Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][ICO] ⚡️⚡️ SKYNET 🚀 Infinity Chain Blockchain + First Blockchain Chip ⚡️⚡️ - page 20. (Read 24734 times)

newbie
Activity: 196
Merit: 0
What is the cost of a Skynet Core core chip if I want to embed an RFID tag? RFID / NFC will certainly play a big role in the IoT world.
From the information I got that Skynet can integrate RFID which costs about 10 cents.
Good. Waltonchain can be integrated into <= 5 cents with self-signing chips, 2kb user-written memory and 1500 scans / sec. Do you think that Skynet can stay competitive in an IoT space if the price is x2 the price per product being tracked? Do you have this information too?
Maybe because there are many factors that affect the final cost of the chip. Until detailed assumptions such as market size, integration schemes, known volumes, comparing chip costs are almost meaningless. The Skynet team has been heavily involved in the development and dissemination of commercial semiconductor products, they can guarantee they will beat competition in terms of function and price. That's what I can get.
newbie
Activity: 196
Merit: 0
What is the cost of a Skynet Core core chip if I want to embed an RFID tag? RFID / NFC will certainly play a big role in the IoT world.
From the information I got that Skynet can integrate RFID which costs about 10 cents.
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
Slowly I began to understand the concept of this project, even though there was still information I needed to explore. Basically the concept idea of this project is quite innovative, which aims to create the first blockchain chip. But it's unfortunate that the absence of a team that helped in providing an explanation of the concepts they made in this forum. In fact, I've never seen manager who posted these ANN here. But fortunately many people stop here and help each other in exchanging information.  Smiley
Maybe now the team is focusing on completing their work that has not yet been completed. Or maybe they are also monitoring whether there is still less than the work they have done. Stay positive thinking only. And it seems the team has provided a place for anyone who wants to know more about this project to the community, such as on the telegram.
newbie
Activity: 168
Merit: 0
Will Skynet have a separate blockchain? And is this token security or utility?
I've heard this before, and basically they created something called Skynet Open Network, Fabric, which you can think of as the "root" of all trees. This is a blockchain platform that allows the creation of Proof-of-Stake blockchains that can have their own independent governance, virtual machines, etc. The token that stalks the original for this is Skynet and the original cost token for this is called Light. Only to this extent do I know.
But is this type of token security or utility?
I guess this is utility token.
newbie
Activity: 136
Merit: 0
Will Skynet have a separate blockchain? And is this token security or utility?
I've heard this before, and basically they created something called Skynet Open Network, Fabric, which you can think of as the "root" of all trees. This is a blockchain platform that allows the creation of Proof-of-Stake blockchains that can have their own independent governance, virtual machines, etc. The token that stalks the original for this is Skynet and the original cost token for this is called Light. Only to this extent do I know.
But is this type of token security or utility?
newbie
Activity: 168
Merit: 0
Will Skynet have a separate blockchain? And is this token security or utility?
I've heard this before, and basically they created something called Skynet Open Network, Fabric, which you can think of as the "root" of all trees. This is a blockchain platform that allows the creation of Proof-of-Stake blockchains that can have their own independent governance, virtual machines, etc. The token that stalks the original for this is Skynet and the original cost token for this is called Light. Only to this extent do I know.
newbie
Activity: 136
Merit: 0
Will Skynet have a separate blockchain? And is this token security or utility?
newbie
Activity: 196
Merit: 0
The team behind the project seems very confident to provide the final product. If you can increase your target funds during tokens, what is the first development you will do?
To interpret that, I think you can read their roadmap.
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
The team behind the project seems very confident to provide the final product. If you can increase your target funds during tokens, what is the first development you will do?
newbie
Activity: 163
Merit: 0
Anyone know about the bonuses on ICO Stages?
What is the percentage of each stage?
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
i need to look at the idea of 3 parts of the mempool. if they put some extra criteria extra besides priority i would like to understand the implications
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
In calculating the validator incentives, there is a percentage of transaction costs for participation in return for a light token. In this case is there a possibility of an malicious validator and how to find out?
All I know is that validator will not get part of the calculation of the percentage of transaction fees and cannot participate. And like other delegated proof of stake models, the more Skynet Tokens one stakes, the more block rewards and transaction fees they get in return. If it's not wrong maybe like that.  Smiley
If the malicious validator really exists, what does it do and how to deal with it?
From what I read if a validator is malicious such as when it commits signing, it is easy to tell on SON because only two conflicting votes are needed. The validator will immediately be dissipated after a slash transaction is committed.
newbie
Activity: 196
Merit: 0
What distinguishes SON architecture from its predecessors such as Bitcoin or Etherium when viewed from Transaction Speed, Transaction Fees, Block Confirmation, and Consensus?
I know the answer, this is because for Transaction Speed, SON can reach 1 Million + TPS, while for Bitcoin 7 TPS, and Etherium 15 TPS. When comparing Transaction Fees, SON is only around <0.01, and two other coins such as Etherium and Bitcoin range from 0.45 and 1 Dollar.  Smiley
And regarding the comparison of block confirmation and consensus of three items clearly have their differences. Like Consensus on Bitcoin and Etherium using Proof of Work but on Etherium there is (Future PoS), while SON uses BFT Proof of Stake. And for each Block Confirmation, the SON has a relatively low time of only about 1 Second, while the other two coins have a higher time than about 14 Seconds for Etherium, and Bitcoin 10 Minutes.  Smiley
newbie
Activity: 196
Merit: 0
What distinguishes SON architecture from its predecessors such as Bitcoin or Etherium when viewed from Transaction Speed, Transaction Fees, Block Confirmation, and Consensus?
I know the answer, this is because for Transaction Speed, SON can reach 1 Million + TPS, while for Bitcoin 7 TPS, and Etherium 15 TPS. When comparing Transaction Fees, SON is only around <0.01, and two other coins such as Etherium and Bitcoin range from 0.45 and 1 Dollar.  Smiley
jr. member
Activity: 196
Merit: 1
What distinguishes SON architecture from its predecessors such as Bitcoin or Etherium when viewed from Transaction Speed, Transaction Fees, Block Confirmation, and Consensus?
hero member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 512
I have a question about Blockchain Hardware . Is it a central processing unit for all existing blockchains certified by skynet network which combining with this device or free communication without certification on it?
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
In calculating the validator incentives, there is a percentage of transaction costs for participation in return for a light token. In this case is there a possibility of an malicious validator and how to find out?
All I know is that validator will not get part of the calculation of the percentage of transaction fees and cannot participate. And like other delegated proof of stake models, the more Skynet Tokens one stakes, the more block rewards and transaction fees they get in return. If it's not wrong maybe like that.  Smiley
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
The Tendermint Core maintains three connections. And usually, Tendermint Core is responsible for sharing blocks between nodes and building transaction order. What are the three connections maintained by Tendermint Core?
From what I've read Tendemint Core has a function in maintaining Mempool Connection, Consensus Connection, and Query Connection.
Can you give a little explanation about these three connections, and why are they maintained by Tendermint Core?
I am not so sure can explain that, except when I open the source of the information. But you can find it yourself in whitepapar. Because there my source of information comes from.  Grin
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
The Tendermint Core maintains three connections. And usually, Tendermint Core is responsible for sharing blocks between nodes and building transaction order. What are the three connections maintained by Tendermint Core?
From what I've read Tendemint Core has a function in maintaining Mempool Connection, Consensus Connection, and Query Connection.
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
The Tendermint Core maintains three connections. And usually, Tendermint Core is responsible for sharing blocks between nodes and building transaction order. What are the three connections maintained by Tendermint Core?
Pages:
Jump to: