What was the reason for the pump today?
Pump does not need any reason, it just happen.
RIC wallet on BTC38 is out of use for a long time - they say it would need dev help to restore it
Indeed. Pump is still going for this crippled horse of a coin.
Topic: [ANN][RIC] Riecoin: constellations POW *CPU* HARD FORK successful, world record - page 82. (Read 685207 times)
February 10, 2017, 01:56:49 AM
Pump does not need any reason, it just happen.
RIC wallet on BTC38 is out of use for a long time - they say it would need dev help to restore it
Indeed. Pump is still going for this crippled horse of a coin.
February 09, 2017, 10:59:23 PM
What was the reason for the pump today?
Pump does not need any reason, it just happen.
RIC wallet on BTC38 is out of use for a long time - they say it would need dev help to restore it
February 09, 2017, 10:24:38 PM
What was the reason for the pump today?
February 09, 2017, 08:59:26 PM
btc38.com service staff said the RIC wallet is crash, need dev help to fix? and dev not respond..is that ture? they disable the Deposit Withdraw a long time.
February 09, 2017, 05:27:48 PM
Just checking out this coin,, and have the same concerns about the high level of virus hits. Granted I have seen this in many many other miners that turn out to be harmless. But, I have actually had these same types actually place a Trojan in my PC and was hacked. So lesson learned. Use at your own RISK anyone remember BlackCat coin? VIRUSES.. was a scam.
this coin has been around a while so I feel that if they were viruses somebody would have flagged it...
this coin has been around a while so I feel that if they were viruses somebody would have flagged it...
February 09, 2017, 02:59:05 PM
I have seen many many flase positive reports coming from wallets and miners. Pretty much all of them have identified the hits as bitcoin miners or something like that. This one has so many hits for trojans I truly believe this .exe is infected.
AegisLab Troj.W32.Gen.lIx9 20170209
AhnLab-V3 Unwanted/Win32.BitCoinMiner.C1339426 20170208
Avast Win64:Malware-gen 20170209
Baidu Win32.Trojan.WisdomEyes.16070401.9500.9998 20170209
Bkav HW64.packed.FE74 20170208
CAT-QuickHeal Risktool.RieCoinMiner.XP4 20170209
ESET-NOD32 a variant of Win32/Packed.NoobyProtect.S suspicious 20170209
Ikarus PUA.NoobyProtect 20170209
Invincea virus.win32.neshta.a 20170203
K7AntiVirus Trojan ( 004de85d1 ) 20170209
K7GW Trojan ( 004de85d1 ) 20170209
McAfee CoinMiner 20170209
McAfee-GW-Edition CoinMiner 20170209
TrendMicro-HouseCall TROJ_GEN.R0C1H06AD17 20170209
You know what is a Packer for executables like UPX?AegisLab Troj.W32.Gen.lIx9 20170209
AhnLab-V3 Unwanted/Win32.BitCoinMiner.C1339426 20170208
Avast Win64:Malware-gen 20170209
Baidu Win32.Trojan.WisdomEyes.16070401.9500.9998 20170209
Bkav HW64.packed.FE74 20170208
CAT-QuickHeal Risktool.RieCoinMiner.XP4 20170209
ESET-NOD32 a variant of Win32/Packed.NoobyProtect.S suspicious 20170209
Ikarus PUA.NoobyProtect 20170209
Invincea virus.win32.neshta.a 20170203
K7AntiVirus Trojan ( 004de85d1 ) 20170209
K7GW Trojan ( 004de85d1 ) 20170209
McAfee CoinMiner 20170209
McAfee-GW-Edition CoinMiner 20170209
TrendMicro-HouseCall TROJ_GEN.R0C1H06AD17 20170209
You know that many of these packers are detected as false positives from AV?
February 09, 2017, 02:47:28 PM
last time when this coin pumped with big vol.. went to 9k ..hoping for something like that.. please mr MM 
February 09, 2017, 02:35:51 PM
I can't understand:
xptMiner 2.2 from http://riepool.ovh virus or not?
because on virustotal ( https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/05bf7a84129c228ecfc81ea5f880dcfe962909045a60335b129fd52df6fdd609/analysis/1486632826/ ) some av mark that miner as trojan,and some as pua/miner.usually miners don't mark or mark as pua/miner.and eset on my pc also says that is Win32/Packed.NoobyProtect.S - suspicious.
xptMiner 2.2 from http://riepool.ovh virus or not?
because on virustotal ( https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/05bf7a84129c228ecfc81ea5f880dcfe962909045a60335b129fd52df6fdd609/analysis/1486632826/ ) some av mark that miner as trojan,and some as pua/miner.usually miners don't mark or mark as pua/miner.and eset on my pc also says that is Win32/Packed.NoobyProtect.S - suspicious.
I have seen many many flase positive reports coming from wallets and miners. Pretty much all of them have identified the hits as bitcoin miners or something like that. This one has so many hits for trojans I truly believe this .exe is infected.
AegisLab Troj.W32.Gen.lIx9 20170209
AhnLab-V3 Unwanted/Win32.BitCoinMiner.C1339426 20170208
Avast Win64:Malware-gen 20170209
Baidu Win32.Trojan.WisdomEyes.16070401.9500.9998 20170209
Bkav HW64.packed.FE74 20170208
CAT-QuickHeal Risktool.RieCoinMiner.XP4 20170209
ESET-NOD32 a variant of Win32/Packed.NoobyProtect.S suspicious 20170209
Ikarus PUA.NoobyProtect 20170209
Invincea virus.win32.neshta.a 20170203
K7AntiVirus Trojan ( 004de85d1 ) 20170209
K7GW Trojan ( 004de85d1 ) 20170209
McAfee CoinMiner 20170209
McAfee-GW-Edition CoinMiner 20170209
TrendMicro-HouseCall TROJ_GEN.R0C1H06AD17 20170209
February 09, 2017, 02:08:35 PM
who knows ?!
no source code available
who can say that there is no virus?
i can´t ! you can???
After more than a year since the release of xptMiner2 you come out now as well??no source code available
who can say that there is no virus?
i can´t ! you can???
However, if you do not trust it you can use the miner you want wherever you want.
February 09, 2017, 01:32:20 PM
I can't understand:
xptMiner 2.2 from http://riepool.ovh virus or not?
because on virustotal ( https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/05bf7a84129c228ecfc81ea5f880dcfe962909045a60335b129fd52df6fdd609/analysis/1486632826/ ) some av mark that miner as trojan,and some as pua/miner.usually miners don't mark or mark as pua/miner.and eset on my pc also says that is Win32/Packed.NoobyProtect.S - suspicious.
who knows ?!xptMiner 2.2 from http://riepool.ovh virus or not?
because on virustotal ( https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/05bf7a84129c228ecfc81ea5f880dcfe962909045a60335b129fd52df6fdd609/analysis/1486632826/ ) some av mark that miner as trojan,and some as pua/miner.usually miners don't mark or mark as pua/miner.and eset on my pc also says that is Win32/Packed.NoobyProtect.S - suspicious.
no source code available
who can say that there is no virus?
i can´t ! you can???
February 09, 2017, 07:33:47 AM
I can't understand:
xptMiner 2.2 from http://riepool.ovh virus or not?
because on virustotal ( https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/05bf7a84129c228ecfc81ea5f880dcfe962909045a60335b129fd52df6fdd609/analysis/1486632826/ ) some av mark that miner as trojan,and some as pua/miner.usually miners don't mark or mark as pua/miner.and eset on my pc also says that is Win32/Packed.NoobyProtect.S - suspicious.
No viruses. This type of software that usually are detected by AV as miners for Bitcoin and is common knowledge.xptMiner 2.2 from http://riepool.ovh virus or not?
because on virustotal ( https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/05bf7a84129c228ecfc81ea5f880dcfe962909045a60335b129fd52df6fdd609/analysis/1486632826/ ) some av mark that miner as trojan,and some as pua/miner.usually miners don't mark or mark as pua/miner.and eset on my pc also says that is Win32/Packed.NoobyProtect.S - suspicious.
Miners binaries also present in other sites it's detected by AV.
February 09, 2017, 04:47:58 AM
I can't understand:
xptMiner 2.2 from http://riepool.ovh virus or not?
because on virustotal ( https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/05bf7a84129c228ecfc81ea5f880dcfe962909045a60335b129fd52df6fdd609/analysis/1486632826/ ) some av mark that miner as trojan,and some as pua/miner.usually miners don't mark or mark as pua/miner.and eset on my pc also says that is Win32/Packed.NoobyProtect.S - suspicious.
xptMiner 2.2 from http://riepool.ovh virus or not?
because on virustotal ( https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/05bf7a84129c228ecfc81ea5f880dcfe962909045a60335b129fd52df6fdd609/analysis/1486632826/ ) some av mark that miner as trojan,and some as pua/miner.usually miners don't mark or mark as pua/miner.and eset on my pc also says that is Win32/Packed.NoobyProtect.S - suspicious.
February 04, 2017, 09:40:23 AM
Here you are:
addnode=176.15.231.28
addnode=192.95.24.114
addnode=207.172.128.231
addnode=45.63.19.206
addnode=5.9.39.9
addnode=85.70.38.244
addnode=176.15.231.28
addnode=192.95.24.114
addnode=207.172.128.231
addnode=45.63.19.206
addnode=5.9.39.9
addnode=85.70.38.244
All work well except the node number 2. Thank you very much
February 04, 2017, 09:11:43 AM
Here you are:
addnode=176.15.231.28
addnode=192.95.24.114
addnode=207.172.128.231
addnode=45.63.19.206
addnode=5.9.39.9
addnode=85.70.38.244
addnode=176.15.231.28
addnode=192.95.24.114
addnode=207.172.128.231
addnode=45.63.19.206
addnode=5.9.39.9
addnode=85.70.38.244
February 03, 2017, 10:25:04 PM
My Wallet cannot find any connection and haven't synced for months. Please help me the list of node
February 03, 2017, 09:34:15 AM
Greetings All,
I'm having some difficulty keeping my services up due to the forking issues being experienced in the Riecoin network. Therefor, sadly, I've had to suspend my Insight explorer, Copay beta, jswallet, faucet and dice games. Fortunately for jswallet you should still be able to grab your private key from the site without a functioning explorer, and I would urge you to do so.
https://cryptap.us/ric
I will continue to monitor the network from time to time with the hope that in the future I can restore some of these services.
Kind Regards,
I'm having some difficulty keeping my services up due to the forking issues being experienced in the Riecoin network. Therefor, sadly, I've had to suspend my Insight explorer, Copay beta, jswallet, faucet and dice games. Fortunately for jswallet you should still be able to grab your private key from the site without a functioning explorer, and I would urge you to do so.
https://cryptap.us/ric
I will continue to monitor the network from time to time with the hope that in the future I can restore some of these services.
Kind Regards,
Services are back up. So I guess can have nice things again
February 02, 2017, 02:48:13 PM
Just spotted this - I'd been trying to figure out why my office was being DDoS'd, and taking down parts of the CMU network along with it. I'd kept a riecoin node going for the last two years despite not really being in crypto any more, but I can't let this prevent everyone in my building from working.
The DoS wasn't a matter of a new version - in my case, they were sending 5Gbps of NTP reflector traffic at my IP address. Carnegie Mellon was not amused. It was a pretty serious attack.
Sorry to hear about the problems. Hope they get resolved!
The DoS wasn't a matter of a new version - in my case, they were sending 5Gbps of NTP reflector traffic at my IP address. Carnegie Mellon was not amused. It was a pretty serious attack.
Sorry to hear about the problems. Hope they get resolved!
Thanks for the info and I'm sorry you had problems at work.
Same here, this was a bandwidth exhaustion attack targeting Riecoin nodes.
@gatra
Here’s a suggestion to make Riecoin botnet resistant while keeping the classic proof-of-work.
Add double SHA-256 (SHA256d) as an additional constraint to the proof-of-work.
SHA256d’s difficulty should be 150s seconds of computation time for an i7 4790k, approximately 4.2 billion hashes.
1). SHA256d(target || nonce) -> offload to GPU
2). Add digest to target
3). Solve proof-of-work puzzle.
4). Submit(256-bit offset, 64-bit nonce).
The idea is simply to add 150 seconds of preprocessing time on a CPU, but only 3-5 seconds on a single GPU.
February 02, 2017, 10:15:17 AM
gatra, just to add a crazy idea... 
Would it be possible to add a couple of other AUX-POW algorithms (like say sha and scrypt) with very low rewards and use a multi-algo (Myriad) approach? Wouldn't this keep these kinds of shenanigans from causing so many issues?
Would it be possible to add a couple of other AUX-POW algorithms (like say sha and scrypt) with very low rewards and use a multi-algo (Myriad) approach? Wouldn't this keep these kinds of shenanigans from causing so many issues?
Nice crazy idea might work!
Yes, it would help. I'll think about it because it has its dangers too: if it's low reward then it will not be mined a lot and will have low diff... in general a new algo means a new attack vector. Maybe we could do it with merged mining.
Sorry, yes, AUX-POW means merged mining... doesn't cost the miner any additional hashrate, so diffs tend to be generally higher.
February 02, 2017, 10:00:29 AM
Just spotted this - I'd been trying to figure out why my office was being DDoS'd, and taking down parts of the CMU network along with it. I'd kept a riecoin node going for the last two years despite not really being in crypto any more, but I can't let this prevent everyone in my building from working.
The DoS wasn't a matter of a new version - in my case, they were sending 5Gbps of NTP reflector traffic at my IP address. Carnegie Mellon was not amused. It was a pretty serious attack.
Sorry to hear about the problems. Hope they get resolved!
The DoS wasn't a matter of a new version - in my case, they were sending 5Gbps of NTP reflector traffic at my IP address. Carnegie Mellon was not amused. It was a pretty serious attack.
Sorry to hear about the problems. Hope they get resolved!
Thanks for the info and I'm sorry you had problems at work.
February 02, 2017, 09:43:36 AM
gatra, just to add a crazy idea...
Would it be possible to add a couple of other AUX-POW algorithms (like say sha and scrypt) with very low rewards and use a multi-algo (Myriad) approach? Wouldn't this keep these kinds of shenanigans from causing so many issues?
Would it be possible to add a couple of other AUX-POW algorithms (like say sha and scrypt) with very low rewards and use a multi-algo (Myriad) approach? Wouldn't this keep these kinds of shenanigans from causing so many issues?
Nice crazy idea might work!
Yes, it would help. I'll think about it because it has its dangers too: if it's low reward then it will not be mined a lot and will have low diff... in general a new algo means a new attack vector. Maybe we could do it with merged mining.
Jump to: