Topic: [ANN][NIM] - Nimiq - The Browser Based Blockchain - page 53. (Read 131236 times)

Sorry, looks like you have no clue what you are talking about. This talking about commits makes no sense, but still I am pretty sure your 10% number does not stand any thoughtful analysis.

bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org and bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org are static websites. No development involved, it's more like marketing and communication. In fact it even includes the blog. Just because Nimiq don't have their website and blog in a GitHub repository, doesn't mean it's not something they put work into. Also the communication hardly says anything about a "blockchain core developer", because developers are there to develop not to communicate.

I am happy to include Wladimirs commits to the other development repositories you mentioned as long as we also include Nimiq team commits outside the core:
- bitcoin/bitcoin: Wladimir +65
- nimiq-network/core: Philipp +175, Pascal +151, Marvin +65
- nimiq/core-rs: Pascal +149, Philipp +61, Marvin +31
- ElementsProject/lightning: Wladimir +4
- vidbina/bitcoin.env: Wladimir +1
- laanwj/rust-bitcoin-rpc: Wladimir +0 (not sure why you brought this up at all)
- laanwj/rust-clightning-rpc: Wladimir +60
- nimiq/accounts: Pascal +10, Marvin +3
- nimiq/keyguard-next: Philipp +11, Pascal +4, Marvin +3
- nimiq/vue-components: Marvin +8
TOTAL: Pascal 314, Philipp 247, Wladimir 130, Marvin 110

Summarized: Wladimir has about 20% more commits than Marvin, but doesn't beat Pascal and Philipp. So maybe the Team should consider firing Marvin....
But still your 10% number is totally off, it's more like 80%....

Even if we add Wladimirs commits to the websites, that only is an additional of 6 commits on bitcoincore.org and 8 commits on bitcoin.org. Adding those will change the number to maybe 75%, still far away from 10%....
And again I managed to prove your point invalid. Maybe stop lying or trying to make points with stuff you don't even understand....

Warning: yuluxugi32132, nimiqshitcoin, coinfanatic, andrewjaxx, john.btc, sasha.new, Scamiq, robin.nimiq are sockpuppet accounts, proven liars and FUDers. All of them were only created this year and only for the purpose of spamming this thread (check their profile). They claim substantial losses due to their Nimiq investments, yet fail to provide any proof that they actually invested. Rumors say that they come from another crypto project, assuming they are a direct competitor to Nimiq. Don't expect anything mentioned by them to be true. If you want real insights, check out Nimiq community channels (Discord, Telegram).

Bonus: Another person arguing with commit counts.

Scamiq's project management is really bad. For most, it looks they are no longer interested into the project avoiding to tell us that the project is a failure and doomed to bankruptcy.

sure sure, caravan leaking $250,000 a month good luck to your caravan

*** The dogs bark, but the caravan goes on ***

What a beautiful feature! Just click "Ignore" at the bottom left of any idiot's name that you want to skip and they magically disappear like roaches when the light is turned ON.

No more garbage for me and this is what my new page looks like without all the obnoxious noise!

https://imgur.com/l4pwh28

If you're looking for a more serious discussion about the project, join the official discord or telegram from nimiq.com.

2 days a month $20,000 usd. good good salary. where can I apply for a job ? any link ?

C'mon that's so pathetic. WE ALL KNOW YOU ARE MARVIN!




JUST ANOTHER ATTEMPT TO TRICK INVESTORS!

Of course I count all of Wladimir's contributions to bitcoin which include repositories like ElementsProject/lightning, vidbina/bitcoin.env, bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org,
bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org, laanwj/rust-bitcoin-rpc, laanwj/rust-clightning-rpc... because all of them are relevant contributions.



That's so pathetic. You just proved that you need fake statistics to justify your excessive salaries. Your workload is only 10% of a real blockchain developer.
Team Nimiq works only for about 2 days a month

"Normana" is a fake account of a team member. He's trying to cover up the scam.



The Telegram channel is worse because it is highly censored.

new proof of burst digging attacks

https://i.imgur.com/RZ9PpOY.png

Yeah they are filthy fucking communists

not only dead, but they ban you if you say anything. yesterday i asked about burst mining => instant ban

Lolz don't know why you say that when official telegram and discord is dead dead dead!!!!!

Nothing you say will save this coin. Nothing!!!!!

Nope. Just check the official telegram channel.

Yes it is an ICO scam. Now they are just laundering the ICO money to look legit for authorities. All ICO investors including me lost 99.999% of their investment, while they buy a 1.1 million dollar villa in Costa Rica, eat sushi and surf the oceans.

So NIMIQ is just another scam ?

There are no good answers to be had, only lame excuses. Team Scamiq is lame lame lame!!!

I still wait official answers from the scamiq team. None were given to my questions. Only a "suck" puppet account answered my questions.

Lazy Marvin should spend more time coding on Nimiq instead of coming to write on here everyday. We didn't pay him to goof off on here!!!

yes yes, very true statements. project dead, devs don't work on project but cash in $200,000 per year... maybe even more. they burned over 6 million dollars from 12,9 million. wasting money and not doing anything useful. project is a failure ico.


network attacked by burst mining. digging not profitable unless you do burst mining.

You are intentionally referring to outdated information. In the AmA a month ago, they announced about $200k/month. They confirmed this number in a recent blog post: around $200k-$210k/month

Seems you are right this time and I miscounted the team members, although 19 vs 20 is not a huge difference anyway. Also I count a total of 10 developers on their team page, not 4. So you are saying that the other team members get about nothing? Do you have any proof for that? According to the recent blog post, compensation for team members ranges from $20 to $90 per hour. This range narrows to $50-$90 for the development team. Of course we don't know what exactly Marvin gets, but it seems to be between $50/hour and $90/hour. The team repeatedly said they don't want to publish per-person salaries, so we need to stick with what we got, but saying that Marvin gets more than $90/hour is definitely a lie from your side if any of the numbers provided by the team is true. We can also try to ask Marvin if he is on the upper or lower end of the $50 to $90 spectrum, if that is so important for you, he is always very open for chats on Discord. I can send him a message if you want, or you do it yourself?


Your reference to Wladimir makes no sense, as you don't only count his commits as a bitcoin core dev, but also all kind of other commits.

So, for the sake of the argument, let's restrict his commits only to bitcoin core, by looking at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/graphs/contributors?from=2018-02-10&to=2019-02-09&type=c You can see that Wladimir actually had 65 commits to bitcoin core within the last year, Marco had the most with 222 commits.
Now doing the same for Nimiq. They have two core implementations (in JS and Rust) in separate repositories, see the commit counts at https://github.com/nimiq-network/core/graphs/contributors?from=2018-02-10&to=2019-02-09&type=c and https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs/graphs/contributors?from=2018-02-10&to=2019-02-09&type=c
You can see that Marvin had 85+31=116 commits to the core repos, Philipp was doing 175+58=233 commits, Pascal 151+149=300 commits. So all of them had more core commits then Wladimir and both Philipp and Pascal had more than Marco.

However, I won't say that the team or any of its developers did more or less than any bitcoin dev. This is because it is hard to rate the value of commits and the amount of work required to produce them. The fact that you tried to do this shows how few you understand about software development in general....

Warning: yuluxugi32132, nimiqshitcoin, coinfanatic, andrewjaxx, john.btc, sasha.new, Scamiq, robin.nimiq are sockpuppet accounts, proven liars and FUDers. All of them were only created this year and only for the purpose of spamming this thread (check their profile). They claim substantial losses due to their Nimiq investments, yet fail to provide any proof that they actually invested. Rumors say that they come from another crypto project, assuming they are a direct competitor to Nimiq. Don't expect anything mentioned by them to be true. If you want real insights, check out Nimiq community channels (Discord, Telegram).

It is easy to debunk Marvin's lies:

Lie No1:
Official transparency report says: "The monthly burn rate excluding one-time, irregular travel and short-term contract expenses was $245000." https://medium.com/nimiq-network/transparency-report-74d4d89933fe

Lie No2:
Their website shows only 19 team members: https://nimiq.com/team. Most of them aren't "blockchain devs": 2 video guys, 1 chef, 1 girl for "Communication" and so on...

Lie No3:
There are only 4 "Blockchain Core Developers" on the website. Marvin is counting 20 to make up his story...

Lie No4:
With filter we see in Marvin's Github profile
120 contributions in the last year in "Nimiq Network" https://github.com/mar-v-in?org=nimiq-network&year_list=1
Removing the filter we get another
48 contributions in the last year in "Nimiq" https://github.com/mar-v-in?org=nimiq&year_list=1
This is a very small improvement.

Marvin's workload is only 10% of a real blockchain developer (such as a bitcoin dev):
1,412 contributions in the last year https://github.com/laanwj?org=bitcoin&year_list=1


That's why Marvin is using fake accounts to cover up his excessive salary.