<>
It seems you have a flawed understanding of the burden of proof.
The risked amount in your feedback to The Pharmacist is 100 BTC. Fact.
You have not shown that you have even traded with The Pharmacist, never mind risked 100 BTC. Fact.
Vod claims that your feedback shows a risked 100 BTC. Fact.
Vod claims that the 100 BTC risk is not substantiated. Fact.
Your lawsuit is based upon this claim:
"Vod is committing libel by claiming that I lied, scammed, and am a criminal."
You have the burden of proof.
You need to substantiate why Vod's claim that you lied is false.
You have the burden of proof.
You're using a similar strategy to Christian apologetics in which they shift the burden of proof onto the one rejecting the claim.
Ignoring the obvious trolling - here is my opinion:
Vod could easily base his defense on "honest opinion" based on what actmyname just said.
Risked BTC and not scammed BTC which is a total diffrence.
I disagree. The definition is clearly stated when you place the feedback.
So you claimed that The Pharmacist stole or tried to steal 100 BTC.
The onus of proof for that claim is on you.
Based on that it is my opinion that you would not only lose. You'd be liable for Vod's legal costs as well.
For your info the defentition of a criminal :
An individual who has been found guilty of the commission of conduct that causes social harm and that is punishable by law; a person who has committed a crime.
There you are wrong again. Because there is a far wider definition of "Criminal".
It can mean anything from being convicted of a crime, having committed an illegal (legal or religious) act or having done something despicable.
It will be a lawsuite from Netherland where my company is registered.
Am just checking your real info since i saw already some people tried to get your info
Considering that you are from Netherland where you claim your company is registered - I wonder what the Dutch law says about releasing personal information about Vod. Europe has some of the strictest privacy laws. Obviously you believe it to be related to your company -
otherwise you'd just lodge it in Poland where you live.Ironically by saying you are going to do the lawsuit from the Netherlands - where libel can be a civil wrong, the statement can also constitute a criminal offense.
https://www.amsadvocaten.com/blog/litigation-2/libel-slander-and-rectification-in-the-netherlands/So
in the Netherlands you could potentially be liable for criminal libel towards the Pharmacist.
You just fucked up your entire case by choice of venue.