Topic: [ANN]VESTARIN🚀ICO is LIVE |Marketplace of goods and services for cryptocurrency - page 15. (Read 67989 times)
April 15, 2018, 07:05:37 AM
Hello, good news for all Vestarin bounty participants. The distribution has been completed, I have received payment from the bounty campaign. This is all thanks to the hard work of the team and the developers. Thanks. Congratulations on his success. Hopefully the token price does not disappoint.
April 14, 2018, 07:06:21 PM
How is going your project?
As far as I understand the project has been completed. And the last stakes have been counted. You can check it directly in the spreadsheet. Currently, we only need to wait for the distribution of tokens. Hopefully the distribution runs smoothly. April 14, 2018, 06:50:12 AM
How is going your project?
April 13, 2018, 11:23:43 AM
I remember how much hype was around some data-selling ICO project (I won't name it not to advertise). I don't understand why to spawn the clones.
Clones-projects will always appear. The main thing here is how they are implemented and whether they can compete with other projects. April 13, 2018, 08:35:58 AM
I thought there was only 1 stage for the ICO (5th Mar. - 4th Apr.), but Devs have changed their ICO rules right after the end of original ICO, without any notification, and are planning to do more ICO sales from 10th May.
They have also changed their Whitepaper, and rewritten the period of ICO. The way of doing things are so UNFAIR.
I feel so scammed by Vestarin Devs. People who have not invested yet, just STAY AWAY from this project.
EDIT: now they say that they won't do another ICO. They just messed up, and lost trust from initial investors.
They have also changed their Whitepaper, and rewritten the period of ICO. The way of doing things are so UNFAIR.
I feel so scammed by Vestarin Devs. People who have not invested yet, just STAY AWAY from this project.
EDIT: now they say that they won't do another ICO. They just messed up, and lost trust from initial investors.
why will the dev team want to lunch another ico? is it that the first ico was not successful? and also can not just change the terms of first initial ico without making proper announcement in this regards, trust and transparency is very important factor for both project developers and invest, bridging that trust will automatically bring misunderstanding and mistrust in the project, really cant understand why they have to go back on their words
On the day ICO ended, dev was planning to do another ICO, due to short of funding, and explained to us that they can not develop full functional application they were planning to. I think you can check at Telegram if they have not deleted that conversation yet.
I think trust is the most important thing in anywhere, especially in Crypto, and they should not have changed their ICO schedule right after the original ICO ends. And moreover, they should have set their soft cap higher, if they can not run their plan with that amount of funding.
I think if funding is not enough, developers should do ICO to 2 that had been planned before. Instead of ending this project with vagueness. I understand that investors will be disappointed with this, but I think this is a step to save the project from failure.
What do you mean by funding not enough...
They have achieved soft cap and soft cap is the minimum limit they think they need for project development. this means they already have enough funds to develop the project although the development will not be as fast as if they reached hard cap.
And if they set ico 2 without notice at the beginning, I think it's a bad move
April 12, 2018, 10:40:39 AM
I remember how much hype was around some data-selling ICO project (I won't name it not to advertise). I don't understand why to spawn the clones.
April 12, 2018, 10:26:10 AM
I thought there was only 1 stage for the ICO (5th Mar. - 4th Apr.), but Devs have changed their ICO rules right after the end of original ICO, without any notification, and are planning to do more ICO sales from 10th May.
They have also changed their Whitepaper, and rewritten the period of ICO. The way of doing things are so UNFAIR.
I feel so scammed by Vestarin Devs. People who have not invested yet, just STAY AWAY from this project.
EDIT: now they say that they won't do another ICO. They just messed up, and lost trust from initial investors.
They have also changed their Whitepaper, and rewritten the period of ICO. The way of doing things are so UNFAIR.
I feel so scammed by Vestarin Devs. People who have not invested yet, just STAY AWAY from this project.
EDIT: now they say that they won't do another ICO. They just messed up, and lost trust from initial investors.
why will the dev team want to lunch another ico? is it that the first ico was not successful? and also can not just change the terms of first initial ico without making proper announcement in this regards, trust and transparency is very important factor for both project developers and invest, bridging that trust will automatically bring misunderstanding and mistrust in the project, really cant understand why they have to go back on their words
On the day ICO ended, dev was planning to do another ICO, due to short of funding, and explained to us that they can not develop full functional application they were planning to. I think you can check at Telegram if they have not deleted that conversation yet.
I think trust is the most important thing in anywhere, especially in Crypto, and they should not have changed their ICO schedule right after the original ICO ends. And moreover, they should have set their soft cap higher, if they can not run their plan with that amount of funding.
I think if funding is not enough, developers should do ICO to 2 that had been planned before. Instead of ending this project with vagueness. I understand that investors will be disappointed with this, but I think this is a step to save the project from failure.
What do you mean by funding not enough...
They have achieved soft cap and soft cap is the minimum limit they think they need for project development. this means they already have enough funds to develop the project although the development will not be as fast as if they reached hard cap.
And if they set ico 2 without notice at the beginning, I think it's a bad move
April 12, 2018, 08:06:22 AM
I thought there was only 1 stage for the ICO (5th Mar. - 4th Apr.), but Devs have changed their ICO rules right after the end of original ICO, without any notification, and are planning to do more ICO sales from 10th May.
They have also changed their Whitepaper, and rewritten the period of ICO. The way of doing things are so UNFAIR.
I feel so scammed by Vestarin Devs. People who have not invested yet, just STAY AWAY from this project.
EDIT: now they say that they won't do another ICO. They just messed up, and lost trust from initial investors.
They have also changed their Whitepaper, and rewritten the period of ICO. The way of doing things are so UNFAIR.
I feel so scammed by Vestarin Devs. People who have not invested yet, just STAY AWAY from this project.
EDIT: now they say that they won't do another ICO. They just messed up, and lost trust from initial investors.
why will the dev team want to lunch another ico? is it that the first ico was not successful? and also can not just change the terms of first initial ico without making proper announcement in this regards, trust and transparency is very important factor for both project developers and invest, bridging that trust will automatically bring misunderstanding and mistrust in the project, really cant understand why they have to go back on their words
On the day ICO ended, dev was planning to do another ICO, due to short of funding, and explained to us that they can not develop full functional application they were planning to. I think you can check at Telegram if they have not deleted that conversation yet.
I think trust is the most important thing in anywhere, especially in Crypto, and they should not have changed their ICO schedule right after the original ICO ends. And moreover, they should have set their soft cap higher, if they can not run their plan with that amount of funding.
I think if funding is not enough, developers should do ICO to 2 that had been planned before. Instead of ending this project with vagueness. I understand that investors will be disappointed with this, but I think this is a step to save the project from failure.
What do you mean by funding not enough...
They have achieved soft cap and soft cap is the minimum limit they think they need for project development. this means they already have enough funds to develop the project although the development will not be as fast as if they reached hard cap.
And if they set ico 2 without notice at the beginning, I think it's a bad move
April 12, 2018, 08:04:08 AM
I thought there was only 1 stage for the ICO (5th Mar. - 4th Apr.), but Devs have changed their ICO rules right after the end of original ICO, without any notification, and are planning to do more ICO sales from 10th May.
They have also changed their Whitepaper, and rewritten the period of ICO. The way of doing things are so UNFAIR.
I feel so scammed by Vestarin Devs. People who have not invested yet, just STAY AWAY from this project.
EDIT: now they say that they won't do another ICO. They just messed up, and lost trust from initial investors.
They have also changed their Whitepaper, and rewritten the period of ICO. The way of doing things are so UNFAIR.
I feel so scammed by Vestarin Devs. People who have not invested yet, just STAY AWAY from this project.
EDIT: now they say that they won't do another ICO. They just messed up, and lost trust from initial investors.
why will the dev team want to lunch another ico? is it that the first ico was not successful? and also can not just change the terms of first initial ico without making proper announcement in this regards, trust and transparency is very important factor for both project developers and invest, bridging that trust will automatically bring misunderstanding and mistrust in the project, really cant understand why they have to go back on their words
On the day ICO ended, dev was planning to do another ICO, due to short of funding, and explained to us that they can not develop full functional application they were planning to. I think you can check at Telegram if they have not deleted that conversation yet.
I think trust is the most important thing in anywhere, especially in Crypto, and they should not have changed their ICO schedule right after the original ICO ends. And moreover, they should have set their soft cap higher, if they can not run their plan with that amount of funding.
I think if funding is not enough, developers should do ICO to 2 that had been planned before. Instead of ending this project with vagueness. I understand that investors will be disappointed with this, but I think this is a step to save the project from failure.
What do you mean by funding not enough...
They have achieved soft cap and soft cap is the minimum limit they think they need for project development. this means they already have enough funds to develop the project although the development will not be as fast as if they reached hard cap.
And if they set ico 2 without notice at the beginning, I think it's a bad move
Yeah, I saw the tele conversation... Was quite disappointing - Lots of people upset with the 2nd round idea. But I personally didn't like the comment about "not enough funding to make it fully functional"
After raising 5k Eth = $2mill. Then instantly saying they need more to develop the project in full?... Idk, thats a big red flag.
Seems like they realized that $2mil isn't nearly enough after purchasing company lambos. Basically, after lambos, there's not much left for development...
Still. None the less. I would like to see the platform become functional so I can use it. Crypto communities are very valuable
April 11, 2018, 09:14:27 PM
I thought there was only 1 stage for the ICO (5th Mar. - 4th Apr.), but Devs have changed their ICO rules right after the end of original ICO, without any notification, and are planning to do more ICO sales from 10th May.
They have also changed their Whitepaper, and rewritten the period of ICO. The way of doing things are so UNFAIR.
I feel so scammed by Vestarin Devs. People who have not invested yet, just STAY AWAY from this project.
EDIT: now they say that they won't do another ICO. They just messed up, and lost trust from initial investors.
They have also changed their Whitepaper, and rewritten the period of ICO. The way of doing things are so UNFAIR.
I feel so scammed by Vestarin Devs. People who have not invested yet, just STAY AWAY from this project.
EDIT: now they say that they won't do another ICO. They just messed up, and lost trust from initial investors.
why will the dev team want to lunch another ico? is it that the first ico was not successful? and also can not just change the terms of first initial ico without making proper announcement in this regards, trust and transparency is very important factor for both project developers and invest, bridging that trust will automatically bring misunderstanding and mistrust in the project, really cant understand why they have to go back on their words
On the day ICO ended, dev was planning to do another ICO, due to short of funding, and explained to us that they can not develop full functional application they were planning to. I think you can check at Telegram if they have not deleted that conversation yet.
I think trust is the most important thing in anywhere, especially in Crypto, and they should not have changed their ICO schedule right after the original ICO ends. And moreover, they should have set their soft cap higher, if they can not run their plan with that amount of funding.
I think if funding is not enough, developers should do ICO to 2 that had been planned before. Instead of ending this project with vagueness. I understand that investors will be disappointed with this, but I think this is a step to save the project from failure.
What do you mean by funding not enough...
They have achieved soft cap and soft cap is the minimum limit they think they need for project development. this means they already have enough funds to develop the project although the development will not be as fast as if they reached hard cap.
And if they set ico 2 without notice at the beginning, I think it's a bad move
April 11, 2018, 08:22:30 PM
I thought there was only 1 stage for the ICO (5th Mar. - 4th Apr.), but Devs have changed their ICO rules right after the end of original ICO, without any notification, and are planning to do more ICO sales from 10th May.
They have also changed their Whitepaper, and rewritten the period of ICO. The way of doing things are so UNFAIR.
I feel so scammed by Vestarin Devs. People who have not invested yet, just STAY AWAY from this project.
EDIT: now they say that they won't do another ICO. They just messed up, and lost trust from initial investors.
They have also changed their Whitepaper, and rewritten the period of ICO. The way of doing things are so UNFAIR.
I feel so scammed by Vestarin Devs. People who have not invested yet, just STAY AWAY from this project.
EDIT: now they say that they won't do another ICO. They just messed up, and lost trust from initial investors.
why will the dev team want to lunch another ico? is it that the first ico was not successful? and also can not just change the terms of first initial ico without making proper announcement in this regards, trust and transparency is very important factor for both project developers and invest, bridging that trust will automatically bring misunderstanding and mistrust in the project, really cant understand why they have to go back on their words
On the day ICO ended, dev was planning to do another ICO, due to short of funding, and explained to us that they can not develop full functional application they were planning to. I think you can check at Telegram if they have not deleted that conversation yet.
I think trust is the most important thing in anywhere, especially in Crypto, and they should not have changed their ICO schedule right after the original ICO ends. And moreover, they should have set their soft cap higher, if they can not run their plan with that amount of funding.
I think if funding is not enough, developers should do ICO to 2 that had been planned before. Instead of ending this project with vagueness. I understand that investors will be disappointed with this, but I think this is a step to save the project from failure.
April 11, 2018, 11:32:13 AM
I thought there was only 1 stage for the ICO (5th Mar. - 4th Apr.), but Devs have changed their ICO rules right after the end of original ICO, without any notification, and are planning to do more ICO sales from 10th May.
They have also changed their Whitepaper, and rewritten the period of ICO. The way of doing things are so UNFAIR.
I feel so scammed by Vestarin Devs. People who have not invested yet, just STAY AWAY from this project.
EDIT: now they say that they won't do another ICO. They just messed up, and lost trust from initial investors.
They have also changed their Whitepaper, and rewritten the period of ICO. The way of doing things are so UNFAIR.
I feel so scammed by Vestarin Devs. People who have not invested yet, just STAY AWAY from this project.
EDIT: now they say that they won't do another ICO. They just messed up, and lost trust from initial investors.
why will the dev team want to lunch another ico? is it that the first ico was not successful? and also can not just change the terms of first initial ico without making proper announcement in this regards, trust and transparency is very important factor for both project developers and invest, bridging that trust will automatically bring misunderstanding and mistrust in the project, really cant understand why they have to go back on their words
On the day ICO ended, dev was planning to do another ICO, due to short of funding, and explained to us that they can not develop full functional application they were planning to. I think you can check at Telegram if they have not deleted that conversation yet.
I think trust is the most important thing in anywhere, especially in Crypto, and they should not have changed their ICO schedule right after the original ICO ends. And moreover, they should have set their soft cap higher, if they can not run their plan with that amount of funding.
April 11, 2018, 09:40:44 AM
I thought there was only 1 stage for the ICO (5th Mar. - 4th Apr.), but Devs have changed their ICO rules right after the end of original ICO, without any notification, and are planning to do more ICO sales from 10th May.
They have also changed their Whitepaper, and rewritten the period of ICO. The way of doing things are so UNFAIR.
I feel so scammed by Vestarin Devs. People who have not invested yet, just STAY AWAY from this project.
EDIT: now they say that they won't do another ICO. They just messed up, and lost trust from initial investors.
They have also changed their Whitepaper, and rewritten the period of ICO. The way of doing things are so UNFAIR.
I feel so scammed by Vestarin Devs. People who have not invested yet, just STAY AWAY from this project.
EDIT: now they say that they won't do another ICO. They just messed up, and lost trust from initial investors.
why will the dev team want to lunch another ico? is it that the first ico was not successful? and also can not just change the terms of first initial ico without making proper announcement in this regards, trust and transparency is very important factor for both project developers and invest, bridging that trust will automatically bring misunderstanding and mistrust in the project, really cant understand why they have to go back on their words
April 11, 2018, 07:24:55 AM
The ICO was completed. When will the company's distribution of bounty? I did not get a reward. Hunters have you received a reward?
April 11, 2018, 03:40:25 AM
The ICO was completed. When will the company's distribution of bounty? I did not get a reward. Hunters have you received a reward?
April 11, 2018, 03:07:53 AM
thank you vestarin i received my bounty reward.. good luck hope it will success..
Have you received the reward in relation to the bounty campaign?
Can any manager or project manager inform if ICO has been finalized?
April 10, 2018, 09:18:41 AM
thank you vestarin i received my bounty reward.. good luck hope it will success..
Have you received the reward in relation to the bounty campaign?
Can any manager or project manager inform if ICO has been finalized?
April 10, 2018, 06:23:44 AM
It is pretty quiet at vestarin. A week after the ICO. I expect an update from their side.
An update about the platform or something?
April 10, 2018, 01:52:47 AM
To this day, the spreadsheet has not been updated. How is this continuation and the future of Vestarin? I did not find any information that this campaign ended, even many participants still use Vestarin's signature.Will ICO's 2nd stage be held in May?
April 09, 2018, 08:39:55 PM
thank you vestarin i received my bounty reward.. good luck hope it will success..
Jump to: