Just for all those who complain about
8% of Lisk supply owned by devs.
Look at ETH, and 12% in devs pockets.
... and ethereum is in top 5 coins.
There is a very clever minds
behind both projects. Something must
to back for all this hard work.
Ethereum devs didn't split the 12% between themselves, it is still locked inside an ETH contract visible to the public:
https://www.etherchain.org/account/0x5abfec25f74cd88437631a7731906932776356f9OTOH, Lisk devs blatantly said they plan to split the 8% Devs share between them two 50/50, with no contract, no nothing...
I'd like to see the Devs come forward and address this issue once for all. We can't just take their word that they "plan to hold their Lisk for a long time":
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14105599I will give you an answer only one time, all terms were clear before the ICO and are still clear. That means bitarri, if you don't like the fact. Then I advise you to not participate in the ICO. Thank you very much for your concerns though.
And now a few facts:Ethereum's dev funds aren't 12%, they are 12M ETH. That means a total of 16.53% of the genesis block. They were worth about $305,000 at launch and now they are worth about $120,000,000.
While it is correct to state that the funds are locked down in a "contract" you can't come and say that this contract is something special. It's simply a smart contract, which has a special purpose. This purpose is only a 4 of 7 multi-signature account (
according to this). Nothing more, nothing fancy like milestones or so. I don't know if they "promised" to pay the ETH out at specific milestones, but in the end that's just a promise. The multi-signature account doesn't prevent them to cash the ETH out, it just makes the account more secure. (I don't care about that, I'm just referring to what you say. For me Ethereum had all the rights to get 12M ETH.
)
Lisk's dev funds are 8%, less than the half of Ethereum's. Our ICO currently collected 1/18 of the Ethereum ICO. That means right now the Ethereum team collected 36 times more for themselves than we do. If we have our funds in control by 2 people that means we are effectively in the same state as Ethereum with 4 people at 2x the amount. If we split the 8M into 4M/4M to each other, it's the same as well.
Our 4M are always visible in the blockchain and if you see them moving to an exchange, you can make your decision and sell. Due to the 8M it isn't our single goal to make an awesome platform and get many dapps. With these 8M we also want that the LISK price rises. If we now make up some artificial milestones, it will only come to problems. I saw this at many other projects already.
We formulated the terms before the ICO started and they are final. Until now over 1450 unique persons participated in our ICO and agreed to the terms. I don't really want to change things, but maybe we can add some more points like a contract. We will definitely address it in our business plan.
If you seriously have concerns over the 8M, please add me on Skype (ask via PM) and I will hear your reasons. Then we will find a solution. Maybe with a contract with Axel Hellinger. Or with a multi-signature account on Lisk. Thanks.