Topic: [ANN][MOSAIC - Gateway to the Crypto World!] - page 14. (Read 1559 times)
Mosaic is bringing a buzz nowadays. But what actually Mosaic will give us ? Specially those who are interested on Crypto ?
When will ICO start? Do you have presale?
whats does MMIP means and what is the use of this in the platform
MMIP stands for - Mosaic Market Intelligence Protocol
MMIP has the following specific properties which are crucial to Mosaic's vision.
MMIP has 4 key aspects:
1. Identity verification
2. A rewards mechanism
3. Anonymous ratings and reviews
4. User protection
what is your protocol in doing research?
can you explain more about this
1. Identity verificaton
2. Trust-minimized economic engine
3. MZX Staking Mechanism
4. Trust-minimized research coverage
5. Anonymous ratings and critiques
1. Identity verificaton
2. Trust-minimized economic engine
3. MZX Staking Mechanism
4. Trust-minimized research coverage
5. Anonymous ratings and critiques
What is the mechanism for assessing the quality of information provided on the Mosaic platform? Who and how does it make its ratings relevant to reviews and conclusions? How many such experts? Is there a possibility of corruption when evaluating content?
The quality of information is assessed by Mosaic's users.
Users can rate research, upvote or downvote etc.
They ultimately decide what content is deemed as good and what content is deemed as bad.
Mosaic Network is decentralized, there is no “admin”, and since there is no admin, in an immutable, decentralized blockchain-based system
like Mosaic, an individual cannot delete or censor particular transactions on the network.
When it comes to evaluating content Mosaic system is designed to take care of
misinformation and spam automatically through mandatory staking contracts.
The underlying mechanics are simple: every time a user posts content on Mosaic or
rates the content of others, they place a slashable stake in MZX into escrow
through a smart contract, with size of the stake dependent on the type of
interaction as well as the accuracy and popularity of past posts. The Mosaic smart
contract holds these tokens in reserve for a given amount of time. At the end of
this period, if a post is heavily downvoted, the staking mechanism automatically
flags that post and removes it from users’ feeds, with the stake sent to a pool
reserved for future contributor rewards. MZX stakes attached to unflagged content
are automatically returned to their original owner and those posts remain
unchanged on the feeds.
We expect this staking mechanism, in conjunction with the requirement for users
to submit their real identities when joining the network, to promote content
excellence while simultaneously penalizing spam, misinformation, or low-quality
comments.
In plain:
That means if I see fake or missleading content and I downvote to make it even more clear my placed slashable stake in MZX to contribute that downvote will be lost for me??
Do I get that right?
No, you wont loose your token. It means that if someone posts fake or misleading content that is downvoted that they lose some of the stake
People that vote won’t lose stake for content they downvoted.
Not everything written in the paper or online are true, it's good that people have the power to upvote and downvote, this is a brilliant way to fight and put down unreliable and insufficient data and research article that are doing more harm than good to people.
Yes. Mosaic designed it this way so researchers will try to post quality content to be upvoted. If their content is heavily downvoted they will lose their tokens and consequently their reputation.
I see.. So this would allow users to post only the legitimate and original source and information, so that their contributions may not be taken.
That's a brilliant idea!
Actually NO, false information can still be written by the users, but the readers which would be the public and the private users will be able to bring it down by the power of down voting once they see that the content is not true and because of this the writer of that article won't be able to get stakes for that written article which would be such a waste of effort on the writers part.
when will be the platform available to conduct research?
whats does MMIP means and what is the use of this in the platform
what are the advantages of subscribing to the platform?
Subscribing to the platform will give you:
access to premium data
rate researchers
vote (upvote/downvote) content articles
receive rewards for conributions to the platform
What is the mechanism for assessing the quality of information provided on the Mosaic platform? Who and how does it make its ratings relevant to reviews and conclusions? How many such experts? Is there a possibility of corruption when evaluating content?
The quality of information is assessed by Mosaic's users.
Users can rate research, upvote or downvote etc.
They ultimately decide what content is deemed as good and what content is deemed as bad.
Mosaic Network is decentralized, there is no “admin”, and since there is no admin, in an immutable, decentralized blockchain-based system
like Mosaic, an individual cannot delete or censor particular transactions on the network.
When it comes to evaluating content Mosaic system is designed to take care of
misinformation and spam automatically through mandatory staking contracts.
The underlying mechanics are simple: every time a user posts content on Mosaic or
rates the content of others, they place a slashable stake in MZX into escrow
through a smart contract, with size of the stake dependent on the type of
interaction as well as the accuracy and popularity of past posts. The Mosaic smart
contract holds these tokens in reserve for a given amount of time. At the end of
this period, if a post is heavily downvoted, the staking mechanism automatically
flags that post and removes it from users’ feeds, with the stake sent to a pool
reserved for future contributor rewards. MZX stakes attached to unflagged content
are automatically returned to their original owner and those posts remain
unchanged on the feeds.
We expect this staking mechanism, in conjunction with the requirement for users
to submit their real identities when joining the network, to promote content
excellence while simultaneously penalizing spam, misinformation, or low-quality
comments.
In plain:
That means if I see fake or missleading content and I downvote to make it even more clear my placed slashable stake in MZX to contribute that downvote will be lost for me??
Do I get that right?
No, you wont loose your token. It means that if someone posts fake or misleading content that is downvoted that they lose some of the stake
People that vote won’t lose stake for content they downvoted.
Not everything written in the paper or online are true, it's good that people have the power to upvote and downvote, this is a brilliant way to fight and put down unreliable and insufficient data and research article that are doing more harm than good to people.
Yes. Mosaic designed it this way so researchers will try to post quality content to be upvoted. If their content is heavily downvoted they will lose their tokens and consequently their reputation.
I see.. So this would allow users to post only the legitimate and original source and information, so that their contributions may not be taken.
That's a brilliant idea!
What is the mechanism for assessing the quality of information provided on the Mosaic platform? Who and how does it make its ratings relevant to reviews and conclusions? How many such experts? Is there a possibility of corruption when evaluating content?
The quality of information is assessed by Mosaic's users.
Users can rate research, upvote or downvote etc.
They ultimately decide what content is deemed as good and what content is deemed as bad.
Mosaic Network is decentralized, there is no “admin”, and since there is no admin, in an immutable, decentralized blockchain-based system
like Mosaic, an individual cannot delete or censor particular transactions on the network.
When it comes to evaluating content Mosaic system is designed to take care of
misinformation and spam automatically through mandatory staking contracts.
The underlying mechanics are simple: every time a user posts content on Mosaic or
rates the content of others, they place a slashable stake in MZX into escrow
through a smart contract, with size of the stake dependent on the type of
interaction as well as the accuracy and popularity of past posts. The Mosaic smart
contract holds these tokens in reserve for a given amount of time. At the end of
this period, if a post is heavily downvoted, the staking mechanism automatically
flags that post and removes it from users’ feeds, with the stake sent to a pool
reserved for future contributor rewards. MZX stakes attached to unflagged content
are automatically returned to their original owner and those posts remain
unchanged on the feeds.
We expect this staking mechanism, in conjunction with the requirement for users
to submit their real identities when joining the network, to promote content
excellence while simultaneously penalizing spam, misinformation, or low-quality
comments.
In plain:
That means if I see fake or missleading content and I downvote to make it even more clear my placed slashable stake in MZX to contribute that downvote will be lost for me??
Do I get that right?
No, you wont loose your token. It means that if someone posts fake or misleading content that is downvoted that they lose some of the stake
People that vote won’t lose stake for content they downvoted.
Not everything written in the paper or online are true, it's good that people have the power to upvote and downvote, this is a brilliant way to fight and put down unreliable and insufficient data and research article that are doing more harm than good to people.
Yes. Mosaic designed it this way so researchers will try to post quality content to be upvoted. If their content is heavily downvoted they will lose their tokens and consequently their reputation.
What is the mechanism for assessing the quality of information provided on the Mosaic platform? Who and how does it make its ratings relevant to reviews and conclusions? How many such experts? Is there a possibility of corruption when evaluating content?
The quality of information is assessed by Mosaic's users.
Users can rate research, upvote or downvote etc.
They ultimately decide what content is deemed as good and what content is deemed as bad.
Mosaic Network is decentralized, there is no “admin”, and since there is no admin, in an immutable, decentralized blockchain-based system
like Mosaic, an individual cannot delete or censor particular transactions on the network.
When it comes to evaluating content Mosaic system is designed to take care of
misinformation and spam automatically through mandatory staking contracts.
The underlying mechanics are simple: every time a user posts content on Mosaic or
rates the content of others, they place a slashable stake in MZX into escrow
through a smart contract, with size of the stake dependent on the type of
interaction as well as the accuracy and popularity of past posts. The Mosaic smart
contract holds these tokens in reserve for a given amount of time. At the end of
this period, if a post is heavily downvoted, the staking mechanism automatically
flags that post and removes it from users’ feeds, with the stake sent to a pool
reserved for future contributor rewards. MZX stakes attached to unflagged content
are automatically returned to their original owner and those posts remain
unchanged on the feeds.
We expect this staking mechanism, in conjunction with the requirement for users
to submit their real identities when joining the network, to promote content
excellence while simultaneously penalizing spam, misinformation, or low-quality
comments.
In plain:
That means if I see fake or missleading content and I downvote to make it even more clear my placed slashable stake in MZX to contribute that downvote will be lost for me??
Do I get that right?
No, you wont loose your token. It means that if someone posts fake or misleading content that is downvoted that they lose some of the stake
People that vote won’t lose stake for content they downvoted.
Not everything written in the paper or online are true, it's good that people have the power to upvote and downvote, this is a brilliant way to fight and put down unreliable and insufficient data and research article that are doing more harm than good to people.
what are the advantages of subscribing to the platform?
What is the mechanism for assessing the quality of information provided on the Mosaic platform? Who and how does it make its ratings relevant to reviews and conclusions? How many such experts? Is there a possibility of corruption when evaluating content?
The quality of information is assessed by Mosaic's users.
Users can rate research, upvote or downvote etc.
They ultimately decide what content is deemed as good and what content is deemed as bad.
Mosaic Network is decentralized, there is no “admin”, and since there is no admin, in an immutable, decentralized blockchain-based system
like Mosaic, an individual cannot delete or censor particular transactions on the network.
When it comes to evaluating content Mosaic system is designed to take care of
misinformation and spam automatically through mandatory staking contracts.
The underlying mechanics are simple: every time a user posts content on Mosaic or
rates the content of others, they place a slashable stake in MZX into escrow
through a smart contract, with size of the stake dependent on the type of
interaction as well as the accuracy and popularity of past posts. The Mosaic smart
contract holds these tokens in reserve for a given amount of time. At the end of
this period, if a post is heavily downvoted, the staking mechanism automatically
flags that post and removes it from users’ feeds, with the stake sent to a pool
reserved for future contributor rewards. MZX stakes attached to unflagged content
are automatically returned to their original owner and those posts remain
unchanged on the feeds.
We expect this staking mechanism, in conjunction with the requirement for users
to submit their real identities when joining the network, to promote content
excellence while simultaneously penalizing spam, misinformation, or low-quality
comments.
In plain:
That means if I see fake or missleading content and I downvote to make it even more clear my placed slashable stake in MZX to contribute that downvote will be lost for me??
Do I get that right?
No, you wont loose your token. It means that if someone posts fake or misleading content that is downvoted that they lose some of the stake
People that vote won’t lose stake for content they downvoted.
Why does your project need a token?
Mosaic token or MZX is a utility token used for content curation on the Mosaic platform, staking for Mosaic contributors and researchers, and payment of subscription fees.
is it mean that without MZX token i cannot use the platform? but that's fine no more free in this world, I'm confused with the staking can you give more info about that sounds interesting
Cool because of this mechanism all the participants in the platform will give the right information and will be bias in all the information if they not do it, they will pay for it, nice idea i like how Mosaic platform will do i think these will help a lot in crypto world
Your first question of Total Supply Token. Please take note that I got this from their Whitepaper.
Token Sale:
We are issuing 1 billion MZX with the following distribution:
• 250 million tokens for token sale subscribers
• 300 million tokens for platform contributors
• 200 million platform reserve tokens
• 50 million tokens for partners
• 200 million tokens for the team
2nd question about MZX supply.
For the Mosaic Network to function properly, the number of tokens in circulation
must be equal to the number necessary to support a thriving research ecosystem.
As we expect the number of participants on the network to grow over time, the
token supply should also increase to match this growth. Therefore, in order to
support our community, Mosaic will implement an inflationary model for the MZX
tokens. Initially, the annual inflation rate is 5%, and will decrease linearly every year
to 1% over 20 years, and afterwards remain at 1% in perpetuity. The smart contract
will create the new tokens at the end of every month. For every new batch of
tokens, 75% will be used to reward contributors to the platform, while 25% will be
used to fund expenses to maintain and expand the network.
Keep updated. More news to come. Just today Mosaic CEO Garrick Hileman was interviewed on CNBC.
https://www.c[Suspicious link removed]m/video/2018/04/10/this-platform-wants-to-provide-data-on-cryptocurrencies.html?__source=sharebar%7Ctwitter&par=sharebar
As the term implies, public data can be accessed by the public, while no public data are called premium data that is only accessible by platform subscribers.
what if i want to join in the platform how many MZX i need in order to join in the platform?
Mosaic is still in presale event.
These information you require will be disseminated soon.
What is mosaic Concept?Is this essentially decentralized
price chart,and news for cryptocurrencies.?
Mosaic - Piecing together the truth!
Mosaic is tackling two of the most pressing problems
plaguing the cryptoasset space today: (1) unreliable and
insufficient data and research; and (2) an overall painful
user experience for market participants.
Mosaic's goal is to solve these problems by providing a database platform
and decentralized market intelligence network with an
intuitive user interface. By solving these two problems
we believe Mosaic will become the foremost cryptoasset
app—the gateway to the crypto world—where people
get their data and research, discuss ideas with other
members of the community, and manage their
portfolios.
Mosaic CEO Dr. Garrick Hileman was recently interviewed on CNB and here he introduced Mosaic idea.
Please do watch.
https://www.cnbc.com/video/2018/04/10/this-platform-wants-to-provide-data-on-cryptocurrencies.html?__source=sharebar%7Ctwitter&par=sharebar
What is mosaic Concept?Is this essentially decentralized
price chart,and news for cryptocurrencies.?
It isn't too late to make your fortune in cryptocurrency. Join this one of the most promising token in 2018. It is powered by Ethereum.
#Mosaic
good luck team
#Mosaic
good luck team
What is the mechanism for assessing the quality of information provided on the Mosaic platform? Who and how does it make its ratings relevant to reviews and conclusions? How many such experts? Is there a possibility of corruption when evaluating content?
The quality of information is assessed by Mosaic's users.
Users can rate research, upvote or downvote etc.
They ultimately decide what content is deemed as good and what content is deemed as bad.
Mosaic Network is decentralized, there is no “admin”, and since there is no admin, in an immutable, decentralized blockchain-based system
like Mosaic, an individual cannot delete or censor particular transactions on the network.
When it comes to evaluating content Mosaic system is designed to take care of
misinformation and spam automatically through mandatory staking contracts.
The underlying mechanics are simple: every time a user posts content on Mosaic or
rates the content of others, they place a slashable stake in MZX into escrow
through a smart contract, with size of the stake dependent on the type of
interaction as well as the accuracy and popularity of past posts. The Mosaic smart
contract holds these tokens in reserve for a given amount of time. At the end of
this period, if a post is heavily downvoted, the staking mechanism automatically
flags that post and removes it from users’ feeds, with the stake sent to a pool
reserved for future contributor rewards. MZX stakes attached to unflagged content
are automatically returned to their original owner and those posts remain
unchanged on the feeds.
We expect this staking mechanism, in conjunction with the requirement for users
to submit their real identities when joining the network, to promote content
excellence while simultaneously penalizing spam, misinformation, or low-quality
comments.
In plain:
That means if I see fake or missleading content and I downvote to make it even more clear my placed slashable stake in MZX to contribute that downvote will be lost for me??
Do I get that right?
Jump to: