Topic: [ANN][SILKCOIN][DARKSILK PREANN][TESTING STORMNODES/DarkSIlk MARKET/I2P] - page 41. (Read 289507 times)
December 19, 2015, 09:07:19 AM
December 19, 2015, 08:39:38 AM
I've been away for a while
lots to catch up
Thanks SLievensDRKSLK for the dedication to this
and for the whitepaper
Loooaaads to read now
lots to catch up
Thanks SLievensDRKSLK for the dedication to this
and for the whitepaper
Loooaaads to read now
December 19, 2015, 08:37:29 AM
The new DarkSilk splashcreen looks pretty awesome!
Pretty dark (black) too.
I can't believe you people are still around you were dead and reborn quite a few times! Is this just another life or it's life?
Will try to follow if I can.
I remember I bought and trade some silkcoin when it was still SC on bittrex... it seemed a very nice coin.
It is a very nice coin
and with the new DarkSilk they will be even nicer
I too think the Splashscreen it's a bit dark
like bhokor said enhancing the contrast between the embossed scorpion and the background will do
December 19, 2015, 05:02:01 AM
The new DarkSilk splashcreen looks pretty awesome!
Pretty dark (black) too.
I can't believe you people are still around you were dead and reborn quite a few times! Is this just another life or it's life?
Will try to follow if I can.
I remember I bought and trade some silkcoin when it was still SC on bittrex... it seemed a very nice coin.
December 18, 2015, 07:29:07 PM
The new DarkSilk splashcreen looks pretty awesome!
December 18, 2015, 07:00:25 PM
Final Splashscreen for DarkSilk:
It is a nice design, perhaps a little more of contrast of the scorpion with the background would be a little more visually attractive, but it is only an opinion
Noted.
December 18, 2015, 06:44:15 PM
Final Splashscreen for DarkSilk:
It is a nice design, perhaps a little more of contrast of the scorpion with the background would be a little more visually attractive, but it is only an opinion
December 18, 2015, 06:09:53 PM
Final Splashscreen for DarkSilk:
December 18, 2015, 04:48:45 PM
Please retweet and like the post below, let's spread the word:
https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328
https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328
I have a question about the whitepaper . You cite the Shadowchat whitepaper [6] and the Bitmessage paper [18]. Given you were following this thread I'm surprised you elected to include the SDC paper since it's a rip-off of Bitmessage. Or do you not think this is the case? Could you explain this decision?
I cited both because I took the code directly from the ShadowCash GitHub and they took the code in-turn from Bitmessage.
Are you stating the code is a rip-off? It is open-source.
Or their whitepaper? I based my content off of the ShadowCash whitepaper, which I then checked through and edited errors and reworded etc. Theirs is based on Bitmessage, another reason I cited both.
Also this is in the whitepaper: "DarkSilk P2P (peer-to-peer) messaging, taken from ShadowChat which is based upon Bitmessage[18], utilises state-of-the-art encryption technology to keep your communications private."
So I ask you, what is the issue? I also ask you kindly to remove Silk from your thread.
The shadowchat paper is a transparent rip-off as anybody can plainly see. The code I cannot speak to. You couldve referenced the Bitmessage paper and the SDC Github I suppose. Anyway its not my bag. Well done on releasing the paper, Ill give it a read later. Good Luck.
coolio. well welcome to the thread man. any questions are welcome!
December 18, 2015, 04:22:07 PM
Please retweet and like the post below, let's spread the word:
https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328
https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328
I have a question about the whitepaper . You cite the Shadowchat whitepaper [6] and the Bitmessage paper [18]. Given you were following this thread I'm surprised you elected to include the SDC paper since it's a rip-off of Bitmessage. Or do you not think this is the case? Could you explain this decision?
I cited both because I took the code directly from the ShadowCash GitHub and they took the code in-turn from Bitmessage.
Are you stating the code is a rip-off? It is open-source.
Or their whitepaper? I based my content off of the ShadowCash whitepaper, which I then checked through and edited errors and reworded etc. Theirs is based on Bitmessage, another reason I cited both.
Also this is in the whitepaper: "DarkSilk P2P (peer-to-peer) messaging, taken from ShadowChat which is based upon Bitmessage[18], utilises state-of-the-art encryption technology to keep your communications private."
So I ask you, what is the issue? I also ask you kindly to remove Silk from your thread.
The shadowchat paper is a transparent rip-off as anybody can plainly see. The code I cannot speak to. You couldve referenced the Bitmessage paper and the SDC Github I suppose. Anyway its not my bag. Well done on releasing the paper, Ill give it a read later. Good Luck.
The bitmessage paper was referenced and cited in the Silk Network whitepaper. I don't understand what the issue is???
His point is I should of referenced the ShadowChat GitHub but at the same time I did take a bulk of information directly from the whitepaper of SDC and they in turn took from Bitmessage. I believe what I have done in the Silk Network whitepaper is absolutely fine and accurately cites what it needed. There is no point in the whitepaper where I quote the code directly that I took from SDC, which in-turn gives no place for citation.
Nice to see that someone is passionate though about morals and making sure people get the recognition they deserve.
December 18, 2015, 04:22:01 PM
I wanna get silky and put on my legs.
December 18, 2015, 04:19:50 PM
Please retweet and like the post below, let's spread the word:
https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328
https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328
I have a question about the whitepaper . You cite the Shadowchat whitepaper [6] and the Bitmessage paper [18]. Given you were following this thread I'm surprised you elected to include the SDC paper since it's a rip-off of Bitmessage. Or do you not think this is the case? Could you explain this decision?
I cited both because I took the code directly from the ShadowCash GitHub and they took the code in-turn from Bitmessage.
Are you stating the code is a rip-off? It is open-source.
Or their whitepaper? I based my content off of the ShadowCash whitepaper, which I then checked through and edited errors and reworded etc. Theirs is based on Bitmessage, another reason I cited both.
Also this is in the whitepaper: "DarkSilk P2P (peer-to-peer) messaging, taken from ShadowChat which is based upon Bitmessage[18], utilises state-of-the-art encryption technology to keep your communications private."
So I ask you, what is the issue? I also ask you kindly to remove Silk from your thread.
The shadowchat paper is a transparent rip-off as anybody can plainly see. The code I cannot speak to. You couldve referenced the Bitmessage paper and the SDC Github I suppose. Anyway its not my bag. Well done on releasing the paper, Ill give it a read later. Good Luck.
The bitmessage paper was referenced and cited in the Silk Network whitepaper. I don't understand what the issue is???
December 18, 2015, 04:17:56 PM
Please retweet and like the post below, let's spread the word:
https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328
https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328
I have a question about the whitepaper . You cite the Shadowchat whitepaper [6] and the Bitmessage paper [18]. Given you were following this thread I'm surprised you elected to include the SDC paper since it's a rip-off of Bitmessage. Or do you not think this is the case? Could you explain this decision?
I cited both because I took the code directly from the ShadowCash GitHub and they took the code in-turn from Bitmessage.
Are you stating the code is a rip-off? It is open-source.
Or their whitepaper? I based my content off of the ShadowCash whitepaper, which I then checked through and edited errors and reworded etc. Theirs is based on Bitmessage, another reason I cited both.
Also this is in the whitepaper: "DarkSilk P2P (peer-to-peer) messaging, taken from ShadowChat which is based upon Bitmessage[18], utilises state-of-the-art encryption technology to keep your communications private."
So I ask you, what is the issue? I also ask you kindly to remove Silk from your thread.
The shadowchat paper is a transparent rip-off as anybody can plainly see. The code I cannot speak to. You couldve referenced the Bitmessage paper and the SDC Github I suppose. Anyway its not my bag. Well done on releasing the paper, Ill give it a read later. Good Luck.
Many thanks Child_Harold, your welcome anytime, enjoy the read
December 18, 2015, 04:14:32 PM
Please retweet and like the post below, let's spread the word:
https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328
https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328
I have a question about the whitepaper . You cite the Shadowchat whitepaper [6] and the Bitmessage paper [18]. Given you were following this thread I'm surprised you elected to include the SDC paper since it's a rip-off of Bitmessage. Or do you not think this is the case? Could you explain this decision?
I cited both because I took the code directly from the ShadowCash GitHub and they took the code in-turn from Bitmessage.
Are you stating the code is a rip-off? It is open-source.
Or their whitepaper? I based my content off of the ShadowCash whitepaper, which I then checked through and edited errors and reworded etc. Theirs is based on Bitmessage, another reason I cited both.
Also this is in the whitepaper: "DarkSilk P2P (peer-to-peer) messaging, taken from ShadowChat which is based upon Bitmessage[18], utilises state-of-the-art encryption technology to keep your communications private."
So I ask you, what is the issue? I also ask you kindly to remove Silk from your thread.
The shadowchat paper is a transparent rip-off as anybody can plainly see. The code I cannot speak to. You couldve referenced the Bitmessage paper and the SDC Github I suppose. Anyway its not my bag. Well done on releasing the paper, Ill give it a read later. Good Luck.
December 18, 2015, 03:23:16 PM
To be honest I have a feeling that Child_Harold is probably the same as most of the people in this thread.
Been fucked. Basically. Pardon my french.
But seriously, this is more than likely the case.
Why not just come and join us dude, and actually be a part of a good community with public and honest, hardworking developers?
Time to stop falling for scams.
Been fucked. Basically. Pardon my french.
But seriously, this is more than likely the case.
Why not just come and join us dude, and actually be a part of a good community with public and honest, hardworking developers?
Time to stop falling for scams.
I 100% agree with this. Because that is exactly what I've done.
yep. been lots of butthurt with this coin. but ive kept it solid and honest for a couple years now and in addition we got a damn fine dev leading the charge. who also has some freakin values. hard to find in crytos.
December 18, 2015, 03:19:21 PM
To be honest I have a feeling that Child_Harold is probably the same as most of the people in this thread.
Been fucked. Basically. Pardon my french.
But seriously, this is more than likely the case.
Why not just come and join us dude, and actually be a part of a good community with public and honest, hardworking developers?
Time to stop falling for scams.
Been fucked. Basically. Pardon my french.
But seriously, this is more than likely the case.
Why not just come and join us dude, and actually be a part of a good community with public and honest, hardworking developers?
Time to stop falling for scams.
I 100% agree with this. Because that is exactly what I've done.
December 18, 2015, 03:16:21 PM
To be honest I have a feeling that Child_Harold is probably the same as most of the people in this thread.
Been fucked. Basically. Pardon my french.
But seriously, this is more than likely the case.
Why not just come and join us dude, and actually be a part of a good community with public and honest, hardworking developers?
Time to stop falling for scams.
Been fucked. Basically. Pardon my french.
But seriously, this is more than likely the case.
Why not just come and join us dude, and actually be a part of a good community with public and honest, hardworking developers?
Time to stop falling for scams.
December 18, 2015, 03:10:11 PM
Please retweet and like the post below, let's spread the word:
https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328
https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328
I have a question about the whitepaper . You cite the Shadowchat whitepaper [6] and the Bitmessage paper [18]. Given you were following this thread I'm surprised you elected to include the SDC paper since it's a rip-off of Bitmessage. Or do you not think this is the case? Could you explain this decision?
well no such thing as a rip-off of open source but not really sure what youre gettinf at. believe shadow chat was rewritten to a different language? its also used in like 100+ coins? youd like us to discrrdit rynos shadowchat? or what you saying here.
December 18, 2015, 02:46:23 PM
Please retweet and like the post below, let's spread the word:
https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328
https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328
I have a question about the whitepaper . You cite the Shadowchat whitepaper [6] and the Bitmessage paper [18]. Given you were following this thread I'm surprised you elected to include the SDC paper since it's a rip-off of Bitmessage. Or do you not think this is the case? Could you explain this decision?
I cited both because I took the code directly from the ShadowCash GitHub and they took the code in-turn from Bitmessage.
Are you stating the code is a rip-off? It is open-source.
Or their whitepaper? I based my content off of the ShadowCash whitepaper, which I then checked through and edited errors and reworded etc. Theirs is based on Bitmessage, another reason I cited both.
Also this is in the whitepaper: "DarkSilk P2P (peer-to-peer) messaging, taken from ShadowChat which is based upon Bitmessage[18], utilises state-of-the-art encryption technology to keep your communications private."
So I ask you, what is the issue? I also ask you kindly to remove Silk from your thread.
December 18, 2015, 02:20:03 PM
Please retweet and like the post below, let's spread the word:
https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328
https://twitter.com/Silk_Network/status/677776959255011328
I have a question about the whitepaper . You cite the Shadowchat whitepaper [6] and the Bitmessage paper [18]. Given you were following this thread I'm surprised you elected to include the SDC paper since it's a rip-off of Bitmessage. Or do you not think this is the case? Could you explain this decision?
Jump to: