Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][POOL] ZERGPOOL.com - Multialgo, autoexchange, 0.5% fee, 250+ coins - page 14. (Read 57740 times)

member
Activity: 1027
Merit: 19
Basically my entire operation is down -- x16r and x16s -- all display the same error... just says "no connection"

Worker "001" is at home... it connects on x16r.

I have a few systems on x17 at my main work location and they are all up.

http://zergpool.com/?address=1CdWHxQf41Bydd4JDxmBQ3Z1P9T6TRZdCR

Did my IP get banned or something ? Miner update needed perhaps ?

Please PM me your IP to verify

thanks
pinpin
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 2
Seems to be working better this morning for some reason. Been 7 days but today finally seeing some blocks being found on the solo a bit. I will monitor it all day hopefully pinpins looked at it.

It was wierd though, My antminers was showing blocks found even once I saw a block that was 1.8 billion which was maybe a digibyte but the pool reported nothing.
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028

I mean seriously I used to make 0.0025 a week.

Am I'm just having the worst luck ever or is there something up.

THERE MAY BE SOMETHING UP--

Recently, there was a network problem of some sort.  I think it affected some of the profitablity calculations for the worse.  The miner population shifted in response, and some of the top mining algos were actually providing little profit even if the coins at the market had a steady value. The number of miners and hash rate had dropped.

Your continual reports of solo-mining problems may have their own merit as well.  Personally, I'd like to know when any coins within an algorithm are being merge-mined versus individually mined with only portions of the total hash rate.  There are low value coins that I would not like to waste hash power on unless they are being merge-mined.  I use the "mc=COIN" flag in my password string to focus my hash, but would like to know if that focus is actually necessary.  If coins are being merge-mined, the "mc" flag is not necessary, as the low value coins  are mined with no separate effort.  On the other hand, if the pool software is portioning out the mining hash, I want my hash focused on the valuable coins.

And, as for solo-mining, there are some good algos where my hash is enough for mining blocks solo.  I just keep reading your reports and have not experimented, as I can't afford to waste hash.

Perhaps pinpins will respond...       --scryptr
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 2
Ok I got a bone to pick with pinpins

My address is 123tsfqm8UmK3UYs3ysLWtEfmXt1fhTcF4, I have been mining for a week in solo or party and hardly find any blocks at all. Now I went to a friend today that has some antminer l3's his address is 17UtYuUAh83Do5i2CGmG8MFBXqACqcz2Gr we setup a party together and have been running for almost 16 hours now and his miners are finding blocks but mine dead in the water.

Please see if my address is on a blacklist or something.

I mean seriously I used to make 0.0025 a week.

Am I'm just having the worst luck ever or is there something up.
newbie
Activity: 110
Merit: 0
Basically my entire operation is down -- x16r and x16s -- all display the same error... just says "no connection"

Worker "001" is at home... it connects on x16r.

I have a few systems on x17 at my main work location and they are all up.

http://zergpool.com/?address=1CdWHxQf41Bydd4JDxmBQ3Z1P9T6TRZdCR

Did my IP get banned or something ? Miner update needed perhaps ?

I am checking other algorithms and the same thing... "no connection" on nearly all of my work location stuff.

I can ping Zergpool & the algorithm servers no problem.

I can connect to ZPOOL no problem so my connection is fine.
newbie
Activity: 110
Merit: 0
Basically my entire operation is down -- x16r and x16s -- all display the same error... just says "no connection"

Worker "001" is at home... it connects on x16r.

I have a few systems on x17 at my main work location and they are all up.

http://zergpool.com/?address=1CdWHxQf41Bydd4JDxmBQ3Z1P9T6TRZdCR

Did my IP get banned or something ? Miner update needed perhaps ?
jr. member
Activity: 212
Merit: 6
Extremely high rate of "Invalid job id" for Veil because of increased lowest / default difficulty to 25 from 14. It was almost perfect just two days ago and for long time (months). It is not the first time you are doing this with your pool coins and you want to attract more miners with just removing 0,5% fee? With so high rate of invalid shares, you can easily have more profit from other pools even with higher fees. Looks like one more coin to mine with different pool...
member
Activity: 1027
Merit: 19
UPDATE

1. Pool fee on odocrypt algo has been reduced to 0% to attract more miners
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 2
Ran solo all day 8 hours of nothing at all nothing period no blocks no earnings nothing switched to shared within 11 min got block of verge.

Rage Quit.
full member
Activity: 204
Merit: 100


Magi -  this is mysticism  Roll Eyes  Tongue
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 2
Typical example was late last night around 11PM. The pool reported I found a block of Sagacoin but my miners reported no blocks found at all. Then left my miners in solo for the entire night the miners reported 4 blocks found yet the pool reported no blocks found.

I run scrypt mining btw.

jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 2
If someone wants to mine 50% solo and 50% shared they can split their
hash accordingly. I prefer to keep the pool egalitarian, it's less like a lottery.

Just my opinion.

Thanks for that but I left all my miners solo for 48 hours never got one block not even a crappy block like neetcoin. Switch to Shared mode for 48 hours I got 24 blocks even got neetcoin crappy blocks so either solo is broken or I have the worst luck in solo.
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
Zergpool gave me only 0.49 $ per day per L3+ .I tested 2 days with 13x L3+ and both days had same profit only 0.49 per machine in shared mode.Is it any mistake i do or is it so bad? (nicehash promising 0.77 $ per machine on calculator).This is what i have on password c=LTC,mc=NLG/GLD/XVG/GAME,pl=2.00 .

Only mining 4 coins there even left out DGB would explain why so low.

with 13 L3+'s c=LTC should be enough

Unless you want solo then c=LTC,m=solo

Thank you.I removed all coins as you said and at last hours i see profit raising Smiley .I will watch it for next days and give results.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
If someone wants to mine 50% solo and 50% shared they can split their
hash accordingly. I prefer to keep the pool egalitarian, it's less like a lottery.

Just my opinion.
member
Activity: 1027
Merit: 19
UPDATE

1. Bitcoin Rhodium(XRC) is now available for mining on x13 algorithm
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 2
Zergpool gave me only 0.49 $ per day per L3+ .I tested 2 days with 13x L3+ and both days had same profit only 0.49 per machine in shared mode.Is it any mistake i do or is it so bad? (nicehash promising 0.77 $ per machine on calculator).This is what i have on password c=LTC,mc=NLG/GLD/XVG/GAME,pl=2.00 .

Only mining 4 coins there even left out DGB would explain why so low.

with 13 L3+'s c=LTC should be enough

Unless you want solo then c=LTC,m=solo
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
Zergpool gave me only 0.49 $ per day per L3+ .I tested 2 days with 13x L3+ and both days had same profit only 0.49 per machine in shared mode.Is it any mistake i do or is it so bad? (nicehash promising 0.77 $ per machine on calculator).This is what i have on password c=LTC,mc=NLG/GLD/XVG/GAME,pl=2.00 .
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 2
All I'm running is two Antminer L3's pretty much worthless profits these days but sometimes I find a block here and there. But lately I have run over 48 hours finding nothing in solo or party modes. But when I switched to shared mode I tend to find blocks which is kinda wierd. But my rewards are maybe 1 % even though My miner confirmed the block.
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 2
Nope you would be the first. No other pool ever offers that period is either 100% solo or shared nothing in between.

member
Activity: 1027
Merit: 19
I know we have solo mode and party modes, but is there a way we could have a hybrid mode.

Just hear me out hybrid mode would be on the shared mode but if a block is found the miner would get 50% of the reward and the pool would get the other 50%. Earnings would still be the same as shared mode but when blocks are found the miner gets a 50/50 split.



Interesting idea, have you seen something similar implemented in any of pool, just to learn a bit more?

Thanks
Pages:
Jump to: