[ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 783.

Calabi–Yau Manifold

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Honolulu psycho dude time to quit that Cool

I know from someone that you bought tons of cheap LISK last days below 40k so chill out dude, soon fuding LISK won't be profitable anymore:)

To all noobs:

If you sold LISK at bottom or just below 40k last days it's time to rebuy because LISK will be pumped hard at poloniex very soon. Fuding about Lisk is going down to ico price etc. crap posts are not profitable and won't take Lisk to low price where you set bids just because many of you sold at 35000 or 37000.

Lisk = moon soon. Development now will be much stronger and time for new ATH in few months.

honolulumark

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 500

Knowledge is power

Quote from: Calabi–Yau Manifold on August 04, 2016, 04:08:49 AM

Quote from: BTCwriter on August 04, 2016, 01:09:19 AM

Lisk volume on POLO say it's about to pop the cherry
When it's happen these ETH, EAT, ETC craps will have no chance in crypto world. The volume and anticipation say it all.

My man. Cheers!

you lost your shit pretty hard when Mal dumped to oblivion. cool out

Calabi–Yau Manifold

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: BTCwriter on August 04, 2016, 01:09:19 AM

Lisk volume on POLO say it's about to pop the cherry
When it's happen these ETH, EAT, ETC craps will have no chance in crypto world. The volume and anticipation say it all.

My man. Cheers!

Calabi–Yau Manifold

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: bbc.reporter on August 03, 2016, 09:45:04 PM

I see somebody attempted to fight the market and tried to pump LSK. This is a big mistake because if the price continues to fall then he will have to dump to avoid a big loss making the price fall more again. Without market sentiment it is good to avoid doing anything for now.

Very ugly post dude.
Obviously that you sold last days at or near bottom Lisk and now trying to FUD. Shame on you and go away!

Mr.Pro

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 251

Quote from: bbc.reporter on August 04, 2016, 03:01:34 AM

I am not saying anything of that sort. I am merely observing the LSK market and making a speculation. As I said fighting the market should not be done. You should save your money for now and patiently wait and observe the market.

Well, I do understand.
But who cares its buy buy buy every dump we should buy buy buy Grin

Im all in on lisk

honolulumark

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 500

Knowledge is power

Quote from: bbc.reporter on August 04, 2016, 03:01:34 AM

Quote from: Mr.Pro on August 03, 2016, 10:01:28 PM

Quote from: bbc.reporter on August 03, 2016, 09:45:04 PM

I see somebody attempted to fight the market and tried to pump LSK. This is a big mistake because if the price continues to fall then he will have to dump to avoid a big loss making the price fall more again. Without market sentiment it is good to avoid doing anything for now.

How much cheap do you want? If you are dreaming that it will hit below ico price then you are wrong..

I am not saying anything of that sort. I am merely observing the LSK market and making a speculation. As I said fighting the market should not be done. You should save your money for now and patiently wait and observe the market.

on a lighter tone, why did you choose bigblackcock reporter as your name? Tongue

starmman

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1029

Quote from: bitseedmike on August 04, 2016, 03:15:26 AM

Quote from: starmman on August 04, 2016, 12:43:08 AM

Quote from: Msile on August 03, 2016, 06:13:11 PM

Hey I have a question about lowering the transaction fees.

Why would delegates agree to lower transaction fees? They'll suddenly receive less money unless the transaction volume goes up a lot.

Sure people could vote them out if they don't want to help, but it sounds pretty hard to get a majority, why is this not a problem?

The transaction fees were one of the reasons what put me off buying Lisk originally (other being the price at the time). If the price increases substantially they will have to drop or a number of smaller players will not even consider using Lisk due to the fees. It could be a barrier (or at lest braking factor) to growth. I understand it is important, but should it scale down with volume or price to keep the coin attractive and keep delegates happy?

Yes, this was set when it was assumed Lisk would be at a lot lower market value. Delegates are meant to be paid mainly from forging rewards, not fees, the reason for the flat fee instead of a percentage like Crypti, which had no forging rewards other than fees.

I would also like to see a much lower fee for naming accounts as well.

If it can be proven that the high transaction fee is a barrier to growth, and it wasn't designed to be this high, then I suspect that it would be in everybodies interest to reduce the fee. I wonder if the dev team and wider community agree and how easy it would be to alter.

bitseedmike

sr. member

Activity: 432

Merit: 250

Quote from: starmman on August 04, 2016, 12:43:08 AM

Quote from: Msile on August 03, 2016, 06:13:11 PM

Hey I have a question about lowering the transaction fees.

Why would delegates agree to lower transaction fees? They'll suddenly receive less money unless the transaction volume goes up a lot.

Sure people could vote them out if they don't want to help, but it sounds pretty hard to get a majority, why is this not a problem?

The transaction fees were one of the reasons what put me off buying Lisk originally (other being the price at the time). If the price increases substantially they will have to drop or a number of smaller players will not even consider using Lisk due to the fees. It could be a barrier (or at lest braking factor) to growth. I understand it is important, but should it scale down with volume or price to keep the coin attractive and keep delegates happy?

Yes, this was set when it was assumed Lisk would be at a lot lower market value. Delegates are meant to be paid mainly from forging rewards, not fees, the reason for the flat fee instead of a percentage like Crypti, which had no forging rewards other than fees.

I would also like to see a much lower fee for naming accounts as well.

starmman

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1029

Quote from: BTCwriter on August 04, 2016, 01:09:19 AM

Lisk volume on POLO say it's about to pop the cherry
When it's happen these ETH, EAT, ETC craps will have no chance in crypto world. The volume and anticipation say it all.

Lets see, can't see anything yet - but can certainly see a big list towards lisk (pun intended) once the result of ETH/ETC war has been decided. Neither may come off in good shape by the end of proceedings. The waters don't seem choppy yet this morning, but the markets haven't fully woken yet

bbc.reporter

legendary

Activity: 3164

Merit: 1506

Quote from: Mr.Pro on August 03, 2016, 10:01:28 PM

Quote from: bbc.reporter on August 03, 2016, 09:45:04 PM

I see somebody attempted to fight the market and tried to pump LSK. This is a big mistake because if the price continues to fall then he will have to dump to avoid a big loss making the price fall more again. Without market sentiment it is good to avoid doing anything for now.

How much cheap do you want? If you are dreaming that it will hit below ico price then you are wrong..

I am not saying anything of that sort. I am merely observing the LSK market and making a speculation. As I said fighting the market should not be done. You should save your money for now and patiently wait and observe the market.

BTCwriter

legendary

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1000

Lisk volume on POLO say it's about to pop the cherry
When it's happen these ETH, EAT, ETC craps will have no chance in crypto world. The volume and anticipation say it all.

starmman

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1029

Quote from: Msile on August 03, 2016, 06:13:11 PM

Hey I have a question about lowering the transaction fees.

Why would delegates agree to lower transaction fees? They'll suddenly receive less money unless the transaction volume goes up a lot.

Sure people could vote them out if they don't want to help, but it sounds pretty hard to get a majority, why is this not a problem?

The transaction fees were one of the reasons what put me off buying Lisk originally (other being the price at the time). If the price increases substantially they will have to drop or a number of smaller players will not even consider using Lisk due to the fees. It could be a barrier (or at lest braking factor) to growth. I understand it is important, but should it scale down with volume or price to keep the coin attractive and keep delegates happy?

Mr.Pro

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 251

Quote from: bbc.reporter on August 03, 2016, 09:45:04 PM

I see somebody attempted to fight the market and tried to pump LSK. This is a big mistake because if the price continues to fall then he will have to dump to avoid a big loss making the price fall more again. Without market sentiment it is good to avoid doing anything for now.

How much cheap do you want? If you are dreaming that it will hit below ico price then you are wrong..

bbc.reporter

legendary

Activity: 3164

Merit: 1506

I see somebody attempted to fight the market and tried to pump LSK. This is a big mistake because if the price continues to fall then he will have to dump to avoid a big loss making the price fall more again. Without market sentiment it is good to avoid doing anything for now.

Herp

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Is Charles Hoskinson still an adviser? Can you involve him in a more direct capacity? He seems to have enough time on his hands since he said he might test some stuff on ETC. Why not test some of his apps on Lisk?

danherbias07

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1134

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: jjmv on August 03, 2016, 06:28:07 PM

speaking of volume...

does anyone else thinks its odd that lisk volume is pretty much #5 @ almost two million, but the cap is barely @ 21mil? Isn't that obvious collecting? And why would folks collect lisk?

Im just saying... get in while prices are low...

Thanks for the heads up. I will be buying later. I see it came down and thingking it will again. I think this low is enough and profits will be there later.

bluedude

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

y²=x3+ax+b, a=0,b=7

Quote from: cryptoboy.architect on August 03, 2016, 06:44:42 PM

Quote from: jjmv on August 03, 2016, 06:28:07 PM

speaking of volume...

does anyone else thinks its odd that lisk volume is pretty much #5 @ almost two million, but the cap is barely @ 21mil? Isn't that obvious collecting? And why would folks collect lisk?

Im just saying... get in while prices are low...

Yup. I've seen same with ETH and FCT, etc. -- slow accumulation, then moon.

Waiting for the DAPPS revolution

cryptoboy.architect

hero member

Activity: 513

Merit: 500

Quote from: jjmv on August 03, 2016, 06:28:07 PM

speaking of volume...

does anyone else thinks its odd that lisk volume is pretty much #5 @ almost two million, but the cap is barely @ 21mil? Isn't that obvious collecting? And why would folks collect lisk?

Im just saying... get in while prices are low...

Yup. I've seen same with ETH and FCT, etc. -- slow accumulation, then moon.

jjmv

sr. member

Activity: 246

Merit: 250

speaking of volume...

does anyone else thinks its odd that lisk volume is pretty much #5 @ almost two million, but the cap is barely @ 21mil? Isn't that obvious collecting? And why would folks collect lisk?

Im just saying... get in while prices are low...

Msile

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 503

Hey I have a question about lowering the transaction fees.

Why would delegates agree to lower transaction fees? They'll suddenly receive less money unless the transaction volume goes up a lot.

Sure people could vote them out if they don't want to help, but it sounds pretty hard to get a majority, why is this not a problem?

Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 783. (Read 3074324 times)