If anyone from CryptoCoinTalk is here, please post this message from the developer (me) up because for some reason I "don't have permission to register"
If you're not from CCT please read it as if it was addressed toward CCT, I hold no grudges toward BTCTalk whatsoever and meant to post this on CCT
-startrant-
I don't know what is wrong with your community here, they scrape the web looking for new coins and then try to crap on them as soon as they can, while also stopping the developers from refuting their points. The only thing I see on this board is shilling and disinfo, I really hope nobody actually takes advice from you guys. I'm sure the admin of this site didn't intend for a community like this, well at least I hope he didn't.
To start off, yes, there was a premine. How much? 3 blocks. After that it was released into the public domain. Why I ask, do you all go crazy over a 3 block premine while there's a thread about Atom on here which had 10,000 blocks mined (about 5x as many coins), but was praised and accepted by you all? It seems very suspicious to me.
To that guy who likes to make his "lists of things bad about this coin" (seriously, I've seen you make one of these lists in about 4 different coin threads, wtf?):
1. 500,000,000,000 (do you think they realise what would mean in fiat currency)
That's the point
2. Claim to no premine, but the evidence is against it
Too bad the evidence is that we never claimed to no premine
3. Stock graphics
Graphics is what chooses a coins success now?
4. Nothing new in concept, and an absolute flood of coins in the first few days
Again, that's the point
5. And that fedoracoin.conf file setup strikes me as odd, but perhaps I am spending too much time on AnonCoins website
I don't know what to say to this, I guess you just needed something to bump your list to have 5 points
-endrant-
Other problem. Difficulty is currently at 35.816, with a block time of ~2mn since nearly 2 hours (43 blocks in 106mn).
Difficulty is supposed to retarget every 10 blocks.
What's happening ?
Not really sure, I'm looking into it right now, we're using the algo that SBC is going to use after block 312000 so maybe the developer of that didn't test it properly.. I'll have to run some tests myself