Topic: [ANN][SBC] From Death Comes Life – The Rebirth of StableCoin - URGENT UPDATE - page 56. (Read 198682 times)

I was able to find both of you :
Catswold - http://forums.stablecoin.net/index.php?action=profile;u=14
LeftToeCut - http://forums.stablecoin.net/index.php?action=profile;u=20

AS I said, I am not mining there right now, I'm over at coin-base, not SBC CryptoCult.

OOPS!  I'm on CryptoCult, not CryptoPool.  Sorry for the confusion.  Too many "cryptos" running around here.

Thanks. Will update the links later tonight.

Forum is finally functional, come say hi! http://forums.stablecoin.net

Would be nice to see what the price would be if cryptsy wasn't absolutely fubar'd right now. How do they manage this? I thought they got a bunch of new servers.

Hey all, I just built a Mac version of the 1.4 wallet. It's available here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/1caiuhjors8xdo3/StableCoin-Qt-1.4.0.0-Mac.zip

Enjoy!

Look at the one used in this forum and modify a bit.

Just getting around to configuring the forum hierarchy, http://forums.stablecoin.net

Any suggestions?

Just emailed the admin at Bter, I recommend everyone else ask for StableCoin support as well. Here is my message:

To:

[email protected]

Subject:

StableCoin

Message:

Hey, do you think it would be possible to list StableCoin on the exchange? It seems to be a really good coin with a lot of potential but Cryptsy is the only one trading it right now, and I would really like to see it on a better site, like Bter.

Let me know what you think.

Also, is there a place we can follow the dev team for updates?

I did this by building wallet from source on Ubuntu and worked fine. Just using the new 1.4 client and left everything else the same.

Should really look into putting this on BTer, Cryptsy is complete trash right now.

Now 77.2 BTC, quiet time on the exchange. Wonder how much this is linked to people staying away from Cryptsy for a bit to let it recover.  

Alright CryptoCulture pool...what the hell is going on with my difficulty?  Seriously...



I'm gonna point my hashes somewhere else until I get an answer  

There are a lot of 'obvious' ways to make the block times more stable.  But most of them also make it nearly certain that whoever has the most compute power gets FAR MORE than a share of the blocks proportional to compute power.

For example, if you ask people to solve a linear rather than probabilistic puzzle, then the fastest computer will win - every time.  If you ask people to solve a dozen puzzles instead of a single puzzle, then what you have is a time to completion with (approximately) a 'normal' distribution -- but whoever has a computer twice as fast as everybody else an earlier, narrower "hump" in their normal distribution than everybody else. Because 90% of the possible solutions are in the area of the 'hump' that comes before the area in everybody else's 'hump' the faster computer will get to its solution 90% of the time before someone else does, meaning double the compute power gets nine times as much probability of winning.  

I'm pointing this out because the complaint of getting beaten to every block is consistent with the problem of being in the smaller of two mining pools, or independent mining, under one of these flawed 'block time stabilization' algorithms.

What exactly is the mechanism by which the block times were stabilized?  And does it leave everyone with fair chances at getting blocks?

Indeed, SBC is going far   

Looking forward to seeing those forums, artos

We had a great 50% Rise in SBC MarketCap today

It's being switched over to SMF (the same software this forum runs on). It'll look great.

Yeah its fine for me as well.

Same as here, Catswold.  Right now, I'm on the coin-base.org pool, since it seems to be functioning.

youll better fix the blockexplorer if you want the coin to continue in coinmarkettcap!

Oh yeah, thanks for picking it up. Reading comprehension there :| That's on the fronend part but you're right, should change it on at fork time.