[ANN][Pool][Profit-Switch][Optional Auto-Exchange per Coin][Vardiff] ~ Hashcows - page 165.

Bonz

full member

Activity: 213

Merit: 100

Mining history: BTC->LTC->FTC->CRC:2200kh/s

Quote from: TheQuin on October 11, 2013, 02:50:44 PM

Quote from: atp1916 on October 11, 2013, 02:20:28 PM

There is no "loyalty" in a multicoin pool that hits the best prof coins.

In fact, it's the other way around.

In unrelated news, I cashed out a couple of BTC in my Coinbase account to my bank and the funds arrived in less than 24 hours, in fact, overnight. Shocked

Dogs are often loyal. People sometimes too. Loyalty to a coin is concept I struggle to understand.

Congrats on getting the money out of Coinbase Cheesy

the only reason to be loyal to a coin is if it is a coin you use in every day dealings. for example i am loyal to CraftCoin because i play on a mine craft server that is using it!

Speaking of CraftCoin how's it looking as an addition to the site?

Kuroth

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Something strange is going on.. One of my 2 cards all the sudden started overheating today.. It is getting up to 90+ before CGWatcher shuts it down..

I have never had a over heat issue until today.. They normally both run at 80...

Any ideas?

TheQuin

hero member

Activity: 2576

Merit: 882

Freebitco.in Support https://bit.ly/2I9BVS2

Quote from: atp1916 on October 11, 2013, 02:20:28 PM

There is no "loyalty" in a multicoin pool that hits the best prof coins.

In fact, it's the other way around.

In unrelated news, I cashed out a couple of BTC in my Coinbase account to my bank and the funds arrived in less than 24 hours, in fact, overnight. Shocked

Dogs are often loyal. People sometimes too. Loyalty to a coin is concept I struggle to understand.

Congrats on getting the money out of Coinbase Cheesy

atp1916

legendary

Activity: 854

Merit: 1000

There is no "loyalty" in a multicoin pool that hits the best prof coins.

In fact, it's the other way around.

In unrelated news, I cashed out a couple of BTC in my Coinbase account to my bank and the funds arrived in less than 24 hours, in fact, overnight. Shocked

TheQuin

hero member

Activity: 2576

Merit: 882

Freebitco.in Support https://bit.ly/2I9BVS2

Quote from: Wipeout2097 on October 11, 2013, 11:50:23 AM

Quote from: TheQuin on October 11, 2013, 07:09:14 AM

Quote from: Racer8 on October 11, 2013, 07:00:24 AM

Quote from: nearmiss on October 10, 2013, 12:13:55 AM

if my calcs are right, a block every 30min @ 500Mh/s would be ~.000332 BTC /Mh/s I believe that is a decent round, in comparison to our current crop of coins. Of course, it wouldn't take much bad luck to swing that quite a bit the wrong way.

I'm no statistical genius but if we mined the most profitable coin (even with a 30 min average block) in the medium/long term then we would still win out even if some rounds did not yield a coin? In other words if the BTC-per-minute-mined of a coin was the consistently the highest would it matter if the block was achieved in a number of shorter rounds some of which did not yield anything?

Just throwing it out there for finer minds than mine to consider.

You are absolutely correct, but most miners don't look at it over the long term. A few rounds with no reward will lead to a bad day and they will start filling up this forum complaining. Just read over the other multi coin pools' threads.

And they would have a point. Miners are not supposed to have loyalty to a pool that does not have loyalty to a coin

I'm not sure I understand what point you are making. I was just saying that there will likely be a number of rounds with no reward, which will be moaned about, but over a longer timeframe the rewards will be better.

Where does loyalty come into it?

Wipeout2097

sr. member

Activity: 840

Merit: 255

SportsIcon - Connect With Your Sports Heroes

Quote from: TheQuin on October 11, 2013, 07:09:14 AM

Quote from: Racer8 on October 11, 2013, 07:00:24 AM

Quote from: nearmiss on October 10, 2013, 12:13:55 AM

if my calcs are right, a block every 30min @ 500Mh/s would be ~.000332 BTC /Mh/s I believe that is a decent round, in comparison to our current crop of coins. Of course, it wouldn't take much bad luck to swing that quite a bit the wrong way.

I'm no statistical genius but if we mined the most profitable coin (even with a 30 min average block) in the medium/long term then we would still win out even if some rounds did not yield a coin? In other words if the BTC-per-minute-mined of a coin was the consistently the highest would it matter if the block was achieved in a number of shorter rounds some of which did not yield anything?

Just throwing it out there for finer minds than mine to consider.

You are absolutely correct, but most miners don't look at it over the long term. A few rounds with no reward will lead to a bad day and they will start filling up this forum complaining. Just read over the other multi coin pools' threads.

And they would have a point. Miners are not supposed to have loyalty to a pool that does not have loyalty to a coin

aTriz

hero member

Activity: 1232

Merit: 683

Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big

I think FTC would be a good add, especially since we have a little over 600mh/s now, I will talk to nearmiss and we will see about it getting enabled today.

TheQuin

hero member

Activity: 2576

Merit: 882

Freebitco.in Support https://bit.ly/2I9BVS2

Quote from: Racer8 on October 11, 2013, 08:02:12 AM

Quote from: TheQuin on October 11, 2013, 07:09:14 AM

Quote from: Racer8 on October 11, 2013, 07:00:24 AM

Quote from: nearmiss on October 10, 2013, 12:13:55 AM

if my calcs are right, a block every 30min @ 500Mh/s would be ~.000332 BTC /Mh/s I believe that is a decent round, in comparison to our current crop of coins. Of course, it wouldn't take much bad luck to swing that quite a bit the wrong way.

I'm no statistical genius but if we mined the most profitable coin (even with a 30 min average block) in the medium/long term then we would still win out even if some rounds did not yield a coin? In other words if the BTC-per-minute-mined of a coin was the consistently the highest would it matter if the block was achieved in a number of shorter rounds some of which did not yield anything?

Just throwing it out there for finer minds than mine to consider.

You are absolutely correct, but most miners don't look at it over the long term. A few rounds with no reward will lead to a bad day and they will start filling up this forum complaining. Just read over the other multi coin pools' threads.

It's a very good point - the pool must keep us troops happy

I should probably give up at this point but the last 30 rounds have an average period of 28 minutes so for a 30 min average block time if you get 5+ rounds a day on it then it will yield fairly consistent returns on a 24 hour basis?

It doesn't really matter how long the rounds are. e.g. If the pool mined FTC for 4 hours in a week if that was 40 rounds of 10 minutes or 4 rounds of 1 hour the same number of shares would be submitted with exactly the same chance of getting blocks, in this example it should be 8 blocks but of course will vary. In short the long term rewards are the same but with a larger short term variance.

To put it another way I agree with you that FTC should be added but if it is I'll have to stop watching this thread for a while. Grin

Racer8

full member

Activity: 150

Merit: 100

Quote from: TheQuin on October 11, 2013, 07:09:14 AM

Quote from: Racer8 on October 11, 2013, 07:00:24 AM

Quote from: nearmiss on October 10, 2013, 12:13:55 AM

if my calcs are right, a block every 30min @ 500Mh/s would be ~.000332 BTC /Mh/s I believe that is a decent round, in comparison to our current crop of coins. Of course, it wouldn't take much bad luck to swing that quite a bit the wrong way.

I'm no statistical genius but if we mined the most profitable coin (even with a 30 min average block) in the medium/long term then we would still win out even if some rounds did not yield a coin? In other words if the BTC-per-minute-mined of a coin was the consistently the highest would it matter if the block was achieved in a number of shorter rounds some of which did not yield anything?

Just throwing it out there for finer minds than mine to consider.

You are absolutely correct, but most miners don't look at it over the long term. A few rounds with no reward will lead to a bad day and they will start filling up this forum complaining. Just read over the other multi coin pools' threads.

It's a very good point - the pool must keep us troops happy

I should probably give up at this point but the last 30 rounds have an average period of 28 minutes so for a 30 min average block time if you get 5+ rounds a day on it then it will yield fairly consistent returns on a 24 hour basis?

TheQuin

hero member

Activity: 2576

Merit: 882

Freebitco.in Support https://bit.ly/2I9BVS2

Quote from: Racer8 on October 11, 2013, 07:00:24 AM

Quote from: nearmiss on October 10, 2013, 12:13:55 AM

if my calcs are right, a block every 30min @ 500Mh/s would be ~.000332 BTC /Mh/s I believe that is a decent round, in comparison to our current crop of coins. Of course, it wouldn't take much bad luck to swing that quite a bit the wrong way.

I'm no statistical genius but if we mined the most profitable coin (even with a 30 min average block) in the medium/long term then we would still win out even if some rounds did not yield a coin? In other words if the BTC-per-minute-mined of a coin was the consistently the highest would it matter if the block was achieved in a number of shorter rounds some of which did not yield anything?

Just throwing it out there for finer minds than mine to consider.

You are absolutely correct, but most miners don't look at it over the long term. A few rounds with no reward will lead to a bad day and they will start filling up this forum complaining. Just read over the other multi coin pools' threads.

Racer8

full member

Activity: 150

Merit: 100

Quote from: nearmiss on October 10, 2013, 12:13:55 AM

if my calcs are right, a block every 30min @ 500Mh/s would be ~.000332 BTC /Mh/s I believe that is a decent round, in comparison to our current crop of coins. Of course, it wouldn't take much bad luck to swing that quite a bit the wrong way.

I'm no statistical genius but if we mined the most profitable coin (even with a 30 min average block) in the medium/long term then we would still win out even if some rounds did not yield a coin? In other words if the BTC-per-minute-mined of a coin was the consistently the highest would it matter if the block was achieved in a number of shorter rounds some of which did not yield anything?

Just throwing it out there for finer minds than mine to consider.

LiteMine

sr. member

Activity: 380

Merit: 250

That XNC was smokin'! Wink

And 35% stale, not 70 lol

aTriz

hero member

Activity: 1232

Merit: 683

Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big

Xnc just couldn't handle the hash heh... still the payout as you guys can see is still well worth it, even with the stales. (For me at least) Hopefully soon we will have some different difficulty options for you guys to mess around with

Araviel

member

Activity: 114

Merit: 10

can you put a manual edit on difficulty of worker please ? We actually mine XNC and with a 200 dif I can't find any share between blocks...

thanks in advance.

Edit : XNC pool is around 70% stale lol

B.T.Coin

sr. member

Activity: 332

Merit: 250

I surely hope the estimated payout counter is broken. It is showing about 1/3 of what I usually get.

EDIT: It's a few hours later now and the estimation went back to normal.

12gaFacelift

sr. member

Activity: 277

Merit: 250

No Withdraw today? i make one at 9:20 and 25 minuts later still nothing in the exchange.

edit: ok ok i take it back, the exchange is having problem Undecided

....as usual

Eastwind

hero member

Activity: 896

Merit: 1000

I have 11.5MH/s from 4 rigs. It displays 10.4MH/s from the hash cow website. I have no problem with that as that value varies a lot. At the moment, it is mining WDC. My submitted share is 470, the total share 46850. So my percentage share of the total share is 1%. The total Hash is 532 MH/s at the moment, my percentage share of the mining power is 2%. So why there is such a big difference? My reject rate is 3.5%

Is it because the my submitted share and total number of share are not difficulty level adjusted (weighted differently)?

aTriz

hero member

Activity: 1232

Merit: 683

Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big