Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANNOUNCE] Bitmessage - P2P Messaging system based partially on Bitcoin - page 19. (Read 89873 times)

full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 101
Do I have to be logged in 24-7 to not miss any bitmessages? (or at least once every day)

Nope, I vaguely remember it's being kept by the peers for some days - otherwise it's being resent by your client...

PS: See
https://bitmessage.org/wiki/FAQ#Can_I_send_a_message_to_someone_that_is_offline
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
In Hashrate We Trust!
Do I have to be logged in 24-7 to not miss any bitmessages? (or at least once every day)
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 101
Uhm, some days ago I got my 1st broadcast regarding the latest version 0.3.0 - yay, broadcasting works (before that I never received such)!

Unfortunately, BM slows down my internet: It takes long for pages to load up (~20sec vs <1s). It affects every traffic that uses DNS (ping 8.8.8.8 is swift as ever) as far as I can oversee. Once I quit BitMessage it returns to normal. BM 0.3.0 differs obviously - I see in my process explorer that it tries many connections (over 10, sometimes I see ~20) at the same time...

Funny thing though is that it does not always slow down my net. *Confusing*

PS: I still have isssues with knownnodes.dat - unless I delete it manually it takes ages to connect. I guess in the near future I will rather batch deleting and BM together...

PPS: Huge thanks for this awesome program nonetheless! *bow*
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
Love this, ease of sms, power of pgp!
Even easier than email!
staff
Activity: 4270
Merit: 1209
I support freedom of choice
Quote
Bitmessage v0.3.0 is available. It is an important release with a new change relevant to everyone.
The most significant change is the move from version 2 to version 3 addresses.
With version 3 addresses, users may set the minimum-Proof-of-Work-difficulty that they require of others in order to receive a message. The network-minimum difficulty is 1 but you may, for example, demand that people who send you messages accomplish a proof of work with a difficulty of 1.5.
Before making new addresses, see the 'Demanded difficulty' tab in the settings menu.
The next new feature is encrypted broadcasts. Broadcasts sent from v3 addresses will now all be encrypted. Broadcasts sent from v2 addresses will remain in clear-text until 2013-05-28 at 10:00 UTC at which time all upgraded clients will automatically switch to using encrypted broadcasts for all addresses.
Note that broadcasts are only encrypted with the address of the person sending them.
Anyone who has the address may read the broadcast. Some people may try to decrypt all broadcasts with all addresses ever seen on the network; this is expected.
The purpose of this feature is to encrypt the data sufficiently well such that unencrypted data will not flow through your Internet connection that you are not actually interested in.
Going forward, all new addresses will be v3 addresses thus it would be wise to upgrade soon so that you may receive messages from new Bitmessage users. v2 and v3 addresses will remain mutually-compatible indefinitely.
The next new feature is Daemon mode which allows Bitmessage to run without a graphical user interface. https://bitmessage.org/wiki/Daemon
You may report issues to the Github issue tracker or by replying to this bitmessage. https://github.com/Bitmessage/PyBitmessage/issues
Users who downloaded the source code with git may use 'git pull origin master' to upgrade.
All the best, Atheros
https://bitmessage.org/
https://github.com/Bitmessage/PyBitmessage
http://www.reddit.com/r/bitmessage/comments/1ds16q/bitmessage_030_beta_is_out/
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
In Hashrate We Trust!
How scalable is BitMessage? Can it handle 1 billion messages per day?
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
Couple of pages ago (#102), I was asking for help with Debian Testing compilation, as Testing is provided with python2.7, but there is no PyQt4.QtCore for python2.7, only for python3.0, which is not supported by Bitmessage.

But on Ubuntu it's working fine, thanks Smiley I just compiled binary and installed it without problems.
I will have to look again on my Debian laptop Smiley

Unfortunately Debian, Fedoria, (and thus others like Mint Linux) cannot run it as easily because their copies of OpenSSL doesn't include Elliptic Curve cryptographic functions for patent reasons.

Umm, no.

Redhat derivative flavours lack the ECDSA module in OpenSSL ... that is Redhat, Fedora, CentOS, Yellow Dog, etc

Debian derivatives are OK ... that is Debian, Ubuntu(s), Mint, etc.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1b/Linux_Distribution_Timeline.svg  Smiley

sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
In Hashrate We Trust!
I tested BitMessage today, it is amazing because its so easy to use!
Even my grandma could use it with a little help Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 249
Merit: 251
Couple of pages ago (#102), I was asking for help with Debian Testing compilation, as Testing is provided with python2.7, but there is no PyQt4.QtCore for python2.7, only for python3.0, which is not supported by Bitmessage.

But on Ubuntu it's working fine, thanks Smiley I just compiled binary and installed it without problems.
I will have to look again on my Debian laptop Smiley

Unfortunately Debian, Fedoria, (and thus others like Mint Linux) cannot run it as easily because their copies of OpenSSL doesn't include Elliptic Curve cryptographic functions for patent reasons.
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
DARKNETMARKETS.COM
Couple of pages ago (#102), I was asking for help with Debian Testing compilation, as Testing is provided with python2.7, but there is no PyQt4.QtCore for python2.7, only for python3.0, which is not supported by Bitmessage.

But on Ubuntu it's working fine, thanks Smiley I just compiled binary and installed it without problems.
I will have to look again on my Debian laptop Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
Hi,
I wasn't using BitMessage for couple of weeks. Is there any more support for Linux, or I still cannot use it on Linux as ready-to-go? Binaries, or something?
Why is only crappy Windows supported?  Huh

Works fine on linux ... what are you talking about?
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
DARKNETMARKETS.COM
Hi,
I wasn't using BitMessage for couple of weeks. Is there any more support for Linux, or I still cannot use it on Linux as ready-to-go? Binaries, or something?
Why is only crappy Windows supported?  Huh
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
Very cool. Guess mine hasn't been restarted much.
sr. member
Activity: 249
Merit: 251
My theory is that if you leave your client online for several hours you'll collect a bunch of IP addresses of nodes that connect for a few minutes and then disconnect.  When you restart the client it goes though that list of IP addresses one at a time trying to connect.  Since most of them are now offline and it takes about 5-10 seconds per connect attempt, it could take a long time to find the first live one.

I don't know this for sure, but deleting knownodes.dat seems to force the client to first connect to a known, hard-coded IP address that's online all the time.  That would explain why deleting the file speeds up the cold connect process.

Yes, that is perfectly accurate. The next Bitmessage version which I hope to release shortly will use 32 threads (and thus up to 32 half-open connections) to connect vastly faster; so this problem will go away.
legendary
Activity: 916
Merit: 1003
My theory is that if you leave your client online for several hours you'll collect a bunch of IP addresses of nodes that connect for a few minutes and then disconnect.  When you restart the client it goes though that list of IP addresses one at a time trying to connect.  Since most of them are now offline and it takes about 5-10 seconds per connect attempt, it could take a long time to find the first live one.

I don't know this for sure, but deleting knownodes.dat seems to force the client to first connect to a known, hard-coded IP address that's online all the time.  That would explain why deleting the file speeds up the cold connect process.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 101
Thanks for the quick response! In the meantime I digged up some older thread at

https://bitmessage.org/forum/index.php/topic,1461.0.html?PHPSESSID=be4dac950fd502fe6069e4a54490365d

and after reading I tried deleting my knownnodes.dat - now it's connecting again: SOLVED!
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
My 028 is perfect, 54 connections
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 101
I also have problems: It won't connect to anything - according to Process Explorer it doesn't even try...

Had this happening already last when I had to use a friend's WLAN so I thought maybe it's blocking it (and didn't bother anymore then) but now I am at home and my ports are specifically opened.

Any pointers what to check (I had updated to 0.2.8 executable)?
Pages:
Jump to: