepaper about legal aspects I think that they are fully aware of all rules and regulations they have to comply with.

Piggy

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 1416

Quote from: belechau on January 29, 2018, 09:45:44 AM

Ehealth needs a Country with regulatory gaps to get Operations started, of course the project has potential anywhere in the world and you can get to it with ease, but you have to start in a country with fewer restrictions

I think when you start a project like this you simply have to comply with the rules, otherwise it will never be accepted.

belechau

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 100

Ehealth needs a Country with regulatory gaps to get Operations started, of course the project has potential anywhere in the world and you can get to it with ease, but you have to start in a country with fewer restrictions

matjas

full member

Activity: 798

Merit: 115

Quote from: Axcel-m on January 29, 2018, 07:55:25 AM

Quote from: Yasemin on January 29, 2018, 07:48:42 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on January 29, 2018, 04:00:49 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on January 29, 2018, 03:02:28 AM

Quote from: the_lovely on January 29, 2018, 02:26:59 AM

Quote from: alphashotgun on January 29, 2018, 02:23:46 AM

is there anybody willing to make a partnership to reach the min invest?

since I can't afford the min im willing to do that

I do not understand why the minimum is so high. First its whitelist, next high minimum, wonder what will be the next big requirements

Well I think 5 ETH is high, but way better then 10 ETH before. Still I think there are a lot of people who are willing to put in 5 ETH in projects, even more.
But yes, to spread the tokens more it would be better if they would make a minimum of 0.5ETH or at least 1 ETH.

Isnt 10 ETH minimum investment usually for private investors? And why did Ehealth change it to 5 ETH? It is more friendly for traders

Very high requirements. But I can understand your approach to avoid the smaler investors and to force the bigerone to get in counntact with you before the huge amount of invest.
Will there be other requirenemts for small investors in future?

There are different requirements for other stages. I haven't found min investment, but prices and discounts (if any) are in the whitepaper.

viljy

hero member

Activity: 1736

Merit: 857

Quote from: jonnytracker on January 29, 2018, 06:38:45 AM

Quote from: Piggy on January 29, 2018, 01:46:34 AM

Quote from: Frickeladm on January 29, 2018, 01:03:17 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on January 28, 2018, 07:09:47 PM

Quote from: aveon on January 28, 2018, 03:34:49 PM

At times the WP seems to be very general, and I want more specific. They want to cooperate with different software developers but do not give any precise info. To understand the whole system, I need more detailed info, because I do not get if it is just a future intention or a certain plan

Since a developers isn't hired yet, we are yet to see technical details in whitepaper.

Can agree, after read through the WP there are not much details about lots of the stuf they want to do. Give us more examples guys!

You can ask a question to the team if you have a specific question.

Is it just a software platform or you are manufacturing equipments like those japanese pulse analyser to measure health. Which I forgot the name will update when I do

There are no devices there. There will be a database of medical knowledge, a patient's medical history, available to any doctor and probably the most neural network for diagnosis, as well as remote diagnostics, probably based on some test with questions.

Axcel-m

newbie

Activity: 182

Merit: 0

Quote from: Yasemin on January 29, 2018, 07:48:42 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on January 29, 2018, 04:00:49 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on January 29, 2018, 03:02:28 AM

Quote from: the_lovely on January 29, 2018, 02:26:59 AM

Quote from: alphashotgun on January 29, 2018, 02:23:46 AM

is there anybody willing to make a partnership to reach the min invest?

since I can't afford the min im willing to do that

I do not understand why the minimum is so high. First its whitelist, next high minimum, wonder what will be the next big requirements

Well I think 5 ETH is high, but way better then 10 ETH before. Still I think there are a lot of people who are willing to put in 5 ETH in projects, even more.
But yes, to spread the tokens more it would be better if they would make a minimum of 0.5ETH or at least 1 ETH.

Isnt 10 ETH minimum investment usually for private investors? And why did Ehealth change it to 5 ETH? It is more friendly for traders

Very high requirements. But I can understand your approach to avoid the smaler investors and to force the bigerone to get in counntact with you before the huge amount of invest.
Will there be other requirenemts for small investors in future?

Yasemin

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Become Part of the Mining Family

Quote from: cantdecide on January 29, 2018, 04:00:49 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on January 29, 2018, 03:02:28 AM

Quote from: the_lovely on January 29, 2018, 02:26:59 AM

Quote from: alphashotgun on January 29, 2018, 02:23:46 AM

is there anybody willing to make a partnership to reach the min invest?

since I can't afford the min im willing to do that

I do not understand why the minimum is so high. First its whitelist, next high minimum, wonder what will be the next big requirements

Well I think 5 ETH is high, but way better then 10 ETH before. Still I think there are a lot of people who are willing to put in 5 ETH in projects, even more.
But yes, to spread the tokens more it would be better if they would make a minimum of 0.5ETH or at least 1 ETH.

Isnt 10 ETH minimum investment usually for private investors? And why did Ehealth change it to 5 ETH? It is more friendly for traders

cantdecide

full member

Activity: 336

Merit: 112

Quote from: omwibya on January 29, 2018, 07:41:24 AM

Quote from: CryptoCutie on January 29, 2018, 06:47:15 AM

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

there's no need to go into the hardware business at least at this point.there are other companies that are doing it and it's better to focus on something.

That is of course true, but on the other hand it would maybe not harm to make partnerships with some hardware companies to get a better working eco system afterwards for software and hardware, if this is possible.

omwibya

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

Quote from: CryptoCutie on January 29, 2018, 06:47:15 AM

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

there's no need to go into the hardware business at least at this point.there are other companies that are doing it and it's better to focus on something.

CryptoCutie

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 131

yes, at the moment EHF will be a software platform.

Je.hitler

member

Activity: 154

Merit: 10

Quote from: jonnytracker on January 29, 2018, 06:38:45 AM

Quote from: Piggy on January 29, 2018, 01:46:34 AM

Quote from: Frickeladm on January 29, 2018, 01:03:17 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on January 28, 2018, 07:09:47 PM

Quote from: aveon on January 28, 2018, 03:34:49 PM

At times the WP seems to be very general, and I want more specific. They want to cooperate with different software developers but do not give any precise info. To understand the whole system, I need more detailed info, because I do not get if it is just a future intention or a certain plan

Since a developers isn't hired yet, we are yet to see technical details in whitepaper.

Can agree, after read through the WP there are not much details about lots of the stuf they want to do. Give us more examples guys!

You can ask a question to the team if you have a specific question.

Is it just a software platform or you are manufacturing equipments like those japanese pulse analyser to measure health. Which I forgot the name will update when I do

For the moment will be a software platform, i say for the moment because we don`t know the plans after the final step in the roadmap.

jonnytracker

sr. member

Activity: 672

Merit: 261

Quote from: Piggy on January 29, 2018, 01:46:34 AM

Quote from: Frickeladm on January 29, 2018, 01:03:17 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on January 28, 2018, 07:09:47 PM

Quote from: aveon on January 28, 2018, 03:34:49 PM

At times the WP seems to be very general, and I want more specific. They want to cooperate with different software developers but do not give any precise info. To understand the whole system, I need more detailed info, because I do not get if it is just a future intention or a certain plan

Since a developers isn't hired yet, we are yet to see technical details in whitepaper.

Can agree, after read through the WP there are not much details about lots of the stuf they want to do. Give us more examples guys!

You can ask a question to the team if you have a specific question.

Is it just a software platform or you are manufacturing equipments like those japanese pulse analyser to measure health. Which I forgot the name will update when I do

Topic: [ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 432. (Read 97848 times)