Pages:
Author

Topic: Announcement @Lauda @ThePharacist @actmyname @Timelord2067 @suchmoon - page 7. (Read 3989 times)

legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist

...

....Beside that the judge doesn't care what nonsense  you I write.
Thats the beautiful going to court that the judge there won't even listen a single second of all that bullshit which is being I’ve posted here ...

ftfy
sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 276
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1926
฿ear ride on the rainbow slide
<>
It seems you have a flawed understanding of the burden of proof.

The risked amount in your feedback to The Pharmacist is 100 BTC. Fact.
You have not shown that you have even traded with The Pharmacist, never mind risked 100 BTC. Fact.
Vod claims that your feedback shows a risked 100 BTC. Fact.
Vod claims that the 100 BTC risk is not substantiated. Fact.
Your lawsuit is based upon this claim:

"Vod is committing libel by claiming that I lied, scammed, and am a criminal."

You have the burden of proof.

You need to substantiate why Vod's claim that you lied is false. You have the burden of proof.



You're using a similar strategy to Christian apologetics in which they shift the burden of proof onto the one rejecting the claim. Roll Eyes



Ignoring the obvious trolling - here is my opinion:

Vod could easily base his defense on "honest opinion" based on what actmyname just said.

Risked BTC and not scammed BTC which is a total diffrence.

I disagree. The definition is clearly stated when you place the feedback.
So you claimed that The Pharmacist stole or tried to steal 100 BTC.
The onus of proof for that claim is on you.



Based on that it is my opinion that you would not only lose. You'd be liable for Vod's legal costs as well.


For your info the defentition of a criminal :

Quote
An individual who has been found guilty of the commission of conduct that causes social harm and that is punishable by law; a person who has committed a crime.


There you are wrong again. Because there is a far wider definition of "Criminal".



It can mean anything from being convicted of a crime, having committed an illegal (legal or religious) act or having done something despicable.

It will be a lawsuite from Netherland where my company is registered.
Am just checking your real info since i saw already some people tried to get your info

Considering that you are from Netherland where you claim your company is registered  - I wonder what the Dutch law says about releasing personal information about Vod. Europe has some of the strictest privacy laws. Obviously you believe it to be related to your company - otherwise you'd just lodge it in Poland where you live.

Ironically by saying you are going to do the lawsuit from the Netherlands - where libel can be a civil wrong, the statement can also constitute a criminal offense.
https://www.amsadvocaten.com/blog/litigation-2/libel-slander-and-rectification-in-the-netherlands/
So in the Netherlands you could potentially be liable for criminal libel towards the Pharmacist. You just fucked up your entire case by choice of venue.  Grin
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
I'm going to bed Martin.....Will see your actions over the next days and will react based on that.


Monday will come and go, and nothing will change.

Then Ill expect you to crawl back into your hole. 

I guarantee it.  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 276
I'm going to bed Martin.....Will see your actions over the next days and will react based on that.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
I didn't posted your face in the security uniform since i guess your comment on that picture is enough proof

I've never hidden the fact work as a part time security guard.  I am a people person - I enjoy the work.  I never work longer than 5-6 hours for a concert.

I've also never hidden the fact I work as a senior consultant for HP, which requires me to work until the project is done.

Can you put two and two together?  Maybe your "wife" can help you?

Smiley

sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 276
Thats what you posted on your FB

That's about as likely as you suing me this Monday....  Tongue


Also how can you as simple security guard enforce any laws ? LOL you have no additional rights but just the same like any other civilian.

YOU can't enforce any laws, but I can.

As a citizen of Canada, I have three powers of arrest.   Smiley







lol so i guess its going to happen
I didn't posted your face in the security uniform since i guess your comment on that picture is proof enough
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
Thats what you posted on your FB

That's about as likely as you suing me this Monday....  Tongue


Also how can you as simple security guard enforce any laws ? LOL you have no additional rights but just the same like any other civilian.

YOU can't enforce any laws, but I can.

As a citizen of Canada, I have three powers of arrest.   Smiley



sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 276
Quote
I've been in part time law enforcement for 30 years and I grew up on a farm.

You mean a security guard working 12-18h/day  Grin


Like i said i will get my satisfaction/justice......

Are 18 hour days considered part time where you live?

I'm sure you will get satisfaction some day, but you'll have to get your cousin alone and drunk first.  Smiley


Thats what you posted on your FB

Also how can you as simple security guard enforce any laws ? LOL you have no additional rights but just the same like any other civilian.

Its always funny i don't know why but security guards always think they are smarter in law where they in general have no clue at all.
I don't know how its in canada but in europe and us they are basicly cheap workers without a good education but with a big mouth

How many friends do you have on FB even asking to add you back as friend ? 0 ? ? ?
Btw what is your height ?You look so small
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
Quote
I've been in part time law enforcement for 30 years and I grew up on a farm.

You mean a security guard working 12-18h/day  Grin


Like i said i will get my satisfaction/justice......

Are 18 hour days considered part time where you live?

I'm sure you will get satisfaction some day, but you'll have to get your cousin alone and drunk first.  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 276
Quote
I've been in part time law enforcement for 30 years and I grew up on a farm.

You mean a security guard working 12-18h/day  Grin which you posted on your FB

Which law are you able to enforce as security guard ? LOL Calling the cops ?


Like i said i will get my satisfaction/justice......


Its always funny i don't know why but security guards always think they are smarter in law where they in general have no clue at all.
I don't know how its in canada but in europe they are basicly cheap workers without a good education but with a big mouth thinking they enforce any laws lol where in reality they have no special rights.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Its my last post on this topic and i will wait till monday.

You're such a trustworthy individual, any judge will immediately see that and will send Vod into an electric chair (or whatever they use for death penalty up there in Canada... drowning in an ice hole?).
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
At vod let us know if you get served next week.

Hmmm, I just checked the future (vods can do that) and nothing happened.  :/

Okay


Seriously, I know your friend spend lots of money on a bogus lawsuit, but Thule is a liar.  He is not suing me.  He is giving me until Monday to remove my trust, which is your standard empty threat.

I've been in part time law enforcement for 30 years and I grew up on a farm.  I can smell bullshit, and I can recognize an actual threat.

Thule is nothing more than a cowpie.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 4256
Merit: 8551
'The right to privacy matters'
At vod let us know if you get served next week.

Hmmm, I just checked the future (vods can do that) and nothing happened.  :/

Okay
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
At vod let us know if you get served next week.

Hmmm, I just checked the future (vods can do that) and nothing happened.  :/

While Thule may need to prove his case he can still drag vod into a court room and cost him money defending himself.

It will cost him money (he doesn't have) to file and follow through.

I will defend myself, costing nothing.

The judge will dismiss his case and he and I will laugh about it over dinner.

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 4256
Merit: 8551
'The right to privacy matters'
<>
It seems you have a flawed understanding of the burden of proof.

The risked amount in your feedback to The Pharmacist is 100 BTC. Fact.
You have not shown that you have even traded with The Pharmacist, never mind risked 100 BTC. Fact.
Vod claims that your feedback shows a risked 100 BTC. Fact.
Vod claims that the 100 BTC risk is not substantiated. Fact.
Your lawsuit is based upon this claim:

"Vod is committing libel by claiming that I lied, scammed, and am a criminal."

You have the burden of proof.

You need to substantiate why Vod's claim that you lied is false. You have the burden of proof.



You're using a similar strategy to Christian apologetics in which they shift the burden of proof onto the one rejecting the claim. Roll Eyes

While Thule may need to prove his case he can still drag vod into a court room and cost him money defending himself.

At vod let us know if you get served next week.

I have a friend that spent more then 20000 fighting a completely bogus lawsuit.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
I see let's wait for the court to decide.
I see you want it the hard way.

I only say it one time.Don't think i will step back.

I don't think you'll step back.... you'd have to step forward first... and you won't do that.

Since you are not posting again until Monday, I guess I can proclaim right now that Monday will come and go, and you will still be a liar. 

Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 276
I see let's wait for the court to decide.
I see you want it the hard way.

I only say it one time.Don't think i will step back.


You will have to proof that i scammed someone which means you need to present somebody who i stole money from or tried to steal money
and you will need to provide criminal records of me since you called me a criminal.

If you are to stupid to understand you can't provide these since they are non existend than you will get a lesson which makes you understand it.


If you think these 100 BTC is going to protect you ok belive in it.You will be teached how the real world works


@actmyname your poor try to reverse staff
is just annoying,Your stupid comments doesn't even need any explanation.
People who have some knowledge about law know what i'm talking about.
You will get the hard lesson.Once there is a court decission i will make it public here.
You call somebody a criminal or scammer its not on him showing its not true but its on you to show that your claims are true and that you didn't defamed someone.
I know you both guys are not the smartest one which also shows your past actions but its starting to annoy me.
Monday and after that i will post the decission of court since its public.



copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
<>
It seems you have a flawed understanding of the burden of proof.

The risked amount in your feedback to The Pharmacist is 100 BTC. Fact.
You have not shown that you have even traded with The Pharmacist, never mind risked 100 BTC. Fact.
Vod claims that your feedback shows a risked 100 BTC. Fact.
Vod claims that the 100 BTC risk is not substantiated. Fact.
Your lawsuit is based upon this claim:

"Vod is committing libel by claiming that I lied, scammed, and am a criminal."

You have the burden of proof.

You need to substantiate why Vod's claim that you lied is false. You have the burden of proof.



You're using a similar strategy to Christian apologetics in which they shift the burden of proof onto the one rejecting the claim. Roll Eyes
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
No Vod is not enough,If you show that claim first you would need to proof that the 100 BTC are invalid.Its on you to proof it since its you who claim that.

Not a problem.  Judge asks you to prove you owned 100 btc.   You can't.  He dismisses your lawsuit.  Smiley
Pages:
Jump to: