Topic: [ANN][RIC] Riecoin: constellations POW *CPU* HARD FORK successful, world record - page 79. (Read 685207 times)
March 15, 2017, 08:50:27 AM
Hello everyone! I'm looking to learn more about Riecoin. I will go through your thread and read up on it, but also - what's the most recent word on the development? I think that the price may rise shortly, there's a huge buy wall on Poloniex.
March 13, 2017, 04:57:34 PM
whoah! someone is making a great work to maintan the ric network. Im connecting to 93 peers right now.
Thanks!
I've noticed a lot of peers as well, but check the "startingheight" on these nodes, they're all sub 100,000 blocks. Think it's a coincidence that over 100 peers show up, all un-synchronized within a few days? Thanks!
March 13, 2017, 03:27:14 AM
whoah! someone is making a great work to maintan the ric network. Im connecting to 93 peers right now.
Thanks!
Thanks!
March 11, 2017, 08:00:09 AM
Give me a break Simba, no pool should have over 51% hashpower. Your constant trolling / FUD spewing is toxic to the community.
Maybe someone does not know or forgot yPool periods....I do not troll nobody, just tell what I think about the current situation of Riecoin and hopefully we can still speak freely here......
Are you actually arguing that it's perfectly okay for one pool or miner to have over 50% of the hashrate?
March 11, 2017, 07:54:23 AM
Give me a break Simba, no pool should have over 51% hashpower. Your constant trolling / FUD spewing is toxic to the community.
Maybe someone does not know or forgot yPool periods....I do not troll nobody, just tell what I think about the current situation of Riecoin and hopefully we can still speak freely here......
March 11, 2017, 07:34:54 AM
Riepool has mined 61% of the last 100 blocks and 40% of the last 1000.
Miners need to spread the hashrate, move to XpoolX or uBlock.it or go solo. Not doing so will surly cause the price to drop even farther.
I do not think that the value of the coin depends on how hashrate has a pool compared to another. The pumps are periodicMiners need to spread the hashrate, move to XpoolX or uBlock.it or go solo. Not doing so will surly cause the price to drop even farther.
Give me a break Simba, no pool should have over 51% hashpower. Your constant trolling / FUD spewing is toxic to the community.
March 11, 2017, 07:32:05 AM
Thats curious, this is the exact argument your are using for the addres who is mining lot of the blocks, now you changed your mind? Funny
Dear I was talking about hashrate spreading on different POOLS, where also other users can benefit from it and not about solo mining. March 11, 2017, 07:06:47 AM
Riepool has mined 61% of the last 100 blocks and 40% of the last 1000.
Miners need to spread the hashrate, move to XpoolX or uBlock.it or go solo. Not doing so will surly cause the price to drop even farther.
I do not think that the value of the coin depends on how hashrate has a pool compared to another. The pumps are periodicMiners need to spread the hashrate, move to XpoolX or uBlock.it or go solo. Not doing so will surly cause the price to drop even farther.
Thats curious, this is the exact argument your are using for the addres who is mining lot of the blocks, now you changed your mind? Funny
March 11, 2017, 06:31:41 AM
Riepool has mined 61% of the last 100 blocks and 40% of the last 1000.
Miners need to spread the hashrate, move to XpoolX or uBlock.it or go solo. Not doing so will surly cause the price to drop even farther.
I do not think that the value of the coin depends on how hashrate has a pool compared to another. The pumps are periodic Miners need to spread the hashrate, move to XpoolX or uBlock.it or go solo. Not doing so will surly cause the price to drop even farther.
March 11, 2017, 06:28:49 AM
Riepool has mined 61% of the last 100 blocks and 40% of the last 1000.
Miners need to spread the hashrate, move to XpoolX or uBlock.it or go solo. Not doing so will surely cause the price to drop even farther.
Miners need to spread the hashrate, move to XpoolX or uBlock.it or go solo. Not doing so will surely cause the price to drop even farther.
March 10, 2017, 02:26:03 PM
Just take a look to another explorer, riepool is using 3 or 4 addresses that are not shown on cryptoid. Simba knows this fact and still making dumb questions xd
Absolutely not! The 4 addresses of RiePool come from 4 redundant DDoS protected nodes and all appear with "RiePool" tag on blockchain (chainz.cryptoid.info).Just check out what are the blocks solved by the pool and if they coincide with the tag on blockchain.
Come on.... let's all...
You XpoolX admin mine with all those different addresses and you have available all that power, also mine in the address RFqKLWLtxR5K6i4VsR8vDHsusvuF3Csg1E
More than one user discovered you!
And there's more........
Uff im so tired of your shity acusations. Yo no know nothing Simba Snow
BTW. thanks for your great work fairglu!
March 10, 2017, 12:44:16 PM
Solo miners & small pools are now listed under "Others" in the Extraction tab!
The "Others" aggregate all addresses that mined a single block during the last 1000 blocks, and that are not tagged. No chart yet for the "Others" yet, I will see if it can be devised (might be tricky to chart though, since an "Other" for a particular 1000 block range could actually have mined dozens of blocks in another 1000 block range, and would no longer be an "Other")
Good job! Now the data are read correctly The "Others" aggregate all addresses that mined a single block during the last 1000 blocks, and that are not tagged. No chart yet for the "Others" yet, I will see if it can be devised (might be tricky to chart though, since an "Other" for a particular 1000 block range could actually have mined dozens of blocks in another 1000 block range, and would no longer be an "Other")
March 10, 2017, 11:58:32 AM
Solo miners & small pools are now listed under "Others" in the Extraction tab!
The "Others" aggregate all addresses that mined a single block during the last 1000 blocks, and that are not tagged. No chart yet for the "Others" yet, I will see if it can be devised (might be tricky to chart though, since an "Other" for a particular 1000 block range could actually have mined dozens of blocks in another 1000 block range, and would no longer be an "Other")
The "Others" aggregate all addresses that mined a single block during the last 1000 blocks, and that are not tagged. No chart yet for the "Others" yet, I will see if it can be devised (might be tricky to chart though, since an "Other" for a particular 1000 block range could actually have mined dozens of blocks in another 1000 block range, and would no longer be an "Other")
March 10, 2017, 04:13:11 AM
BTC 38 reopened theirs RIC wallet finally
March 10, 2017, 03:52:13 AM
Now on the Extraction tab of the blockchain:
- RiePool 26%
- RFqKLWLtxR5K6... 17%
- XpoolX 16%
- gpupool.com 4%
- RHRYttuh4t7Y8... 1%
...and the remaining 36%
The type of DDoS these days (the wallet saturation attack) and the fact that many solved blocks each come from a different address, I do not think it's a coincidence.
Probably this is the same user with the 5% fee address mentioned by dga, the same that developed 2.500.000-3.000.000 KH/s of mining power on XpoolX and then mysteriously disappeared....
Meanwhile, the exchange value has fallen below 1000 satoshi.
for dga: let me find the address (that I don't remember) then I'll communicate
- RiePool 26%
- RFqKLWLtxR5K6... 17%
- XpoolX 16%
- gpupool.com 4%
- RHRYttuh4t7Y8... 1%
...and the remaining 36%
The type of DDoS these days (the wallet saturation attack) and the fact that many solved blocks each come from a different address, I do not think it's a coincidence.
Probably this is the same user with the 5% fee address mentioned by dga, the same that developed 2.500.000-3.000.000 KH/s of mining power on XpoolX and then mysteriously disappeared....
Meanwhile, the exchange value has fallen below 1000 satoshi.
for dga: let me find the address (that I don't remember) then I'll communicate
Yeah, this current DDoS hasn't been fun. Though I'm sure the blocks are still there, they just don't rank when each block is from a new address.
RiePool also has servers stratum DDoS protected and several redundant wallets to try to avoid attacks and everything works perfectly!
March 10, 2017, 03:49:03 AM
Just take a look to another explorer, riepool is using 3 or 4 addresses that are not shown on cryptoid. Simba knows this fact and still making dumb questions xd
Absolutely not! The 4 addresses of RiePool come from 4 redundant DDoS protected nodes and all appear with "RiePool" tag on blockchain (chainz.cryptoid.info).Just check out what are the blocks solved by the pool and if they coincide with the tag on blockchain.
Come on.... let's all...
You XpoolX admin mine with all those different addresses and you have available all that power, also mine in the address RFqKLWLtxR5K6i4VsR8vDHsusvuF3Csg1E
More than one user discovered you!
And there's more........
March 10, 2017, 02:56:19 AM
Just take a look to another explorer, riepool is using 3 or 4 addresses that are not shown on cryptoid. Simba knows this fact and still making dumb questions xd
March 10, 2017, 02:11:55 AM
Now on the Extraction tab of the blockchain:
- RiePool 26%
- RFqKLWLtxR5K6... 17%
- XpoolX 16%
- gpupool.com 4%
- RHRYttuh4t7Y8... 1%
...and the remaining 36%
The type of DDoS these days (the wallet saturation attack) and the fact that many solved blocks each come from a different address, I do not think it's a coincidence.
Probably this is the same user with the 5% fee address mentioned by dga, the same that developed 2.500.000-3.000.000 KH/s of mining power on XpoolX and then mysteriously disappeared....
Meanwhile, the exchange value has fallen below 1000 satoshi.
for dga: let me find the address (that I don't remember) then I'll communicate
- RiePool 26%
- RFqKLWLtxR5K6... 17%
- XpoolX 16%
- gpupool.com 4%
- RHRYttuh4t7Y8... 1%
...and the remaining 36%
The type of DDoS these days (the wallet saturation attack) and the fact that many solved blocks each come from a different address, I do not think it's a coincidence.
Probably this is the same user with the 5% fee address mentioned by dga, the same that developed 2.500.000-3.000.000 KH/s of mining power on XpoolX and then mysteriously disappeared....
Meanwhile, the exchange value has fallen below 1000 satoshi.
for dga: let me find the address (that I don't remember) then I'll communicate
Yeah, this current DDoS hasn't been fun. Though I'm sure the blocks are still there, they just don't rank when each block is from a new address.
March 10, 2017, 01:28:34 AM
NEW Riecoin Pool Open!
PPLNS Payouts
Full Block Rewards Including Tx Fees
0% Pool Fee
uBlock.it
DDoS Protected Stratum
Redundant DDoS Protected Daemons
[email protected]
More coins coming soon . .
PPLNS Payouts
Full Block Rewards Including Tx Fees
0% Pool Fee
uBlock.it
DDoS Protected Stratum
Redundant DDoS Protected Daemons
[email protected]
More coins coming soon . .
March 10, 2017, 12:33:54 AM
Now on the Extraction tab of the blockchain:
- RiePool 26%
- RFqKLWLtxR5K6... 17%
- XpoolX 16%
- gpupool.com 4%
- RHRYttuh4t7Y8... 1%
...and the remaining 36%
The type of DDoS these days (the wallet saturation attack) and the fact that many solved blocks each come from a different address, I do not think it's a coincidence.
Probably this is the same user with the 5% fee address mentioned by dga, the same that developed 2.500.000-3.000.000 KH/s of mining power on XpoolX and then mysteriously disappeared....
Meanwhile, the exchange value has fallen below 1000 satoshi.
for dga: let me find the address (that I don't remember) then I'll communicate
- RiePool 26%
- RFqKLWLtxR5K6... 17%
- XpoolX 16%
- gpupool.com 4%
- RHRYttuh4t7Y8... 1%
...and the remaining 36%
The type of DDoS these days (the wallet saturation attack) and the fact that many solved blocks each come from a different address, I do not think it's a coincidence.
Probably this is the same user with the 5% fee address mentioned by dga, the same that developed 2.500.000-3.000.000 KH/s of mining power on XpoolX and then mysteriously disappeared....
Meanwhile, the exchange value has fallen below 1000 satoshi.
for dga: let me find the address (that I don't remember) then I'll communicate
Jump to: