Announcement @Lauda @ThePharacist @actmyname @Timelord2067 @suchmoon - page 6.

Thule

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 276

Quote from: Vod on November 03, 2018, 02:47:26 PM

Quote from: Thule on November 03, 2018, 02:39:31 PM

My only reply to you since i have enough work to do over the weekend is that you as DT member who's feedback is being instantly seen by every member on this forum and as a person of trust
has a total diffrent value then doing this as a "normal" member.

You have a way way higher responsibility on your actions since your actions have way way higher impact and reach.

In court this makes a big diffrence.

Quote

OK, but it makes you a hypocrite, doesn't it? I'll easily show in court you were not offended by my words, since you issued the same words to many other people.

Your argumentation impresses me.Just shows it will be an easy case

I'll have to take your word on it.

You publically discredited The Pharmacist and stated he risked 100 btc with him.

I simply distrust you for lying. Good luck collecting damages for my telling you to back up your claim.

Roll Eyes

You called me before in public a scammer,fraud,spammer and now even a criminal which has been documented and backed up.

I really hope thats not your defense line.

If thepharmacist feels offended he has the full right to open a case.
You are not his lawyer nor his defendant and being only responsible for your own words.

For me that topic is closed now till monday.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: Thule on November 03, 2018, 02:39:31 PM

My only reply to you since i have enough work to do over the weekend is that you as DT member who's feedback is being instantly seen by every member on this forum and as a person of trust
has a total diffrent value then doing this as a "normal" member.

You have a way way higher responsibility on your actions since your actions have way way higher impact and reach.

In court this makes a big diffrence.

Quote

OK, but it makes you a hypocrite, doesn't it? I'll easily show in court you were not offended by my words, since you issued the same words to many other people.

Your argumentation impresses me.Just shows it will be an easy case

I'll have to take your word on it.

You publically discredited The Pharmacist and stated he risked 100 btc with him.

I simply distrust you for lying. Good luck collecting damages for my telling you to back up your claim.

Roll Eyes

Thule

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 276

My only reply to you since i have more important work to do as reading your poor argumentations over the weekend is that you as DT member who's feedback is being instantly seen by every member on this forum and as a person of trust has a total diffrent value then doing this as a "normal" member.

You have a way way higher responsibility on your actions since your actions have way way higher impact and reach.

In court this makes a big diffrence.

Quote

OK, but it makes you a hypocrite, doesn't it? I'll easily show in court you were not offended by my words, since you issued the same words to many other people.

Your argumentation impresses me.Just shows it will be an easy case

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: Thule on November 03, 2018, 02:30:56 PM

The case is between you and me only.
Anything else i said these people can open a case against me.They are free to do so.

OK, but it makes you a hypocrite, doesn't it? I'll easily show in court you were not offended by my words, since you issued the same words to many other people.

Quote from: Thule on November 03, 2018, 02:30:56 PM

I got two PM's from 2 diffrent members asking me if they may join the lawsuite.
I don't currently know since i doubt this will be allowed by canadian law since in europe its 100% not allowed.
I will call on monday a local lawyer and will post more information about it.

Wow - I got 58 PM's from 56 different members offering to give me money for my defense! Roll Eyes

I love the negative feedback you left for me. You literally wrote I was bad for doing X, and then you did X on the next line!

Quote

Posting targeted false claims to discredit people.
He is part of Lauda's gang.

"You called me in public a scammer,liar and most important criminal!!!!!!"

Roll Eyes

Thule

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 276

Quote from: Vod on November 03, 2018, 02:21:57 PM

Quote from: Thule on November 03, 2018, 01:51:53 PM

Also Vod your twisting won't help you anymore.
You called me in public a scammer,liar and most important criminal.

And you've called 24 people in public a scammer, liar and most important criminal.

Quickselller type hypocrite. Roll Eyes

Quote from: Thule on November 03, 2018, 01:51:53 PM

Since you keep ignorant and acting like a douchbag you will get served.

The word is arrogant. Didn't you say your wife was a judge?

The case is between you and me only.
Anything else i said these people can open a case against me.They are free to do so.

No i didn't say she is a judge i said she owns a chamber/chancellery .Thats a big diffrence just for your info

@all
I got two PM's from 2 diffrent members asking me if they may join the lawsuite.
I don't currently know since i doubt this will be allowed by canadian law since in europe its 100% not allowed.
Also i will open a lawsuite via company and not my person.
I will call on monday a local lawyer and will post more information about it if it will be possible to join (maybe as company)

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: Thule on November 03, 2018, 01:51:53 PM

Also Vod your twisting won't help you anymore.
You called me in public a scammer,liar and most important criminal.

And you've called 24 people in public a scammer, liar and most important criminal.

Quickselller type hypocrite. Roll Eyes

Quote from: Thule on November 03, 2018, 01:51:53 PM

Since you keep ignorant and acting like a douchbag you will get served.

The word is arrogant. Didn't you say your wife was a judge?

Thule

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 276

Quote from: Vod on November 03, 2018, 02:27:26 AM

Quote from: Thule on November 02, 2018, 06:20:53 AM

And also one and for the final time if you take Vod's claim serious than you are also obliged in court to take the rest of that page serious.

And it clearly says : Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer.

Hey, you left trust:
Vod 2018-10-08 0.00000000 participating in merit circle

Where/When did I scam you?

If we take your claim serious then we are obliged to take the rest of the page serious...

