Topic: Announcement @Lauda @ThePharacist @actmyname @Timelord2067 @suchmoon - page 10. (Read 3989 times)

Here's the case in your point

Everyone with a working brain instantly see for what my negativ rating was.What you guys are doing is to interpret something into it which doesn't exist.
You create false facts to discredit someone.Funny that thepharmacist and vod didn't said a single word about it the past 10 months as it was clear what the negativ trust was for and started creating new facts to discredit as they always do.And any DT member claiming its not clear for what the negativ trust was should instantly check his ability to interpret anything

VOD hasn't called me a scammer ealier ?This time he called me a liar,criminal and indirectly a defamer making false claims.


You must be blind not having seen the massiv amount of being called a scammer and fraud by Lauda and his gang even you participated in these threads.

Never saw you say a single word about it to anyone

But i will tell you something.You are a high professional in creating excuses or discrediting

Wrong. Vod has not called you a scammer. Vod has however called you a criminal. The only reason I didn't see this is because I was not looking for the keyword "criminal" and because I am not omniscient I did not instantly recall the thread (which I hadn't read).

Double standards? What a non-sequitur.

Here's the case in point: you put down "100 BTC" as the risked amount in the feedback.
Why? There was no BTC involved in any trade or lack thereof.

Posts where i'm being defamed as scammer and spammer

Next people who see the trust system instantly think i'm a scammer when not knowing me.
You are very well aware of it based on your old postings where you talk with other DT2 members

Funny you as so called DT member reacted on my post but didn't reacted on VOD for calling me a scammer and criminal.
Seems you agree with it


What was my comment ? Based on that comment part of DT members agree i claimed thepharmacist scammed me for 100 btc ?

A great example of the double standards on this forum the community is complaining about

We can stop right here.

My comment is exactly "Engaging in account sale conduct".
The reference points to a thread in which you state "If you accept escrow i will take it"

I do not see a false claim here. Would you like to tell me what is incorrect about my feedback?

---

I just took a brief look at all the threads you've made. As far as I could tell, no one called you a scammer. Stop lying.

I will give only a small comment on your poor reply.

It was you who started the problem by giving negativ feedback with false claims and when being questioned you tried to discredit me at all cost make me look like a scammer and criminal which clearly harmed my reputation.I told you directly that you harmed my business with your false claims and lies and accuse of being a scammer and now even criminal.

You gave horse shit making fun and even trying to discredit more.I even warned you that i'm not somebody who will let false claims on my person go away

That whole situation is the result of your abusiv behavior as DT members and nothing more.
I said in the beginning i won't let my name stay in such a bad light.
You laughed about it asking what i'm going to do since i have no options instead of deleting your false claims or trying to resolve it.


So these are the options i'm going to use which are a result of your massiv abuse and ignorance of harming and defaming honest people and giving shit about it.


Oh so now i have it blown up because i didn't give up so quick like the rest of people you abused ?
The real blow is first to come

You wanna make a private bet via escrow ?



I collected already all evidences on every public post you called me a scammer ,liar,fraud etc and now even criminal.VOD will have an opportunity to proof these claims.

I gave time till monday and i hold to my word.
I surely won't let anybody call me in public a scammer and criminal without reacting on it.


Actually if you would google my name you would see that my wife is a lawyer running her own chamber.If you belive my reaction is not based on your previous actions then please feel free to sue me

You are not going to do this. This is because it will be a waste of time. Not only that, but it seems unlikely that anyone is going to look at your testimonies as reliable especially considering your behavior in your recent posts.

If you are going to attack anyone for slander then it would be of your best interest to expunge all cases of your slander. And no, the excuse "well DT members are doing it so I can too" is not admissible. Moreover, your claim is simply untrue. All trusted feedback leads to a relevant reference. All your feedback either has no reference or leads to a circle and is utterly pointless. Seems to me that if you truly are going to do this whole marketing thing, it would lead to backlash against you.

---

You consistently make the false attribution that we have been calling you a scammer. This is untrue.
You consistently make the claim that we have no proof for our feedback. This is untrue.
You consistently justify your improper use of the trust system by pretending that you are parroting. This is untrue.
You consistently lie and deflect and insult and think that you understand the trust system. This is untrue.

---

I haven't made that many replies here because really - I don't have to. You keep digging yourself down deeper into the hole that you've blasted with the creation of these threads. Your vendetta is unhealthy. It's an internalized obsession and it seems that you're merely projecting everything that you have done onto other users.

Most people can see that you have blown everything out of proportion and will reject anything that does not conform to your beliefs. Beliefs that are absolutely, demonstrably untrue.
However, you keep waiting. Waiting for someone to agree. Through your confirmatory bias you hold this user's opinion in high regard and simply ignore every other opinion, attributing it to part of the gang. And of course, there will always be a user that will agree with you. And you will always have that self-serving bias to justify your actions. That is because there will always be users that receive the negative feedback and feel indignant enough to create droves of threads about the "wrongdoing", seeking the same thing you are.

---

In reality, your actions are not unique. I personally have seen the same anger and process of retribution several times. The end result is always the same: the user stops posting on the forum.

The sooner you let go of your obsession, the sooner you can move on with your life.

Yes i will contact today the DT1 members who elected VOD and will hold them responsible for his actions and permanent lies.

Maybe i will even go a step further on him with legal charges for calling me in public a scammer and a criminal.
He is a Canadian resident so he is obligated to not break canadian laws

Yes anger you are part of the cause.How many people have complaint about you ?

If DT2 members are giving feedback for worthless feedbacks to the users then they may not be at the DT2 member for too long.

And do you know how DT2 members are selected? they are not selected from theymos or other admin if DT1 member add them to their trust list then they will become DT2 member.

Ha ha so you wanna claim now DT2 members are to dumb now to read comments ?

You guys are so pathetic i really ask myself who would choose such stupid people as DT2 members who are even unable to read comments and make assumption based on BS.

Also its says risked amount and not scammed amount which VOD claimed



I gave 2 people negativ trust because its was them claiming its ok to give negativ trust based on their mood.I just gave them which they said its ok so where is your problem ?

I get called a scammer without proof getting said i called thepharmacist a scammer who SCAMMED me for 100 BTC and there is no proof of that either more over you can say the DT2 members are to dumb to read feedback comments and the most funny thing is again thepharmacist never said himself over 10 months that i accused him.

But dumbfucks will always do everything.

You guys will get the love you deserve.

LOL what a poor try to discredit someone.


In my comment it cleary says : "Calling me scammer and spammer without proof.
Total idiot defending Lauda

I guess part of their team"

Where do you see there being accused to scam me ?

You faggots are clearly looking for anything to accuse somebody to discredit

Your feedback was back from january.It means 9-10 months ago where you and VOD clearly saw these comments.
And now you claim i accused you for scamming ?Funny you never mentioned it earlier you faggot

Hey man, why are you complaining?
You literally left negative rating to users only because you don't like them:

---

I sense much anger in you. Ignored you will be.

Because on the feedback you left me on 1/27/18, you put 100BTC in the amount risked, which amounts to the same thing.  That was only one of several feedbacks you left on my trust page on that day. 

VOD you are a DT member ?

How the fuck did you get it ?
You are even to dumb to read.
You gave me negativ feedback with the reason that i claimed that thePharmacist scammed 100 BTC from me ?


Where the fuck did you blind asshole read that ?
1.5x glasses are not helping anymore?

Would love to see your poor claim reference .And a stupid fuck like you is making false accuses on purpose ?

But i guess Lauda asked you to claim so ?Heh ?



You are now part of my love circle

Now show me fucker one sentence where i claimed i got scammed by ThePharmacist
BTW reading your low quality threads you must be a retarded poor old pot smoker.
If you call the topics of your threads quality to bitcointalk i guess that would be the biggest joke in the century

47 years old and still so stupid ?You are clearly a shame for all canadians.

I'm heartbroken as usual.


Right. So you don't need to provide justification but everyone else needs to do so in a manner made up by you. Sounds almost legit.


Dude... your trust history is littered with no-reference ratings, butthurt ratings, meaningless "I don't trust this person" ratings, etc. You're certainly not somebody who should lecture anyone on the topic of the trust system, Mr. Escrow Scammer.

I have clearly stated what I think of the OP and why, and provided a reference, and the OP was kind enough to confirm the validity of that rating with this awesome thread. If you don't like that you can... I don't know... cry or something.

I still can see Lauda's negative feedback on your trust page,go and check the untrusted ratings because now lauda is not a DT member so it won't show up in default trust ratings.

Any DT member can give as much as ratings if they want and more DT members can give feedbacks for the same reason also which doesn't means abusing the system tho,and more over -2 or -32 it won't make any difference,simply you can't participate in any campaigns.

That looks a lot like a deflection to me.

Just because justification was not posted, does not mean it doesn’t exist and a small number of these types of instances is different than giving these types of ratings on a regular basis.

Looks like you are a retard demanding from other people quality posts but are unable to provide yourself a clear reference of somebody who scammed or tried to scam and being unable to admit it

No, this justifies me to laugh at Quicksy.

I strongly agree with this

check my thread : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-my-account-redtrust-5060006


hopefully anyone can stop their false accusations