Topic: [ANN][NIM] - Nimiq - The Browser Based Blockchain - page 52. (Read 131236 times)

There's no point in arguing with Marvin as long as he uses his fake account "normana".

Marvin, if you want us to take you serious, man-up and stop hiding behind sock puppet accounts.

Check out the original ICO terms at https://nimiq.com/terms/ what they are supposed to do and how much funds they shall take for each of that parts. Many of the items were already done, others are still pending. Then compare with how many funds are left to find out if the funds are enough to tackle the other points.
The only thing you always bring it down to is the price. Low price or loss in token value is not the definition of scam.

Just recently, the team announced partnership with an upcoming peer-to-peer exchange (Agora Trade) as well as a financial industry partner to bring the first usable peer-to-peer exchange with fiat support through atomic swaps. Obviously we can't verify if they are still on track to do this in 2019, but it is certainly possible they are. Where did you get the information this is not going to happen in 2019?

Warning: yuluxugi32132, nimiqshitcoin, coinfanatic, andrewjaxx, john.btc, sasha.new, Scamiq, robin.nimiq are sockpuppet accounts, proven liars and FUDers. All of them were only created this year and only for the purpose of spamming this thread (check their profile). They claim substantial losses due to their Nimiq investments, yet fail to provide any proof that they actually invested. Rumors say that they come from another crypto project, assuming they are a direct competitor to Nimiq. Don't expect anything mentioned by them to be true. If you want real insights, check out Nimiq community channels (Discord, Telegram).

Marvin, nobody believes anything you say as long as you're hiding behind fake accounts.

Man-up and accept the truth. We all know "normana" is a sock puppet of Marvin Wissfeld.

Investors can't trust Nimiq as long as it's represented by fake accounts.

This guy, normana (sockpuppet account of Marvis Wisshithole) is a pathetic liar. He is believing his own lies. Oh my fucking god. Most probably this medical disorder comes from smoking too much cannabis in Costa Rica.

They were supposed to promote the coin, get it on good exchanges and grow the community, instead they scammed us and failed to do all of these things. Without users or developers this coin falls in price towards zero and miners will stop mining, making the blockchain stop. In other words they didn't deliver what they were supposed to, a sustainable blockchain.

Also they promised us a fiat p2p exchange for 2019 in the original roadmap, but they just dropped it. And then they are constantly reengineering stuff without first ensuring the coin grows in value through promotion. They could take a leaf from litecoin and what they're doing to promote the coin.

There is no conflict between what I said and what GitHub says. GitHub contributions are communication and commits. I never said otherwise. You failed to proof that bitcoin devs have significantly more commits. This concludes that the significantly higher number of contributions consist mainly of communication. Learn to apply basic logic.

Thanks for confirming again where this FUD is coming from.

In my opinion there are four possible situations an ICO project might be in:
(1) The project failed. They are unable to produce what they intend to due to lack of funding. All the team can do is publicly announce and excuse for their failure.
(2) The project failed. The team did not produce anything or only very few of what was announced during the ICO and stopped further development.
(3) The project is in progress. The team is producing what is intended to be produced by the ICO investors.
(4) The project is succesful. The team produced all the things the ICO investors wanted them to produce. There is no reason for refunds as the investors got what they paid for.

It's now up to you to decide which of the four best describes the current situation.
(1) is not the case given the financial insights the team provided in their latest blog post
(2) is invalid given they are still actively developing and also developed a fully functional blockchain completely from scratch and launched a mainnet, which is kind of the main thing they proposed to do with the ICO funds.
So only (3) and (4) are possible options. Decide which one you prefer.

Warning: yuluxugi32132, nimiqshitcoin, coinfanatic, andrewjaxx, john.btc, sasha.new, Scamiq, robin.nimiq are sockpuppet accounts, proven liars and FUDers. All of them were only created this year and only for the purpose of spamming this thread (check their profile). They claim substantial losses due to their Nimiq investments, yet fail to provide any proof that they actually invested. Rumors say that they come from another crypto project, assuming they are a direct competitor to Nimiq. Don't expect anything mentioned by them to be true. If you want real insights, check out Nimiq community channels (Discord, Telegram).

I'm not sure if 284 code contributions for $200000/yr seems more like a scam than just like a failed project.

posted already. someone posted scam report about nimiq before there. here link is https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49090820 diggers should take cautious of this scam

Ok fine it's a failed project. Now can we please have some accountability from the team!!!!!!

Anybody who truly believes this was a scam should consider opening an accusation against it here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0

Just post your best evidence and why you think it's a scam. Others will probably jump in to help you prove (or disprove) your suspicions.

I read about 10 pages of the thread from various points and it seems more just like a failed project then a scam. Nevertheless, I am interested in the outcome, thus I'll be following this thread.

project dead already

why no official answers !!!

Marvin is a big reason this project is failing, get rid of him ASAP

Yet another lie of Marvin (aka normana) debunked:
Issues and pull requests will appear on your contribution graph [and] Commits will appear on your contributions graph.

Obviously, Marvin lied when he claimed "communication" is counted as contributions. Bitcoin developers don't "communicate" more, they simply work 10x more than the nimiq scammers.

yes yes, less drugs more work! project is already too dead. bankruptcy is near in a couple of months shutting down the entire network

There are even open source projects that have more work committed. One example is the nimiq's biggest competitor, namely WebDollar. According to its github repository, WEBD devs had over  3,000+ commits in a year with no funding or ICO shit. I guess nimiq devs need pocket money to buy cannabis

Marvin, I simplified this statistic to your advantage and it still shows clearly that Nimiq devs are working less than one day a week for $200000/yr.

You can keep on trying to argue that for some magical reason all bitcoin developers are blowing up their contribution statistics but that doesn't make you look any less pathethic, Marvin.

I'd suggest you guys should simply take less drugs!

Contributions on GitHub include comments, issues, code reviews.... Nimiq Team does make little use of these features on GitHub, instead they use other communication channels like Discord and Telegram. It thus makes even less sense to compare the contributions count instead of the commit count. Again, you seem to lack understanding of what you are talking about.

And you just had to change your number from 10% to 20% because you just had to find out your number is invalid even when doing completely nonsense comparisons....

Warning: yuluxugi32132, nimiqshitcoin, coinfanatic, andrewjaxx, john.btc, sasha.new, Scamiq, robin.nimiq are sockpuppet accounts, proven liars and FUDers. All of them were only created this year and only for the purpose of spamming this thread (check their profile). They claim substantial losses due to their Nimiq investments, yet fail to provide any proof that they actually invested. Rumors say that they come from another crypto project, assuming they are a direct competitor to Nimiq. Don't expect anything mentioned by them to be true. If you want real insights, check out Nimiq community channels (Discord, Telegram).

LOOOOL! Marvin, YOU call yourself "blockchain core developer" but all you do is justifying the nimiq scam using fake accounts.


Let's get the numbers straight to prove you're lying again:

Top Bitcoin developers' number of contributions in the last year:
Wladimir J. van der Laan: 1413 contributions
Pieter Wuille:                    938 contributions
Matt Corallo:                   1440 contributions

(Almost all of their contributions are to bitcoin projects)



Team Scamiq in comparison:
Marvin Wissfeld:                 284 contributions
Philip von Styp-Rekowsky:  304 contributions
Pascal Berrang:                  793 contributions

(This is even counting your work on your instant messenger which obviously isn't what investors are paying you for)


Real blockchain developers work at least 5x more than Nimiq's "blockchain developers"

these ppl can't get it. Wladimir is working for free, while marvin is making 200,000 USD a year + benefits for shitty work.