You've called 24 people scammers without proof.

Roll Eyes

Quote

you strongly believe that this person is a scammer.

What purpose has merit ?

Quote

Yep, and as you're looking at tort law, you would need to prove that there are damages.

Yeah i know your garbage twisting.
But once again for you candian laws :

Plaintiffs don’t have to prove falsity, malice or special damages to win a defamation suit. As such, Canadian politicians often use libel litigation as a way to silence critics.

Defendants are considered prima facie liable until proven innocent.

Actual Malice is not a requirement in Canadian defamation lawsuits, meaning the plaintiff does not have to prove that the defendant lied with malicious intent.

Just as info i updated my trust feedback to move it back to the use it should have and not the the one some stupid DT members turned it to.

Also Vod your twisting won't help you anymore.
You called me in public a scammer,liar and most important criminal.

If one of the other people want to take actions against my claims they are free to do so.However i won't have to explain myself in canadian court because the case there will be only you defaming me.

Since you keep ignorant and acting like a douchbag you will get served.

mehedi89

brand new

Activity: 0

Merit: 0

https://www.google.com/url?q=http://[Suspicious link removed]/2Dg52og&sa=D&ust=1541208157730000&usg=AFQjCNGXsVNzxsXxvkfY8VqWk9ZeYiPa2g

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: Thule on November 02, 2018, 06:20:53 AM

And also one and for the final time if you take Vod's claim serious than you are also obliged in court to take the rest of that page serious.

And it clearly says : Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer.

Hey, you left trust:
Vod 2018-10-08 0.00000000 participating in merit circle

Where/When did I scam you?

If we take your claim serious then we are obliged to take the rest of the page serious...

You've called 24 people scammers without proof.

Roll Eyes

sirazimuth

legendary

Activity: 3388

Merit: 3514

born once atheist

Quote from: Thule on October 29, 2018, 03:01:58 AM

People who will get the special treatment from me

suchmoon
TheUltraElite
Timelord2067
The Pharmacist
Lauda
actmyname

Can I get special treatment too? My wife thinks I'm a jerk....

xtraelv

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1926

฿ear ride on the rainbow slide

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: actmyname on November 02, 2018, 04:48:48 PM

This is such a trivial matter that at worst, it would cost Vod some gas money.

That's OK - I just bought a brand new Prius.

The courthouse is close enough I could drive there on EV mode, using no gas at all.

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Quote from: Thule on November 02, 2018, 12:33:15 PM

canadian laws are awesome and clear

Yep, and as you're looking at tort law, you would need to prove that there are damages.

If we're talking libel then you should show that Vod has made false statements that directly caused you damages.

But then Vod can always claim that there was qualified privilege or fair comment and dismiss your case, full stop. The latter being, "you strongly believe this person is a scammer" being applied to your asinine behavior.

This is such a trivial matter that at worst, it would cost Vod some gas money.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 6981

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: TMAN on November 02, 2018, 11:25:19 AM

shit this is still going on... why people feeding the crazy?

I was wondering that myself, but Vod has had some pretty decent zingers aimed at Thule that were amusing to read.

Still, I think Thule has gone full mixan at this point and it's probably best to start giving this thread the deaf ear. I'm going to start this myself. I have nothing left to say in my defense of whatever it is Thule thinks my crime is, but I shall be waiting with bated breath for LE to show up at my door with a charge that I slandered/libeled someone on the interwebs.

ibminer

legendary

Activity: 1789

Merit: 2535

Goonies never say die.

This thread is starting to get like:

"I know you are, but what am I? I know you are, but what am I?.. Infinity!!" Grin

From a feedback perspective, Thule sealed his own fate with the way he's conducted himself after the feedback was left. Similar to a criminal who gets additional time when they come into court and decide to start attacking others in the courtroom. If the goal is or was to get a clean feedback record, he's already failed, and will continue to fail, whether a legal case has been won or not... but, uh, good luck with the legal battle, Thule... I'm sure there is much to be won here. Roll Eyes

BitcoinSupremo

copper member

Activity: 1442

Merit: 529

I am afraid as much as you try and as hard as you try , the negative is going to stay especially when is valid. People are suffering non-valid negative feedbacks and they are used to it, you want to clear your name by threatening and blackmailing ? I don't think this will lead you to any good. As LFC_Bitcoin said either deal with the negative or start new, you can't do much, this is decentralized forum there are no cops here and if you are concerned about signature campaigns there are a lot of altcoin ones who accept red trust persons.

Bottom line, there is a solution to everything.

Thule

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 276

canadian laws are awesome and clear

Quote

Plaintiffs don’t have to prove falsity, malice or special damages to win a defamation suit. As such, Canadian politicians often use libel litigation as a way to silence critics.

Quote

Defendants are considered prima facie liable until proven innocent.

Quote

Actual Malice is not a requirement in Canadian defamation lawsuits, meaning the plaintiff does not have to prove that the defendant lied with malicious intent.

So like i said previous all your nonsense claims are invalid in court

TMAN

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1808

Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do

shit this is still going on... why people feeding the crazy?

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Is it Monday yet? Feels like Monday with that "businessman" yapping here again.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote

Vod will be unable to claim in court

I'll have to be summoned to court before I can claim anything.

And that is not going to happen with a dishonest bozo like yourself.

Topic: Announcement @Lauda @ThePharacist @actmyname @Timelord2067 @suchmoon - page 6. (Read 3989 times)