Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][MZC][SHA-256] MAZACOIN *First Sovereign Currency* ANDROID WALLET AVAIL.!! - page 30. (Read 278416 times)

legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info

I still think mergemining will attract solid pools (as opposed to profitswitching multipools) and provide a much needed baseline hashrate. It will take some time to attract those pools. We will open a pool for maza when new your new code is available (and tested) - we'd prefer to see it mergemined, but we will put our support behind maza now that development has recommenced. (and, yes, I do mean mergemined with bitcoin in particular, but I'd be open to some other parent chains, or sibling chains)


Is merge mining mazacoin even working?
To this day I haven't seen any realworld example of a pool merge-mining mazacoin, so I am not even sure if this was just another promise without real development?
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
While I'm not 100% in favor of changing the block reward, it's certainly not the worst idea running Wink If this has the support of payu, and the consensus of the community, then....fork away.

I'm not real big on the idea of dropping the block time to 1 minute. What's the advantage to be gained here? The 1 minute and and fast blockchains are very taxing on my network. In particular, the 1 minute time on Zetacoin is enough that I put that down as quickly as I put it in my pool rotation.

In general I'd like to see activity that attracts consumers. Increase usage will certainly attract traders and more importantly - miners. . I really don't think that the structure of the blockchain is the difficulty. Low hashrate presents exceptional opportunistic mining for multipools and the more selfish miners I believe I see on the maza chain. 

What I would think would get maza more attention (and increase price accordingly, and then typically miners follow) has nothing to do with the blockchain.

Real-world casino gaming machines that accept maza. There's casinos all over where I live, with a local tribe opening a new one now. I'd like to be able to go talk to them and present Mazacoin in such a way that they could easily see
 - how it works
 - how it secures their income
 - how easily they can adopt
 - how they can profit buying maza early for later jackpots and winnings (profit potential)
 - how maza can increase their margins through decrease handing costs, and increased impulse sales

Developers, miners, and traders are consumers largely of the tech of a coin/blockchain - they're not so much the "users" of it. Focusing on how users of maza can better achieve their goals will be the most effective way to secure the blockchain itself. More users, more attention, more price, and then the key to security follows: hashrate.

I still think mergemining will attract solid pools (as opposed to profitswitching multipools) and provide a much needed baseline hashrate. It will take some time to attract those pools. We will open a pool for maza when new your new code is available (and tested) - we'd prefer to see it mergemined, but we will put our support behind maza now that development has recommenced. (and, yes, I do mean mergemined with bitcoin in particular, but I'd be open to some other parent chains, or sibling chains)

While I continue to focus on casino adoption, I also note that Payu mentioned that some food vendors would be accepting maza this summer. It's powow season. though someone derided this as small and insignificant, I think it's a key to real usage. One of the best ways to spread a message is through food. "Put your money where your mouth is" I guess Wink Indian communities are pretty small - it doesn't take much to get the message to the people of influence in those communities. I'll certainly find myself in some of these situations this summer. I'd like to have the confidence to spread the message to those vendors. (mmmm fry bread!) Wink

anyhow. just my 2maza worth for today. Thanks for the help owlhooter, definitely we need someone to put forth the real effort you are. It would make me very happy to see the maza that we've promised to give back to the community it's intended to benefit worthwhile to give, and that is again starting to look like a possibility.






hero member
Activity: 611
Merit: 500
Anglo Saxon Crypto Enthusiast
I think this coin is starting to mature nicely  Grin
full member
Activity: 183
Merit: 100
Definitely have a lot of work to do.  First on the agenda is to get a fork in to lower the block reward some and fix up the diff calculations, so the blocks will flow smoother.

At this point I am looking at implementing DGW3 for the diff calculations and lowering the block reward to 1000 MZC per block.  I was also considering changing the block spacing to 1 minute instead of the current 2 minutes, if I do that we will go 500 MZC per block every 1 minute to achieve the same reward reduction.

Please let me know if you have any opinions on any of these plans and any suggestions you would like to lend.

I am also working on securing the remaining 16 Million MZC that was in the Tribal Trust that was sent to me.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
Btw, Asiacoin was also up 100% today.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
Honestly after the Spain coin pump, i think that Mazacoin will be pumped soon on Mintpal, i can be wrong, but .... if they start to pump something then they continue, they did Pesota coin too.
hero member
Activity: 2436
Merit: 503
Cryptocasino.com
sr. member
Activity: 310
Merit: 250
While I never did see eye to eye with AP, he did get the coin off the ground and I do respect him but the project needs to rebuild. They gotta structure the team, provide a road map and get a lot of shit together. Will def be a tough climb and they need someone to step in and work with Payu and watch the devs to get the shit squared away and come up with some vision.
full member
Activity: 139
Merit: 100
As someone who rode out the MZC rise and collapse, and have since moved on - I just wanted to come back to say congratulations to MZC for the wonderful news that AP has finally left the team. I haven't been keeping up on the latest but I hope Payu gets some new blood in there, and I still have some MZC sitting on a USB waiting for my next road trip through the Black Hills.

March on Payu!

Good news indeed, but waaaay too late!

Anyway best wishes for MZC.
full member
Activity: 177
Merit: 100
START NOW Smiley --> maza.ssdpool.com
Target for  your miners at: stratum+tcp://miners1.ssdpool.com:3336
•1% Pool Fee
•PROP payout system
•DDoS Protected
•Clustered Servers+ VARDIFF
•24/7 Monitoring on Stratum
•SSD for all servers for best performance
sr. member
Activity: 310
Merit: 250
So there was no kgw (with fix) implementation or digishield  to try and deter mining pools from switching on off for this coin?

If not probably this is the first thing that should be done before talking about reviving the coin.

Yes, a Kimoto Gravity Well implementation will be included in the fork.

Why KGW? It is one of the slowest diff calcs out there and kills resources on Android.

What the hell does KGW which is a difficulty algorithm to do with Android?

This probably was the weirdest thing I saw since the newbie invasion


-Clients run diff calcs to accept blocks.
-Diff calcs that run averages are continually doing math to accept blocks with the correct diff.
-MZC has always wanted to be mostly android based due to their basis as defined out previously which is why the client never was updated and Android was paying bounties
-Coins that have Andoid/Java clients using KGW complain that the floating point used by the diff causes a lot of issues on their devices such as battery drain due to its higher processing need with problems in floating point math in Java


DGW used fixed point math which ran much better in java thus reducing the complaints by Android users for battery drain.


Bigger picture here that needs to be considered and not look at things like this in a narrow view but the larger goal of a project.

Make sense? There was a thread on here a while back when the diff calcs were coming out that also had some info on Android users having issues.
full member
Activity: 183
Merit: 100
If you are trying to revamp the coin for the community, wouldn't the collective knowledge of people on here be better than the isolated views of a few in a Skype chat? What happened to IRC?

I have been watching input from all areas and don't rely solely on the skype group.  Any info I have to give out that is solid will be spread in all areas.  I am also always in the IRC channel even if I'm away and will answer questions posted there when I see them if the user that asked is still there.  I want this coin to succeed for the Lakota and any other tribes that may want to adopt Maza.  We do have a fork planned and will change the diff algo so that we can try to get more consistent block times since real time usability is key,  we will also adjust the block reward some at this time.  I still don't like a drastic change all the way to 500 so am willing to hear all comments and concerns.
full member
Activity: 183
Merit: 100
Please test your changes in a test net. Don't copy and paste some class files and compile to release. Adding and messing with diff recalcs can really screwup a block chain.

Man what a buzz kill.  This takes all the fun and excitement out of it.  lol
hero member
Activity: 577
Merit: 500
Shine Like The Sun
Boxxa - could u join the devs again, so there would be more helping hands to get the coin back on track. I can so see a bright future for mzc, if only the technical would be fine tuned.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 501
in defi we trust
So there was no kgw (with fix) implementation or digishield  to try and deter mining pools from switching on off for this coin?

If not probably this is the first thing that should be done before talking about reviving the coin.

Yes, a Kimoto Gravity Well implementation will be included in the fork.

Why KGW? It is one of the slowest diff calcs out there and kills resources on Android.

What the hell does KGW which is a difficulty algorithm to do with Android?

This probably was the weirdest thing I saw since the newbie invasion
sr. member
Activity: 310
Merit: 250
If you are trying to revamp the coin for the community, wouldn't the collective knowledge of people on here be better than the isolated views of a few in a Skype chat? What happened to IRC?

DGW is a lot better IMO. Read up on Java fixed vs floating point. It is twice as fast and helps the android dev. Please test your changes in a test net. Don't copy and paste some class files and compile to release. Adding and messing with diff recalcs can really screwup a block chain.
full member
Activity: 183
Merit: 100
So there was no kgw (with fix) implementation or digishield  to try and deter mining pools from switching on off for this coin?

If not probably this is the first thing that should be done before talking about reviving the coin.

Yes, a Kimoto Gravity Well implementation will be included in the fork.

Why KGW? It is one of the slowest diff calcs out there and kills resources on Android.

I don't think I am sold on KGW, was thinking of going with DGW3, but haven't looked to see how any android wallets with that have been working out.  Anyone like to chime in that might have experience on that front?
hero member
Activity: 2436
Merit: 503
Cryptocasino.com
So there was no kgw (with fix) implementation or digishield  to try and deter mining pools from switching on off for this coin?

If not probably this is the first thing that should be done before talking about reviving the coin.

Yes, a Kimoto Gravity Well implementation will be included in the fork.

Why KGW? It is one of the slowest diff calcs out there and kills resources on Android.

They dont respond in these forums anymore, you have to join their esoteric skype cult to be in the know.

Owl is on there quite often if you want you can join skype group also or you can contact people throught facebook ..any problem?
full member
Activity: 134
Merit: 100
So there was no kgw (with fix) implementation or digishield  to try and deter mining pools from switching on off for this coin?

If not probably this is the first thing that should be done before talking about reviving the coin.

Yes, a Kimoto Gravity Well implementation will be included in the fork.

Why KGW? It is one of the slowest diff calcs out there and kills resources on Android.

They dont respond in these forums anymore, you have to join their esoteric skype cult to be in the know.
sr. member
Activity: 310
Merit: 250
So there was no kgw (with fix) implementation or digishield  to try and deter mining pools from switching on off for this coin?

If not probably this is the first thing that should be done before talking about reviving the coin.

Yes, a Kimoto Gravity Well implementation will be included in the fork.

Why KGW? It is one of the slowest diff calcs out there and kills resources on Android.
Pages:
Jump to: