There were a lot of questions about the tokens and what will be burned and what not.
We told we would hold a liquidity reserve to support the smooth functioning of the SOMA platform. We were thinking about 10% of the unsold tokens.
For the moment nothing is created, so there is no liquidity reserve.
We think this reserve would help any liquidity problems with the SCT to support smooth fuctioning of the SOMA platform. If investors hold on there SCT we think there should be a problem with the liquidity. So with this reserve, users can still buy SCT after ICO to be used on the platform, this will not be at ICO price.
The devs have decided to listen to our great community.
We will consider based on the feedback if the liquidity reserve will be created or not.
So please give us a well argumented feedback on what you think its best for SOMA and his future.
We will listen to you guys.
No reserve of liquidity is needed. If even on the site the price will be higher than at the ICO, how will this help, if prices fall on exchanges? And if there is a reserve of liquidity, it will. Why reserve liquidity? Are SOMA tokens not decimal? I think that investors who bought with confidence that unsold tokens will be burned, will be dissatisfied with the appearance of this liquidity reserve.
Maybe you don't understand what the liquidity is. It's not about token's price, it's about tokens in circulation, if there will be a small about circulating on the platform, there will be a liquidity problem.
I suggest FIEX to point this out because people are misunderstanding this