Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][VTR] vTorrent - Share with freedom | 2FA | HD | @Bittrex - page 69. (Read 436160 times)

legendary
Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000
price predictions ? I think vtr can hit 50k this year.. maybe more! Now we just need to break 10k.. and secretly I believe this is the next polo coin Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
It's interesting to see the Joystream dependencies

Code:
[submodule "libtorrent"]
path = libtorrent
[submodule "mSIGNA"]
path = mSIGNA

Libtorrent is basically the engine, but msigna looks like how they are managing the Bitcoin relationship with the storage files on your local drive. So it's mostly open source software already.
member
Activity: 86
Merit: 10
...
Ohhhhh, they're JoyStream screenshots. I see.

 Cheesy





What kind of difference will 1300000 block fork bring us
Regarding to staking calculations?
full member
Activity: 138
Merit: 100
Everything's a bubble, idiot
..

Do you think you could successfully merge VTR with a joystream fork? If the VTR devs fail?

I'm not interested in any of that. The VTR devs look to have a far superior implementation vs. Joystream, if they are going to run a straight implementation of a BitTorrent client.

1000 times better.

Joystream is going to fail badly unless they introduce some payment hubs to keep users from spamming the Bitcoin blockchain with micro-transactions. At the current cost of BTC fees, Joystream is dead in the water. You would need to be buying an mp3 file for about $5 just in fees.

vTorrent is the only game in town.


I imagine that's what the VTR token will be for? To pass fees around without touching the VTR blockchain, then it gets periodically converted back into VTR. Similar to ETH and Gas I guess. Or maybe I'm wrong.

Also, BTC transaction speeds are atrocious and why you'd want to build anything on top of that blockchain is a mystery to me. I've been waiting 5 1/2 hours for the first confirmation of a transaction sent with 25c fee.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
..

Do you think you could successfully merge VTR with a joystream fork? If the VTR devs fail?

I'm not interested in any of that. The VTR devs look to have a far superior implementation vs. Joystream, if they are going to run a straight implementation of a BitTorrent client.

1000 times better.

Joystream is going to fail badly unless they introduce some payment hubs to keep users from spamming the Bitcoin blockchain with micro-transactions. At the current cost of BTC fees, Joystream is dead in the water. You would need to be buying an mp3 file for about $5 just in fees.

vTorrent is the only game in town.
full member
Activity: 138
Merit: 100
Everything's a bubble, idiot
...

So... where are those screens from?

 Huh Huh

My computer, where else?

edit

why does bitcoin-core 0.14.0 still get blocked by virus software? You would think they have that sorted by now.

So it's not commented out from VTR's code.

The devs haven't released any yet. What they seem to have running in the clients are sections where the client will launch a bridge that will run a fully functioning BitTorrent client. 

Do you think you could successfully merge VTR with a joystream fork? If the VTR devs fail?


Ohhhhh, they're JoyStream screenshots. I see.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
...

So... where are those screens from?

 Huh Huh

My computer, where else?

edit

why does bitcoin-core 0.14.0 still get blocked by virus software? You would think they have that sorted by now.

So it's not commented out from VTR's code.

The devs haven't released any yet. What they seem to have running in the clients are sections where the client will launch a bridge that will run a fully functioning BitTorrent client. 

Do you think you could successfully merge VTR with a joystream fork? If the VTR devs fail?
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
...

So... where are those screens from?

 Huh Huh

My computer, where else?

edit

why does bitcoin-core 0.14.0 still get blocked by virus software? You would think they have that sorted by now.

So it's not commented out from VTR's code.

The devs haven't released any yet. What they seem to have running in the clients are sections where the client will launch a bridge that will run a fully functioning BitTorrent client. 
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
...

So... where are those screens from?

 Huh Huh

My computer, where else?

edit

why does bitcoin-core 0.14.0 still get blocked by virus software? You would think they have that sorted by now.

So it's not commented out from VTR's code.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
...

So... where are those screens from?

 Huh Huh

My computer, where else?

edit

why does bitcoin-core 0.14.0 still get blocked by virus software? You would think they have that sorted by now.
hero member
Activity: 613
Merit: 501
What are you talking about coins? Where did you get those screenshots from? There is a screenshot of early beta version of the client in the ANN and it doesn't look similar to those screenshots.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
Once you move a file into a target directory, it seems like you can become a seller and set your price, from zero to whatever



full member
Activity: 138
Merit: 100
Everything's a bubble, idiot
Some of this stuff looks rather simple, but I guess the issues are not with the front end, but various aspects on the back-end







The actual generation of the torrent files is the easy part as that functionality has been tested and working on BitTorrent for years now.

Stopping fake seeders from earning revenues from your token and encrypting the various channels of communications is probably the harder part.

So... where are those screens from?
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
...
Was this commented out from the code already released?

Did you notice it's all in BTC and not VTR?

Just taking a look at what's what.

I think the @vtorrent implementation will be much better than this, probably closer to how uTorrent or similar actually looks and functions.

Code:

It seems to be a bridge to run the actual BitTorrent client. So there must be some two-way interaction with the QT wallet. So you should really see the benefits of two worlds in one place, either use each one on their own or together.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Some of this stuff looks rather simple, but I guess the issues are not with the front end, but various aspects on the back-end







The actual generation of the torrent files is the easy part as that functionality has been tested and working on BitTorrent for years now.

Stopping fake seeders from earning revenues from your token and encrypting the various channels of communications is probably the harder part.

Was this commented out from the code already released?
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
Some of this stuff looks rather simple, but I guess the issues are not with the front end, but various aspects on the back-end







The actual generation of the torrent files is the easy part as that functionality has been tested and working on BitTorrent for years now.

Stopping fake seeders from earning revenues from your token and encrypting the various channels of communications is probably the harder part.
sr. member
Activity: 437
Merit: 250
The upcoming hardfork does what exactly? thanks
full member
Activity: 152
Merit: 100
Sell now for used japanese car... Hodl for brand new ferarri
full member
Activity: 138
Merit: 100
Everything's a bubble, idiot
Thanks coins, must have missed that one.

Yeah, almost at 6k again  Smiley
full member
Activity: 152
Merit: 100
Only 5 BTC to new ATH
Pages:
Jump to: