Topic: ♦♦♦♦♦♦[ANN]♦♦MTR♦♦MasterTraderCoin♦♦10.4m♦♦TOSHIDESK LLC♦♦ETNA Partnership♦♦♦♦♦♦ - page 91. (Read 229808 times)

Hm I don't like moving entire amount lower. Better to sell 100k at 75.

I feel like 400,000 mtr at the price point of 75,000 satoshi is also a good move.

I still think 100k @ 75k is the way to go, or 400k @75k.

So whats the plan for a no sale on the ICO? Maybe the price was set to high? We can maybe go with the price and supply of the 2nd place winning vote? Dev, your thoughts?

I wonder if there is a way we can file a "community complaint" to have Barabass banned from this forum. Perhaps collect signatures. He is Obnoxious and NEVER has anything constructive to say.

Vegas

A: you're a loser with nothing better to do...

Q: ...what the heck am I doing answering a  newbie account..

I have updated the bootstrap.dat file up to block 113395 which works on both Linux and Windows versions of the wallet. I have also recompiled the Pi binary with UPNP enabled which improves the number of connections.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11261172

barabbas, it seems that you are carrying on with your attempts to sabotage this project that shows promise, by spreading, fud, baseless accusations which if unproven are lies. This is crypto and there is always risk and by the mere fact of participating in crypto one knows the risk one is taking. The devs for this project have delivered much more so far than most other projects which reduces the risk. Lets look at this based on the facts at hand:

Your argument seems to be around the 400k coins at 120k sats to raise ~500BTC. You keep referring to the stupid (moronic) action from the dev to do this as he will never get it. You also say that the dev is manipulating the price as well as that he is doing this project only to get access to actionable trading information.

I have attached a screenshot right at the bottom which you keep overlooking which is very clearly posted on the OP, indicating that the number of coins and price was a community decision and not that of the dev. Based on the poll, the community voted for 400k @ 120k sats. Personally I voted for 100k @ 75k as that is more realistic imo. However, as shown by the poll outcome the option of 400k @ 120k sats won by far. I accept the outcome and therefore support the community in this regard. As a matter of principle I would be upset if the dev gets a mandate from the community and then do something different. This evidence clearly renders any of your claims, accusations and references to the number of coins and price thereof, the devs involvement in the choice and anything else related to it as baseless and unsubstantiated. Just the mere fact that you base your whole argument on the number of coins and price without reference to the poll and the mandate by the community makes your whole case fall flat. Unless you can prove that the dev acted on his own with the placement with its current specs your argument does not hold water.

The dev mentioned that he bought coins on the market. He did not say that he is manipulating the price. It can also be one of the other 30 voters that are buying selling coins that would like to see the placement succeed or even just a price increase based on normal trading. Unless you can provide confidential trading records from Bittrex that indicates ALL trades at the current levels are from the devs account, your accusations are just speculation.

I expect you to provide evidence that the poll did not happen, the confidential trading records as well as evidence that the dev is doing this only to get access to actionable trading information because without it, your accusations are baseless, lies, fud and typical of that of a troll that is trying to wreck a project that shows promise and the way you state your case just plan rude and inappropriate. You are so confident with your accusations that you keep returning and posting them again and again which seems to indicate that you have the evidence at hand. You have already caused damage in that you probably scared away investors for the current placement. I will be reporting my own post to the moderators and that I have requested this evidence from you. If you can provide the evidence then I will apologise and follow your warnings. If you cannot provide the evidence, I would request the moderators to take action against you as a fudder, lier, troll and saboteur if they agree with me. If you cannot provide evidence to support your claim them stay away from this thread.

I am so far satisfied with the way that the dev team has handled things with MTR and ToshiDesk and it seems much more professional and refreshing than most other offerings in the alt-coin market.

Screenshot from OP for your reference and convenience:

Riddle me this Batman that I'm a bit confused here and on the verge of a hysterics attack: How is it possible that this idiot would hope to sell a single unit of this crap at 120k sat when there's a grand total of 2.482BTC on the bid, ALL of it ranging from a top of 60k (HALF the pretended price) to a bottom of 10 satoshis? Ain't life just a hoot? Wow...

Now, watch for a magic "investor" appearing with a handful of BTC paying those 120k on pre-order... in case the offer sells off...

Now, when people REALLY want to be scammed, shouldn't they just be?

You make quite a point Riddler, quite a point...