I'm also sort of interested in why the hash rate is so low while mining FST
FST has a fair amount of rejects because of well, how fast the blocks come. Unfortunately it looks like the difficulty on the pool isn't registering right either for FST, we more than doubled it from what the site is showing 
Topic: [ANN][Pool][Profit-Switch][Optional Auto-Exchange per Coin][Vardiff] ~ Hashcows - page 131. (Read 347329 times)
December 10, 2013, 11:50:41 PM
December 10, 2013, 11:49:59 PM
I'm also sort of interested in why the hash rate is so low while mining FST
Blocks get solved too quickly at this low of a difficulty.
December 10, 2013, 11:41:29 PM
I'm also sort of interested in why the hash rate is so low while mining FST
December 10, 2013, 11:37:28 PM
Hello, im new here, i just started mining here yesterday.
is this rejected % normal?
worker.1 = ATI 7970
worker.2 = ATI 7850
The kh in the pool is normally correct (in the print screen is a little low) but the rejected % is really high right? Do i have problems with my configurations or something?
is this rejected % normal?
worker.1 = ATI 7970
worker.2 = ATI 7850
The kh in the pool is normally correct (in the print screen is a little low) but the rejected % is really high right? Do i have problems with my configurations or something?
That look's extremely high though maybe you took the SS right after a coin switch to something with a high reject % (like FastCoin)
Though if some of the more pro miners have some tips for you, I'm sure they can help you out
My rejection rate is even higher, mainly my multi-gpu setups. FST is insanely low difficulty though which would cause it (I hope). Usually jobs are solved before you even submit then, hence the rejections.
December 10, 2013, 11:30:37 PM
Hello, im new here, i just started mining here yesterday.
is this rejected % normal?
worker.1 = ATI 7970
worker.2 = ATI 7850
The kh in the pool is normally correct (in the print screen is a little low) but the rejected % is really high right? Do i have problems with my configurations or something?
is this rejected % normal?
worker.1 = ATI 7970
worker.2 = ATI 7850
The kh in the pool is normally correct (in the print screen is a little low) but the rejected % is really high right? Do i have problems with my configurations or something?
That look's extremely high though maybe you took the SS right after a coin switch to something with a high reject % (like FastCoin)
Though if some of the more pro miners have some tips for you, I'm sure they can help you out
December 10, 2013, 11:14:45 PM
Hello, im new here, i just started mining here yesterday.
is this rejected % normal? http://s2.subirimagenes.com/imagen/previo/thump_8731382captura-de-pantalla.png
worker.1 = ATI 7970
worker.2 = ATI 7850
The kh in the pool is normally correct (in the print screen is a little low) but the rejected % is really high right? Do i have problems with my configurations or something?
is this rejected % normal? http://s2.subirimagenes.com/imagen/previo/thump_8731382captura-de-pantalla.png
worker.1 = ATI 7970
worker.2 = ATI 7850
The kh in the pool is normally correct (in the print screen is a little low) but the rejected % is really high right? Do i have problems with my configurations or something?
December 10, 2013, 11:06:14 PM
Is anybody else showing 0 for estimated earnings the last 3 rounds?
yeah, check a few posts up i think they're doing work on the DBThanks. I guess I missed that when I was skimming the thread. My bad.
December 10, 2013, 10:59:28 PM
Is anybody else showing 0 for estimated earnings the last 3 rounds?
Yup. They said they were playing with the estimated earnings functions though so hopefully it's just that.
December 10, 2013, 10:56:08 PM
Is anybody else showing 0 for estimated earnings the last 3 rounds?
yeah, check a few posts up i think they're doing work on the DB December 10, 2013, 10:52:00 PM
Is anybody else showing 0 for estimated earnings the last 3 rounds?
December 10, 2013, 10:41:38 PM
i think the algo is fine whatever they are doing behind the scenes. besides SBC, which we seem to be super slow switching off of. We spiked the difficulty to 14 and now 20 and the site is still showing it as difficulty 4 with us mining
December 10, 2013, 10:11:59 PM
Is there any chance that the algorithm for choosing the coin is shared with the cows for inspection? I often suspect that the choice of coin is suboptimal, but it is impossible to know for sure. The cows have the greatest incentive to optimize the algorithm besides hashco.ws, so why not bundle forces to improve it? Or could that knowledge be abused by a third party?
December 10, 2013, 09:58:19 PM
cool, thanks for reply.
few things I think would make your stats better
1. Include User Share count for each round
2. Include BTC/ hour metric for each round
3. You can make room in the table by removing coins for auto-trade. It can easily be derived from matured coins - paid out coins
Thanks!
few things I think would make your stats better
1. Include User Share count for each round
2. Include BTC/ hour metric for each round
3. You can make room in the table by removing coins for auto-trade. It can easily be derived from matured coins - paid out coins
Thanks!
December 10, 2013, 09:57:39 PM
Quick update:
-Est/confirmed exchanged #'s will be innacurate for a bit, while we continue to work on tweaking them on the back-end.
-SXC is indeed very profitable but round #5166 was thrown off by 2 stuck orders way above the current price. Though as you can see at current CORRECT prices it's profitability is over 140.
Moo
Glad I read this; I was worried my miner wasn't working. -Est/confirmed exchanged #'s will be innacurate for a bit, while we continue to work on tweaking them on the back-end.
-SXC is indeed very profitable but round #5166 was thrown off by 2 stuck orders way above the current price. Though as you can see at current CORRECT prices it's profitability is over 140.
Moo
December 10, 2013, 09:42:12 PM
Quick update:
-Est/confirmed exchanged #'s will be innacurate for a bit, while we continue to work on tweaking them on the back-end.
-SXC is indeed very profitable but round #5166 was thrown off by 2 stuck orders way above the current price. Though as you can see at current CORRECT prices it's profitability is over 140.
Moo
-Est/confirmed exchanged #'s will be innacurate for a bit, while we continue to work on tweaking them on the back-end.
-SXC is indeed very profitable but round #5166 was thrown off by 2 stuck orders way above the current price. Though as you can see at current CORRECT prices it's profitability is over 140.
Moo
When do you guys decide to stop the round and when do you start trading?
Shouldn't you trade right away as blocks mature, to make sure you don't miss out on profitability. Doesn't make sense to wait till another coin is more profitable to start selling. Am i missing something?
We attempt to trade right after the block matures and attempt to trade many times throughout the day
December 10, 2013, 09:40:31 PM
Quick update:
-Est/confirmed exchanged #'s will be innacurate for a bit, while we continue to work on tweaking them on the back-end.
-SXC is indeed very profitable but round #5166 was thrown off by 2 stuck orders way above the current price. Though as you can see at current CORRECT prices it's profitability is over 140.
Moo
-Est/confirmed exchanged #'s will be innacurate for a bit, while we continue to work on tweaking them on the back-end.
-SXC is indeed very profitable but round #5166 was thrown off by 2 stuck orders way above the current price. Though as you can see at current CORRECT prices it's profitability is over 140.
Moo
When do you guys decide to stop the round and when do you start trading?
Shouldn't you trade right away as blocks mature, to make sure you don't miss out on profitability. Doesn't make sense to wait till another coin is more profitable to start selling. Am i missing something?
December 10, 2013, 09:06:08 PM
Quick update:
-Est/confirmed exchanged #'s will be innacurate/off for a bit, while we continue to work on tweaking them on the back-end.
-SXC is indeed very profitable but round #5166 was thrown off by 2 stuck orders way above the current price. Though as you can see at current CORRECT prices it's profitability is over 140.
Moo
-Est/confirmed exchanged #'s will be innacurate/off for a bit, while we continue to work on tweaking them on the back-end.
-SXC is indeed very profitable but round #5166 was thrown off by 2 stuck orders way above the current price. Though as you can see at current CORRECT prices it's profitability is over 140.
Moo
December 10, 2013, 07:20:18 PM
Holy crap, 12 mins on SXC = estimated 0.013668 BTC, or 1.647023 BTC a day! If only......
Yea, were looking into it, I would doubt that is legit but if it is then we are happy cows!
I'll let you guys know.
The calculations of the cows were correct, I just don't think those buy orders on Craptsy are for real.
December 10, 2013, 07:19:51 PM
Looking at Cryptsy's trading history...looks like the trading history is broken at the moment for SXC.
Otherwise why is there so much cheap SXC for sale, when the buy is so large?
Think thats what caused the huge jump in SXC.
Otherwise why is there so much cheap SXC for sale, when the buy is so large?
Think thats what caused the huge jump in SXC.
December 10, 2013, 07:12:13 PM
Holy crap, 12 mins on SXC = estimated 0.013668 BTC, or 1.647023 BTC a day! If only......
Yea, were looking into it, I would doubt that is legit but if it is then we are happy cows!
I'll let you guys know.
SXC was literally raped by bunch of horned cows, mooo, moooo, MOOOOO!!!!
cow tipping
Jump to: