Topic: [ANN][RIC] Riecoin: constellations POW *CPU* HARD FORK successful, world record - page 76. (Read 685265 times)
April 08, 2017, 01:16:22 PM
Hello ! anyone can help me? I download the wallet . But he is not synchronizing. 3 years and 8 week behind. thank you.
April 08, 2017, 10:08:06 AM
{
"version" : 100200,
"protocolversion" : 10070001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 646528,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 519,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 1419.00000000,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1486796207,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"relayfee" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : ""
}
"version" : 100200,
"protocolversion" : 10070001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 646528,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 519,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 1419.00000000,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1486796207,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"relayfee" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : ""
}
That is very interesting....
He is a sleeping giant, maybe?
Anyway, interesting to take a look
...... 
Just in case RIC wake up 
April 08, 2017, 08:19:18 AM
Today we will see it at 5500
Longterm you think $1?
April 08, 2017, 08:15:20 AM
Today we will see it at 5500
April 08, 2017, 08:10:25 AM
Wow Big pump Korean, new highs already. Hope RIC can see 5000 sats today
How high u think could go?
April 08, 2017, 07:08:19 AM
Wow Big pump Korean, new highs already. Hope RIC can see 5000 sats today
April 08, 2017, 05:16:23 AM
April 07, 2017, 05:41:47 AM
100k sats here we go!
April 05, 2017, 11:12:03 AM
The problem is not you get more of the 50% of the blocks, read previous messages, the problem was, you (in purpose or not) forked the chain.
Riepool was blocks after the main chain and connect to the main chain two or three times to spend transactions.
There's no problem if there is an user who have 50% of hashrate or a pool or whatever, the problem is when the user uses the hashrate to fork the
chain and destroys the normal functioning of the coin.
The user, or the pool, with 50% of the hashrate is not doing malicius activities to the chain and now all works normally.
Riepool was blocks after the main chain and connect to the main chain two or three times to spend transactions.
There's no problem if there is an user who have 50% of hashrate or a pool or whatever, the problem is when the user uses the hashrate to fork the
chain and destroys the normal functioning of the coin.
The user, or the pool, with 50% of the hashrate is not doing malicius activities to the chain and now all works normally.
I repeat for the last time if the network had problems is not up to me!
However we still waiting for your answer:
Quote
For xpoolx: can you explain why you're getting 5% of the coins on the blocks resolved in solo by one user (now about 50% of the blocks)?
Why did you decide to move months ago your great mining capacity from xpoolx to solo mining?
If not you, then you made an agreement with someone?
Why did you decide to move months ago your great mining capacity from xpoolx to solo mining?
If not you, then you made an agreement with someone?
let.s start over it and continue with it and then see what,s happens to us.
March 31, 2017, 11:02:23 PM
Github
https://github.com/riecoin/riecoin
The Linux compile
needs to update the rpcrawtransaction.cpp file changing line 299
Find the riecoin home folder once its cloned click, src click, find open
RPCRawTransaction.cpp click,
Change line 299 to
const CScriptID& hash = boost::get(address);
Click Save and close
https://github.com/unitusdev/unitus/commit/5258735ad867b44eadf58eaf27a6639da43f81a0
https://github.com/riecoin/riecoin
The Linux compile
needs to update the rpcrawtransaction.cpp file changing line 299
Find the riecoin home folder once its cloned click, src click, find open
RPCRawTransaction.cpp click,
Change line 299 to
const CScriptID& hash = boost::get
Click Save and close
https://github.com/unitusdev/unitus/commit/5258735ad867b44eadf58eaf27a6639da43f81a0
yup - got that before ...
tanx ...
the issue is the python install for the algo used ... changes need to be done - but i dont have the time to look now ... i have to fly out ( or drive - depending on flooding here ) for a week or two - so i cant work on anything but the project i am flying out for ... so will be a few weeks before i can 'mess' with our code - let alone test ...
tanx again ...
#crysx
March 31, 2017, 08:25:20 PM
Github
https://github.com/riecoin/riecoin
The Linux compile
needs to update the rpcrawtransaction.cpp file changing line 299
Find the riecoin home folder once its cloned click, src click, find open
RPCRawTransaction.cpp click,
Change line 299 to
const CScriptID& hash = boost::get(address);
Click Save and close
https://github.com/unitusdev/unitus/commit/5258735ad867b44eadf58eaf27a6639da43f81a0
https://github.com/riecoin/riecoin
The Linux compile
needs to update the rpcrawtransaction.cpp file changing line 299
Find the riecoin home folder once its cloned click, src click, find open
RPCRawTransaction.cpp click,
Change line 299 to
const CScriptID& hash = boost::get
Click Save and close
https://github.com/unitusdev/unitus/commit/5258735ad867b44eadf58eaf27a6639da43f81a0
March 29, 2017, 09:35:56 AM
he should know - he built our stratum also ... an awesome guy to say the least about ahmed ... and he has little time free for much else at the moment - let alone debugging our system with the inclusion of a another stratum in the mix ...
...yes, his work was very helpful for the altcoin community!
good luck with your project!
yup - honest and talented ahmed is ... pretty awesome guy also ...
there will be time to start looking at the links you supplied earlier - for the riecoin changes that need to be made ...
ill be in touch soon mate ...
tanx ...
#crysx
March 29, 2017, 09:34:00 AM
he should know - he built our stratum also ... an awesome guy to say the least about ahmed ... and he has little time free for much else at the moment - let alone debugging our system with the inclusion of a another stratum in the mix ...
...yes, his work was very helpful for the altcoin community!
good luck with your project!
March 29, 2017, 08:21:45 AM
ok ...
seems that the work involved in getting this 'algo' to integrate into the existing stratum - is more work than its worth ... as its a complete rewrite ...
damn! ...
this is the issue with this type of setup - where adoption is minimal - and the difficulty level in getting things integrated costs more than the infrastructure itself ... until we have the extra time ( which is the main reason ) and cashflow ( the second ) to commit to the development of the backend systems for the coin - at this moment in time this module for our systems needs to be shelved for us at cwi ...
apologies - as i truly believe this is a coin worth following ...
#crysx
seems that the work involved in getting this 'algo' to integrate into the existing stratum - is more work than its worth ... as its a complete rewrite ...
damn! ...
this is the issue with this type of setup - where adoption is minimal - and the difficulty level in getting things integrated costs more than the infrastructure itself ... until we have the extra time ( which is the main reason ) and cashflow ( the second ) to commit to the development of the backend systems for the coin - at this moment in time this module for our systems needs to be shelved for us at cwi ...
apologies - as i truly believe this is a coin worth following ...
#crysx
sorry but if you need a complete rewrite then you're not doing it the right way. If you look at the changes I made in order to adapt the stratum-mining you can see it's not many lines. It's true that the block header has changed so you'll need some rewrite if you didn't plan for that, but it's not that much, any coin that isn't just a btc clone will need some effort. Our stratum code was merged by ahmedbodi in https://github.com/ahmedbodi/stratum-mining, there you can see a version that works for more coins.
If you are developing a mining platform and you open source your code maybe I could help you with riecoin-specific code.
Regards!
tanx mate ...
its a very similar system - but from what ive been told ( by the namesake who built the stratum you mentioned ) - he told me that its a LOT of work with the custom cwi-stratum that was built for us ...
he should know - he built our stratum also ... an awesome guy to say the least about ahmed ... and he has little time free for much else at the moment - let alone debugging our system with the inclusion of a another stratum in the mix
...he didnt say it 'couldnt' be done - he said its a LOT of work involved due to a rewrite of the code of our cwi-stratum ...
though the beauty of the cwi-stratum is such that - it MAY work alongside another python stratum like what ahmed has created and what you have converted ... so if it is possible - we maybe able to use the stratum that you have there for riecoin - without recoding our own stratum ... the issue there is - if anything happens for any reason - it would mean a much more complex case for debugging
... as we are bringing in a separate entity into the equation ...but it maybe worth a try - and i may have a go in a separate profile altogether - to sort of 'sandbox' the stratum form our main cwi-stratum currently installed ...
lets see how this goes ... i appreciate the offer for help also - as when i start - i will undoubtedly require your help
...#crysx
March 29, 2017, 06:50:39 AM
Today is the day for ric, shakeout went well now it is time for 3k+
i do not think sobecause chinese have too much riecoin
March 29, 2017, 06:43:38 AM
ok ...
seems that the work involved in getting this 'algo' to integrate into the existing stratum - is more work than its worth ... as its a complete rewrite ...
damn! ...
this is the issue with this type of setup - where adoption is minimal - and the difficulty level in getting things integrated costs more than the infrastructure itself ... until we have the extra time ( which is the main reason ) and cashflow ( the second ) to commit to the development of the backend systems for the coin - at this moment in time this module for our systems needs to be shelved for us at cwi ...
apologies - as i truly believe this is a coin worth following ...
#crysx
seems that the work involved in getting this 'algo' to integrate into the existing stratum - is more work than its worth ... as its a complete rewrite ...
damn! ...
this is the issue with this type of setup - where adoption is minimal - and the difficulty level in getting things integrated costs more than the infrastructure itself ... until we have the extra time ( which is the main reason ) and cashflow ( the second ) to commit to the development of the backend systems for the coin - at this moment in time this module for our systems needs to be shelved for us at cwi ...
apologies - as i truly believe this is a coin worth following ...
#crysx
sorry but if you need a complete rewrite then you're not doing it the right way. If you look at the changes I made in order to adapt the stratum-mining you can see it's not many lines. It's true that the block header has changed so you'll need some rewrite if you didn't plan for that, but it's not that much, any coin that isn't just a btc clone will need some effort. Our stratum code was merged by ahmedbodi in https://github.com/ahmedbodi/stratum-mining, there you can see a version that works for more coins.
If you are developing a mining platform and you open source your code maybe I could help you with riecoin-specific code.
Regards!
March 29, 2017, 03:32:03 AM
Today is the day for ric, shakeout went well now it is time for 3k+
March 28, 2017, 01:40:50 PM
ONLY RIC IS LEFT ON POLO TO GO 2 TO 4X
10x+ potential.. not 4x.. I think today we will break 3k then we can say real breakout happened.. and then moon
March 28, 2017, 08:17:09 AM
ONLY RIC IS LEFT ON POLO TO GO 2 TO 4X
March 27, 2017, 09:39:27 PM
ok ...
seems that the work involved in getting this 'algo' to integrate into the existing stratum - is more work than its worth ... as its a complete rewrite ...
damn! ...
this is the issue with this type of setup - where adoption is minimal - and the difficulty level in getting things integrated costs more than the infrastructure itself ... until we have the extra time ( which is the main reason ) and cashflow ( the second ) to commit to the development of the backend systems for the coin - at this moment in time this module for our systems needs to be shelved for us at cwi ...
apologies - as i truly believe this is a coin worth following ...
#crysx
seems that the work involved in getting this 'algo' to integrate into the existing stratum - is more work than its worth ... as its a complete rewrite ...
damn! ...
this is the issue with this type of setup - where adoption is minimal - and the difficulty level in getting things integrated costs more than the infrastructure itself ... until we have the extra time ( which is the main reason ) and cashflow ( the second ) to commit to the development of the backend systems for the coin - at this moment in time this module for our systems needs to be shelved for us at cwi ...
apologies - as i truly believe this is a coin worth following ...
#crysx
Jump to: