Topic: [ANN][RIC] Riecoin: constellations POW *CPU* HARD FORK successful, world record - page 92. (Read 685265 times)

Hello, welcome to the Forum.

For the use of cores try to start more xptMiner (4 or 5) without "-t" parameter, while for the Sieve Size value if you have a RAM of at least 16GB you can set a value as "-s 3500000000" or "-s 4000000000" (3.5 / 4 billions)

Good mining!

Anyone's wallet not syncing?  Mine says there aren't any active connections to the network

Hello.

I am newbie to the RIC.

I am wondering that How can i optimize my miner for using all of my CPU resources??


When I start mining using the xptminer, the miner only use 5 thread...
But my CPU is E5-2667 V3(32core)...
So, I should use -t 32 option, but my cpu utilization(load average) is only 20.

Does anyone know that how to set cpu threads for mining properly and the sieve value?

Is there any mining hardware comparisons for this coin? Like, how much will I get by mining on different CPU's.

Hi everybody, based on Rascal71 work, I started a pool.

Is there anybody willing to help me test it ?
Please consider it A PRIVATE TEST ROUND. So please use PM.
Zero fees of course.

Opensource gatra's miner seems to be working fine (stratum).

Just to stirr a water a bit - let's see if we encounter a DDoS - while staying private

Kind regards

Leave the dev fee and the ability to change it from 0 to whatever we want. I left it on for riecoin and will leave it on when I mine scrypt coins. Nothing wrong with getting paid for your work.

Well it's more or less complete I guess but I sort of hit a road block with getting some of the algos to build correctly so I wanted to try to iron that out first but I might just release it anyway and work out the rest later, plus I'm still debating on if I'm going to leave the dev fee or just take it out.

Thanks for the clarification guys. I had no idea there were superblocks. So happy I'm solo mining now.

Hey Rascal, you mentioned that you were working on a proxy for other coins. Hows that going?

Around superblocks the reward is diminished a bit, and the coins instead go to whoever finds the superblock (which has a higher difficulty). The idea being that this does not change the number of RIC that will be generated, while allowing (and giving an incentive) to find higher prime constellations.

In case of block 410814, the corresponding superblock is 410832, which ranked #2 in the hall of fame: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ric/halloffame.dws

don't worry, I read some people had problems compiling my fork so I'll review that and try to generate all the binaries.


This is the final implementation that I have for the superblocks:
Difficulty adjustments were performed every 288 blocks which should take 12 hs, so once every 14 adjustments (ie once a week) we will have a special interval. In these special intervals the difficulty will be adjusted a little bit down for all blocks except one which will be the superblock. The expected behavior is that 287 blocks will be shorter (136 seconds instead of 150), lending 14 seconds each to the superblock which will in total accumulate almost 70 minutes. This is the most elegant solution I could find since every interval will still have 288 blocks and be targeted to last 12hs.
So, if in a few days you get blocks with a reward of 45,33333333 instead of 50, then it is expected behavior. Don't complain: your block had less reward because it was easier to find, it's still fair. And if you get a block with 1389,33333333 RIC, then congratulations: you solved the superblock.

This is implemented, under testing, and working fine so far. Now what remains is to decide the block number for the hard fork (around 135000?), generating all the binaries and issuing alerts for everyone to upgrade.

Regards!
Gatra

I think something is up with Rascal's mining proxy. Not accusing him of anything, its probably just a bug. Maybe someone more technically minded on coinbase/stratum and other tech can chime in.

Every so often I mine a block worth 45.3333333 here is an example. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ric/tx.dws?e5a7eb4eae84dd53d78e27f880a40a93b09b41206b4740b2fe9a67207662fc8e.htm

This is the actual block link.
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ric/block.dws?410814.htm

Can anyone shed some light on this?

I think something is up with Rascal's mining proxy. Not accusing him of anything, its probably just a bug. Maybe someone more technically minded on coinbase/stratum and other tech can chime in.

Every so often I mine a block worth 45.3333333 here is an example. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ric/tx.dws?e5a7eb4eae84dd53d78e27f880a40a93b09b41206b4740b2fe9a67207662fc8e.htm

This is the actual block link.
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ric/block.dws?410814.htm

Can anyone shed some light on this?

I've been grown years ago but im sure not even know how the dga algorithm work cause if yow knew how it works and then read your post about the improvement will understand why some users on the forum are asking the source code.

Or maybe you are using a better code than erathostenes algorithm? so you are a genius, give this men the math nobel

Im not jealous but i dont like the liars and scammers.