Topic: [ANN][RIC] Riecoin: constellations POW *CPU* HARD FORK successful, world record - page 191. (Read 685214 times)
March 20, 2014, 04:13:09 PM
WTB 360 RIC for 90 mBTC
March 20, 2014, 04:09:26 PM
Since the difficulty has dropped does that mean that less cpu's have been mining?
That means less cpus were mining before the difficulty dropped. March 20, 2014, 04:01:19 PM
Since the difficulty has dropped does that mean that less cpu's have been mining?
March 20, 2014, 03:49:26 PM
meh... upcpu is good for some locations, bad in others:
[00:27:20] 2ch/s: 3.8213 3ch/s: 0.1623 4ch/s: 0.0100 Shares total: 4 / 1
:/
[00:27:20] 2ch/s: 3.8213 3ch/s: 0.1623 4ch/s: 0.0100 Shares total: 4 / 1
:/
March 20, 2014, 03:46:51 PM
Fastest, for now, is mine: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dga/crypto/ric/
I should be pushing an update in a few hours. Dev fee is 7% now as discussed earlier, will be chopped down and open sourced with no fee within a few days. Only xptMiner is compatible with ypool at this point, to my knowledge.
I should be pushing an update in a few hours. Dev fee is 7% now as discussed earlier, will be chopped down and open sourced with no fee within a few days. Only xptMiner is compatible with ypool at this point, to my knowledge.
Aha, thanks for your swift reply.
Quote
Your compilation problem is because of an STL issue - you may be missing a -I to where clang has its STL, or are using an out of date version.
If it's any help for debugging, the same is done when I use g++4-9 or icpc instead of g++ (it's 4.8 by default in my system).
Quote
Are you on a mac? I haven't tried getting xptminer built on mine, but I could give it a go if that's why you're having troubles with it.
Nope, I'm on a linux / wolfdale setup, just looking to optimize through compilation with gcc-4.9, icc, clang, clang++, g++-4.9 and icpc.
The codebase you're using is about 8x slower than the binary release of mine. No amount of compiler help will make it worthwhile. But figuring out the issues you're working on will help when I open source mine - which is going to happen a little sooner than I anticipated.
Stay tuned.icc, in particular, might help a fair bit, but the bulk of the time is spent in GMP -- so if you want to do yourself a favor, get a super-tuned install of gmp.
I did throw a little ispc at it, but I've removed it for the open source version because (a) I optimized around the need for what I'd been doing; and (b) I didn't want to complicate the build.
There's a nice place where you could throw some ispc in there, though, if you feel like it. But it needs some architectural changes first.
I am preparing a pool with the new stratum miner code that will have servers very fast servers across the US. Would love to have the support of your high performance miner to relieve the power that a single large pool has over this coin!
March 20, 2014, 03:46:32 PM
Speak for yourself, most of my shares are accepted.
I am talking about 70 servers at 3 different providers, two in EU and one in the US.
March 20, 2014, 03:42:38 PM
Speak for yourself, most of my shares are accepted.
March 20, 2014, 03:33:54 PM
Since ypool has most of the hashing power and this is not good i want to mine in other pool.
But is there any other stable pool? Which? And how much less income do you expect to have in other pool?
income depends on the fee of the poolBut is there any other stable pool? Which? And how much less income do you expect to have in other pool?
why would you expect less income?
http://ric.upcpu.com/ already has 4 blocks
Too many invalid shares on upcpu (almost 400ms latency from Europe), we need an EU server! Willing to donate, upcpu owner contact me via pm
EDIT : 35% of shares submitted are invalid due to latency! Current server is hosted in China, we need both US and EU servers ASAP!
EDIT 2: Pool is unusable for anyone outside of China, latency fluctuates up to 5000ms and invalid shares are over 70%
Gave upcpu another try , invalid shares all over :
Server1
[00:09:52] 2ch/s: 12.4679 3ch/s: 0.4705 4ch/s: 0.0069 Shares total: 1 / 0
Server2
[00:10:00] 2ch/s: 12.1173 3ch/s: 0.4574 4ch/s: 0.0137 Shares total: 2 / 1
Server3
[00:10:08] 2ch/s: 11.8434 3ch/s: 0.4783 4ch/s: 0.0067 Shares total: 1 / 0
Server4
[00:10:32] 2ch/s: 12.4176 3ch/s: 0.4666 4ch/s: 0.0065 Shares total: 1 / 0
Server5
[00:10:33] 2ch/s: 12.4692 3ch/s: 0.5500 4ch/s: 0.0065 Shares total: 1 / 0
Server6
[00:10:48] 2ch/s: 11.8771 3ch/s: 0.4867 4ch/s: 0.0063 Shares total: 1 / 0
Server7
[00:10:40] 2ch/s: 12.7424 3ch/s: 0.4160 4ch/s: 0.0192 Shares total: 3 / 1
Server8
[00:10:48] 2ch/s: 11.7570 3ch/s: 0.4425 4ch/s: 0.0126 Shares total: 2 / 1
Server9
[00:10:56] 2ch/s: 12.1943 3ch/s: 0.4433 4ch/s: 0.0062 Shares total: 1 / 0
...
70 servers , 50%-100% invalid shares, not a single server has all shares accepted.
March 20, 2014, 03:21:46 PM
xpt protocol pools. For now that is: ypool.net and ric.upcpu.com
Thanks. I just went to download the faster client and saw AVX2 and SSE4 binaries. I only have up to ssse3, so I guess they won't run for me... Bummer.
March 20, 2014, 03:17:28 PM
Since ypool has most of the hashing power and this is not good i want to mine in other pool.
But is there any other stable pool? Which? And how much less income do you expect to have in other pool?
income depends on the fee of the poolBut is there any other stable pool? Which? And how much less income do you expect to have in other pool?
why would you expect less income?
http://ric.upcpu.com/ already has 4 blocks
Too many invalid shares on upcpu (almost 400ms latency from Europe), we need an EU server! Willing to donate, upcpu owner contact me via pm
EDIT : 35% of shares submitted are invalid due to latency! Current server is hosted in China, we need both US and EU servers ASAP!
EDIT 2: Pool is unusable for anyone outside of China, latency fluctuates up to 5000ms and invalid shares are over 70%
March 20, 2014, 03:14:21 PM
xpt protocol pools. For now that is: ypool.net and ric.upcpu.com
March 20, 2014, 03:09:10 PM
8 times? Nice stuff... With what pools is it compatible?
March 20, 2014, 02:44:04 PM
Fastest, for now, is mine: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dga/crypto/ric/
I should be pushing an update in a few hours. Dev fee is 7% now as discussed earlier, will be chopped down and open sourced with no fee within a few days. Only xptMiner is compatible with ypool at this point, to my knowledge.
I should be pushing an update in a few hours. Dev fee is 7% now as discussed earlier, will be chopped down and open sourced with no fee within a few days. Only xptMiner is compatible with ypool at this point, to my knowledge.
Aha, thanks for your swift reply.
Quote
Your compilation problem is because of an STL issue - you may be missing a -I to where clang has its STL, or are using an out of date version.
If it's any help for debugging, the same is done when I use g++4-9 or icpc instead of g++ (it's 4.8 by default in my system).
Quote
Are you on a mac? I haven't tried getting xptminer built on mine, but I could give it a go if that's why you're having troubles with it.
Nope, I'm on a linux / wolfdale setup, just looking to optimize through compilation with gcc-4.9, icc, clang, clang++, g++-4.9 and icpc.
The codebase you're using is about 8x slower than the binary release of mine. No amount of compiler help will make it worthwhile. But figuring out the issues you're working on will help when I open source mine - which is going to happen a little sooner than I anticipated.
Stay tuned.icc, in particular, might help a fair bit, but the bulk of the time is spent in GMP -- so if you want to do yourself a favor, get a super-tuned install of gmp.
I did throw a little ispc at it, but I've removed it for the open source version because (a) I optimized around the need for what I'd been doing; and (b) I didn't want to complicate the build.
There's a nice place where you could throw some ispc in there, though, if you feel like it. But it needs some architectural changes first.
March 20, 2014, 01:12:05 PM
Fastest, for now, is mine: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dga/crypto/ric/
I should be pushing an update in a few hours. Dev fee is 7% now as discussed earlier, will be chopped down and open sourced with no fee within a few days. Only xptMiner is compatible with ypool at this point, to my knowledge.
I should be pushing an update in a few hours. Dev fee is 7% now as discussed earlier, will be chopped down and open sourced with no fee within a few days. Only xptMiner is compatible with ypool at this point, to my knowledge.
Aha, thanks for your swift reply.
Quote
Your compilation problem is because of an STL issue - you may be missing a -I to where clang has its STL, or are using an out of date version.
If it's any help for debugging, the same is done when I use g++4-9 or icpc instead of g++ (it's 4.8 by default in my system).
Quote
Are you on a mac? I haven't tried getting xptminer built on mine, but I could give it a go if that's why you're having troubles with it.
Nope, I'm on a linux / wolfdale setup, just looking to optimize through compilation with gcc-4.9, icc, clang, clang++, g++-4.9 and icpc.
March 20, 2014, 12:49:09 PM
Fastest, for now, is mine: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dga/crypto/ric/
I should be pushing an update in a few hours. Dev fee is 7% now as discussed earlier, will be chopped down and open sourced with no fee within a few days. Only xptMiner is compatible with ypool at this point, to my knowledge.
Your compilation problem is because of an STL issue - you may be missing a -I to where clang has its STL, or are using an out of date version.
Are you on a mac? I haven't tried getting xptminer built on mine, but I could give it a go if that's why you're having troubles with it.
I should be pushing an update in a few hours. Dev fee is 7% now as discussed earlier, will be chopped down and open sourced with no fee within a few days. Only xptMiner is compatible with ypool at this point, to my knowledge.
Your compilation problem is because of an STL issue - you may be missing a -I to where clang has its STL, or are using an out of date version.
Are you on a mac? I haven't tried getting xptminer built on mine, but I could give it a go if that's why you're having troubles with it.
Is the miner in the first page compatible with ypool (seems to have its own?)... and if yes, which is the fastest?
And a second question: If I replace g++ with clang++ I get this:
make
clang++ -c -Wall -Wextra -std=c++0x -O3 -march=native -fomit-frame-pointer -march=native -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -IxptMiner/includes/ -IxptMiner/OpenCL -I../gmp-5.1.3 xptMiner/ticker.cpp -o xptMiner/ticker.o
clang++ -c -Wall -Wextra -std=c++0x -O3 -march=native -fomit-frame-pointer -march=native -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -IxptMiner/includes/ -IxptMiner/OpenCL -I../gmp-5.1.3 xptMiner/main.cpp -o xptMiner/main.o
In file included from xptMiner/main.cpp:1:
xptMiner/global.h:4:10: fatal error: 'algorithm' file not found
#include
^
1 error generated.
make: *** [xptMiner/main.o] Error 1
...any ideas to fix it?
And a second question: If I replace g++ with clang++ I get this:
make
clang++ -c -Wall -Wextra -std=c++0x -O3 -march=native -fomit-frame-pointer -march=native -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -IxptMiner/includes/ -IxptMiner/OpenCL -I../gmp-5.1.3 xptMiner/ticker.cpp -o xptMiner/ticker.o
clang++ -c -Wall -Wextra -std=c++0x -O3 -march=native -fomit-frame-pointer -march=native -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -IxptMiner/includes/ -IxptMiner/OpenCL -I../gmp-5.1.3 xptMiner/main.cpp -o xptMiner/main.o
In file included from xptMiner/main.cpp:1:
xptMiner/global.h:4:10: fatal error: 'algorithm' file not found
#include
^
1 error generated.
make: *** [xptMiner/main.o] Error 1
...any ideas to fix it?
March 20, 2014, 11:41:06 AM
Is the miner in the first page compatible with ypool (seems to have its own?)... and if yes, which is the fastest?
And a second question: If I replace g++ with clang++ I get this:
make
clang++ -c -Wall -Wextra -std=c++0x -O3 -march=native -fomit-frame-pointer -march=native -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -IxptMiner/includes/ -IxptMiner/OpenCL -I../gmp-5.1.3 xptMiner/ticker.cpp -o xptMiner/ticker.o
clang++ -c -Wall -Wextra -std=c++0x -O3 -march=native -fomit-frame-pointer -march=native -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -IxptMiner/includes/ -IxptMiner/OpenCL -I../gmp-5.1.3 xptMiner/main.cpp -o xptMiner/main.o
In file included from xptMiner/main.cpp:1:
xptMiner/global.h:4:10: fatal error: 'algorithm' file not found
#include
^
1 error generated.
make: *** [xptMiner/main.o] Error 1
...any ideas to fix it?
And a second question: If I replace g++ with clang++ I get this:
make
clang++ -c -Wall -Wextra -std=c++0x -O3 -march=native -fomit-frame-pointer -march=native -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -IxptMiner/includes/ -IxptMiner/OpenCL -I../gmp-5.1.3 xptMiner/ticker.cpp -o xptMiner/ticker.o
clang++ -c -Wall -Wextra -std=c++0x -O3 -march=native -fomit-frame-pointer -march=native -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -IxptMiner/includes/ -IxptMiner/OpenCL -I../gmp-5.1.3 xptMiner/main.cpp -o xptMiner/main.o
In file included from xptMiner/main.cpp:1:
xptMiner/global.h:4:10: fatal error: 'algorithm' file not found
#include
^
1 error generated.
make: *** [xptMiner/main.o] Error 1
...any ideas to fix it?
March 20, 2014, 05:41:54 AM
Since ypool has most of the hashing power and this is not good i want to mine in other pool.
But is there any other stable pool? Which? And how much less income do you expect to have in other pool?
income depends on the fee of the poolBut is there any other stable pool? Which? And how much less income do you expect to have in other pool?
why would you expect less income?
http://ric.upcpu.com/ already has 4 blocks
Too many invalid shares on upcpu (almost 400ms latency from Europe), we need an EU server! Willing to donate, upcpu owner contact me via pm
EDIT : 35% of shares submitted are invalid due to latency! Current server is hosted in China, we need both US and EU servers ASAP!
EDIT 2: Pool is unusable for anyone outside of China, latency fluctuates up to 5000ms and invalid shares are over 70%
March 20, 2014, 01:42:17 AM
Check out this message which explains it nicely too: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.906833
So it looks like maybe the spend isn't there yet?
I think it is, this explains how to spend: https://gist.github.com/gavinandresen/3966071Quote
You can then send funds into that 2-of-3 transaction using the normal sendtoaddress/sendmany RPC commands, or the GUI (or anything that's been updated to recognize multisig addresses).
That will create a multi signature transaction.
If you want to then SPEND the funds sent in that 2-of-3 transaction... that isn't implemented yet (well, if bitcoin has all 3 private keys in it's wallet then the funds will show up in the wallet's total balance and it may be selected to be spent like any other funds received by the wallet). "We" need to implement RPC calls to implement BIP 10 or something like it.
That will create a multi signature transaction.
If you want to then SPEND the funds sent in that 2-of-3 transaction... that isn't implemented yet (well, if bitcoin has all 3 private keys in it's wallet then the funds will show up in the wallet's total balance and it may be selected to be spent like any other funds received by the wallet). "We" need to implement RPC calls to implement BIP 10 or something like it.
So it looks like maybe the spend isn't there yet?
That was written much later than the post you linked.
Found this beta open source multisig address generator for BTC: https://coinb.in/multisig/
Perhaps someone could look into forking it for RIC. We don't even need to use it, it'd still be a valuable asset
March 20, 2014, 01:04:28 AM
diff down to 1504
Excellent for us low level miners!
avg. block time = 180
target time = 150
this means diff will go down even further at current rates
and RIC shows no signs of going below 0.25 milibits! 0.25 is resistance.
Yes, I will hodl these coins long term.
March 20, 2014, 12:06:29 AM
diff down to 1504
Excellent for us low level miners!
Jump to: