a similar project has already had to be in ICO
why do you think so?
Topic: [ANN][PRESALE] Pareto Network - The P2P Financial Content & Information Marketplace - page 79. (Read 64375 times)
December 03, 2017, 03:36:43 PM
December 03, 2017, 03:35:54 PM
a similar project has already had to be in ICO
why do you think so?
December 03, 2017, 03:35:32 PM
a similar project has already had to be in ICO
why do you think so? December 03, 2017, 03:35:05 PM
a similar project has already had to be in ICO
December 03, 2017, 03:34:29 PM
At what stage is the project now?
What exactly do you mean?
December 03, 2017, 03:34:12 PM
At what stage is the project now?
What exactly do you mean? December 03, 2017, 03:33:42 PM
At what stage is the project now?
What exactly do you mean? December 03, 2017, 03:33:23 PM
At what stage is the project now?
What exactly do you mean? December 03, 2017, 03:32:58 PM
At what stage is the project now?
What exactly do you mean? December 03, 2017, 03:31:15 PM
At what stage is the project now?
What exactly do you mean? December 03, 2017, 03:30:26 PM
At what stage is the project now?
December 03, 2017, 03:32:07 AM
I'm talking about the Waterfall. What we discussed earlier is the attraction of wealthy investors. The richer the investor, the earlier he will receive information. That is, the service itself has considered opportunities for the richest and customers who will pay not to informants but to services
what kind of waterfall are we talking about? I do not understand. But speaking in general, the developers of the service also want to eat, and the promotion of their own crypto-currency based on the service - a normal practice
He talked about an algorithm called Waterfall. This is an algorithm for distributing information between users in a certain sequence
December 03, 2017, 03:29:16 AM
I'm talking about the Waterfall. What we discussed earlier is the attraction of wealthy investors. The richer the investor, the earlier he will receive information. That is, the service itself has considered opportunities for the richest and customers who will pay not to informants but to services
what kind of waterfall are we talking about? I do not understand. But speaking in general, the developers of the service also want to eat, and the promotion of their own crypto-currency based on the service - a normal practice
December 03, 2017, 03:27:15 AM
I'm talking about the Waterfall. What we discussed earlier is the attraction of wealthy investors. The richer the investor, the earlier he will receive information. That is, the service itself has considered opportunities for the richest and customers who will pay not to informants but to services
December 03, 2017, 03:24:32 AM
do not forget that the information is distributed in a priority sequence, depending on the amount of crypto currency in the account.
and what now? for example, I would keep my money on the air, and in case I needed information that would interest me - I would transfer a couple of coins to an account in Pareto. So I would get priority, it is not difficult at all
December 03, 2017, 03:21:28 AM
do not forget that the information is distributed in a priority sequence, depending on the amount of crypto currency in the account.
what do you mean? that investors need to develop a crypto currency based on the service base in order to get the latest information? This is a normal practice for such cryptoservices
December 03, 2017, 03:18:55 AM
do not forget that the information is distributed in a priority sequence, depending on the amount of crypto currency in the account.
December 03, 2017, 03:15:30 AM
Guys, you know how much information means for the crypto currency market. Information is very expensive, and if the information is correct - it will bring a huge income. For example, if all users of the network were aware of the crisis in Zimbabwe this year and that the rapid growth of the DASH would be associated with it - very many man would now have a lot of money
Yes, you are right, the information will help to earn, or save a lot of resources. In such a case, a service of percentage incentives for the seller of information may be necessary. That is, in the event that the information will bring income to the investor, he will give a small percentage to the information provider. Let's say 1% of the income. If we take into account that the investor will not be alone, but the revenue will be significant, this is a good stimulus for sellers of information
In this case, the informant will remain with a hole in his pocket
Imagine yourself in the investor's place. It turns out that the price initially claimed as guaranteed will change during the transaction due to these 10%. This fact lowers the credibility of the service
December 03, 2017, 03:11:24 AM
Guys, you know how much information means for the crypto currency market. Information is very expensive, and if the information is correct - it will bring a huge income. For example, if all users of the network were aware of the crisis in Zimbabwe this year and that the rapid growth of the DASH would be associated with it - very many man would now have a lot of money
Yes, you are right, the information will help to earn, or save a lot of resources. In such a case, a service of percentage incentives for the seller of information may be necessary. That is, in the event that the information will bring income to the investor, he will give a small percentage to the information provider. Let's say 1% of the income. If we take into account that the investor will not be alone, but the revenue will be significant, this is a good stimulus for sellers of information
In this case, the informant will remain with a hole in his pocket
December 03, 2017, 03:08:41 AM
Guys, you know how much information means for the crypto currency market. Information is very expensive, and if the information is correct - it will bring a huge income. For example, if all users of the network were aware of the crisis in Zimbabwe this year and that the rapid growth of the DASH would be associated with it - very many man would now have a lot of money
Yes, you are right, the information will help to earn, or save a lot of resources. In such a case, a service of percentage incentives for the seller of information may be necessary. That is, in the event that the information will bring income to the investor, he will give a small percentage to the information provider. Let's say 1% of the income. If we take into account that the investor will not be alone, but the revenue will be significant, this is a good stimulus for sellers of information
I believe that it would be optimal not to put any specific interest for a successful transaction, investors themselves decide how much incentives to allocate an insider
Yes, I agree.
And I think that when the information will bring more than one thousand dollars - the buyer will have a natural desire to thank his informant, and there is no longer any restriction. The informant will receive a rating and financial encouragement
Jump to: