Topic: [ANN][KMD][dPoW] Komodo - An Open, Composable Smart Chain Platform, Secured by B - page 274. (Read 1192056 times)

Dave Collins, says, 5:43 "This is really low hanging fruit and not many people have done this so we're gong to go ahead, start the ball rolling and ya know huh, take it."

And there you have it, "not many people have done this" they where not the first, they took it.

He was talking about decentralized exchanges and atomic swaps, that exist, didn't name them clearly if at all, but he also didn't lie because BaterDex was/is already doing it and could easily be inserted into the decentralized exchange's statement but he didn't, he also didn't say that they jumped somebody else's train either, he played it down.

If this is being played as a first atomic swap then he has shot himself in the foot.

That's why I am not impressed with DICKHEAD sorry I mean DECRED or is it really NOCRED, sorry again, I get confused.

I wounder if De Cred is like De Grease, to take all the grease away, to take all the Credibility away, probably not but looks like it.

Everybody's jumping everybody else's train, it's always the same.

Hey guys,

I just finished my nomp based KMD Pool.


Pool fee: 0.1%

http://88.253.8.58:8080/

stratum+tcp://88.253.8.58:3857

user: wallet
pass: x

is it possible to retrieve the wallet with only the passphrase?

It seams like DECRED also made the revolutionary atomic swap for the first time in history https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jw5icKcmdbA&feature=youtu.be

So who was first? And which one is more revolutionary?

It seams like DECRED also made the revolutionary atomic swap for the first time in history https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jw5icKcmdbA&feature=youtu.be

So who was first? And which one is more revolutionary?

which do you consider more revolutionary?
ordinary atomic swap which we did over a year ago, or one where the coin blockchains are not on the local node and electrum servers were used?

It seams like DECRED also made the revolutionary atomic swap for the first time in history https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jw5icKcmdbA&feature=youtu.be

So who was first? And which one is more revolutionary?

We hope to have it ready as soon as possible but it is difficult to find a developer who can help. We're actively looking and once one has been found it should take ~2 weeks.

You can not kill a good idea with "amateur announcement"
people need to stop taking things so seriously
this project does more than most of the projects
and we need to say thanks for that
instead of seeking what to judge :|

The next demand shock should come by q4, and this time they may heat up a lot faster than before: There is a lot of fiat swishing around out there.
Each of the big leaps in Komodo has been due to some wealthy individual deciding to hedge systemic tail risks by investing a small part of their wealth in kmd.  The number of persons seeking such a hedge will increase substantially when the indexing bull runs out of steam and the bond bubble begins to deflate.
Zk-Snarks remains the single technology most like hard money: non-inflationary, fungible, private - and it far outpaces the field in minimizing counterparty risks, conflicts of interest, and agency problems, such as we see in the governance of ETH, and even, now, in BTC itself.  While punters will always chase the speculative momentum of the day wherever it is found, the smart money, the slow money, the big money is much more concerned about risk management than speculation.  Btw Komodo provides a unique value proposition in this area:  Money which cannot be seen, cannot be stolen and huge asset market creation.
Yes.. there is still a lot of hard technical, social, and business enterprise work which needs to be done in order to realize those potentials.  My advice: Buy in kmd whenever you have pricing power.  Mine kmd, even when it is temporarily unprofitable, and do not sell.  Your reward will be huge, true investments takes some time. That's why its called long-term.

The next demand shock should come by q4, and this time they may heat up a lot faster than before: There is a lot of fiat swishing around out there.
Each of the big leaps in Komodo has been due to some wealthy individual deciding to hedge systemic tail risks by investing a small part of their wealth in kmd.  The number of persons seeking such a hedge will increase substantially when the indexing bull runs out of steam and the bond bubble begins to deflate.
Zk-Snarks remains the single technology most like hard money: non-inflationary, fungible, private - and it far outpaces the field in minimizing counterparty risks, conflicts of interest, and agency problems, such as we see in the governance of ETH, and even, now, in BTC itself.  While punters will always chase the speculative momentum of the day wherever it is found, the smart money, the slow money, the big money is much more concerned about risk management than speculation.  Btw Komodo provides a unique value proposition in this area:  Money which cannot be seen, cannot be stolen and huge asset market creation.
Yes.. there is still a lot of hard technical, social, and business enterprise work which needs to be done in order to realize those potentials.  My advice: Buy in kmd whenever you have pricing power.  Mine kmd, even when it is temporarily unprofitable, and do not sell.  Your reward will be huge, true investments takes some time. That's why its called long-term.

You can not kill a good idea with "amateur announcement"
people need to stop taking things so seriously
this project does more than most of the projects
and we need to say thanks for that
instead of seeking what to judge :|

Not false at all.  I'm currently doing some work for a large global bank that has over 100,000 Windows desktops and tens of thousands of Windows servers.

They also have large numbers of Linux servers, but the Windows estate is non-trivial and runs many mission critical systems.