ok.... so it seems it is as I thought- the ''Skype'' forking group are not actually working with Payu then... or at least the hardfork is not agreed with - this is some kinda takeover .... has one of these ever worked? from what I can see the group has also been blagging - making promises they are in no position to make happen... AP seems to really not give a fuck- I can see why people are against him- but I had a feeling that unless Payu is really on board with a fork - it will not happen.. Payu is the connection to the Lakota..
forking hell!
there are several millions Mazacoins with a decision to make and soon...
because this is now taking the piss- out of the concept, the goal, the Lakota, the investors...well just about everyone..
Actions- with clarity, honour, openness, a goal, and with a sense of urgency are what is needed....
and it is needed now.
Payu- take control of this!!!!
The Skype group had been talking to Payu and I think he's been torn. He has never decided 100% to fork the coin away from AP, and I think AP and I have come up with some plans to help make some changes to the coin without changing the overall economics of the coin, it will just extend coin creation out over extra years, changing the total coin count and drastically changing the block reward would only scream scam and the dev team would lose any trust it has left that it can maintain consistency in the coin design.
I do like the idea of doing a percentage of each block to the tribal trust, but have to make sure we do it in a way that we can keep trust of the miners and investors in the coin, we also still have to have discussions about this topic.
Fair do's.... some consistency would be good.... although if the coin design is flawed... then there would be nothing wrong with fixing it... what is the point in having a technology that has the ability to adapt if the ability is not used when
neededI think it is fair to say that thus far the coin has not done what was expected , for various reasons... this must be the case, unless the coin was designed to crash as it has done? if AP/Payu/yourself have a sound logic and plan that you can explain, in words and figures to everyone, that bares out the original design laid out in the white paper, and you can show with numbers and projections and logic that there is a mathematical base that this can grow on... then thats great.. please share? If not and it can be accepted that the coin could be improved... then maybe that would be the right choice? A fork does not necessarily have to equal scam. As I said there is little point in having a coin that has the function to be changed, to adapt, to fix itself, to fork... if it is not used IF and WHEN it becomes needed.
Eitherway , fork or no fork, the added communication is something.. though it would help if the added communication were to have some coherence ..
right now it seems like different groups pulling in different directions... I really hope that the communication continues, though it would be nice to have it mirrored in the offical twitter page/website. The sad thing is that open communication, from the get go , with investors and with this forum could have saved so much hassle.
We are all waiting to hear about official developments from the tribe in their stance to this coin.. that along with consistent action and communication along with a hard look at if the coin desgin is fit for intended purpose - are what is needed with this coin... also to leverage the community ... those that have not already had enough and sold up and quit. Really - the great logo that was desgined , should we not revisit this now and get it used? for just one example of using the community as a resource? (devs,designers,PR people, tech support etc)
As for official news regarding the tribe adopting the coin- is this not a horse before the cart situation ? what is the incentive to adopt a crypto that is so unstable and worth so very little? however the official stamp would make a HUGE difference to this coin... also why are people not kept more informed about these developments? should there not be a consistent push to make this happen? and if there is then why do we not know about it? it is no good to just dangle a carrot... even the donkey gets wise in the end.
Does the current dev team have the skill set? the community, the resources , the support, the drive and the vision to execute this project? good intentions are not enough.. and frankly the communication and maybe the execution of the project thus far has bordered on total disrespect for the entire project and the community and the Lakota... and the KEY thing that could have alleviated most of this, would have been keeping people in the loop, proper communication about the challenges and problems the coin faces.
This coin has incredible potential and a true cause... like I said Payu & co please do continue to engage the community... be open, be realistic,make a hard plan with set goals and a endgame, take actions, make them count... leverage the community, we can help , keep us in the loop.