Author

Topic: [ANN][TAC] TalkCoin - page 114. (Read 266731 times)

full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
June 17, 2014, 09:27:58 PM
Where does the 1 TAC go for each chat?
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
June 17, 2014, 09:19:01 PM
Anyway to mute the sound when a chat comes through?
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
June 17, 2014, 09:04:20 PM
It will be nice to hear some updates from Dev

Hi, we are working on a big release for end of June.  We are just finalizing the details so I will announce later.

Thank you!
member
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
June 17, 2014, 08:24:55 PM
Isn't 78 million coins a year a lot?

What do you think which scenario is better?
1. 200k TACs per month for first 6 months  and then suddenly 6mil TACs for month for next 6 month?
2. Or 6mil TACs per month and then gradually decrease to end of year.

Do you think in which scenario some serious investors will consider to invest in TAC ?
Please stop this mentality. At this stage we need more of people to know about TAC, to use TAC. The 1 TAC block reward or too high TAC price would scare every newcomer who want to join.

In reality of course the 50 or 1 TAC per block scenario couldn't happen, so I agree that my examples are a little bit extreme. But every block reward change more than 10 folds would be dangerous.

Regards,

This changing block reward is not a good concept I think.

It should be related to supply of miners...

I agree with this... Happy to leave other things open to voting however manipulation of the block reward regardless of the amount of miners is bad news long term...


I think voting on changing block reward adds some life to the coin and the community. And it causes different kinds of reactions for different people, meaning the coin is always changing and doesn't get boring... Take a jump to 1 TAC reward for example: the current (short-sighted) miners may jump to mining another coin, but this leaves less difficulty for the long-term thinking miners to mine more easily. New miners aren't likely to join during 1 TAC reward period, but some new people may still buy and then vote the reward higher next time, then they may actually mine. And I think the TAC value won't jump around too much on the markets just because of a temporary block reward change.

It's fun, engaging, and part of what I love about TAC so much. More voting will be even better, but please don't remove one of the best features of Talkcoin!

There should be a vote to permanently leave at 1 block reward or vote for rewards, the first would be the best option for this good coin in the long run

If you guys want fun coins theres always hunter coin theres a built in game i think, though not sure how that coin ended up
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
June 17, 2014, 07:40:20 PM
Also, I think going on poloniex was too early... imo.. i need more time  Wink
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
June 17, 2014, 07:33:38 PM
Isn't 78 million coins a year a lot?

What do you think which scenario is better?
1. 200k TACs per month for first 6 months  and then suddenly 6mil TACs for month for next 6 month?
2. Or 6mil TACs per month and then gradually decrease to end of year.

Do you think in which scenario some serious investors will consider to invest in TAC ?
Please stop this mentality. At this stage we need more of people to know about TAC, to use TAC. The 1 TAC block reward or too high TAC price would scare every newcomer who want to join.

In reality of course the 50 or 1 TAC per block scenario couldn't happen, so I agree that my examples are a little bit extreme. But every block reward change more than 10 folds would be dangerous.

Regards,

This changing block reward is not a good concept I think.

It should be related to supply of miners...

I agree with this... Happy to leave other things open to voting however manipulation of the block reward regardless of the amount of miners is bad news long term...


I think voting on changing block reward adds some life to the coin and the community. And it causes different kinds of reactions for different people, meaning the coin is always changing and doesn't get boring... Take a jump to 1 TAC reward for example: the current (short-sighted) miners may jump to mining another coin, but this leaves less difficulty for the long-term thinking miners to mine more easily. New miners aren't likely to join during 1 TAC reward period, but some new people may still buy and then vote the reward higher next time, then they may actually mine. And I think the TAC value won't jump around too much on the markets just because of a temporary block reward change.

It's fun, engaging, and part of what I love about TAC so much. More voting will be even better, but please don't remove one of the best features of Talkcoin!

Profit and future investment seems to be what the masses are searching for .. more than fun, though fun is a bonus.


A coin needs to be adapting and growing. You don't you die like doge coin and litecoin.

sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
www.dashpay.io
June 17, 2014, 05:29:48 PM

I noted an improvement in stability

This is my settings for two R9-290


{
"pools" : [
   {
      "url" : "stratum+tcp://mine2.tac.nonce-pool.com:4020",
      "user" : "xxxxx.3",
      "pass" : "x"
   }
]
,
"intensity" : "0,0",
"xintensity" : "60,60",
"rawintensity" : "0,0",
"worksize" : "0,0",
"kernel" : "nist5,nist5",
"lookup-gap" : "0,0",
"thread-concurrency" : "8128,8128",
"shaders" : "2816,2816",
"gpu-threads" : "2,2",
"gpu-engine" : "0-947,0-947",
"gpu-fan" : "0-85,0-85",
"gpu-memclock" : "0,0",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0,0",
"gpu-powertune" : "20,20",
"gpu-vddc" : "0.000,0.000",
"temp-cutoff" : "95,95",
"temp-overheat" : "85,85",
"temp-target" : "75,75",
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "28",
"failover-switch-delay" : "60",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "7",
"tcp-keepalive" : "30",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}

What speeds are you getting?
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
June 17, 2014, 05:08:15 PM
I have released an optimised version of nist5 for sgminer (and amd). It is based on x11mod from lasybear
It works best on 14.6 amd drivers.

It was tested so far on my R9-290x and allows to almost double the hashrate.
On the standard talkcoin kernel, I was getting around 8.5MHash/s (on 14.6 drivers)
With this kernel I get 15.8MHash/s (average) at 1050MHash/s

To use it:
"sgminer.exe --kernel nist5 --no-submit-stale -o stratum+tcp://erebor.dwarfpool.com:3350 -u Your_Tac_Address -p1 -I 19"

I highly recommend to keep an eye on the temperature as the card can run hot (80°C) and over/underclock according to your liking.

The source can be found at: https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11mod
binaries with ADL (fan temp) support for windows: http://www31.zippyshare.com/v/26248514/file.html

Donations are welcomed (since I double your hashrate  Grin)
    BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
    TAC: TuqNvPoQxghHfzwnPpAxSTiYoN6FM8LM5p

Well I hope there is a bounty for that too  Grin



it seems that using xIntensity instead of Intensity is better. My sgminer is a lot more stable using xIntensity.


Any improvement in speed ? Could you share ? Thanks.

I noted an improvement in stability

This is my settings for two R9-290


{
"pools" : [
   {
      "url" : "stratum+tcp://mine2.tac.nonce-pool.com:4020",
      "user" : "xxxxx.3",
      "pass" : "x"
   }
]
,
"intensity" : "0,0",
"xintensity" : "60,60",
"rawintensity" : "0,0",
"worksize" : "0,0",
"kernel" : "nist5,nist5",
"lookup-gap" : "0,0",
"thread-concurrency" : "8128,8128",
"shaders" : "2816,2816",
"gpu-threads" : "2,2",
"gpu-engine" : "0-947,0-947",
"gpu-fan" : "0-85,0-85",
"gpu-memclock" : "0,0",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0,0",
"gpu-powertune" : "20,20",
"gpu-vddc" : "0.000,0.000",
"temp-cutoff" : "95,95",
"temp-overheat" : "85,85",
"temp-target" : "75,75",
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "28",
"failover-switch-delay" : "60",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "7",
"tcp-keepalive" : "30",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
June 17, 2014, 04:51:05 PM
Isn't 78 million coins a year a lot?

What do you think which scenario is better?
1. 200k TACs per month for first 6 months  and then suddenly 6mil TACs for month for next 6 month?
2. Or 6mil TACs per month and then gradually decrease to end of year.

Do you think in which scenario some serious investors will consider to invest in TAC ?
Please stop this mentality. At this stage we need more of people to know about TAC, to use TAC. The 1 TAC block reward or too high TAC price would scare every newcomer who want to join.

In reality of course the 50 or 1 TAC per block scenario couldn't happen, so I agree that my examples are a little bit extreme. But every block reward change more than 10 folds would be dangerous.

Regards,

This changing block reward is not a good concept I think.

It should be related to supply of miners...

I agree with this... Happy to leave other things open to voting however manipulation of the block reward regardless of the amount of miners is bad news long term...


I think voting on changing block reward adds some life to the coin and the community. And it causes different kinds of reactions for different people, meaning the coin is always changing and doesn't get boring... Take a jump to 1 TAC reward for example: the current (short-sighted) miners may jump to mining another coin, but this leaves less difficulty for the long-term thinking miners to mine more easily. New miners aren't likely to join during 1 TAC reward period, but some new people may still buy and then vote the reward higher next time, then they may actually mine. And I think the TAC value won't jump around too much on the markets just because of a temporary block reward change.

It's fun, engaging, and part of what I love about TAC so much. More voting will be even better, but please don't remove one of the best features of Talkcoin!
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
www.dashpay.io
June 17, 2014, 04:36:46 PM
Isn't 78 million coins a year a lot?

What do you think which scenario is better?
1. 200k TACs per month for first 6 months  and then suddenly 6mil TACs for month for next 6 month?
2. Or 6mil TACs per month and then gradually decrease to end of year.

Do you think in which scenario some serious investors will consider to invest in TAC ?
Please stop this mentality. At this stage we need more of people to know about TAC, to use TAC. The 1 TAC block reward or too high TAC price would scare every newcomer who want to join.

In reality of course the 50 or 1 TAC per block scenario couldn't happen, so I agree that my examples are a little bit extreme. But every block reward change more than 10 folds would be dangerous.

Regards,

This changing block reward is not a good concept I think.

It should be related to supply of miners...

I agree with this... Happy to leave other things open to voting however manipulation of the block reward regardless of the amount of miners is bad news long term...
full member
Activity: 223
Merit: 100
June 17, 2014, 04:24:25 PM
Isn't 78 million coins a year a lot?

What do you think which scenario is better?
1. 200k TACs per month for first 6 months  and then suddenly 6mil TACs for month for next 6 month?
2. Or 6mil TACs per month and then gradually decrease to end of year.

Do you think in which scenario some serious investors will consider to invest in TAC ?
Please stop this mentality. At this stage we need more of people to know about TAC, to use TAC. The 1 TAC block reward or too high TAC price would scare every newcomer who want to join.

In reality of course the 50 or 1 TAC per block scenario couldn't happen, so I agree that my examples are a little bit extreme. But every block reward change more than 10 folds would be dangerous.

Regards,

This changing block reward is not a good concept I think.

It should be related to supply of miners...
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
June 17, 2014, 04:24:11 PM
I have released an optimised version of nist5 for sgminer (and amd). It is based on x11mod from lasybear
It works best on 14.6 amd drivers.

It was tested so far on my R9-290x and allows to almost double the hashrate.
On the standard talkcoin kernel, I was getting around 8.5MHash/s (on 14.6 drivers)
With this kernel I get 15.8MHash/s (average) at 1050MHash/s

To use it:
"sgminer.exe --kernel nist5 --no-submit-stale -o stratum+tcp://erebor.dwarfpool.com:3350 -u Your_Tac_Address -p1 -I 19"

I highly recommend to keep an eye on the temperature as the card can run hot (80°C) and over/underclock according to your liking.

The source can be found at: https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11mod
binaries with ADL (fan temp) support for windows: http://www31.zippyshare.com/v/26248514/file.html

Donations are welcomed (since I double your hashrate  Grin)
    BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
    TAC: TuqNvPoQxghHfzwnPpAxSTiYoN6FM8LM5p

Well I hope there is a bounty for that too  Grin



it seems that using xIntensity instead of Intensity is better. My sgminer is a lot more stable using xIntensity.


Any improvement in speed ? Could you share ? Thanks.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
June 17, 2014, 04:10:54 PM
I have released an optimised version of nist5 for sgminer (and amd). It is based on x11mod from lasybear
It works best on 14.6 amd drivers.

It was tested so far on my R9-290x and allows to almost double the hashrate.
On the standard talkcoin kernel, I was getting around 8.5MHash/s (on 14.6 drivers)
With this kernel I get 15.8MHash/s (average) at 1050MHash/s

To use it:
"sgminer.exe --kernel nist5 --no-submit-stale -o stratum+tcp://erebor.dwarfpool.com:3350 -u Your_Tac_Address -p1 -I 19"

I highly recommend to keep an eye on the temperature as the card can run hot (80°C) and over/underclock according to your liking.

The source can be found at: https://github.com/djm34/sph-sgminer_x11mod
binaries with ADL (fan temp) support for windows: http://www31.zippyshare.com/v/26248514/file.html

Donations are welcomed (since I double your hashrate  Grin)
    BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
    TAC: TuqNvPoQxghHfzwnPpAxSTiYoN6FM8LM5p

Well I hope there is a bounty for that too  Grin



it seems that using xIntensity instead of Intensity is better. My sgminer is a lot more stable using xIntensity.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
June 17, 2014, 04:02:23 PM
Does anyone have a compiled Windows CPU miner?

Thanks,
Griff
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
June 17, 2014, 03:15:05 PM
Isn't 78 million coins a year a lot?

What do you think which scenario is better?
1. 200k TACs per month for first 6 months  and then suddenly 6mil TACs for month for next 6 month?
2. Or 6mil TACs per month and then gradually decrease to end of year.

Do you think in which scenario some serious investors will consider to invest in TAC ?
Please stop this mentality. At this stage we need more of people to know about TAC, to use TAC. The 1 TAC block reward or too high TAC price would scare every newcomer who want to join.

In reality of course the 50 or 1 TAC per block scenario couldn't happen, so I agree that my examples are a little bit extreme. But every block reward change more than 10 folds would be dangerous.

Regards,
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
June 17, 2014, 03:04:18 PM
Isn't 78 million coins a year a lot?
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
June 17, 2014, 03:02:16 PM
People at the chat room screaming again for 1 TAC block reward.
Someone good at math could please look at the trading volume of Polo and Bittrex, you should understand why a lower block reward doesn't necessary relate with a higher price.
Block reward lower than 20 TAC at this stage would do more harm to the coin than good.
I will continue to vote 50 TAC because I know a lot of people still too naive and thinking 1 TAC per block would magically bring the TAC price 2000% higher.

Regards,
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
June 17, 2014, 01:22:52 PM
About tac propaganda articles, opinions, future discussions
Open daily percentage of cases talkcoin user exceeds the btc etc.
talkcin anonymous chat (freedom of speech is the aspirations of people around the world for thousands of years)

You can Google translate it

sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
Saved you from a scam? Send me some BTC!
June 17, 2014, 01:18:37 PM
Hi,

Anyone have any instructions for a noob on how to update a headless PiMP rig to the 14.6 drivers so I can try djm34's new miner?

Thanks.

hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
June 17, 2014, 12:51:49 PM
77    Talkcoin   $ 156,579   $ 0.034172   4,582,036 TAC   $ 12,292   

LOL 30% increases since my last post. Now people begin to panic buy? LOL
I wonder how look the sell order in Bittrex will last. It looks thiner and thiner every minute.
Someone still want to sell his TAC under 10k sat? LOL  Grin

I've got the same predicament, every 3 months I get a juicy power bill to pay for my farm, so I do 10 weeks of accumulation and 2 weeks of instamining to pay bills.

I've gotta do 2 weeks of instamining now and I'm not sure what to mine.  I could just instamine TAC but I could never bring myself to sell any TAC lol...

I don't trust coinwarz/whatmine etc, they always try to sell you the wrong coins so they can mine the low diff coins...

Dude me too. I have the huge 6 months bill waiting for me and I still didn't sell any of my lovely coin.  Embarrassed
Instamine is much more difficult and time consuming than 4 months ago, now people with your farm size is flooding bitcointalk forum and waiting for every opportunity to instamine.
Right now for AMD farm I think mining at trademybit and use auto exchange is a pretty ok option.
Jump to: