Topic: [ANNOUNCE] paccoin a new SHA256D coin is being introduced - page 63. (Read 136599 times)
You guys know that this Civil War between the Old Dev & New Devs is hurting this coin. So as long as this continues I wouldn't invest at all.
Looks like the price of this Old Coin is dropping like a rock because these people are smart enough to know that this version of PAC coin has no future. 
Hopefully the New Pac coin, $PAC, end up being more promising.
Hopefully the New Pac coin, $PAC, end up being more promising.
so does it means peoples having old pac those will be loss all the coins or what ?
It means you have 3 choices, hodl and watch its value continue to drop, sell the coin now and cut your losses, or redeem this coin for Pac Cash coming out in February and hope for the best with that one.
Bill, do you see the Yobit wallet being sync'ed soon? Got a lot of coin held hostage now.
I know what you mean, I sent 26 million to Yobit on the 17th, so I'm waiting for it to arrive also.
Note to self breakcrypto sent me the "patch" 2 days before the exchanges went down... Hmmm.... coincidence?
My "patch" didn't cause anything to your coin accept attempt to fix it for you -- it's never been used as far as I know outside of me testing it on my own system for all of 5 minutes to see the chain stabilize its height and properly keep the TX from the mempool. The test run lost out to the main-chain trust score nearly instantaneous and was a segregated chain -- you know by what the crypto world calls consensus which is how networks work -- not that I think you understand any of that.
Beyond that, how is it even possible my alleged fork could break your "working" code? If someone could so easily fork your damn chain then your chain doesn't work anyway. The simple fact is your code is shitty and it doesn't work right. Hell, it's damn easy to verify that my patch would simply cause a stable side fork based on height instead of trust alone -- nothing else. Your PoS / trust logic controls the main chain. For what you keep lying about to even POSSIBLY be true, I'd somehow need have connections to all of the exchanges to have had anyone on the "fork."
Wow, just wow. You're either stupid or obtuse and I can't decide which -- probably just both.
At the very least, if you want to pretend to be peercoin, then you need to backport properly which you aren't doing. If your chain is forking and not back-porting TX properly, the "rewrite" and "resurrect" logic is terribly broken at the very least. Fix your shitty code or base your chain on height and keep your chain stable -- take your pick.
Either way, as I've said, don't blame me for it -- look in the mirror or to whoever you paid to write that pile of junk. If the exchanges pulled your coin it's because it's broken you dumb shit not because someone tried to help you.
Hi breakcrypto, what did the new devs sent to cryptopia and yobit?
A new patch to fix these problems that got our money stuck in the first place.
Looks like the price of this Old Coin is dropping like a rock because these people are smart enough to know that this version of PAC coin has no future.
Hopefully the New Pac coin, $PAC, end up being more promising.
Hopefully the New Pac coin, $PAC, end up being more promising.
so does it means peoples having old pac those will be loss all the coins or what ?
Looks like the price of this Old Coin is dropping like a rock because these people are smart enough to know that this version of PAC coin has no future.
Hopefully the New Pac coin, $PAC, end up being more promising.
Hopefully the New Pac coin, $PAC, end up being more promising.
is PAC a Shit coin ?
PAC masternodes ? i cant find PAC as Masternodes
PAC masternodes ? i cant find PAC as Masternodes
This coin is a peace of crap... I still don't see why anyone is wasting their time with this
I even went as far as installing the wallet. OMG. I thought NXT was crappy, but this one tops everything.
Pacexc https://pacexc.com (coming soon)
Could this be turn-key ready, related to Novaexchange, perfect timing or just merely coincidence?
Could this be turn-key ready, related to Novaexchange, perfect timing or just merely coincidence?
Bill, do you see the Yobit wallet being sync'ed soon? Got a lot of coin held hostage now.
I know what you mean, I sent 26 million to Yobit on the 17th, so I'm waiting for it to arrive also.
Note to self breakcrypto sent me the "patch" 2 days before the exchanges went down... Hmmm.... coincidence?
My "patch" didn't cause anything to your coin accept attempt to fix it for you -- it's never been used as far as I know outside of me testing it on my own system for all of 5 minutes to see the chain stabilize its height and properly keep the TX from the mempool. The test run lost out to the main-chain trust score nearly instantaneous and was a segregated chain -- you know by what the crypto world calls consensus which is how networks work -- not that I think you understand any of that.
Beyond that, how is it even possible my alleged fork could break your "working" code? If someone could so easily fork your damn chain then your chain doesn't work anyway. The simple fact is your code is shitty and it doesn't work right. Hell, it's damn easy to verify that my patch would simply cause a stable side fork based on height instead of trust alone -- nothing else. Your PoS / trust logic controls the main chain. For what you keep lying about to even POSSIBLY be true, I'd somehow need have connections to all of the exchanges to have had anyone on the "fork."
Wow, just wow. You're either stupid or obtuse and I can't decide which -- probably just both.
At the very least, if you want to pretend to be peercoin, then you need to backport properly which you aren't doing. If your chain is forking and not back-porting TX properly, the "rewrite" and "resurrect" logic is terribly broken at the very least. Fix your shitty code or base your chain on height and keep your chain stable -- take your pick.
Either way, as I've said, don't blame me for it -- look in the mirror or to whoever you paid to write that pile of junk. If the exchanges pulled your coin it's because it's broken you dumb shit not because someone tried to help you.
Hi breakcrypto, what did the new devs sent to cryptopia and yobit?
How many confirmations are needed for maturation of the blocks?
Send transactions only need 3 confirmations. PoS as I recall needs 30.
yeah it looks like the blockexplorer is corrupted. see block 2641372 has three entries.
Hi guys!
I have a POS transaction. In the wallet it has the status "generated but not confirmed", but in the explorer I can see a lot of confirmations.
What should I do: wait for a new wallet or rescan my wallet?
sorry for my english
I have a POS transaction. In the wallet it has the status "generated but not confirmed", but in the explorer I can see a lot of confirmations.
What should I do: wait for a new wallet or rescan my wallet?
sorry for my english
Generated but not confirmed means it orphaned. if the block explorer says something else does that mean the block explorer is on the patch?
PAC masternodes go!
@Tradesatoshi,
You can buy 500 M PAC for 0.0088DOGE/PAC, (DOGE now @60 satoshis);
Costing about 2.68 BTC per master node.
@Tradesatoshi,
You can buy 500 M PAC for 0.0088DOGE/PAC, (DOGE now @60 satoshis);
Costing about 2.68 BTC per master node.
Hi guys!
I have a POS transaction. In the wallet it has the status "generated but not confirmed", but in the explorer I can see a lot of confirmations.
What should I do: wait for a new wallet or rescan my wallet?
sorry for my english
I have a POS transaction. In the wallet it has the status "generated but not confirmed", but in the explorer I can see a lot of confirmations.
What should I do: wait for a new wallet or rescan my wallet?
sorry for my english
How many confirmations are needed for maturation of the blocks?
Hi guys!
I have a POS transaction. In the wallet it has the status "generated but not confirmed", but in the explorer I can see a lot of confirmations.
What should I do: wait for a new wallet or rescan my wallet?
sorry for my english
I have a POS transaction. In the wallet it has the status "generated but not confirmed", but in the explorer I can see a lot of confirmations.
What should I do: wait for a new wallet or rescan my wallet?
sorry for my english
New $pac to the moooon! Mr Corlass old PAC is junk....and never worth a penny.
The only value is the new "world" for $PAC. You not see that Mr Bill? PAC has value BECAUSE OF Mr EXPOS and his big team!
You are not as smart as your beliefs
The only value is the new "world" for $PAC. You not see that Mr Bill? PAC has value BECAUSE OF Mr EXPOS and his big team!
You are not as smart as your beliefs
Mr Expos, AKA Saul Wolf, i give him props, lots of energy, great work, he's putting together an awesome team. I'm sure they'll have great success!!
This coin is a peace of crap... I still don't see why anyone is wasting their time with this
Hahahaha more FUD!!
This coin is a peace of crap... I still don't see why anyone is wasting their time with this
Hi Bill, what does it mean by veternus, when he posted comments about that the new devs released a patch to cryptopia and yobit?
I mean, could anybody just make a patch and send to exchanges? Or such statement is just a placebo statement?
I mean, could anybody just make a patch and send to exchanges? Or such statement is just a placebo statement?
I saw that post, and was concerned, if they mean "patch" they mean breakcryptos "patch" it would mean that the exchanges's wallets would disconnect our users wallets.
The reason is the "patch" breakcrypto whos name probably really mins fixcrypto, uses protocol 60008. Our wallets use protocol 60007. So the new protocol wallets will automatically disconnect older wallets.
Since I was able to successfully send paccoins to tradesatoshi yesterday it means they are using the correct wallet, and not the patch. If however Yobit and Cryptopia are using the new protocol, our coins will never arrive.
As far as anyone making a patch, the normal procedure is to make a patch and present it to the developers as a "pull request" to evaluate whether it should be implemented. This is how its done normally. The developers then test it, and decide if its worth implementing. I looked at it, and decided it was not beneficial, and decided not to use it. I encourage others not to use it, because as we have seen it has caused the exchanges to lose sync and thereby required a rebuild of the block chain, causing these massive delays.
Jump to: