Topic: [ANN][ICO]CREDITS - New Blockchain for financial industry [HARDCAP REACHED!] - page 30. (Read 37709 times)
April 01, 2018, 06:03:34 AM
I think it would be best not to spread FUD here for at least nine months and give CREDITS time to complete and launch its blockchain. It remains to be seen whether they will successfully challenge the established techniques but if they do it it'll be a major breakthrough in cryptocurrency that will change financial system.
April 01, 2018, 04:51:13 AM
All we seem to here is credits bad code this and credits scam this when the facts are:
- Live test shown ( Most other coins have not done this)
- Good code/Bad Code ( That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, your code can have the best flow structure, recursive code, dynamic code generation
methods and let me tell you that is all bullshit. What counts is fast code especially at Alpha/beta level, make your code fast, as long as the final result is fast then
the rest is bullshit which will be improved upon just like the bullshit wallet problem that everyone seems to focus on)
- Code reviews ( Bullshit again at this point, its so easy to look at written code and rip it apart, show that O, yes I could of written this method better or
structured that class better.
Writing code from scratch in a completely new field like Blockchain which is still in its infancy is super hard. So before these
so called super coders rip the Credits code apart, stop and realize that Credits have written their own code from the bottom up. Should they follow best
practice, of course. Is there a best practice in Blockchain programming, I don't think so. Continuously pointing out negatives and not positives is a bullshit
review. So many stupid pompous reviewers who should be taken with a grain of salt.
- Working product ( Continuous and prompt delivery. Working, working, working. These guys are hustling every day to bring out something revolutionary that works.
Careful when investing in crypto, its a risky market. But more importantly watch out for all of these paid fudders spreading negativity. Crypto/Blockchain is big business and there are many people trying to suppress it.
- Live test shown ( Most other coins have not done this)
- Good code/Bad Code ( That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, your code can have the best flow structure, recursive code, dynamic code generation
methods and let me tell you that is all bullshit. What counts is fast code especially at Alpha/beta level, make your code fast, as long as the final result is fast then
the rest is bullshit which will be improved upon just like the bullshit wallet problem that everyone seems to focus on)
- Code reviews ( Bullshit again at this point, its so easy to look at written code and rip it apart, show that O, yes I could of written this method better or
structured that class better.
Writing code from scratch in a completely new field like Blockchain which is still in its infancy is super hard. So before these
so called super coders rip the Credits code apart, stop and realize that Credits have written their own code from the bottom up. Should they follow best
practice, of course. Is there a best practice in Blockchain programming, I don't think so. Continuously pointing out negatives and not positives is a bullshit
review. So many stupid pompous reviewers who should be taken with a grain of salt.
- Working product ( Continuous and prompt delivery. Working, working, working. These guys are hustling every day to bring out something revolutionary that works.
Careful when investing in crypto, its a risky market. But more importantly watch out for all of these paid fudders spreading negativity. Crypto/Blockchain is big business and there are many people trying to suppress it.
Again some positive preachers trying to sound smart.
No one is paid to explain why this is a shitcoin. However, people are paid to shill this all over the place if you haven't noticed already.
They said they are developing this garbage for 3 years. That should be enough to realize how bad it is.
Looking at your last bunch of posts. All fud aimed at credits just like Sebastian.
I am not trying to sound clever, Credits is showing promise.
I can see by the way you write you are biased based on nothing more than your own agenda. Your opinion means nothing without facts.
The fact is there is working code and tests to prove it.
April 01, 2018, 04:46:26 AM
Credits is doing a lot of advertising on google ads which might explain the recent price pump.
April 01, 2018, 04:40:46 AM
All we seem to here is credits bad code this and credits scam this when the facts are:
- Live test shown ( Most other coins have not done this)
- Good code/Bad Code ( That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, your code can have the best flow structure, recursive code, dynamic code generation
methods and let me tell you that is all bullshit. What counts is fast code especially at Alpha/beta level, make your code fast, as long as the final result is fast then
the rest is bullshit which will be improved upon just like the bullshit wallet problem that everyone seems to focus on)
- Code reviews ( Bullshit again at this point, its so easy to look at written code and rip it apart, show that O, yes I could of written this method better or
structured that class better.
Writing code from scratch in a completely new field like Blockchain which is still in its infancy is super hard. So before these
so called super coders rip the Credits code apart, stop and realize that Credits have written their own code from the bottom up. Should they follow best
practice, of course. Is there a best practice in Blockchain programming, I don't think so. Continuously pointing out negatives and not positives is a bullshit
review. So many stupid pompous reviewers who should be taken with a grain of salt.
- Working product ( Continuous and prompt delivery. Working, working, working. These guys are hustling every day to bring out something revolutionary that works.
Careful when investing in crypto, its a risky market. But more importantly watch out for all of these paid fudders spreading negativity. Crypto/Blockchain is big business and there are many people trying to suppress it.
- Live test shown ( Most other coins have not done this)
- Good code/Bad Code ( That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, your code can have the best flow structure, recursive code, dynamic code generation
methods and let me tell you that is all bullshit. What counts is fast code especially at Alpha/beta level, make your code fast, as long as the final result is fast then
the rest is bullshit which will be improved upon just like the bullshit wallet problem that everyone seems to focus on)
- Code reviews ( Bullshit again at this point, its so easy to look at written code and rip it apart, show that O, yes I could of written this method better or
structured that class better.
Writing code from scratch in a completely new field like Blockchain which is still in its infancy is super hard. So before these
so called super coders rip the Credits code apart, stop and realize that Credits have written their own code from the bottom up. Should they follow best
practice, of course. Is there a best practice in Blockchain programming, I don't think so. Continuously pointing out negatives and not positives is a bullshit
review. So many stupid pompous reviewers who should be taken with a grain of salt.
- Working product ( Continuous and prompt delivery. Working, working, working. These guys are hustling every day to bring out something revolutionary that works.
Careful when investing in crypto, its a risky market. But more importantly watch out for all of these paid fudders spreading negativity. Crypto/Blockchain is big business and there are many people trying to suppress it.
Again some positive preachers trying to sound smart.
No one is paid to explain why this is a shitcoin. However, people are paid to shill this all over the place if you haven't noticed already.
They said they are developing this garbage for 3 years. That should be enough to realize how bad it is.
April 01, 2018, 04:38:12 AM
Hi friends! Tell me, please, does the credits team have major and world-famous partners? This is a very interesting question for me.
This is their scam partner which they are most proud of.
https://www.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/85rd9g/fake_and_scam_partnerships_the_cringe_with_this/?st=JFFXR655&sh=ca2a1547
April 01, 2018, 04:35:45 AM
Hi friends! Tell me, please, does the credits team have major and world-famous partners? This is a very interesting question for me.
April 01, 2018, 03:29:47 AM
All we seem to here is credits bad code this and credits scam this when the facts are:
- Live test shown ( Most other coins have not done this)
- Good code/Bad Code ( That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, your code can have the best flow structure, recursive code, dynamic code generation
methods and let me tell you that is all bullshit. What counts is fast code especially at Alpha/beta level, make your code fast, as long as the final result is fast then
the rest is bullshit which will be improved upon just like the bullshit wallet problem that everyone seems to focus on)
- Code reviews ( Bullshit again at this point, its so easy to look at written code and rip it apart, show that O, yes I could of written this method better or
structured that class better.
Writing code from scratch in a completely new field like Blockchain which is still in its infancy is super hard. So before these
so called super coders rip the Credits code apart, stop and realize that Credits have written their own code from the bottom up. Should they follow best
practice, of course. Is there a best practice in Blockchain programming, I don't think so. Continuously pointing out negatives and not positives is a bullshit
review. So many stupid pompous reviewers who should be taken with a grain of salt.
- Working product ( Continuous and prompt delivery. Working, working, working. These guys are hustling every day to bring out something revolutionary that works.
Careful when investing in crypto, its a risky market. But more importantly watch out for all of these paid fudders spreading negativity. Crypto/Blockchain is big business and there are many people trying to suppress it.
- Live test shown ( Most other coins have not done this)
- Good code/Bad Code ( That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, your code can have the best flow structure, recursive code, dynamic code generation
methods and let me tell you that is all bullshit. What counts is fast code especially at Alpha/beta level, make your code fast, as long as the final result is fast then
the rest is bullshit which will be improved upon just like the bullshit wallet problem that everyone seems to focus on)
- Code reviews ( Bullshit again at this point, its so easy to look at written code and rip it apart, show that O, yes I could of written this method better or
structured that class better.
Writing code from scratch in a completely new field like Blockchain which is still in its infancy is super hard. So before these
so called super coders rip the Credits code apart, stop and realize that Credits have written their own code from the bottom up. Should they follow best
practice, of course. Is there a best practice in Blockchain programming, I don't think so. Continuously pointing out negatives and not positives is a bullshit
review. So many stupid pompous reviewers who should be taken with a grain of salt.
- Working product ( Continuous and prompt delivery. Working, working, working. These guys are hustling every day to bring out something revolutionary that works.
Careful when investing in crypto, its a risky market. But more importantly watch out for all of these paid fudders spreading negativity. Crypto/Blockchain is big business and there are many people trying to suppress it.
April 01, 2018, 12:16:05 AM
All the rigid index tells us that if Credits can really make the products, the Credits is a return of 10 times since the end of the product.
March 31, 2018, 10:43:33 PM
why you guys at war with each other on this thread...this is why crypto is on the floor to many immature people in this space.
FUD, FOMO those are the most common reason why there are so much hate on this project.
What i dont understand is if some dont like a project why they dont just ignore and move on. its easy and simple.
March 31, 2018, 10:16:43 PM
why you guys at war with each other on this thread...this is why crypto is on the floor to many immature people in this space.
March 31, 2018, 07:59:48 PM
I wonder when this things will end we will have this argument as long as they cannot prove and verified and put to test their platform, I am not a good coder, but the team needs to understand that not only investors are looking in their code but programmer as well, so if these programmers are telling us that Credits code is a piece of shit, this is something to worry about.
March 31, 2018, 07:55:17 PM
Hi all, this is my first message here.
At first I was very positive about Credits (I got some...), but then I begin to follow this dev third party analysis:
https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-code-review-credits-cs-beta-29-03-2019-5ffce7313a38
Iam lost out here...how is possible this so critical analysis about the code, and the Credits team claiming that the will deliver state of art tech? Am I missing something here?
I look to guarantee qualifed teams (ADA, QTUM, ETH, EOS, etc) and look like they are keeping pushing hard to get to their targets, that don't looking so ambitious as Credits. So why should I expect Credits will suceed? Iam thinking about selling everything...
Thanks in advance and sorry for the no so good english. :-)
At first I was very positive about Credits (I got some...), but then I begin to follow this dev third party analysis:
https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-code-review-credits-cs-beta-29-03-2019-5ffce7313a38
Iam lost out here...how is possible this so critical analysis about the code, and the Credits team claiming that the will deliver state of art tech? Am I missing something here?
I look to guarantee qualifed teams (ADA, QTUM, ETH, EOS, etc) and look like they are keeping pushing hard to get to their targets, that don't looking so ambitious as Credits. So why should I expect Credits will suceed? Iam thinking about selling everything...
Thanks in advance and sorry for the no so good english. :-)
... that guy is a charlatan who knows a little about development, and he did a few embarrassing reviews also of other BC projects, reviewing "code" when there is basically nothing that can be, or should be reviewed, because none of these projects are stupid enough to release actual core code to public and competition. He is doing this "for those without any knowledge", but its pretty clear he is very limited in his understanding, and he more than clearly has his own agenda.
funny shit really. so you are saying that everyone pointing out this garbage code are charlatans? cheap talk really, almost as cheap as credits guys. please explain to us how great the code is. instead of this constant 'it's fud it's lies' talk.
March 31, 2018, 07:38:48 PM
Hi all, this is my first message here.
At first I was very positive about Credits (I got some...), but then I begin to follow this dev third party analysis:
https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-code-review-credits-cs-beta-29-03-2019-5ffce7313a38
Iam lost out here...how is possible this so critical analysis about the code, and the Credits team claiming that the will deliver state of art tech? Am I missing something here?
I look to guarantee qualifed teams (ADA, QTUM, ETH, EOS, etc) and look like they are keeping pushing hard to get to their targets, that don't looking so ambitious as Credits. So why should I expect Credits will suceed? Iam thinking about selling everything...
Thanks in advance and sorry for the no so good english. :-)
At first I was very positive about Credits (I got some...), but then I begin to follow this dev third party analysis:
https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-code-review-credits-cs-beta-29-03-2019-5ffce7313a38
Iam lost out here...how is possible this so critical analysis about the code, and the Credits team claiming that the will deliver state of art tech? Am I missing something here?
I look to guarantee qualifed teams (ADA, QTUM, ETH, EOS, etc) and look like they are keeping pushing hard to get to their targets, that don't looking so ambitious as Credits. So why should I expect Credits will suceed? Iam thinking about selling everything...
Thanks in advance and sorry for the no so good english. :-)
... that guy is a charlatan who knows a little about development, and he did a few embarrassing reviews also of other BC projects, reviewing "code" when there is basically nothing that can be, or should be reviewed, because none of these projects are stupid enough to release actual core code to public and competition. He is doing this "for those without any knowledge", but its pretty clear he is very limited in his understanding, and he more than clearly has his own agenda.
March 31, 2018, 07:38:14 PM
if you think that why are you here ?
to protect you against financial loss
Its time to accumulate even more now.Credits will explode in 3rd Quarter.100X gains for sure at the end of the year.Just HODL
you should take less drugs
March 31, 2018, 07:31:06 PM
This is a 3 years work they claim. You can imagine now whats going on.
... you should look on what projects did CTO Eugeniy Butyaev work in the last 5 years, and what kind of ledgers for banks and institutions did they build.
March 31, 2018, 06:27:59 PM
Thank you for your ansewr... Iam really disapointed with CS...glad I still didnt l have a lost.
You are not missing anything
It's exactly how it is. I guess their "team" will continue to hype as hard as they can in an attempt to pump this coin as high as possible.
Food for thought: 4.8mil coins now sitting in IDEX, and 8.3mil coins sitting in Kucoin. Once there is enough buy support - all these coins will be dumped.
Good luck everyone invested in being not the last one to exit this "train"
Hi all, this is my first message here.
At first I was very positive about Credits (I got some...), but then I begin to follow this dev third party analysis:
https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-code-review-credits-cs-beta-29-03-2019-5ffce7313a38
Iam lost out here...how is possible this so critical analysis about the code, and the Credits team claiming that the will deliver state of art tech? Am I missing something here?
I look to guarantee qualifed teams (ADA, QTUM, ETH, EOS, etc) and look like they are keeping pushing hard to get to their targets, that don't looking so ambitious as Credits. So why should I expect Credits will suceed? Iam thinking about selling everything...
Thanks in advance and sorry for the no so good english. :-)
At first I was very positive about Credits (I got some...), but then I begin to follow this dev third party analysis:
https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-code-review-credits-cs-beta-29-03-2019-5ffce7313a38
Iam lost out here...how is possible this so critical analysis about the code, and the Credits team claiming that the will deliver state of art tech? Am I missing something here?
I look to guarantee qualifed teams (ADA, QTUM, ETH, EOS, etc) and look like they are keeping pushing hard to get to their targets, that don't looking so ambitious as Credits. So why should I expect Credits will suceed? Iam thinking about selling everything...
Thanks in advance and sorry for the no so good english. :-)
You are not missing anything
It's exactly how it is. I guess their "team" will continue to hype as hard as they can in an attempt to pump this coin as high as possible.Food for thought: 4.8mil coins now sitting in IDEX, and 8.3mil coins sitting in Kucoin. Once there is enough buy support - all these coins will be dumped.
Good luck everyone invested in being not the last one to exit this "train"
March 31, 2018, 06:16:28 PM
i havent seen this gem here.
Thanks to ortiizz for showing this on reddit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0jV2y9j9dU&feature=youtu.be&t=84
Some of the best partners of credits they shared for a week.
It doesnt matter that they disabled Likes and Comments. Thats how "legit" companies work.
Thanks to ortiizz for showing this on reddit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0jV2y9j9dU&feature=youtu.be&t=84
Some of the best partners of credits they shared for a week.
It doesnt matter that they disabled Likes and Comments. Thats how "legit" companies work.
As they disabled comments, they are automatically labeled a scam in your messed up world. Just
shows you the amount of nonsense you come up with.
If you want to talk conspiracy theories.
Are you and your scam group employed by the Syndicate that tries to keep market prices down?
As i'm reading through other crypto threads I see the same behavior you are showing here. Very interesting stuff.
You and your people cannot keep cryptos down forever.
Lol like that's the only reason. Cmon dude.
https://www.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/85rd9g/fake_and_scam_partnerships_the_cringe_with_this/?st=JFFXR655&sh=ca2a1547
How awesome is this? Pretty much the best cringe this year.
March 31, 2018, 05:57:46 PM
As a investor, fear, uncertainty and doubt is exactly what I feel about Credits. Given the high targets of the projects, I had high expectation about the code review. I didnt expected comments like these:
"Ok guys, I’m done for now, I really loved that the guys from Credits gave me the client early, and I really wanted to like the code more, but it’s still basic and unfortunately junior code. They did improve from last time, but it’s still so far away from being something real, we aren’t at PoC level yet, we can’t be talking about beta already.
Conclusion: They did update MD5 to Blake, but the rest is unfortunately still no where near the level it needs to be able to compete in this field or against the caliber of developers out there. Credits team, let’s talk, I want to help"
So I did not got what you mean by "twisted the truth". What is the true? Did they prove what they claim?
Iam in for the product, not for the marketing....hope we have better reviews on the short term. Thank you for your wellcome!
If you read through it carefully he is quite positive in many of his comments. His main criticism is he doesn't have full visibility which he wants. Its not the complete code so he can't see the though put of the 400k tps he wants to see but and no one said it was the fuil code yet. For context look at the guys other reviews, even big respected projects he's pretty negative on. I think he is sincere reviewer of what he can see at this early stage but its others suggesting the review is only bad who are twisting the truth. Like you newbie fudder. lol
This review is not a comment on the overall project, scope, or success thereof
So far, I’m not seeing anything new from the Credits team, but they are using a bunch of cool technologies, this is less a ground up build and more a Frankenstein approach (I like a good Frankenstein approach though), let’s continue"
Unfortunately, we can’t interrogate the Node, and we can’t send transactions, so nothing we can continue there unfortunately, so we can’t confirm their TPS claims just yet.
"Ok guys, I’m done for now, I really loved that the guys from Credits gave me the client early, and I really wanted to like the code more, but it’s still basic and unfortunately junior code. They did improve from last time, but it’s still so far away from being something real, we aren’t at PoC level yet, we can’t be talking about beta already.
Conclusion: They did update MD5 to Blake, but the rest is unfortunately still no where near the level it needs to be able to compete in this field or against the caliber of developers out there. Credits team, let’s talk, I want to help"
So I did not got what you mean by "twisted the truth". What is the true? Did they prove what they claim?
Iam in for the product, not for the marketing....hope we have better reviews on the short term. Thank you for your wellcome!
Hi all, this is my first message here.
At first I was very positive about Credits (I got some...), but then I begin to follow this dev third party analysis:
https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-code-review-credits-cs-beta-29-03-2019-5ffce7313a38
Iam lost out here...how is possible this so critical analysis about the code, and the Credits team claiming that the will deliver state of art tech? Am I missing something here?
I look to guarantee qualifed teams (ADA, QTUM, ETH, EOS, etc) and look like they are keeping pushing hard to get to their targets, that don't looking so ambitious as Credits. So why should I expect Credits will suceed? Iam thinking about selling everything...
Thanks in advance and sorry for the no so good english. :-)
At first I was very positive about Credits (I got some...), but then I begin to follow this dev third party analysis:
https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-code-review-credits-cs-beta-29-03-2019-5ffce7313a38
Iam lost out here...how is possible this so critical analysis about the code, and the Credits team claiming that the will deliver state of art tech? Am I missing something here?
I look to guarantee qualifed teams (ADA, QTUM, ETH, EOS, etc) and look like they are keeping pushing hard to get to their targets, that don't looking so ambitious as Credits. So why should I expect Credits will suceed? Iam thinking about selling everything...
Thanks in advance and sorry for the no so good english. :-)
If you read through it carefully he is quite positive in many of his comments. His main criticism is he doesn't have full visibility which he wants. Its not the complete code so he can't see the though put of the 400k tps he wants to see but and no one said it was the fuil code yet. For context look at the guys other reviews, even big respected projects he's pretty negative on. I think he is sincere reviewer of what he can see at this early stage but its others suggesting the review is only bad who are twisting the truth. Like you newbie fudder. lol
This review is not a comment on the overall project, scope, or success thereof
So far, I’m not seeing anything new from the Credits team, but they are using a bunch of cool technologies, this is less a ground up build and more a Frankenstein approach (I like a good Frankenstein approach though), let’s continue"
Unfortunately, we can’t interrogate the Node, and we can’t send transactions, so nothing we can continue there unfortunately, so we can’t confirm their TPS claims just yet.
March 31, 2018, 05:49:37 PM
Its time to accumulate even more now.Credits will explode in 3rd Quarter.100X gains for sure at the end of the year.Just HODL
March 31, 2018, 05:16:19 PM
if you think that why are you here ?
Jump to: