Topic: [ANN][MIN] Minerals - POS | Developing own anon solution | - page 323. (Read 742187 times)
This coin is the start of a new fair standard. Many coins will follow. Combine it with Starcraft tournaments.. BOOM! Price explosion incoming.
we need to get on bittrex! this will blow up there...
Bittrex is needed and it is an excellent exchange. I must however take my hat off to C-CEX for coming to the party and maintaining their integrity under a lot of peer pressure. C-CEX did not fold and give in to the pressure. I will therefore support CCEX a lot in the future.
Bittrex however is needed and we should try to pursade them not to give in to the peer pressure and also to maintain their integrity.
Bittrex however is needed and we should try to pursade them not to give in to the peer pressure and also to maintain their integrity.
I'm sure Bittrex team is watching and its just a matter of time they list Minerals.
while we are a community MIN will be raising, keep mining, positive attitude,giving support,following C-CEX,things will go well as far, MIN has inovation!!!!
Bittrex is needed and it is an excellent exchange. I must however take my hat off to C-CEX for coming to the party and maintaining their integrity under a lot of peer pressure. C-CEX did not fold and give in to the pressure. I will therefore support CCEX a lot in the future.
Bittrex however is needed and we should try to pursade them not to give in to the peer pressure and also to maintain their integrity.
Bittrex however is needed and we should try to pursade them not to give in to the peer pressure and also to maintain their integrity.
Made a thread about the various things I've read here, feel free to chime in.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/is-the-alternate-cryptocurrencies-market-being-monopolized-659485
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/is-the-alternate-cryptocurrencies-market-being-monopolized-659485
I think it is becoming more and more clear... BIG ones are united in order to gain more power, more control and more advantage over the ordinary crypto guys (independent devs, miners, small pools, small exchanges...)...
Isn't it clear for everyone the circle this mafia is trying to create?!
1. Puppet developer offers new coin with no innovation or whatsoever in it. (0 - Everything is set and agreed by the parties in advance.)
2. Big pools are among the first to offer their service for mining.
3. Big multipools point the hashpower there to create "big expectations" among ordinary miners. Meanwhile - pointing 90%+ of the hash in the "right direction".
4. After 1-2 days, when multipools have already mined enough quantity - big exchanges (a hate to admit it - Bittrex seems to be on the front line) list the shitcoin to create interest.
5. Pump is created - multipools get a good pie (and then distribute just a small part of it to the ordinary miners, using MP's services). Pools get their 2% of all mined coins + decent % from transactions. Exchanges do the same...
6. I could even imagine that the rest of the big pie is furthermore divided between multipool-pool-exchange-dev.
So, I do not really think, Bittrex will add us.
We better focus on voting on Poloniex and Mintpal... And helping C-Cex, Kingcoiney, etc. to grow by trading there. Because diversity, strong competition and variety of pools, honest multipools, non-greedy exchanges - all these are the weapons to fight with mafia, monopolies and similar bad practices...
Isn't it clear for everyone the circle this mafia is trying to create?!
1. Puppet developer offers new coin with no innovation or whatsoever in it. (0 - Everything is set and agreed by the parties in advance.)
2. Big pools are among the first to offer their service for mining.
3. Big multipools point the hashpower there to create "big expectations" among ordinary miners. Meanwhile - pointing 90%+ of the hash in the "right direction".
4. After 1-2 days, when multipools have already mined enough quantity - big exchanges (a hate to admit it - Bittrex seems to be on the front line) list the shitcoin to create interest.
5. Pump is created - multipools get a good pie (and then distribute just a small part of it to the ordinary miners, using MP's services). Pools get their 2% of all mined coins + decent % from transactions. Exchanges do the same...
6. I could even imagine that the rest of the big pie is furthermore divided between multipool-pool-exchange-dev.
So, I do not really think, Bittrex will add us.
We better focus on voting on Poloniex and Mintpal... And helping C-Cex, Kingcoiney, etc. to grow by trading there. Because diversity, strong competition and variety of pools, honest multipools, non-greedy exchanges - all these are the weapons to fight with mafia, monopolies and similar bad practices...
I can't mine thousands of coin cause of big Farms and asics, pls just stop with this bullshit of centralized.
well you can mine million of doge coins using farm and asics..
I can't mine thousands of coin cause of big Farms and asics, pls just stop with this bullshit of centralized.
What about bittrex exchange ?
they are thinking about it still
<@bittrex-richie> Allcryptocoins: yeah we get a lot of that feedback.. like i said.. its super polarizing...
<@bittrex-richie> we either are a) pool operator bitches and part of the mafia or b) destroying crypto by setting a bad precendent.
so they do understand that it would look bad if they don't add MIN. I have no idea what is the precendent he's talking about tho..
Makes no sense to me.
i do understand what bittrex thinking, they are on confusing situation
1. if they dont add MIN, our community will say bittrex is controlled by pool operator and part of their mafia
2. if they do add MIN, pool community will say bittrex is destroying crypto by accepting MIN which they said MIN is bad example for centralized control by dev at launch
the only way to control the whales at least 50% is about MIN is doing, but what about the small miners
finally someone is helping so bittrex is not destroying crypto by accepting MIN on the contrary is helping
What about bittrex exchange ?
they are thinking about it still
<@bittrex-richie> Allcryptocoins: yeah we get a lot of that feedback.. like i said.. its super polarizing...
<@bittrex-richie> we either are a) pool operator bitches and part of the mafia or b) destroying crypto by setting a bad precendent.
so they do understand that it would look bad if they don't add MIN. I have no idea what is the precendent he's talking about tho..
Makes no sense to me.
i do understand what bittrex thinking, they are on confusing situation
1. if they dont add MIN, our community will say bittrex is controlled by pool operator and part of their mafia
2. if they do add MIN, pool community will say bittrex is destroying crypto by accepting MIN which they said MIN is bad example for centralized control by dev at launch
You said it right Uray. Conspiracy is good
When is next multipool payout?
MIN going up to 5000 sat, yay !
r u from the future?
or ur message goes trough worm hole and ended up in the past
or u r drunk
What about bittrex exchange ?
they are thinking about it still
<@bittrex-richie> Allcryptocoins: yeah we get a lot of that feedback.. like i said.. its super polarizing...
<@bittrex-richie> we either are a) pool operator bitches and part of the mafia or b) destroying crypto by setting a bad precendent.
so they do understand that it would look bad if they don't add MIN. I have no idea what is the precendent he's talking about tho..
Makes no sense to me.
i do understand what bittrex thinking, they are on confusing situation
1. if they dont add MIN, our community will say bittrex is controlled by pool operator and part of their mafia
2. if they do add MIN, pool community will say bittrex is destroying crypto by accepting MIN which they said MIN is bad example for centralized control by dev at launch
this exactly....
I would listen too demand... and ignore the people who dont like it... its not like they MUST trade min...
What about bittrex exchange ?
they are thinking about it still
<@bittrex-richie> Allcryptocoins: yeah we get a lot of that feedback.. like i said.. its super polarizing...
<@bittrex-richie> we either are a) pool operator bitches and part of the mafia or b) destroying crypto by setting a bad precendent.
so they do understand that it would look bad if they don't add MIN. I have no idea what is the precendent he's talking about tho..
Makes no sense to me.
i do understand what bittrex thinking, they are on confusing situation
1. if they dont add MIN, our community will say bittrex is controlled by pool operator and part of their mafia
2. if they do add MIN, pool community will say bittrex is destroying crypto by accepting MIN which they said MIN is bad example for centralized control by dev at launch
If pool operators could be trusted not to leak the source and to not break ranks by dropping the hash limits, then it could be done in a decentralised fashion. Unfortunately you just need one weak link and the whole coin POW goes down the drain. For now the only way to ensure integrity is to do it centralised, until an acceptable decentralised way can be found that would guarantee integrity.
MIN going up to 5000 sat, yay !
What about bittrex exchange ?
they are thinking about it still
<@bittrex-richie> Allcryptocoins: yeah we get a lot of that feedback.. like i said.. its super polarizing...
<@bittrex-richie> we either are a) pool operator bitches and part of the mafia or b) destroying crypto by setting a bad precendent.
so they do understand that it would look bad if they don't add MIN. I have no idea what is the precendent he's talking about tho..
The precedent would be that if there is something new in a coin that is part of innovation or taking crypto forward, even if it is an experiment, and a certain part of the community don't like it, and they veto the coin, then it would pave the way for selective crypto coins in future that suits only certain parts of the community. Lets say in future a new coin is launched with some method that makes pool operators redundant, then and they bitch about it, then the precedent would be there to exclude the coin from exchanges.
No, the correct way is to stick with ethics and maintain integrity and give each coin with its characteristics an equal chance on the exchanges, even if it pisses off a certain part of the community. That piece of innovation might now be unpopular, but might just be the thing taking crypto forward a few steps and build the body of knowledge.
What about bittrex exchange ?
they are thinking about it still
<@bittrex-richie> Allcryptocoins: yeah we get a lot of that feedback.. like i said.. its super polarizing...
<@bittrex-richie> we either are a) pool operator bitches and part of the mafia or b) destroying crypto by setting a bad precendent.
so they do understand that it would look bad if they don't add MIN. I have no idea what is the precendent he's talking about tho..
Makes no sense to me.
i do understand what bittrex thinking, they are on confusing situation
1. if they dont add MIN, our community will say bittrex is controlled by pool operator and part of their mafia
2. if they do add MIN, pool community will say bittrex is destroying crypto by accepting MIN which they said MIN is bad example for centralized control by dev at launch
Jump to: