Hi JORKpr
With your lovely hash rate, would you mind telling us what number & type of card you are running. I ran three RX480s today for a while & the hash rate was only about 80-90Khs.
Cheers
Vezpit
Topic: [ANN][NYC] NEW YORK COIN at 2017 MACY'S THANKSGIVING DAY PARADE IN NYC! - page 240. (Read 141517 times)
October 02, 2017, 06:07:31 AM
October 02, 2017, 05:41:21 AM
With all respect for your desire to maintain the network of the NYC coin and at the same time be rewarded - the answer is NO!
"Claymore's" - no. The official Ethereum Miner does not support the Stratum protocol, it supports only the HTTP protocol.
Claymore's Dual Miner is like a multipul. It's just a guarantee that in the end you will pay a fee for electricity.
NYC was originally and completely founded as SCRYPT coin and standard procedures, as well as servers based on the Stratum Protocol.
The positive in this is more than a flaw.
We can suggest moving to cgminer 3.7.2. Strangely enough, this is the most stable and fastest miner.
As for me, I'm currently working on cgminer 3.7.2 (linux) and 4.2.1 under windows 7.
I'm mining on the official mining NYC pool - http://nyc.mypool.club/index.php.
I support the NYC network and earn from 2014 starting from two HD7990.
"Claymore's" - no. The official Ethereum Miner does not support the Stratum protocol, it supports only the HTTP protocol.
Claymore's Dual Miner is like a multipul. It's just a guarantee that in the end you will pay a fee for electricity.
NYC was originally and completely founded as SCRYPT coin and standard procedures, as well as servers based on the Stratum Protocol.
The positive in this is more than a flaw.
We can suggest moving to cgminer 3.7.2. Strangely enough, this is the most stable and fastest miner.
As for me, I'm currently working on cgminer 3.7.2 (linux) and 4.2.1 under windows 7.
I'm mining on the official mining NYC pool - http://nyc.mypool.club/index.php.
I support the NYC network and earn from 2014 starting from two HD7990.
October 02, 2017, 02:24:18 AM
Hi everyone,
I will need your help for the NYC mining.
can we mining with "Claymore's" ?(I know you can use CGMiner, BFGMiner ..) but I mine ETH with Claymore's dual and i will like mining the NYC too :p
Can experts help me please?
Thank you all
I will need your help for the NYC mining.
can we mining with "Claymore's" ?(I know you can use CGMiner, BFGMiner ..) but I mine ETH with Claymore's dual and i will like mining the NYC too :p
Can experts help me please?
Thank you all
Sorry, the algorithm for NYC is Scrypt. Claymore doesn't support the NYC algorithm.
October 02, 2017, 02:18:36 AM
Hi everyone,
I will need your help for the NYC mining.
can we mining with "Claymore's" ?(I know you can use CGMiner, BFGMiner ..) but I mine ETH with Claymore's dual and i will like mining the NYC too :p
Can experts help me please?
Thank you all
I will need your help for the NYC mining.
can we mining with "Claymore's" ?(I know you can use CGMiner, BFGMiner ..) but I mine ETH with Claymore's dual and i will like mining the NYC too :p
Can experts help me please?
Thank you all
October 02, 2017, 02:09:47 AM
This should be included in the NYC collage with the text included. Please include text in image and I'll add it to NYC collage at nycoin.net
If you prefer the other without the message feel free
October 01, 2017, 06:58:33 PM
If more nodes will improve performance, I have 2 empty vps subscriptions that I can provide login access if you can configure nodes for NYC. PM me.
October 01, 2017, 04:45:09 PM
NYC se tornando gigante 
October 01, 2017, 03:37:40 PM
Here is the code in our 1.0.0.1 version... slightly different are the commented lines. This may just give us a warning for users of 1.0.0.1.
I lost the link to the 0.10.4 version. Anyone have the github link?
Question is what is in the 0.10.4 code base that people are using?
I lost the link to the 0.10.4 version. Anyone have the github link?
Question is what is in the 0.10.4 code base that people are using?
Code:
// Check the version of the last 100 blocks to see if we need to upgrade:
if (!fIsInitialDownload)
{
int nUpgraded = 0;
const CBlockIndex* pindex = pindexBest;
for (int i = 0; i < 100 && pindex != NULL; i++)
{
if (pindex->nVersion > CBlock::CURRENT_VERSION)
++nUpgraded;
pindex = pindex->pprev;
}
if (nUpgraded > 0)
printf("SetBestChain: %d of last 100 blocks above version %d\n", nUpgraded, CBlock::CURRENT_VERSION);
// if (nUpgraded > 100/2)
// strMiscWarning is read by GetWarnings(), called by Qt and the JSON-RPC code to warn the user:
// strMiscWarning = _("Warning: this version is obsolete, upgrade required");
}
October 01, 2017, 03:19:16 PM
UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE:
Please revert to original newyorkc code and DO NOT USE updated 2017 code or wallets
2014 GITHUB ORIGINAL CODE
https://www.github.com/nycoin/nycoin
Please revert to original newyorkc code and DO NOT USE updated 2017 code or wallets
2014 GITHUB ORIGINAL CODE
https://www.github.com/nycoin/nycoin
Someone is continuing to mine with the broken 'new' code.
Rewards are going to this address RCwtyDazabX4n5SNjzqTRPncd4oQZ9Z8zJ.
Please revert back to the old code until the new one is ready.
Hi
Thanks for the warning. Currently using wallet v1.0.1.1-unk-beta. Assume this is the old version. Do you know what version is the one causing problems?
The original source, Linked above, is Version 1.0.0.1 and is the recommended version for mining.
The newer wallets, Version 1.1.0 and Version 0.10.4 maybe causing the problem.
I see the following connected to my node. I've also just compiled a version 1.0.0.2 with checkpoints added. You may also see this version in the wild.
Code:
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.1.1/",
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0.1/",
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0.1/",
"subver" : "/NewYorkCoin:1.1.0/",
"subver" : "/NewYorkCoin:1.1.0/",
"subver" : "/NewYorkCoin:1.1.0/",
"subver" : "/NewYorkCoin:1.1.0/",
"subver" : "/Newyorkcoin:0.10.4/",
"subver" : "/Newyorkcoin:0.10.4/",
"subver" : "/Newyorkcoin:0.10.4/",
If you inspect your debug logs, You will find the following warning and the chain is reorganizing regularly.
SetBestChain: 86 of last 100 blocks above version 1
Question: What will happen when the majority of the blocks are above version 1? Will the chain split?
Question: What version is the exchanges running?
Question: What is the status of the new wallet development?
see post: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/debuglog-entry-setbestchain-1-of-last-100-blocks-above-946136
Think We will see a warning first saying something like:
if (pindex->nVersion > CBlock::CURRENT_VERSION)
++nUpgraded;
pindex = pindex->pprev;
}
if (nUpgraded > 0)
LogPrintf("SetBestChain: %d of last 100 blocks above version %d\n", nUpgraded, (int)CBlock::CURRENT_VERSION);
if (nUpgraded > 100/2)
{
// strMiscWarning is read by GetWarnings(), called by Qt and the JSON-RPC code to warn the user:
strMiscWarning = _("Warning: This version is obsolete, upgrade required!");
CAlert::Notify(strMiscWarning, true);
fWarned = true;
October 01, 2017, 03:04:32 PM
UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE:
Please revert to original newyorkc code and DO NOT USE updated 2017 code or wallets
2014 GITHUB ORIGINAL CODE
https://www.github.com/nycoin/nycoin
Please revert to original newyorkc code and DO NOT USE updated 2017 code or wallets
2014 GITHUB ORIGINAL CODE
https://www.github.com/nycoin/nycoin
Someone is continuing to mine with the broken 'new' code.
Rewards are going to this address RCwtyDazabX4n5SNjzqTRPncd4oQZ9Z8zJ.
Please revert back to the old code until the new one is ready.
Hi
Thanks for the warning. Currently using wallet v1.0.1.1-unk-beta. Assume this is the old version. Do you know what version is the one causing problems?
The original source, Linked above, is Version 1.0.0.1 and is the recommended version for mining.
The newer wallets, Version 1.1.0 and Version 0.10.4 maybe causing the problem.
I see the following connected to my node. I've also just compiled a version 1.0.0.2 with checkpoints added. You may also see this version in the wild.
Code:
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.1.1/",
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0.1/",
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.0.0.1/",
"subver" : "/NewYorkCoin:1.1.0/",
"subver" : "/NewYorkCoin:1.1.0/",
"subver" : "/NewYorkCoin:1.1.0/",
"subver" : "/NewYorkCoin:1.1.0/",
"subver" : "/Newyorkcoin:0.10.4/",
"subver" : "/Newyorkcoin:0.10.4/",
"subver" : "/Newyorkcoin:0.10.4/",
If you inspect your debug logs, You will find the following warning and the chain is reorganizing regularly.
SetBestChain: 86 of last 100 blocks above version 1
Question: What will happen when the majority of the blocks are above version 1? Will the chain split?
Question: What version is the exchanges running?
Question: What is the status of the new wallet development?
October 01, 2017, 02:55:42 PM
It is finally October ~
there will be huge things happening in NYC
there will be huge things happening in NYC
Yes the October has come! Agreed. The question should be how to increase the value. We have been saying October! October!! October!!! Talking about advertising it in the US and so on but we have not talk about how to raise the value from over 10 times less than 1sat to even 1sat.
One thing I know is, if we like let us advertise it allover the world, without more exchanges this coin will not make any reasonable increase in price at CoinGather.
One way to raise price is to 'burn' coins. With a total of 100B this would be an enormous task, but doable if say a levy was put on all mining & the resulting coins 'burned'.
October 01, 2017, 02:50:26 PM
It is finally October ~
there will be huge things happening in NYC
there will be huge things happening in NYC
Yes the October has come! Agreed. The question should be how to increase the value. We have been saying October! October!! October!!! Talking about advertising it in the US and so on but we have not talk about how to raise the value from over 10 times less than 1sat to even 1sat.
One thing I know is, if we like let us advertise it allover the world, without more exchanges this coin will not make any reasonable increase in price at CoinGather.
October 01, 2017, 02:20:56 PM
UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE:
Please revert to original newyorkc code and DO NOT USE updated 2017 code or wallets
2014 GITHUB ORIGINAL CODE
https://www.github.com/nycoin/nycoin
Please revert to original newyorkc code and DO NOT USE updated 2017 code or wallets
2014 GITHUB ORIGINAL CODE
https://www.github.com/nycoin/nycoin
Someone is continuing to mine with the broken 'new' code.
Rewards are going to this address RCwtyDazabX4n5SNjzqTRPncd4oQZ9Z8zJ.
Please revert back to the old code until the new one is ready.
Hi
Thanks for the warning. Currently using wallet v1.0.1.1-unk-beta. Assume this is the old version. Do you know what version is the one causing problems?
October 01, 2017, 02:17:51 PM
Since 2014, many have tried to overthrow it, but failed and will not succeed, as we are a voluntary base throughout the world!
This should be included in the NYC collage with the text included. Please include text in image and I'll add it to NYC collage at nycoin.net October 01, 2017, 02:12:59 PM
Does anyone know of other crypto's that sell coin directly from their website? Rather than using an exchange. Anyone know any US regs? State regs? International?
IF we could all pool coins for sale *and price NYC appropriately* and sell directly for BTC, we could get away from coingather. And wait for poloniex or another real exchange listing. And skip the crap pay-to-play exchanges. Just a thought.
P.S. I would price NYC initially at 10 satoshi. And raise price weekly/daily as demand increases. Direct exchange for BTC. Min 0.1 BTC purchases of NYC.
IF we could all pool coins for sale *and price NYC appropriately* and sell directly for BTC, we could get away from coingather. And wait for poloniex or another real exchange listing. And skip the crap pay-to-play exchanges. Just a thought.
P.S. I would price NYC initially at 10 satoshi. And raise price weekly/daily as demand increases. Direct exchange for BTC. Min 0.1 BTC purchases of NYC.
October 01, 2017, 01:43:29 PM
///Earning 700-1000 coins per day with my spare CPU. Not great you might say ??///
Who now mines, that's smart. Very soon the extraction of coins will be difficult.
We are here with the community to think of another pool.
But with the commission percentage in the bill of the advertising company of our coin.
a litle - 1 %.
all money will go scryptenthusiast. We trust him.
This includes the cost of hosting, and the creation and maintenance of free.
The official pool http://nyc.mypool.club/index.php
will naturally remain without commision and will be kept at the expense of donate.
We are proud of the heroes by donate, they need to know.
Name % NYC Total
alex 2 117.38
anonymous 4 504.82
anonymous 5 252.52
anonymous 1 202.09
anonymous 2 84.29
anonymous 1 12.45
anonymous 1 2.16
banezinho 1 15,720.56
david667 1 254.32
ddd 1 37.89
djgerrymk 1 3,170.81
igorsoti 1 1.14
imre 2.1 578.08
JORK 5 1,326,586.02
kibic71 2 141.43
kraken76 1 140.42
rc9999 1 5,279.48
servercomp1 1 5,286.60
vezpit 3 78.85
Small calculations of the reliability of our coin network suggest that there should be at least 4 pools.
Who now mines, that's smart. Very soon the extraction of coins will be difficult.
We are here with the community to think of another pool.
But with the commission percentage in the bill of the advertising company of our coin.
a litle - 1 %.
all money will go scryptenthusiast. We trust him.
This includes the cost of hosting, and the creation and maintenance of free.
The official pool http://nyc.mypool.club/index.php
will naturally remain without commision and will be kept at the expense of donate.
We are proud of the heroes by donate, they need to know.
Name % NYC Total
alex 2 117.38
anonymous 4 504.82
anonymous 5 252.52
anonymous 1 202.09
anonymous 2 84.29
anonymous 1 12.45
anonymous 1 2.16
banezinho 1 15,720.56
david667 1 254.32
ddd 1 37.89
djgerrymk 1 3,170.81
igorsoti 1 1.14
imre 2.1 578.08
JORK 5 1,326,586.02
kibic71 2 141.43
kraken76 1 140.42
rc9999 1 5,279.48
servercomp1 1 5,286.60
vezpit 3 78.85
Small calculations of the reliability of our coin network suggest that there should be at least 4 pools.
October 01, 2017, 01:20:59 PM
Since 2014, many have tried to overthrow it, but failed and will not succeed, as we are a voluntary base throughout the world!
October 01, 2017, 10:37:29 AM
The NYC coin is progressing, as is coin network support.
The community rejoices in progress.
It's cool that the official pool http://nyc.mypool.club/index.php
has the efficiency above - Pool Efficiency 99.75%.
Welcome mine and support the coin.
It is no exaggeration to say that NYC support for the week has increased in mathematical order.
Next, you can not be a visionary, how much you will earn on NYC, now participating in the mining.
The moon is very close.
Earning 700-1000 coins per day with my spare CPU. Not great you might say ??
look long term when this coin grows and hits the main exchanges
October 01, 2017, 10:15:54 AM
UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE:
Please revert to original newyorkc code and DO NOT USE updated 2017 code or wallets
2014 GITHUB ORIGINAL CODE
https://www.github.com/nycoin/nycoin
Please revert to original newyorkc code and DO NOT USE updated 2017 code or wallets
2014 GITHUB ORIGINAL CODE
https://www.github.com/nycoin/nycoin
Someone is continuing to mine with the broken 'new' code.
Rewards are going to this address RCwtyDazabX4n5SNjzqTRPncd4oQZ9Z8zJ.
Please revert back to the old code until the new one is ready.
September 30, 2017, 07:29:34 PM
Maintenance complete on the ..
Longest running NYC pool
First block solve - 03/08/2015
https://hobbyistpool.ddns.net/nyc
is back on-line at 09/30/2017 17:07:16 PST
Guys, Looking at the network health a little deeper ...
There appears to be only two nodes that are allowing inbound connections....
76.95.178.229:17020 - https://hobbyistpool.ddns.net/nyc
34.213.47.235:17020
Is the other pools even full nodes?
Let's get a list together.
Longest running NYC pool
First block solve - 03/08/2015
https://hobbyistpool.ddns.net/nyc
is back on-line at 09/30/2017 17:07:16 PST
Guys, Looking at the network health a little deeper ...
There appears to be only two nodes that are allowing inbound connections....
76.95.178.229:17020 - https://hobbyistpool.ddns.net/nyc
34.213.47.235:17020
Is the other pools even full nodes?
Let's get a list together.
Jump to: