says 3.4GH/s nethashrate and i am counting ~1.7.
edit: now 4
hmm indeed strange..edit: now 4
watch the blocks..
The daemon is probably just a bit unsure about nethashrate itself ;-)
j/k ya know,,, keep up the good work 
Topic: [ANN][RVC] / RevoCoin / POS - POW / 10,000kh miner limit / LAUNCH 22-07 - page 78. (Read 133063 times)
July 22, 2014, 11:33:47 PM
watch the blocks..
The daemon is probably just a bit unsure about nethashrate itself ;-)
j/k ya know,,, keep up the good work 
July 22, 2014, 11:09:30 PM
says 3.4GH/s nethashrate and i am counting ~1.7.
edit: now 4
hmm indeed strange..edit: now 4
watch the blocks..
The daemon is probably just a bit unsure about nethashrate itself ;-)
July 22, 2014, 11:07:23 PM
(not) surprisingly, after the "missing" blocks were pointed out the difficulty dropped
block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16
the 3 pool hash rate is very stable at around 1.3 GH, how do the diff change by 80%?block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16
I checked the net hash right when the missing blocks were posted and there was about 800 MH/s not account for in the pools.
I believe ocminer is honest, not sure about others.
we will see with the block explorer where they are, i'm still monitoring the blocks and did not see anything suspicious anymore
thx, ocminer, for your time on the monitoring, it seems they see we caught them.
by the way, can you check the reward structure in the source? the op is very confusing..
Sure:
Code:
/ miner's coin base reward
int64_t GetProofOfWorkReward(int64_t nFees)
{
int64_t nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
if(pindexBest->nHeight == 1)
{
nSubsidy = 2500000 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 120)
{
nSubsidy = 0 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 720)
{
nSubsidy = 1000 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1440)
{
nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 2160)
{
nSubsidy = 1500 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 2880)
{
nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 3600)
{
nSubsidy = 10000 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 4320)
{
nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5040)
{
nSubsidy = 2000 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5760)
{
nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 6480)
{
nSubsidy = 2500 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 7200)
{
nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 7920)
{
nSubsidy = 3000 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 8640)
{
nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
}
Hm, what happened with
from the ANN? -.- And how do you plan to achieve changing the PoW timeframe after mining has started? (the market demand condition)
July 22, 2014, 11:05:15 PM
says 3.4GH/s nethashrate and i am counting ~1.7.
edit: now 4
hmm indeed strange..edit: now 4
watch the blocks..
July 22, 2014, 10:57:37 PM
says 3.4GH/s nethashrate and i am counting ~1.7.
edit: now 4
edit: now 4
hmm indeed strange..
watch the blocks..
July 22, 2014, 10:55:25 PM
says 3.4GH/s nethashrate and i am counting ~1.7.
Whoa, net hash is taking off now. Over 4GH/s.
July 22, 2014, 10:52:25 PM
says 3.4GH/s nethashrate and i am counting ~1.7.
edit: now 4
edit: now 4
July 22, 2014, 10:48:44 PM
What does this mean?
You have exceeded the pools configured REVO warning threshold. Please initiate a transfer!
You have exceeded the pools configured REVO warning threshold. Please initiate a transfer!
means pool will keep your coin if u leave there too long.
Pool: "Don't say i never tell you to move your coin
" 
July 22, 2014, 10:47:11 PM
What does this mean?
You have exceeded the pools configured REVO warning threshold. Please initiate a transfer!
You have exceeded the pools configured REVO warning threshold. Please initiate a transfer!
July 22, 2014, 10:11:37 PM
Uploaded my miner if anyone need it. Included config file and kernel/bin for 280x. Just change pool/user/pass in config file and start run.bat.
You also need 14.6rc2 driver if you want to generate kernel yourself.
If you use 5xxx/6xxx cards use "algorithm" : "bitblockold",
i am getting 3MH/s with 280x at 1160/1500
http://www46.zippyshare.com/v/11324655/file.html
edit: config is for 4 diff cards. 1st parameter is for 280x other 3 can be deleted.
You also need 14.6rc2 driver if you want to generate kernel yourself.
If you use 5xxx/6xxx cards use "algorithm" : "bitblockold",
i am getting 3MH/s with 280x at 1160/1500
http://www46.zippyshare.com/v/11324655/file.html
edit: config is for 4 diff cards. 1st parameter is for 280x other 3 can be deleted.
I thank you as well
July 22, 2014, 09:50:13 PM
Uploaded my miner if anyone need it. Included config file and kernel/bin for 280x. Just change pool/user/pass in config file and start run.bat.
You also need 14.6rc2 driver if you want to generate kernel yourself.
If you use 5xxx/6xxx cards use "algorithm" : "bitblockold",
i am getting 3MH/s with 280x at 1160/1500
http://www46.zippyshare.com/v/11324655/file.html
edit: config is for 4 diff cards. 1st parameter is for 280x other 3 can be deleted.
Hey thx bro, nice work! You also need 14.6rc2 driver if you want to generate kernel yourself.
If you use 5xxx/6xxx cards use "algorithm" : "bitblockold",
i am getting 3MH/s with 280x at 1160/1500
http://www46.zippyshare.com/v/11324655/file.html
edit: config is for 4 diff cards. 1st parameter is for 280x other 3 can be deleted.
July 22, 2014, 09:40:35 PM
Uploaded my miner if anyone need it. Included config file and kernel/bin for 280x. Just change pool/user/pass in config file and start run.bat.
You also need 14.6rc2 driver if you want to generate kernel yourself.
If you use 5xxx/6xxx cards use "algorithm" : "bitblockold",
i am getting 3MH/s with 280x at 1160/1500
http://www46.zippyshare.com/v/11324655/file.html
edit: config is for 4 diff cards. 1st parameter is for 280x other 3 can be deleted.
You also need 14.6rc2 driver if you want to generate kernel yourself.
If you use 5xxx/6xxx cards use "algorithm" : "bitblockold",
i am getting 3MH/s with 280x at 1160/1500
http://www46.zippyshare.com/v/11324655/file.html
edit: config is for 4 diff cards. 1st parameter is for 280x other 3 can be deleted.
July 22, 2014, 09:37:22 PM
(not) surprisingly, after the "missing" blocks were pointed out the difficulty dropped
block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16
the 3 pool hash rate is very stable at around 1.3 GH, how do the diff change by 80%?block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16
I checked the net hash right when the missing blocks were posted and there was about 800 MH/s not account for in the pools.
I believe ocminer is honest, not sure about others.
we will see with the block explorer where they are, i'm still monitoring the blocks and did not see anything suspicious anymore
thx, ocminer, for your time on the monitoring, it seems they see we caught them.
by the way, can you check the reward structure in the source? the op is very confusing..
Sure:
Code:
/ miner's coin base reward
int64_t GetProofOfWorkReward(int64_t nFees)
{
int64_t nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
if(pindexBest->nHeight == 1)
{
nSubsidy = 2500000 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 120)
{
nSubsidy = 0 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 720)
{
nSubsidy = 1000 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1440)
{
nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 2160)
{
nSubsidy = 1500 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 2880)
{
nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 3600)
{
nSubsidy = 10000 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 4320)
{
nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5040)
{
nSubsidy = 2000 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5760)
{
nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 6480)
{
nSubsidy = 2500 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 7200)
{
nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 7920)
{
nSubsidy = 3000 * COIN;
}
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 8640)
{
nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
}
July 22, 2014, 09:34:02 PM
(not) surprisingly, after the "missing" blocks were pointed out the difficulty dropped
block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16
the 3 pool hash rate is very stable at around 1.3 GH, how do the diff change by 80%?block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16
I checked the net hash right when the missing blocks were posted and there was about 800 MH/s not account for in the pools.
I believe ocminer is honest, not sure about others.
we will see with the block explorer where they are, i'm still monitoring the blocks and did not see anything suspicious anymore
thx, ocminer, for your time on the monitoring, it seems they see we caught them.
by the way, can you check the reward structure in the source? the op is very confusing.. ty
July 22, 2014, 09:24:11 PM
(not) surprisingly, after the "missing" blocks were pointed out the difficulty dropped
block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16
the 3 pool hash rate is very stable at around 1.3 GH, how do the diff change by 80%?block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16
I checked the net hash right when the missing blocks were posted and there was about 800 MH/s not account for in the pools.
I believe ocminer is honest, not sure about others.
we will see with the block explorer where they are, i'm still monitoring the blocks and did not see anything suspicious anymore
July 22, 2014, 09:22:44 PM
(not) surprisingly, after the "missing" blocks were pointed out the difficulty dropped
block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16
the 3 pool hash rate is very stable at around 1.3 GH, how do the diff change by 80%?block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16
I checked the net hash right when the missing blocks were posted and there was about 800 MH/s not account for in the pools.
I believe ocminer is honest, not sure about others.
July 22, 2014, 09:19:23 PM
(not) surprisingly, after the "missing" blocks were pointed out the difficulty dropped
block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16
the 3 pool hash rate is very stable at around 1.3 GH, how do the diff change by 80%?block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16
I checked the net hash right when the missing blocks were posted and there was about 800 MH/s not account for in the pools.
July 22, 2014, 09:18:46 PM
(not) surprisingly, after the "missing" blocks were pointed out the difficulty dropped
block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16
the 3 pool hash rate is very stable at around 1.3 GH, how do the diff change by 80%?block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16
i've also had a look at that.. net hash is stable.. so i think it might be some flaw.. surely no hidden pool or so
July 22, 2014, 09:18:16 PM
any pointers would be appreciated. my gpu does not do anything beyond this point.
Quote
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
sgminer --algorithm bitblock -o stratum+tcp://revo.suprnova.cc:3777 -u revo1.1 -p x -I 17 -d 1-3 --gpu-platform 0
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
sgminer --algorithm bitblock -o stratum+tcp://revo.suprnova.cc:3777 -u revo1.1 -p x -I 17 -d 1-3 --gpu-platform 0
just heat and no shares
not sure if this is the difference? : --pool-algorithm bitblock
that made it worse.. now it wont even run.
sgminer-5.0-pre-release-2014-07-08-win32.zip
Found here:
https://nicehash.com/software/
July 22, 2014, 09:17:41 PM
(not) surprisingly, after the "missing" blocks were pointed out the difficulty dropped
block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16
the 3 pool hash rate is very stable at around 1.3 GH, how do the diff change by 80%? block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16
Jump to: