Posted by: pandionrain - on: Today at 04:17:18 PM
In the history section at the top, I think your second sentence should immediately address the community take over. It kinda sounds like SILK is still in limbo. Something along the lines of...
"On June 24, 2014, after seeing a rise to the top of every exchange in which it was involved,
the original Silkcoin developers decided to abandon the community and its investors in a shameless display of confusion and greed. On June xx, 2014, the Silkcoin community united and confidently took the reins to commit their highly competent skills and resouces to ensure Silkcoin reaches its revolutionary destination. Weaving together its innovative and visionary concepts of unifying staking, social media, payment processing, currency exchange, [insert agenda] into one strong, yet pliable, fabric, Silkcoin will open a new pathway by bringing its unique crypto payment structure to the forefront as the most convenient and efficient medium for everday transactions to meet all business and consumer needs."
Got carried away on the rest, but we do need that second sentece idea addresses right after saying the orig devs fell off the camel.
This is great point!Please anyone, who has the adequate permission/s please do it asap.
Would it be possible to lock both other Silkcoin threads here at BitcoinTalk? (I still can add replies to both)
If it is not possible, can you at least rewrite their first post on the first page - in such a way it lets the reader that only this thread is official and updated.
Thanks!
)
