The project does look good and I do like the technology. The only part I do not understand is the KYC pricing model.
Today existent companies on this field charge their customers within $1 and $3 per KYC check. By doing this ICO you are basically preselling 42m of KYC checks in this price range. The cost for KYC checks is not $10 to $50 as you have stated. Specially not for big corporations running millions of KYC checks per year. They even get prices that go even lower than $1.
So let's say that your project succeed, the technology is great and everyone want to use it. Your crypto price will go up and this will increase the cost for big potential customers. Why a big corporation will pay more for a bulk KYC checks if they can get them much cheaper with other solutions?
I still see potential, probably for small companies and individuals (like ebay sellers). But the higher the price goes up the less appealing the product is.
The user that wants to be verified pays 10-50$.
The concept of token is as follows: The KYC.LEGAL token is a utility token which offers its holders numerous advantages. The main advantage is the possibility of getting a 50% discount on the KYC verification services offered by the platform. This discount is not available to people without tokens. To receive the discount, they will need to lease the project tokens from token holders. In this case, the 50% discount is split equally between the lessee and the token holder, i.e. each receives a 25% discount on the full cost of the services. Therefore, along with the opportunity to take advantage of a 50% discount on services, token holders can also receive an economic benefit from the lease of tokens. After a single use, the tokens will be temporarily deactivated. Therefore, to be able to regularly use the platform's services and lease the tokens, token holders will have to purchase enough tokens to satisfy their needs. Plans for the future also include the possibility of withdrawing tokens from the system and selling them on an exchange.
Perhaps I am missing something but it is companies running KYC on their users base. The customer is not the one initiating the KYC, is the company, the process costs is on them, not on their users.
For example, the swissborg ICO are running KYC on any investor above $5k, but the cost is on them. Is a basic AML requirement.
It is know your customer, not know your company.
Please clarify,