[Announcement] Block Erupter USB - page 16.

Shevek

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: bigbeninlondon on June 04, 2013, 08:04:57 AM

Quote from: Shevek on June 04, 2013, 02:29:52 AM

Quote from: Chuck on June 04, 2013, 01:58:34 AM

All of this is true, but these people are helping secure the bitcoin network by adding to the network hashrate. We should be encouraging this kind of behavior Wink

This is a common fallacy in bitcoin propaganda. There is no secure bonus with higher hashrates. The network keeps secure by an adequate balance of difficulty and hashrate. And this balance is guaranteed by the algorithm, not the miners.

Disagree. 51% becomes more and more difficult the more hashrate + higher distribution.

I agree with higher distribution.

But not with higher hashrates. In fact, now we are in much more higher risks of 51% attack due to the almost centralised production of ASICs. If some ASIC maker would take over bitcoin the cards are on her hand.

bigbeninlondon

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Quote from: Shevek on June 04, 2013, 02:29:52 AM

Quote from: Chuck on June 04, 2013, 01:58:34 AM

Quote from: markyminer on June 02, 2013, 02:58:04 PM

OMG .Fools and their money! When this was announced difficultly was under 10m and network hashrate under 80t/h. Now you've got them it's 12m (+20%) and network hashrate is 100t/h+ . In under 3 days difficulty will hit 14.4m. So thats a 44% increase in diffuclty in 5 weeks, around the 30% + a month I predicted.

All of this is true, but these people are helping secure the bitcoin network by adding to the network hashrate. We should be encouraging this kind of behavior Wink

This is a common fallacy in bitcoin propaganda. There is no secure bonus with higher hashrates. The network keeps secure by an adequate balance of difficulty and hashrate. And this balance is guaranteed by the algorithm, not the miners.

Disagree. 51% becomes more and more difficult the more hashrate + higher distribution. The safety factor is in high hash rate + high rate of decentralization. So when an individual plugs in 300 MH/s, they are raising the hashrate and decentralizing the network a little. This is not a common fallacy, it's common knowledge.

nubbins

legendary

Activity: 1554

Merit: 1009

Quote from: Buddytronic on June 04, 2013, 04:21:08 AM

I think it's a big novelty factor - these things are selling on Ebay for $400 at the moment.

This is precisely why I bought ten of these things. It's REALLY easy to make ROI if you end up with 4 units at zero cost

klondike_bar

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1005

ASIC Wannabe

Quote from: kinitex on June 04, 2013, 02:35:57 AM

This has the worst Mhash/$ ratio of any asic device out there at 1.22Mh/s per $1. The runner up is asicminer's erupter blade at 1.87Mh/s per $1.

How do they get away with it? Because it's basically the only form of asic being shipped without a pre-order...

yup. i give them full credit for finding a price people ill pay and selling at that price like they are. I wont invest for another month till we see some competition push things past 2Mh/s per $ on a small scale or 4Mh/s per $ on a larger scale. There will be intersecting curves of supply, demand, and technology that will see an 'ideal' moment for quick ROI and lasting profits past 2 years of use (the block erupter USB will take 7-14mos to ROI, and would be incredibly lucky if it ever made a 100% gain in the 2 years following).

im thinking this nice little point in time is about a month or 2 away, and will consist of avalon chips being made into avalon knockoffs and the k1/k16/k64 style boards, plus a newer version from asicminer that is faster and better priced to the market.

If i cannot make my money back with a unit in 6 months from the day i receive it (not place an order or first see it on sale), then the design doesn't interest me. If a system returns its cost in 6 months, you could see another 100% profit after about another 10-18 months, and after that (2years) the device will make little more then the electricity it costs and may even have burnt out or failed already.

Buddytronic

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

Quote from: kinitex on June 04, 2013, 02:35:57 AM

This has the worst Mhash/$ ratio of any asic device out there at 1.22Mh/s per $1. The runner up is asicminer's erupter blade at 1.87Mh/s per $1.

How do they get away with it? Because it's basically the only form of asic being shipped without a pre-order...

I think it's a big novelty factor - these things are selling on Ebay for $400 at the moment.

kinitex

member

Activity: 62

Merit: 10

This has the worst Mhash/$ ratio of any asic device out there at 1.22Mh/s per $1. The runner up is asicminer's erupter blade at 1.87Mh/s per $1.

How do they get away with it? Because it's basically the only form of asic being shipped without a pre-order...

Shevek

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: Chuck on June 04, 2013, 01:58:34 AM

Quote from: markyminer on June 02, 2013, 02:58:04 PM

OMG .Fools and their money! When this was announced difficultly was under 10m and network hashrate under 80t/h. Now you've got them it's 12m (+20%) and network hashrate is 100t/h+ . In under 3 days difficulty will hit 14.4m. So thats a 44% increase in diffuclty in 5 weeks, around the 30% + a month I predicted.

All of this is true, but these people are helping secure the bitcoin network by adding to the network hashrate. We should be encouraging this kind of behavior Wink

This is a common fallacy in bitcoin propaganda. There is no secure bonus with higher hashrates. The network keeps secure by an adequate balance of difficulty and hashrate. And this balance is guaranteed by the algorithm, not the miners.

Chuck

member

Activity: 92

Merit: 10

Quote from: markyminer on June 02, 2013, 02:58:04 PM

OMG .Fools and their money! When this was announced difficultly was under 10m and network hashrate under 80t/h. Now you've got them it's 12m (+20%) and network hashrate is 100t/h+ . In under 3 days difficulty will hit 14.4m. So thats a 44% increase in diffuclty in 5 weeks, around the 30% + a month I predicted.

All of this is true, but these people are helping secure the bitcoin network by adding to the network hashrate. We should be encouraging this kind of behavior Wink

daemondazz

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: LazyOtto on June 03, 2013, 09:12:48 PM

scorch (skôrch)
1. To burn superficially so as to discolor or damage the texture of. See Synonyms at burn1.

Yep, 40-45°C for 3 months here in central Australia will do that

LazyOtto

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: CanadianGuy on June 03, 2013, 06:48:40 PM

... I live in Canada, our 2-3 months of summer can still be scorching hot. Cool

Uh, NOT.

scorch (skôrch)
1. To burn superficially so as to discolor or damage the texture of. See Synonyms at burn1.
2. To wither or parch with intense heat.
3. To destroy (land and buildings) by or as if by fire so as to leave nothing salvageable to an enemy army.

CanadianGuy

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

What kind of cooling should I aim for with 50 of these bad boys? Keep in mind my #1 concern is noise level. It may be very close to a child's room and I don't want it to be noisy. The house does not have A/C. Although I live in Canada, our 2-3 months of summer can still be scorching hot. Cool

nubbins

legendary

Activity: 1554

Merit: 1009

Quote from: dnaleor on June 03, 2013, 05:26:10 PM

Quote from: joae1975 on June 03, 2013, 05:01:51 PM

Anker's probably like, "Why the sudden rush in worldwide hub orders?" Haha!!

lol

someone should tell them before they ramp up production Wink

...or maybe... they'd just slap BTC COMPATIBLE on the box!

dnaleor

legendary

Activity: 1470

Merit: 1000

Want privacy? Use Monero!

Quote from: joae1975 on June 03, 2013, 05:01:51 PM

Anker's probably like, "Why the sudden rush in worldwide hub orders?" Haha!!

lol

elasticband

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom

will get a pic up soon

joae1975

hero member

Activity: 752

Merit: 500

Anker's probably like, "Why the sudden rush in worldwide hub orders?" Haha!!

SmiGueL

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 252

Quote from: elasticband on June 01, 2013, 02:20:00 PM

would love to add another 2 racks to that photo for ya!

Quote from: elasticband on June 03, 2013, 11:49:57 AM

make that 77 erupters via 8 USB hubs

Would love to see photos of that too! Cool

mdude77

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1001

Quote from: LazyOtto on June 03, 2013, 02:35:35 PM

Quote from: elasticband on June 03, 2013, 11:49:57 AM

make that 77 erupters via 8 USB ubs

What is the range of hw errors as a percent of accepted shares that you're getting, please?

On my working one it is running at about 0.9%. (IIRC, several other folks have reported getting about a 1% hw error rate.)

One which is now dead and in the process of getting replaced ran at about 10% hw errors for roughly eight hours. Then it died.

-- edit

NOTE: I had a fan blowing over them. They were both 'warm to the touch'. Not the 'freaking hot' you encounter without active cooling.

I'm getting about 1.1% HW errors across my 7.

M

bystander

full member

Activity: 177

Merit: 100

Quote from: elasticband on June 03, 2013, 11:49:57 AM

make that 77 erupters via 8 USB ubs

Great to hear that you've got the rest running now! Did you end up running the rest on a second machine (mac)?

LazyOtto

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: elasticband on June 03, 2013, 11:49:57 AM

make that 77 erupters via 8 USB ubs

What is the range of hw errors as a percent of accepted shares that you're getting, please?

On my working one it is running at about 0.9%. (IIRC, several other folks have reported getting about a 1% hw error rate.)

One which is now dead and in the process of getting replaced ran at about 10% hw errors for roughly eight hours. Then it died.

-- edit

NOTE: I had a fan blowing over them. They were both 'warm to the touch'. Not the 'freaking hot' you encounter without active cooling.

elasticband

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom

make that 77 erupters via 8 USB ubs

Topic: [Announcement] Block Erupter USB - page 16. (Read 251926 times)