So how much money do users get from these delegates? If someone have 10,000 lisk how much is your share per month? If that is a good amount of $$ then very few people will sell.
Some people calculated that it will range from 10.000 to 250.000 a year so people will be scamming and scheming all over the place to get those spots.
Its a horrible Idea but none seems to care.
I care. A lot. I am trying my best to see that there are no sock puppets or scams in the mainnet by obtaining background information on testnet delegates. I'm a snoopy, nosey guy that reads too many detective crime novels ( not to mention
zerohedge.com ) and so I have a natural suspicion about EVERYBODY. Follow my efforts at the links below, and newer spreadsheets I will release for mainnet once Lisk is launched...
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bs7njoJwBTO31H2GJoWopNKKpAtggixsbZZiSIxQkRk/editOr maybe you're talking about the apparent high amounts of real money involved in being a delegate. Hey, I have always advocated that Lisk be a zero-inflation, volunteer delegate coin. But if there's money on the table, then I am going after my fair share. That's why I am a testnet Active Delegate to prove I can do the job, and why I hope to be a Active Delegate on mainnet. Please vote for me!
Max wanted to motivate people to set up nodes to solve a non-participation problem at Crypti (for the record, I was one of the few Crypti community Active Delegates, too). Well, the reward motivation structure he set up has solved that Crypti problem. We've now got over 1300+ Standby Delegates trying to get a top 101 Active Delegate spot - and that's just on TESTNET. I really wonder just how many of those 1300+ realize they've got to download and setup specialized delegate software on a VPS server with their own
http://aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd address - and how many have actually done so?
Just because the absolute numbers suddenly look like they're going to get very large doesn't mean that things are not going according to plan or have become a horrible idea. It means that the intended motivation just gets that much stronger (and the expenses that much higher) for 101 people to do a VERY good job in securing a coin blockchain worth hundreds of millions of dollars. SECURING THE BLOCKCHAIN IS THE PRIME JOB of an Active Delegate, NOT running charity giveaways and vote participation faucets.
When Max set up Lisk, he decided 4M Lisk was fair compensation for the two main Lisk devs. He also decided that 150K Lisk or 3.75% of the Dev reward was also fair compensation to an individual for their work AND EXPENSES to secure the Lisk blockchain for its first year. And that motivating
reward for running the Lisk internet backbone drops every year until year five , like an accelerated Bitcoin halving event.
Meanwhile, the
expenses for running the Lisk internet backbone are probably only going up up up in years to come. DDoS protection like Lisk is gonna need doesn't come cheap. Don't start criticizing the fat stacks held by delegates before there is a
true cost estimate and budget of just what it is going to take to create and run the internet backbone this growing monster called Lisk is ultimately going to need.