Author

Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 408. (Read 3074142 times)

hero member
Activity: 2147
Merit: 518

Hey Liskers

Today I have published my second transparency report for February 2017.

Polycrypto's Transparency Report February

Good job @ Poly#Crypto 👍👍

Thanks @Limx Dev

^^^sorry for my typo, this is my third report, not my second

do not worry, your reports are always transparent.



Good work Poly

And everyone can see most delegates don't sell, they donate some LSK for good actions and hold a lot of forging rewards, in this case over 90%.

I totally agree with you Smiley

Delegates are in for ideological principles, most of them dont hold any lsk. Smart ones dont hold any alts, totally disregarding the superiority of the tech or potential to grow. But u wont understand that as u aint smart, quite the otherwise u are the puppet on strings and every ur move is dictated by my will.
member
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
https://hoskinsoncharles.blogspot.com/2017/02/some-thoughts-on-lisk.html

oh shit. fucking max and oliver - thanks for reaching out to charles. you are idiots.
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.
I should really have been asked if I wanted loob on this  Shocked I just keep digging, soon to be a fucking whale when its at 100sat and I have averaged down my life savings. Come on whales lets get this back on the radar.

Poor poor lisk <3
hero member
Activity: 739
Merit: 500
I'm not saying this doesn't sting, but no new info there, his complains match most what is being brought up here, and his frustration of his advise not being followed are well known for the better part of a year now. And most things that hee talks about (the time wasted on german entity, and the result of this of not hiring developers much sooner, the slow progress, the headstrong determination how things should work) was already discussed to death countless times.

Most of these should really never have occured, but there is no fixing that now, they can only move forward. Although I still not sure that they are throwing enough manpower at  the problems. I mean, fine you want a good SDK, and that takes time (let's ignore why that is a process that just started). There is enough money to hire two full teams. How about one in Berlin one working over the net? One is brainstorming and trying to work out the best possible solution before coding. The other just do it showing fast progress. A few months from now see who came up with what, and combine the efforts.

Sure it's looks like a waste of resources but as resources go Lisk has a lot less time than money at the moment.
legendary
Activity: 1938
Merit: 1014

Hey Liskers

Today I have published my second transparency report for February 2017.

Polycrypto's Transparency Report February

Good job @ Poly#Crypto 👍👍

Thanks @Limx Dev

^^^sorry for my typo, this is my third report, not my second

do not worry, your reports are always transparent.



Good work Poly

And everyone can see most delegates don't sell, they donate some LSK for good actions and hold a lot of forging rewards, in this case over 90%.

I totally agree with you Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 246
Merit: 250

ouch!  Cry Cry   Okay.. this hurts really bad.
Thanks for taking time to publish that Charles.

I'm definitely getting out of Lisk to never look back again  Angry

still, I wish the best of luck and patience to all Lisk fans and, what we now can really call, bagholders.


The is the truth which we have to face, the LISK is a rip off token for bailing out Crypti, Max knows nothing on technology, he is definitely a failed scammer, got the fund and did nothing. Shame on him, 15000 BTC can buy everything. Guys you gave him Ferrari and Lambo.
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0

ouch!  Cry Cry   Okay.. this hurts really bad.
Thanks for taking time to publish that Charles.

I'm definitely getting out of Lisk to never look back again  Angry

still, I wish the best of luck and patience to all Lisk fans and, what we now can really call, bagholders.


Ouch indeed! I really got a bad feeling now. Doesn't look good, more and more investorls will be getting out of Lisk.
legendary
Activity: 1111
Merit: 1000
crypto-enthusiast since 2012

ouch!  Cry Cry   Okay.. this hurts really bad.
Thanks for taking time to publish that Charles.

I'm definitely getting out of Lisk to never look back again  Angry

still, I wish the best of luck and patience to all Lisk fans and, what we now can really call, bagholders.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 511
Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?

I don't understand that as an exact and 100% time table. It is more a guideline. And I think that was a calculation with the existing Devs at that time.
If the team grows and more developers work on it, it can go faster of course.

On the other hand, it is not good to say we are finished definitely in Q2, if they don' t know how many Devs are available to do the work.
A lot of projects know the problems when they need to postpone predicted dates. This is also bad.

WTF have they been doing for a year. Should have a working SDK by now. Look at the charts for Lisk, it's clear people have lost faith, it's dumping hard.

WTF did you inform yourself about the last 12 months? How do I become the best troll?
It's all said so far. So shut up
hero member
Activity: 715
Merit: 500
Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?

I don't understand that as an exact and 100% time table. It is more a guideline. And I think that was a calculation with the existing Devs at that time.
If the team grows and more developers work on it, it can go faster of course.

On the other hand, it is not good to say we are finished definitely in Q2, if they don' t know how many Devs are available to do the work.
A lot of projects know the problems when they need to postpone predicted dates. This is also bad.

WTF have they been doing for a year. Should have a working SDK by now. Look at the charts for Lisk, it's clear people have lost faith, it's dumping hard.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 511
Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?

I don't understand that as an exact and 100% time table. It is more a guideline. And I think that was a calculation with the existing Devs at that time.
If the team grows and more developers work on it, it can go faster of course.

On the other hand, it is not good to say we are finished definitely in Q2, if they don' t know how many Devs are available to do the work.
A lot of projects know the problems when they need to postpone predicted dates. This is also bad.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 511

Hey Liskers

Today I have published my third transparency report for February 2017.

Polycrypto's Transparency Report February

Good work Poly

And everyone can see most delegates don't sell, they donate some LSK for good actions and hold a lot of forging rewards, in this case over 90%.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Communications Lead
Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?

Because then they wouldn't be able to pay themselves their high wages for the rest of their lives Smiley.

and perhaps not all of the fund is in reality available to authentically spend. who knows what arrangements were in place at the beginning of the ICO with BTC whales, leading the charge with their oversized donations to suck others in. who knows.

One year to stabilize the core and another year to plan/develop SDK is just too long in cryptoland. I mean you can work at your own pace, but that doesn't mean that when you finish the project it will still be useful, the project may in fact not even matter by then. Crypto moves/evolves at a fast pace.

The current time timetable is comfy for lisk team but is really hurting investors.

The team will grow in the upcoming months, but we're taking into account the amount of time it takes for a new developer to get acquainted with the code. It may be seen as "too long" in the cryptocurrency space, but it is not long for software development. Every release is a step forward towards the right direction.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 510

Hey Liskers

Today I have published my second transparency report for February 2017.

Polycrypto's Transparency Report February

Good job @ Poly#Crypto 👍👍

Thanks @Limx Dev

^^^sorry for my typo, this is my third report, not my second
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
ARK Team likes to ban and delete posts in reddit.
Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?

Because then they wouldn't be able to pay themselves their high wages for the rest of their lives Smiley.

and perhaps not all of the fund is in reality available to authentically spend. who knows what arrangements were in place at the beginning of the ICO with BTC whales, leading the charge with their oversized donations to suck others in. who knows.

One year to stabilize the core and another year to plan/develop SDK is just too long in cryptoland. I mean you can work at your own pace, but that doesn't mean that when you finish the project it will still be useful, the project may in fact not even matter by then. Crypto moves/evolves at a fast pace.

The current time timetable is comfy for lisk team but is really hurting investors.
copper member
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1348

Hey Liskers

Today I have published my second transparency report for February 2017.

Polycrypto's Transparency Report February

Good job @ Poly#Crypto 👍👍
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 510
 
Hey Liskers

Today I have published my third transparency report for February 2017.

Polycrypto's Transparency Report February
Jump to: