Topic: [ANN][RZR] Razor - Cutting Edge of Technology ☆[TOR]☆[No Pre/ICO] Updated Nodes! - page 65. (Read 247521 times)

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 21, 2014, 04:32:26 AM

Hey guys,

Few quick questions,

Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?

Thanks,

"Is this the first coin to implement tor?"
No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin

"Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?"
Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor.

"What are its current issues?"
Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be.

And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community.

Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin?

So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school?

Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own.

It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO

How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game?

Just answer my criticism, no need to resort to bets, name-calling or use your so-called Twitter "fame".

I'm giving you an opportunity to make a public statement that this is a scam. You seem very sure. Why would you not view this as free money?

Are you a coward? Just a troll?

How about 5,000$ if 10 is too rich for you

Just answer this:

Why did Bryce called Neutrino a scam and then copied its code, call it his own and then launched his own coin?
Why not work with the Neutrino Devs instead?
Why is there no difference between the two codes at this moment?
Why isn't Razorcoin showing any anonymity tests to prove it's working?

Be mature and just answer the above.

You've proven my point. You are a coward who is calling something a scam without facts you are sure of to back it up. Go away troll, you lose.

Talking to yourself? Just answer the damm questions!

"People are too lazy to do research. The answers are out there."

There you go... Huh

jebus911

full member

Activity: 138

Merit: 100

Quote from: scambust on June 21, 2014, 06:32:57 AM

Quote from: jebus911 on June 21, 2014, 06:28:32 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 21, 2014, 04:32:26 AM

Hey guys,

Few quick questions,

Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?

Thanks,

"Is this the first coin to implement tor?"
No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin

"Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?"
Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor.

"What are its current issues?"
Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be.

And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community.

Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin?

So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school?

Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own.

It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO

How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game?

Just answer my criticism, no need to resort to bets, name-calling or use your so-called Twitter "fame".

I'm giving you an opportunity to make a public statement that this is a scam. You seem very sure. Why would you not view this as free money?

Are you a coward? Just a troll?

How about 5,000$ if 10 is too rich for you

Just answer this:

Why did Bryce called Neutrino a scam and then copied its code, call it his own and then launched his own coin?
Why not work with the Neutrino Devs instead?
Why is there no difference between the two codes at this moment?
Why isn't Razorcoin showing any anonymity tests to prove it's working?

Be mature and just answer the above.

You've proven my point. You are a coward who is calling something a scam without facts you are sure of to back it up. Go away troll, you lose.

Talking to yourself? Just answer the damm questions!

"People are too lazy to do research. The answers are out there."

scambust

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1007

Quote from: jebus911 on June 21, 2014, 06:28:32 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 21, 2014, 04:32:26 AM

Hey guys,

Few quick questions,

Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?

Thanks,

"Is this the first coin to implement tor?"
No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin

"Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?"
Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor.

"What are its current issues?"
Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be.

And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community.

Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin?

So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school?

Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own.

It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO

How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game?

Just answer my criticism, no need to resort to bets, name-calling or use your so-called Twitter "fame".

I'm giving you an opportunity to make a public statement that this is a scam. You seem very sure. Why would you not view this as free money?

Are you a coward? Just a troll?

How about 5,000$ if 10 is too rich for you

Just answer this:

Why did Bryce called Neutrino a scam and then copied its code, call it his own and then launched his own coin?
Why not work with the Neutrino Devs instead?
Why is there no difference between the two codes at this moment?
Why isn't Razorcoin showing any anonymity tests to prove it's working?

Be mature and just answer the above.

You've proven my point. You are a coward who is calling something a scam without facts you are sure of to back it up. Go away troll, you lose.

Talking to yourself? Just answer the damm questions!

jebus911

full member

Activity: 138

Merit: 100

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 21, 2014, 04:32:26 AM

Hey guys,

Few quick questions,

Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?

Thanks,

"Is this the first coin to implement tor?"
No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin

"Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?"
Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor.

"What are its current issues?"
Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be.

And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community.

Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin?

So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school?

Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own.

It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO

How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game?

Just answer my criticism, no need to resort to bets, name-calling or use your so-called Twitter "fame".

I'm giving you an opportunity to make a public statement that this is a scam. You seem very sure. Why would you not view this as free money?

Are you a coward? Just a troll?

How about 5,000$ if 10 is too rich for you

Just answer this:

Why did Bryce called Neutrino a scam and then copied its code, call it his own and then launched his own coin?
Why not work with the Neutrino Devs instead?
Why is there no difference between the two codes at this moment?
Why isn't Razorcoin showing any anonymity tests to prove it's working?

Be mature and just answer the above.

You've proven my point. You are a coward who is calling something a scam without facts you are sure of to back it up. Go away troll, you lose.

Crypto_Enthusiast

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

With a username like 'scambust' - he has obviously created this account to do one thing, what a sad, sad life this person must live.

My sympathies.

scambust

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1007

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 21, 2014, 04:32:26 AM

Hey guys,

Few quick questions,

Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?

Thanks,

"Is this the first coin to implement tor?"
No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin

"Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?"
Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor.

"What are its current issues?"
Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be.

And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community.

Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin?

So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school?

Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own.

It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO

How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game?

Just answer my criticism, no need to resort to bets, name-calling or use your so-called Twitter "fame".

I'm giving you an opportunity to make a public statement that this is a scam. You seem very sure. Why would you not view this as free money?

Are you a coward? Just a troll?

How about 5,000$ if 10 is too rich for you

Just answer this:

Why did Bryce called Neutrino a scam and then copied its code, call it his own and then launched his own coin?
Why not work with the Neutrino Devs instead?
Why is there no difference between the two codes at this moment?
Why isn't Razorcoin showing any anonymity tests to prove it's working?

Be mature and just answer the above. I bet no one will ever answer this.

jebus911

full member

Activity: 138

Merit: 100

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 21, 2014, 04:32:26 AM

Hey guys,

Few quick questions,

Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?

Thanks,

"Is this the first coin to implement tor?"
No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin

"Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?"
Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor.

"What are its current issues?"
Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be.

And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community.

Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin?

So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school?

Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own.

It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO

How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game?

Just answer my criticism, no need to resort to bets, name-calling or use your so-called Twitter "fame".

I'm giving you an opportunity to make a public statement that this is a scam. You seem very sure. Why would you not view this as free money?

Are you a coward? Just a troll?

How about 5,000$ if 10 is too rich for you

scambust

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1007

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 21, 2014, 04:32:26 AM

Hey guys,

Few quick questions,

Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?

Thanks,

"Is this the first coin to implement tor?"
No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin

"Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?"
Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor.

"What are its current issues?"
Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be.

And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community.

Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin?

So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school?

Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own.

It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO

How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game?

Just answer my criticism, no need to resort to bets, name-calling or use your so-called Twitter "fame".

jebus911

full member

Activity: 138

Merit: 100

http://bitbet.us/ We'll make it public so everyone can see me take your money.

jebus911

full member

Activity: 138

Merit: 100

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 21, 2014, 04:32:26 AM

Hey guys,

Few quick questions,

Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?

Thanks,

"Is this the first coin to implement tor?"
No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin

"Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?"
Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor.

"What are its current issues?"
Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be.

And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community.

Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin?

So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school?

Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own.

It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO

How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game?

scambust

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1007