Author

Topic: [ANN][RIC] Riecoin: constellations POW *CPU* HARD FORK successful, world record - page 202. (Read 685214 times)

newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
ok - windows build (very beta) of my miner is now online, same URL - http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dga/crypto/ric/

It's the one that ends in .exe.  Same dev fee, but this one is 9% me, 0.5% jh00, 0.5% clintar - I used his mingw makefile.

I'll be chipping that fee down over the coming days, but hopefully it's worthwhile running now even with it.

I am using this version on a core i5 under windows 7 and boosted from 7 to 9.
However it will not run on a Athlon 64 x2 running windows XP 32 bit version.
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Riecoin and Huntercoin to rule all!
I'm glad I'm not mining RIC anymore, 3-5 guys are mining 50% of the coin, super fun! No wonders why this coin is dying and price 1/10th of what it used to be, it's a dump festival!

Yep, this coin is DEAD

I really doubt this coin is dead. Sure it is low volume but people are still mining this whether to dump or to hold. So its farrrrrr from death. I don't know how you guys define death? Price dropping? Because that would be pulling the trigger before gun is loaded kind of thought process.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
Updated the optimized ypool miner - about 10-30% faster (haven't finished an extensive head-to-head benchmark).

But this one is much more aggressive about being pool-friendly:  It sieves all six spots to a million, to try to reduce the advantage that the solo miners currently have vs the pool miners.

Please note that this one will still find you 10-30% more *shares* - but it will also help the pool find substantially more *blocks* for you to get shares of.  I've made sure that this extra pool-friendliness does not slow anything down for the individual miner (and, indeed, it's faster than b7).

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dga/crypto/ric/

  -Dave

Holey, shmoley.

Just starting it is already faster in all categories. Will let it run for a while and see how it settles in and report back.

Thanks for your work. Your fee is definitely worth it.

legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
I'm glad I'm not mining RIC anymore, 3-5 guys are mining 50% of the coin, super fun! No wonders why this coin is dying and price 1/10th of what it used to be, it's a dump festival!

Yep, this coin is DEAD
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
RIE/BTC went live on agx.io on 03/15/2014!

Be sure to check out agx.io to learn about our just-announced AMD Radeon R9 280x Giveaway that runs through 11:59p Sunday March 23rd 2014! Trade on AGX to earn entries in the giveaway! You can also link directly to the infographic on the promo here: http://24.media.tumblr.com/d22fc786c1528580d601aabc03fef3e2/tumblr_n2jsh3w23G1trlaa8o1_1280.png

- The Austin Global Team

Find us at:
agx.io
bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=507474
bitcointalk handles: "agx.io," "AustinGlobal"
twitter.com/AustinGlobalX
austinglobal.tumblr.com
dga
hero member
Activity: 737
Merit: 511
I'm glad I'm not mining RIC anymore, 3-5 guys are mining 50% of the coin, super fun! No wonders why this coin is dying and price 1/10th of what it used to be, it's a dump festival!

Eh - mine are all going to ypool and getting split up between everyone else. Smiley

I'll release the high-performance version as soon as we resolve the fairness issue a little more.  I'll probably do binary only to start to prevent 4chain patching.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1005
I'm glad I'm not mining RIC anymore, 3-5 guys are mining 50% of the coin, super fun! No wonders why this coin is dying and price 1/10th of what it used to be, it's a dump festival!
dga
hero member
Activity: 737
Merit: 511
...
After all - why do you charge a fee on your pool?  *grin*

The alternatives are worse for the coin, I think:  If you look at what's happening with RIC right now, for example, there's one person solo mining 10% of the blocks with a private, super-optimized miner (not mine;  user a00k).  Supercomputing could be doing it too.  Any of the advanced miner devs could rent out a ton of machines quite profitably and mine on them.  But I think those approaches aren't nearly as good for the coin as having a lot of people interested in it and participating -- and finding huge prime clusters.  The alternative leaves every-day miners disgruntled at their block rates, which is part of why I'm releasing my stuff, beyond the annoying cheater on ypool.  Riecoin is cool and fun, and I want people to be having fun mining it and participating.

Yeah, but over time it will get better as more optimized miners are released. I charge a pool fee to "cover expenses"  Wink

I did try to implement a developer fee, but the way I thought of doing it (probably very hacky) was just to hard to implement without knowing more C++, php, and python :/

I am also currently mining about 10 percent of the blocks, but doing so with very little resources (20 CPUs). Even at this difficulty, I am solving 60-65 blocks per day with the pure x86-64 assembly implementation of my solo miner which is more efficient at higher difficulties. However, when the public versions catch up, we should easily reach 1536-bit difficulty, the race is on.

You're still ahead.  Smiley I'm mining 7% using a fairly similar set of resources on a private branch of my miner that's running in full-out block finder mode.  It's a bit of a shame - it costs me shares on ypool, but I really want to get the fairness issue worked out.
sr. member
Activity: 278
Merit: 250
...
After all - why do you charge a fee on your pool?  *grin*

The alternatives are worse for the coin, I think:  If you look at what's happening with RIC right now, for example, there's one person solo mining 10% of the blocks with a private, super-optimized miner (not mine;  user a00k).  Supercomputing could be doing it too.  Any of the advanced miner devs could rent out a ton of machines quite profitably and mine on them.  But I think those approaches aren't nearly as good for the coin as having a lot of people interested in it and participating -- and finding huge prime clusters.  The alternative leaves every-day miners disgruntled at their block rates, which is part of why I'm releasing my stuff, beyond the annoying cheater on ypool.  Riecoin is cool and fun, and I want people to be having fun mining it and participating.

Yeah, but over time it will get better as more optimized miners are released. I charge a pool fee to "cover expenses"  Wink

I did try to implement a developer fee, but the way I thought of doing it (probably very hacky) was just to hard to implement without knowing more C++, php, and python :/

I am also currently mining about 10 percent of the blocks, but doing so with very little resources (20 CPUs). Even at this difficulty, I am solving 60-65 blocks per day with the pure x86-64 assembly implementation of my solo miner which is more efficient at higher difficulties. However, when the public versions catch up, we should easily reach 1536-bit difficulty, the race is on.
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
ok - windows build (very beta) of my miner is now online, same URL - http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dga/crypto/ric/

It's the one that ends in .exe.  Same dev fee, but this one is 9% me, 0.5% jh00, 0.5% clintar - I used his mingw makefile.

I'll be chipping that fee down over the coming days, but hopefully it's worthwhile running now even with it.

Thanks dga,I'm running your windows miner now
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
Finished a lot quicker than I expected. Mostly because I've been working on this the entire day since I got home. Felt productive Smiley. Sent the design to gatra. Hope he can upload it and show you the new designed site. Sleeping now.

Yes better design, I like the following.
1. Not so overpowering with green.
2. video does not play every time I visit.
3. Useful links. I like the idea of a live ticker from Poloniex. He was with us from the start.
4. Clear menus.
5. Nice size and placement for the riecoin symbol a the top.

Not quite sure about the 3 boxes below the video they seem clunky somehow.

Bigtruck
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Riecoin and Huntercoin to rule all!
I have a simple idea to solve the "trust" issue. If he agrees, we send everything to gatra in order to safeguard them. Simple as that ...
Yeah, that is an easy way of doing it... If gatra steals the funds the coin will have no future (creator is scammer).

I agree, although I hate to ask Gatra to take on another responsibility. But yea, he can't steal the funds because they'd be worthless pretty damn fast.

I disagree on this because it leaves money in the hand of one unknown individual. Although I trust gatra, doing it that way is too illogical in an organization sense. And I agree with Remi that Gatra shouldn't take on too many responsibility. From what I know, he has outside work beside  developing Riecoin. The point of this foundation is for Gatra to only focus on Riecoin development and to relieve him of some of his stress, not add on to it.

The foundation should have a trustless or close to it system.
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 501
I have a simple idea to solve the "trust" issue. If he agrees, we send everything to gatra in order to safeguard them. Simple as that ...
Yeah, that is an easy way of doing it... If gatra steals the funds the coin will have no future (creator is scammer).

I agree, although I hate to ask Gatra to take on another responsibility. But yea, he can't steal the funds because they'd be worthless pretty damn fast.
dga
hero member
Activity: 737
Merit: 511
Updated the optimized ypool miner - about 10-30% faster (haven't finished an extensive head-to-head benchmark).

But this one is much more aggressive about being pool-friendly:  It sieves all six spots to a million, to try to reduce the advantage that the solo miners currently have vs the pool miners.

Please note that this one will still find you 10-30% more *shares* - but it will also help the pool find substantially more *blocks* for you to get shares of.  I've made sure that this extra pool-friendliness does not slow anything down for the individual miner (and, indeed, it's faster than b7).

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dga/crypto/ric/

  -Dave
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 250
"Trading Platform of The Future!"
I have a simple idea to solve the "trust" issue. If he agrees, we send everything to gatra in order to safeguard them. Simple as that ...
Yeah, that is an easy way of doing it... If gatra steals the funds the coin will have no future (creator is scammer).
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
I have a simple idea to solve the "trust" issue. If he agrees, we send everything to gatra in order to safeguard them. Simple as that ...
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Riecoin and Huntercoin to rule all!
For the foundation, I will be PMing those interested in 2 weeks to gather ideas on how to actually implement a trustless system that everyone agrees on. Until then, signups are encouraged. All we need from you is time and dedication.
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Riecoin and Huntercoin to rule all!
Guess the majority of the community (or the one that spoke up) wants Option 2 in the design. I will make fixes with suggestions from the members to spoken up from btctalk and rictalk. Give me a week max. Work has me handling 3 projects so I am swamped. Meanwhile I will ask Gatra to post it live first. It only needs some minor cosmetic fixes so I don't see the problem not to go live with it. Better site = more people interested.
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 501
A major problem is that this requires trusting the exchange. If the exchange is unknown, how can people be sure there is no corruption?

Quote
The address will of course be available 24/7 for the community to check the amount inside the wallet.

Do any exchanges keep all of the Riecoin for a given account at one address?

Quote
Finally, before I forget, there is a 200 RIC fee to join this foundation. It is to make sure you are serious and dedicated.
I don't think this is necessary. It should be easy enough to determine if one is serious through other means. I strongly oppose this.
Quote
You will also have to reveal your real life identity to the foundation so that we can release this information if you abuse the foundation in any possible ways.
I also oppose this.
Quote
The information will be kept private from the public of course.
How can anyone trust this will be the case? This trusts the 5 people fully and equally.

I think a better system is to have trusted parties control arbitrary amounts of the foundation's funds. This system is better because it is not as convoluted, and it is more open and transparent. Rather than making personal information public for accountability, the party will lose all of the trust it had.

You have a point. But entrusting any amount of RIC to one individual is too risky even if you split it amongst five. I would rather rely on the current exchanges we have now AGX.io and Poloniex.com owner are identified. Only worries is Mintpal and BTC38. Maybe a solution is to keep a arbitrary amount in multiple random exchanges and withdraw them every month and mix them around the exchanges we have right now? I am for suggestions. Guess for now, I will just take up names of people who are interested in becoming part of the foundation.

hmmm, great idea, hard to figure out how best to execute it though. I agree that its probably best if there are not minimum donation limits or requirements to be public to join the foundation. Although that said, I'm happy put 200RIC towards this as well - and don't worry NR, you'll get your bounty for sure when the new site goes live.....

A divided foundation could maybe work. I'm not sure whats best. Lets all think on this some more, but definitely something we need to do one way or another.

Oh and thoughts on website design, while I'm here. Sorry I'm so busy I just have very little time for Riecoining right now. but:

Look and layout to me looked really good. I like it a lot. Fonts, background, everything. 2 things I would note from a very quick survey though:
1)the folder style link boxes halfway down are cool, but could use some sort of a border around them i think - maybe a drop shadow?
2)Would be nice to have a bigger 'team' on the about page. Oh and, I am both Remistevens and Bill Sotnikow. I'm Remi for fun (comedy vids, music), and I'm Bill for clients (my real name). I freelance online so I'm already very public. You can find my address, phone number, work history everything you would need to torment me if needed.

legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
ok - windows build (very beta) of my miner is now online, same URL - http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dga/crypto/ric/

It's the one that ends in .exe.  Same dev fee, but this one is 9% me, 0.5% jh00, 0.5% clintar - I used his mingw makefile.

I'll be chipping that fee down over the coming days, but hopefully it's worthwhile running now even with it.

Back to report.

On my Amd 8350 I am now getting: 2ch/s:  8.835 was 3.784     3 ch/s: 0.216 was  0.071      4 ch/s: 0.0051 was 0.0004
On my Amd 1100T results are         2ch/s: 11.012                   3 ch/s: 0.268                      4 ch/s: 0.0054

I didn't write down my before results on the 1100T since I seen it was a huge improvement on the 8350. My confirmed/unconfirmed balance on YPool is now back to about 2.9026 coins.

I didn't notice a big improvement on my Intel Xeon L5520, I also only ran it for about 20 mins. It went from 2ch/s: 2.910 to 3.230 but it didn't find any shares so I went back to the old one. I will try it again today and be a little more patient with it (also still trying to figure out how to overclock it). I also have not tried it at all on my Amd Phenom II X3 but I am going to try it today also.

Thanks for the work.

Jump to: