done..
downloading blocks
DFtszYZuunFGPKvYRzkyoeECPLo2q5coWY
1 click masternodes would be nice..
i must change this background color, its hitting my eyes
Topic: [ANN][SILKCOIN][DARKSILK PREANN][TESTING STORMNODES/DarkSIlk MARKET/I2P] - page 61. (Read 289507 times)
November 08, 2015, 06:06:24 PM
November 08, 2015, 06:01:06 PM
Stealth Transactions have been fixed!!!
Now I need to test InstantX and just get the core CTransaction/CMutableTransaction brought in-line with Dash.
Then it is pre-launch/further testing time
Now I need to test InstantX and just get the core CTransaction/CMutableTransaction brought in-line with Dash.
Then it is pre-launch/further testing time
is there alive testnet coming with masternodes?
(testnet explorer would be nice too..)
i would like to seek some loop holes..
http://explorer.darksilk.org
Build the current source and connect to 82.8.176.59
Block 2686 currently.
No Stormnodes up atm but can send funds for you to setup as many as you would like. Info is in the readme for ports etc.
November 08, 2015, 05:49:06 PM
Stealth Transactions have been fixed!!!
Now I need to test InstantX and just get the core CTransaction/CMutableTransaction brought in-line with Dash.
Then it is pre-launch/further testing time
Now I need to test InstantX and just get the core CTransaction/CMutableTransaction brought in-line with Dash.
Then it is pre-launch/further testing time
is there alive testnet coming with masternodes?
(testnet explorer would be nice too..)
i would like to seek some loop holes..
November 08, 2015, 04:37:39 PM
Stealth Transactions have been fixed!!!
Now I need to test InstantX and just get the core CTransaction/CMutableTransaction brought in-line with Dash.
Then it is pre-launch/further testing time
Now I need to test InstantX and just get the core CTransaction/CMutableTransaction brought in-line with Dash.
Then it is pre-launch/further testing time
November 08, 2015, 02:07:07 PM
Some suggestions for DarkSilk (I reviewed https://github.com/SCDeveloper/DarkSilk-Release-Candidate):
....
Did I review the wrong code or do you have another repo? ....
I am 
I am bringing the codebase up to 12.1
Currently I am between 11.2 and 12.1 of Dash.
There are still a lot of differences such as CCoins too
DarkSilk will launch with these changes you mention in place
I am bringing the codebase up to 12.1
Currently I am between 11.2 and 12.1 of Dash.
There are still a lot of differences such as CCoins too
DarkSilk will launch with these changes you mention in place
I'm glad you included theses and other fixes. I only named a few. I know you have been working really hard on DarkSilk.
Are you including Sling's market in the first version or did you remove it?
i was wondering the same. have i wrong git?
that may be i had.
if so the core is ok? but not out yet?
How many times.....
DarkSilk is not released.
ok. but dont ignore these olds bugs. cryptovote already gave you some small part of those. he knows what we are talking about.
problem is not the mastenode code, but the main code..
all because of some guy messed up sourcecode out there really bad time with the earlier masternode shit coins.
who was it? icm? name if you can.
I know about the mess of Crave. It doesn't work, simple.
I have been working on DarkSilk since April and CryptoVote was using MY commits and is now helping with DarkSilk which is nice of him.
If anyone is aware of the mess of Crave and other similar codebases, it's me
Check this repo - https://github.com/SCDeveloper/Crave-Darksilk-Comparison (I made this 16 days ago and have done thousands of line changes since but this will give you an idea of the amount of work done)
There is not just the difference between CTransaction and CMutable, there are all the node elements, block scanning, Stealth address and messaging issues. Darksend simply doesn't work in Crave and basically the Dash code in Crave is just for show.
A simple example and proof of this is the fact that the mixer is disabled in the Crave source to not display on the overview page, ask yourself why.
I am of course referencing the original Crave release not any work done thereafter.
looks way better.. (git i looked earlier was last commit 3 months ago)
even the support for /* miniupnpc 1.9.20150730 */ added
"ibm" guys are waiting your work for crave?
"Darksend simply doesn't work in Crave and basically the Dash code in Crave is just for show.
A simple example and proof of this is the fact that the mixer is disabled in the Crave source to not display on the overview page, ask yourself why."
-yep, i found that months ago when fighting with similar code.
this BIG work you have done would help much with my hobby coin, but for personal reasons i am unable to continue..
It wouldn't surprise me if the "IBM" devs are using/waiting on my/our work.
Oh MaN! IBM is gonna fork silk now too?? lol it just never ends.
November 07, 2015, 10:12:49 PM
Some suggestions for DarkSilk (I reviewed https://github.com/SCDeveloper/DarkSilk-Release-Candidate):
....
Did I review the wrong code or do you have another repo? ....
I am
I am bringing the codebase up to 12.1
Currently I am between 11.2 and 12.1 of Dash.
There are still a lot of differences such as CCoins too
DarkSilk will launch with these changes you mention in place
I am bringing the codebase up to 12.1
Currently I am between 11.2 and 12.1 of Dash.
There are still a lot of differences such as CCoins too
DarkSilk will launch with these changes you mention in place
I'm glad you included theses and other fixes. I only named a few. I know you have been working really hard on DarkSilk.
Are you including Sling's market in the first version or did you remove it?
i was wondering the same. have i wrong git?
that may be i had.
if so the core is ok? but not out yet?
How many times.....
DarkSilk is not released.
ok. but dont ignore these olds bugs. cryptovote already gave you some small part of those. he knows what we are talking about.
problem is not the mastenode code, but the main code..
all because of some guy messed up sourcecode out there really bad time with the earlier masternode shit coins.
who was it? icm? name if you can.
I know about the mess of Crave. It doesn't work, simple.
I have been working on DarkSilk since April and CryptoVote was using MY commits and is now helping with DarkSilk which is nice of him.
If anyone is aware of the mess of Crave and other similar codebases, it's me
Check this repo - https://github.com/SCDeveloper/Crave-Darksilk-Comparison (I made this 16 days ago and have done thousands of line changes since but this will give you an idea of the amount of work done)
There is not just the difference between CTransaction and CMutable, there are all the node elements, block scanning, Stealth address and messaging issues. Darksend simply doesn't work in Crave and basically the Dash code in Crave is just for show.
A simple example and proof of this is the fact that the mixer is disabled in the Crave source to not display on the overview page, ask yourself why.
I am of course referencing the original Crave release not any work done thereafter.
looks way better.. (git i looked earlier was last commit 3 months ago)
even the support for /* miniupnpc 1.9.20150730 */ added
"ibm" guys are waiting your work for crave?
"Darksend simply doesn't work in Crave and basically the Dash code in Crave is just for show.
A simple example and proof of this is the fact that the mixer is disabled in the Crave source to not display on the overview page, ask yourself why."
-yep, i found that months ago when fighting with similar code.
this BIG work you have done would help much with my hobby coin, but for personal reasons i am unable to continue..
It wouldn't surprise me if the "IBM" devs are using/waiting on my/our work.
November 07, 2015, 10:11:16 PM
Available Supply.
Currently it is set to 90,000,000 but this is subject to change prior to launch.
November 07, 2015, 08:12:18 PM
Some suggestions for DarkSilk (I reviewed https://github.com/SCDeveloper/DarkSilk-Release-Candidate):
....
Did I review the wrong code or do you have another repo? ....
I am
I am bringing the codebase up to 12.1
Currently I am between 11.2 and 12.1 of Dash.
There are still a lot of differences such as CCoins too
DarkSilk will launch with these changes you mention in place
I am bringing the codebase up to 12.1
Currently I am between 11.2 and 12.1 of Dash.
There are still a lot of differences such as CCoins too
DarkSilk will launch with these changes you mention in place
I'm glad you included theses and other fixes. I only named a few. I know you have been working really hard on DarkSilk.
Are you including Sling's market in the first version or did you remove it?
i was wondering the same. have i wrong git?
that may be i had.
if so the core is ok? but not out yet?
How many times.....
DarkSilk is not released.
ok. but dont ignore these olds bugs. cryptovote already gave you some small part of those. he knows what we are talking about.
problem is not the mastenode code, but the main code..
all because of some guy messed up sourcecode out there really bad time with the earlier masternode shit coins.
who was it? icm? name if you can.
I know about the mess of Crave. It doesn't work, simple.
I have been working on DarkSilk since April and CryptoVote was using MY commits and is now helping with DarkSilk which is nice of him.
If anyone is aware of the mess of Crave and other similar codebases, it's me
Check this repo - https://github.com/SCDeveloper/Crave-Darksilk-Comparison (I made this 16 days ago and have done thousands of line changes since but this will give you an idea of the amount of work done)
There is not just the difference between CTransaction and CMutable, there are all the node elements, block scanning, Stealth address and messaging issues. Darksend simply doesn't work in Crave and basically the Dash code in Crave is just for show.
A simple example and proof of this is the fact that the mixer is disabled in the Crave source to not display on the overview page, ask yourself why.
I am of course referencing the original Crave release not any work done thereafter.
looks way better.. (git i looked earlier was last commit 3 months ago)
even the support for /* miniupnpc 1.9.20150730 */ added
"ibm" guys are waiting your work for crave?
"Darksend simply doesn't work in Crave and basically the Dash code in Crave is just for show.
A simple example and proof of this is the fact that the mixer is disabled in the Crave source to not display on the overview page, ask yourself why."
-yep, i found that months ago when fighting with similar code.
this BIG work you have done would help much with my hobby coin, but for personal reasons i am unable to continue..
November 07, 2015, 05:36:13 PM
Available Supply.
November 07, 2015, 05:26:19 PM
November 07, 2015, 05:21:55 PM
hi.
How much DARKSILK will be?
How much DARKSILK will be?
November 07, 2015, 12:44:46 PM
Some suggestions for DarkSilk (I reviewed https://github.com/SCDeveloper/DarkSilk-Release-Candidate):
....
Did I review the wrong code or do you have another repo? ....
I am
I am bringing the codebase up to 12.1
Currently I am between 11.2 and 12.1 of Dash.
There are still a lot of differences such as CCoins too
DarkSilk will launch with these changes you mention in place
I am bringing the codebase up to 12.1
Currently I am between 11.2 and 12.1 of Dash.
There are still a lot of differences such as CCoins too
DarkSilk will launch with these changes you mention in place
I'm glad you included theses and other fixes. I only named a few. I know you have been working really hard on DarkSilk.
Are you including Sling's market in the first version or did you remove it?
i was wondering the same. have i wrong git?
that may be i had.
if so the core is ok? but not out yet?
How many times.....
DarkSilk is not released.
ok. but dont ignore these olds bugs. cryptovote already gave you some small part of those. he knows what we are talking about.
problem is not the mastenode code, but the main code..
all because of some guy messed up sourcecode out there really bad time with the earlier masternode shit coins.
who was it? icm? name if you can.
I know about the mess of Crave. It doesn't work, simple.
I have been working on DarkSilk since April and CryptoVote was using MY commits and is now helping with DarkSilk which is nice of him.
If anyone is aware of the mess of Crave and other similar codebases, it's me
Check this repo - https://github.com/SCDeveloper/Crave-Darksilk-Comparison (I made this 16 days ago and have done thousands of line changes since but this will give you an idea of the amount of work done)
There is not just the difference between CTransaction and CMutable, there are all the node elements, block scanning, Stealth address and messaging issues. Darksend simply doesn't work in Crave and basically the Dash code in Crave is just for show.
A simple example and proof of this is the fact that the mixer is disabled in the Crave source to not display on the overview page, ask yourself why.
I am of course referencing the original Crave release not any work done thereafter.
November 07, 2015, 12:35:53 PM
Some suggestions for DarkSilk (I reviewed https://github.com/SCDeveloper/DarkSilk-Release-Candidate):
....
Did I review the wrong code or do you have another repo? ....
I am
I am bringing the codebase up to 12.1
Currently I am between 11.2 and 12.1 of Dash.
There are still a lot of differences such as CCoins too
DarkSilk will launch with these changes you mention in place
I am bringing the codebase up to 12.1
Currently I am between 11.2 and 12.1 of Dash.
There are still a lot of differences such as CCoins too
DarkSilk will launch with these changes you mention in place
I'm glad you included theses and other fixes. I only named a few. I know you have been working really hard on DarkSilk.
Are you including Sling's market in the first version or did you remove it?
i was wondering the same. have i wrong git?
that may be i had.
if so the core is ok? but not out yet?
How many times.....
DarkSilk is not released.
ok. but dont ignore these olds bugs. cryptovote already gave you some small part of those. he knows what we are talking about.
problem is not the mastenode code, but the main code..
all because of some guy messed up sourcecode out there really bad time with the earlier masternode shit coins.
who was it? icm? name if you can.
November 07, 2015, 11:20:07 AM
Some suggestions for DarkSilk (I reviewed https://github.com/SCDeveloper/DarkSilk-Release-Candidate):
....
Did I review the wrong code or do you have another repo? ....
I am
I am bringing the codebase up to 12.1
Currently I am between 11.2 and 12.1 of Dash.
There are still a lot of differences such as CCoins too
DarkSilk will launch with these changes you mention in place
I am bringing the codebase up to 12.1
Currently I am between 11.2 and 12.1 of Dash.
There are still a lot of differences such as CCoins too
DarkSilk will launch with these changes you mention in place
I'm glad you included theses and other fixes. I only named a few. I know you have been working really hard on DarkSilk.
Are you including Sling's market in the first version or did you remove it?
i was wondering the same. have i wrong git?
that may be i had.
if so the core is ok? but not out yet?
How many times.....
DarkSilk is not released.
November 07, 2015, 11:10:10 AM
Some suggestions for DarkSilk (I reviewed https://github.com/SCDeveloper/DarkSilk-Release-Candidate):
....
Did I review the wrong code or do you have another repo? ....
I am
I am bringing the codebase up to 12.1
Currently I am between 11.2 and 12.1 of Dash.
There are still a lot of differences such as CCoins too
DarkSilk will launch with these changes you mention in place
I am bringing the codebase up to 12.1
Currently I am between 11.2 and 12.1 of Dash.
There are still a lot of differences such as CCoins too
DarkSilk will launch with these changes you mention in place
I'm glad you included theses and other fixes. I only named a few. I know you have been working really hard on DarkSilk.
Are you including Sling's market in the first version or did you remove it?
i was wondering the same. have i wrong git?
that may be i had.
if so the core is ok? but not out yet?
November 06, 2015, 03:49:27 PM
Please tell me that the new wallet won't be such a memory hog. My 1.1.1.1 silkcoin wallet is a fucking memory hog and is just downright aweful. Can't hardly do anything with wallet open. Sucks.
Memory hog? DarkSilk? Take a look
Currently the Qt wallet for Linux is 10.8MB and it's memory usage is around 50MB:
The Windows Qt wallet is 28.8MB and it's memory usage is around 33MB:
November 06, 2015, 01:36:46 PM
Please tell me that the new wallet won't be such a memory hog. My 1.1.1.1 silkcoin wallet is a fucking memory hog and is just downright aweful. Can't hardly do anything with wallet open. Sucks.
Is all that really necessary?
The wallet works just fine.
I sometimes have 25+ POS wallets(including silk) staking and cgminer running at the same time on my machine and still can run almost any application including photoshop and lightroom without issue.
jeesh, the drama...
November 06, 2015, 12:17:53 AM
Please tell me that the new wallet won't be such a memory hog. My 1.1.1.1 silkcoin wallet is a fucking memory hog and is just downright aweful. Can't hardly do anything with wallet open. Sucks.
It will be better, i can assure you of that, we have a far better dev looking after things now!
November 05, 2015, 10:26:01 PM
Please tell me that the new wallet won't be such a memory hog. My 1.1.1.1 silkcoin wallet is a fucking memory hog and is just downright aweful. Can't hardly do anything with wallet open. Sucks.
November 04, 2015, 06:07:57 PM
Some node please?
I'm on 1.1.1.1 and not running a .conf file and have 20 connections. Here's some from my "getpeerinfo" that appeared to be running 1.1.1.1. I'm not sure why some have different ports.
Code:
71.58.178.14:16666
188.165.42.51:16666
82.73.160.43:16666
194.135.94.86:16666
104.255.33.186:16666
23.227.190.182:59938
45.63.7.225:58947
217.44.137.65:16666
5.147.248.22:52892
163.47.20.62:52712
204.11.237.233:55202
95.90.218.108:46268
91.40.105.11:59237
75.130.163.51:55988
78.132.246.45:63972
73.238.205.108:2042
188.165.42.51:16666
82.73.160.43:16666
194.135.94.86:16666
104.255.33.186:16666
23.227.190.182:59938
45.63.7.225:58947
217.44.137.65:16666
5.147.248.22:52892
163.47.20.62:52712
204.11.237.233:55202
95.90.218.108:46268
91.40.105.11:59237
75.130.163.51:55988
78.132.246.45:63972
73.238.205.108:2042
Jump to: