Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][ICO] NITRO:🔥Fuelling the Video Games Economy🔥 Crowdsale now live! - page 20. (Read 24961 times)

member
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
Good day to everyone! I have a legal entity on whose behalf I want to buy your coins. Will I have this opportunity?

Hello. As far as I know, investment is available to everybody: for both individuals and legal entities.
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
Good day to everyone! I have a legal entity on whose behalf I want to buy your coins. Will I have this opportunity?
member
Activity: 177
Merit: 10
Good evening. There will be a 25% during the first 24 hours after the start of the ICO, and will there be any incentives for investors after that?
Greetings. After the first 24 hours from the beginning of the ICO investors will be able to buy coins with a 15 % bonus in the next 48 hours.
member
Activity: 392
Merit: 10
Good evening. There will be a 25% during the first 24 hours after the start of the ICO, and will there be any incentives for investors after that?
full member
Activity: 308
Merit: 100
It's great that young game studios will finally get the resources to realize their bold ideas and interesting projects. But why didn’t anyone take care of the holders of the tokens? They will invest their money in the development of computer games, but no dividends are provided for them. I think it’s necessary to make sure that the financed projects allocate part of their profits to pay dividends to the coin holders.

What makes you think that there won’t be any dividends in Nitro? It would be strange if Nitro gave game studios the money that the company received from its investors. Perhaps you have not noticed, but the game studio will give Nitro 20-30% of its profit once every three months within 5 years. So the holders of the tokens will not remain wanting Smiley
That’s great. Yes, most likely, I didn’t notice it when studying the project. It turns out that the holders of the tokens will receive dividends every three months. Do you know how much of the 20-30% that Nitro will receive will be spent on dividend payments?
Not exactly. Holders of tokens will receive rewards for their services periodically, but not once in 3 months. The payout schedule and the amount that will be allocated to this are not yet determined. I think that such information will appear soon, so be sure to follow the news of the company.


I’m wondering where Nitro would take money to finance games when the money collected during the ICO will run out. After all, they do not plan a reissue of their coins.
full member
Activity: 392
Merit: 100
It's great that young game studios will finally get the resources to realize their bold ideas and interesting projects. But why didn’t anyone take care of the holders of the tokens? They will invest their money in the development of computer games, but no dividends are provided for them. I think it’s necessary to make sure that the financed projects allocate part of their profits to pay dividends to the coin holders.

What makes you think that there won’t be any dividends in Nitro? It would be strange if Nitro gave game studios the money that the company received from its investors. Perhaps you have not noticed, but the game studio will give Nitro 20-30% of its profit once every three months within 5 years. So the holders of the tokens will not remain wanting Smiley
That’s great. Yes, most likely, I didn’t notice it when studying the project. It turns out that the holders of the tokens will receive dividends every three months. Do you know how much of the 20-30% that Nitro will receive will be spent on dividend payments?
Not exactly. Holders of tokens will receive rewards for their services periodically, but not once in 3 months. The payout schedule and the amount that will be allocated to this are not yet determined. I think that such information will appear soon, so be sure to follow the news of the company.

member
Activity: 322
Merit: 10
It's great that young game studios will finally get the resources to realize their bold ideas and interesting projects. But why didn’t anyone take care of the holders of the tokens? They will invest their money in the development of computer games, but no dividends are provided for them. I think it’s necessary to make sure that the financed projects allocate part of their profits to pay dividends to the coin holders.

What makes you think that there won’t be any dividends in Nitro? It would be strange if Nitro gave game studios the money that the company received from its investors. Perhaps you have not noticed, but the game studio will give Nitro 20-30% of its profit once every three months within 5 years. So the holders of the tokens will not remain wanting Smiley
That’s great. Yes, most likely, I didn’t notice it when studying the project. It turns out that the holders of the tokens will receive dividends every three months. Do you know how much of the 20-30% that Nitro will receive will be spent on dividend payments?
full member
Activity: 392
Merit: 100
It's great that young game studios will finally get the resources to realize their bold ideas and interesting projects. But why didn’t anyone take care of the holders of the tokens? They will invest their money in the development of computer games, but no dividends are provided for them. I think it’s necessary to make sure that the financed projects allocate part of their profits to pay dividends to the coin holders.

What makes you think that there won’t be any dividends in Nitro? It would be strange if Nitro gave game studios the money that the company received from its investors. Perhaps you have not noticed, but the game studio will give Nitro 20-30% of its profit once every three months within 5 years. So the holders of the tokens will not remain wanting Smiley
member
Activity: 322
Merit: 10
It's great that young game studios will finally get the resources to realize their bold ideas and interesting projects. But why didn’t anyone take care of the holders of the tokens? They will invest their money in the development of computer games, but no dividends are provided for them. I think it’s necessary to make sure that the financed projects allocate part of their profits to pay dividends to the coin holders.
member
Activity: 266
Merit: 10
The team is quite professional and diverse. I think the project will be successful.

I absolutely agree with you. I have been following these projects for a long time.
member
Activity: 258
Merit: 10
Good afternoon. Does anyone know if NOX tokens can be used to buy in-game products in projects that are listed in the Nitro marketplace?

NOD (Nitro Dollar) tokens, which is the subtoken, will be used for inside the actual games for products, upgrades, etc.
member
Activity: 258
Merit: 10
I realized that any token holder will be able to exchange NOX tokens to NOD. And will it be possible to exchange NOD to NOX?

Yes, token holders will be able to freely exchange between NOX and NOD.
member
Activity: 258
Merit: 10
You say that the owners of the tokens will be an important part of the project, but, nevertheless, only by the company's specialists will be able to choose which projects should be funded. It seems to me that this is not very fair in relation to investors. They should also take part in this.
You are absolutely right, investors should also take part in this process. That is why they will have such an opportunity;) After the team of specialists selects a prospective project, it is approved or not approved by the holders of the tokens.
I believe that voting isn’t the most effective tool in this situation. Imagine that there will be 51% of vote "for" the project by the holders of tokens, and 49% "against". Then the administration of Nitro will receive a large wave of disturbances and it won’t be in vain.

The solution won’t follow this pattern. In order let the project to be accepted for financing in Nitro, it won’t only be necessary to get more “for” votes than “against” ones, but also a certain minimum number of “for” votes.
And what if the minimum number of votes that will be needed to be collected to let the project be accepted for funding in Nitro? I think that there should be at least 90% of the "for" votes.


I became interested in the topic about the votes and I have a question. Will two users who have 100 and 1000 tokens have the same number of votes when approving projects for funding?

There will be 1 vote per NOX token
member
Activity: 258
Merit: 10
You say that the owners of the tokens will be an important part of the project, but, nevertheless, only by the company's specialists will be able to choose which projects should be funded. It seems to me that this is not very fair in relation to investors. They should also take part in this.
You are absolutely right, investors should also take part in this process. That is why they will have such an opportunity;) After the team of specialists selects a prospective project, it is approved or not approved by the holders of the tokens.
I believe that voting isn’t the most effective tool in this situation. Imagine that there will be 51% of vote "for" the project by the holders of tokens, and 49% "against". Then the administration of Nitro will receive a large wave of disturbances and it won’t be in vain.

The solution won’t follow this pattern. In order let the project to be accepted for financing in Nitro, it won’t only be necessary to get more “for” votes than “against” ones, but also a certain minimum number of “for” votes.
And what if the minimum number of votes that will be needed to be collected to let the project be accepted for funding in Nitro? I think that there should be at least 90% of the "for" votes.


It will definitely be more than a simple majority, but we haven't finalized on the exact requirement yet.  We will make announcements as we do though.
member
Activity: 205
Merit: 10
It's interesting how often will the holders of tokens be rewarded for financing the projects of game studios
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
Good afternoon. Does anyone know if NOX tokens can be used to buy in-game products in projects that are listed in the Nitro marketplace?
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
I realized that any token holder will be able to exchange NOX tokens to NOD. And will it be possible to exchange NOD to NOX?
full member
Activity: 240
Merit: 101
You say that the owners of the tokens will be an important part of the project, but, nevertheless, only by the company's specialists will be able to choose which projects should be funded. It seems to me that this is not very fair in relation to investors. They should also take part in this.
You are absolutely right, investors should also take part in this process. That is why they will have such an opportunity;) After the team of specialists selects a prospective project, it is approved or not approved by the holders of the tokens.
I believe that voting isn’t the most effective tool in this situation. Imagine that there will be 51% of vote "for" the project by the holders of tokens, and 49% "against". Then the administration of Nitro will receive a large wave of disturbances and it won’t be in vain.

The solution won’t follow this pattern. In order let the project to be accepted for financing in Nitro, it won’t only be necessary to get more “for” votes than “against” ones, but also a certain minimum number of “for” votes.
And what if the minimum number of votes that will be needed to be collected to let the project be accepted for funding in Nitro? I think that there should be at least 90% of the "for" votes.


I became interested in the topic about the votes and I have a question. Will two users who have 100 and 1000 tokens have the same number of votes when approving projects for funding?
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 100
You say that the owners of the tokens will be an important part of the project, but, nevertheless, only by the company's specialists will be able to choose which projects should be funded. It seems to me that this is not very fair in relation to investors. They should also take part in this.
You are absolutely right, investors should also take part in this process. That is why they will have such an opportunity;) After the team of specialists selects a prospective project, it is approved or not approved by the holders of the tokens.
I believe that voting isn’t the most effective tool in this situation. Imagine that there will be 51% of vote "for" the project by the holders of tokens, and 49% "against". Then the administration of Nitro will receive a large wave of disturbances and it won’t be in vain.

The solution won’t follow this pattern. In order let the project to be accepted for financing in Nitro, it won’t only be necessary to get more “for” votes than “against” ones, but also a certain minimum number of “for” votes.
And what if the minimum number of votes that will be needed to be collected to let the project be accepted for funding in Nitro? I think that there should be at least 90% of the "for" votes.
member
Activity: 258
Merit: 10
You say that the owners of the tokens will be an important part of the project, but, nevertheless, only by the company's specialists will be able to choose which projects should be funded. It seems to me that this is not very fair in relation to investors. They should also take part in this.
You are absolutely right, investors should also take part in this process. That is why they will have such an opportunity;) After the team of specialists selects a prospective project, it is approved or not approved by the holders of the tokens.

Yup, exactly!
Pages:
Jump to: