is there a reason why they say dont go past I 15 i normally run my card between 17 - 19 granted its on N scrypt or just scrypt
you just answered your own question 
Topic: [ANN][X11/X13] X11 (Darkcoin)/X13 (Marucoin) miner (based on sph-sgminer) - page 16. (Read 351509 times)
June 22, 2014, 05:20:25 PM
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
ADAMANT — the most secure and anonymous messenger
June 22, 2014, 04:56:41 PM
is there a reason why they say dont go past I 15 i normally run my card between 17 - 19 granted its on N scrypt or just scrypt
June 22, 2014, 03:38:42 PM
X13 mining with -k x13modold is working for amd h5xxx and h6xxx 
??
Cause i can't get it work.....
only HW
smaller worksize, for 5*** 128 works and 6*** 256 ??Cause i can't get it work.....
only HW
June 22, 2014, 02:35:42 PM
X13 mining with -k x13modold is working for amd h5xxx and h6xxx ??
Cause i can't get it work.....
only HW
??Cause i can't get it work.....
only HW
June 22, 2014, 01:50:04 PM
Is there a command to automatically decrease the GPU workload, for example, when streaming a movie. I have some stuttering and a lot of artifacts while the SGminer is running. It would be excellent if the GPU workload was maximized only when the computer is idle. "GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT" does not seem to affect this.
I haven't compiled the .exe by my self, downloaded a build from this thread. But is clueless whether it is 32 or 64 bit.
I'm running Win 7, 64
7970 @ GPU clock: 1050 & GPU mem: 1580
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
sgminer --kernel x11mod -o stratum+tcp://x -u x -p x -w 256 -I 15 -g 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 --temp-cutoff 85 --lookup-gap 2
I haven't compiled the .exe by my self, downloaded a build from this thread. But is clueless whether it is 32 or 64 bit.
I'm running Win 7, 64
7970 @ GPU clock: 1050 & GPU mem: 1580
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
sgminer --kernel x11mod -o stratum+tcp://x -u x -p x -w 256 -I 15 -g 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 --temp-cutoff 85 --lookup-gap 2
June 22, 2014, 12:11:54 PM
Anybody with a 6950 and X11?
I currently get 1.7 Mh/s at the moment, without any tuning, just Intensity on 16.
I currently get 1.7 Mh/s at the moment, without any tuning, just Intensity on 16.
check my post
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7452546
June 22, 2014, 10:58:07 AM
Someone can upload compiled new kernel for R9 270/270x ??
June 22, 2014, 10:21:07 AM
Anybody with a 6950 and X11?
I currently get 1.7 Mh/s at the moment, without any tuning, just Intensity on 16.
I currently get 1.7 Mh/s at the moment, without any tuning, just Intensity on 16.
June 22, 2014, 09:09:11 AM
I have a hd6870 driver 14.4 on win8.1, i try to mine x13
I use this miner with this bat
sgminer start and connect to pool, get diff
This is what i get:
only HW
Can someone help me pls ??
I use this miner with this bat
Quote
sgminer.exe -k x13modold -o stratum+tcp://xxxxx.xxx:yyyy -u user -p password --thread-concurrency 6720 --intensity 11
sgminer start and connect to pool, get diff
This is what i get:
Quote
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [Ss]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0: 67.0C 1630RPM | 463.3K/465.6Kh/s | A:0 R: 0.0% HW:7 WU:0.000/m I:11
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[14:13:12] Started sgminer 4.1.0
[14:13:12] WARNING: GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT is not specified!
[14:13:12] WARNING: GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS is not specified!
[14:13:12] Kernel x13mod (AMD HD 5xxx/6xxx) is experimental.
[14:13:12] Probing for an alive pool
[14:13:12] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.004
[14:13:13] Network diff set to 1.15K
[P]ool management [G]PU management [Ss]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0: 67.0C 1630RPM | 463.3K/465.6Kh/s | A:0 R: 0.0% HW:7 WU:0.000/m I:11
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[14:13:12] Started sgminer 4.1.0
[14:13:12] WARNING: GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT is not specified!
[14:13:12] WARNING: GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS is not specified!
[14:13:12] Kernel x13mod (AMD HD 5xxx/6xxx) is experimental.
[14:13:12] Probing for an alive pool
[14:13:12] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.004
[14:13:13] Network diff set to 1.15K
only HW
Can someone help me pls ??
Someone get in same situation ?
June 22, 2014, 09:08:43 AM
so now one 280x can do above 4MH on x11, very nice, what about the wattage?
how to check wattage
[/quote]
you need a wattmeter
June 22, 2014, 09:03:50 AM
so now one 280x can do above 4MH on x11, very nice, what about the wattage?
[/quote]
how to check wattage
June 22, 2014, 08:28:39 AM
ok guys... (devs)
U HAVE FAILED !!
x11 should be 50% less noise and 50% less power. And what ?
My r9 290 is again hot (5.1 gh/s) and power consuming (about ~160W ? ). And I quess in a week there will be "new patch" and it will run ~6,5 GH/s and about 230W (what is max in scrypt) - sb just need to public his new .cl or amd new drivers optimised for miners x11.
So x11 is big BS if u ask me. Now very close to scrypt (would like to see if that 5 MH/s do not destroy my GPU faster than ~900 KH/s with scrypt)
sad day
U HAVE FAILED !!
x11 should be 50% less noise and 50% less power. And what ?
My r9 290 is again hot (5.1 gh/s) and power consuming (about ~160W ? ). And I quess in a week there will be "new patch" and it will run ~6,5 GH/s and about 230W (what is max in scrypt) - sb just need to public his new .cl or amd new drivers optimised for miners x11.
So x11 is big BS if u ask me. Now very close to scrypt (would like to see if that 5 MH/s do not destroy my GPU faster than ~900 KH/s with scrypt)
sad day
What is preventing you from keeping your rigs at the lower hashrate and lower power consumption with the old version?
u rly asked that question ? ur nick should be "suchmoron" not "suchmoon"
Why use x11 instead of scrypt if they will soon be the same (or x11 is more secure or sth ? Isnt that just a method ? )
r9 290 scrypt 900KH/s = 230W
r9 290 x11 7GH/s = 230W (soon, when max optimised)
so what is the point to use x11 ? It was better coz everyone with same GPU used less power than scrypt. Hashrate isnt important at all as long as its fair and now scrypt is more fair coz sb still can squezee more from x11.
ehm, just Nvidia was uber profitable in our expense.
I guess you have many NV gpus..
nvidia is still far above, 2.7mh/s one 750ti against 4.2mh/s 280x on x11
one 280x need to climb until 5.4 with a consumption of 120w max, it will not happen no matter what optimization you can pull out
June 22, 2014, 08:20:10 AM
I have a hd6870 driver 14.4 on win8.1, i try to mine x13
I use this miner with this bat
sgminer start and connect to pool, get diff
This is what i get:
only HW
Can someone help me pls ??
I use this miner with this bat
Quote
sgminer.exe -k x13modold -o stratum+tcp://xxxxx.xxx:yyyy -u user -p password --thread-concurrency 6720 --intensity 11
sgminer start and connect to pool, get diff
This is what i get:
Quote
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [Ss]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0: 67.0C 1630RPM | 463.3K/465.6Kh/s | A:0 R: 0.0% HW:7 WU:0.000/m I:11
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[14:13:12] Started sgminer 4.1.0
[14:13:12] WARNING: GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT is not specified!
[14:13:12] WARNING: GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS is not specified!
[14:13:12] Kernel x13mod (AMD HD 5xxx/6xxx) is experimental.
[14:13:12] Probing for an alive pool
[14:13:12] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.004
[14:13:13] Network diff set to 1.15K
[P]ool management [G]PU management [Ss]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0: 67.0C 1630RPM | 463.3K/465.6Kh/s | A:0 R: 0.0% HW:7 WU:0.000/m I:11
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[14:13:12] Started sgminer 4.1.0
[14:13:12] WARNING: GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT is not specified!
[14:13:12] WARNING: GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS is not specified!
[14:13:12] Kernel x13mod (AMD HD 5xxx/6xxx) is experimental.
[14:13:12] Probing for an alive pool
[14:13:12] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.004
[14:13:13] Network diff set to 1.15K
only HW
Can someone help me pls ??
June 22, 2014, 08:12:53 AM
ok guys... (devs)
U HAVE FAILED !!
x11 should be 50% less noise and 50% less power. And what ?
My r9 290 is again hot (5.1 gh/s) and power consuming (about ~160W ? ). And I quess in a week there will be "new patch" and it will run ~6,5 GH/s and about 230W (what is max in scrypt) - sb just need to public his new .cl or amd new drivers optimised for miners x11.
So x11 is big BS if u ask me. Now very close to scrypt (would like to see if that 5 MH/s do not destroy my GPU faster than ~900 KH/s with scrypt)
sad day
U HAVE FAILED !!
x11 should be 50% less noise and 50% less power. And what ?
My r9 290 is again hot (5.1 gh/s) and power consuming (about ~160W ? ). And I quess in a week there will be "new patch" and it will run ~6,5 GH/s and about 230W (what is max in scrypt) - sb just need to public his new .cl or amd new drivers optimised for miners x11.
So x11 is big BS if u ask me. Now very close to scrypt (would like to see if that 5 MH/s do not destroy my GPU faster than ~900 KH/s with scrypt)
sad day
it was expected man, x11 was just not optimized, that was the only reason for the low wattage, some guy really think that the algo was magical and give you low consumption, lmao
Guys
I just try to
Sapphire R9 280X dualx
w7 64
cat 13.2
just del all .bin and replace it
replace x11mod.cl
and set config like COOLERbyPSP
thanks man, it's work without install cat 14.6
get ~3.3 Mhs before
it's just already run, i dont know for few hour later
I just try to
Sapphire R9 280X dualx
w7 64
cat 13.2
just del all .bin and replace it
replace x11mod.cl
and set config like COOLERbyPSP
thanks man, it's work without install cat 14.6
get ~3.3 Mhs before
it's just already run, i dont know for few hour later
so now one 280x can do above 4MH on x11, very nice, what about the wattage?
June 22, 2014, 08:08:08 AM
is this new .cl virus free ? I heard this cooler guy has shady past ?
June 22, 2014, 07:46:54 AM
Guys
I just try to
Sapphire R9 280X dualx
w7 64
cat 13.2
just del all .bin and replace it
replace x11mod.cl
and set config like COOLERbyPSP
thanks man, it's work without install cat 14.6
get ~3.3 Mhs before
it's just already run, i dont know for few hour later
COOLERbyPSP
can we know where's you get this file .cl/.bin, so we can always get an new update
I just try to
Sapphire R9 280X dualx
w7 64
cat 13.2
just del all .bin and replace it
replace x11mod.cl
and set config like COOLERbyPSP
thanks man, it's work without install cat 14.6
get ~3.3 Mhs before
it's just already run, i dont know for few hour later
COOLERbyPSP
can we know where's you get this file .cl/.bin, so we can always get an new update
June 22, 2014, 06:22:46 AM
Hi,
How much mh/s I can get from R9 280(without X) on X11/X13 mining?
Big a difference in performance between R9 280 и R9 280X?
Thanks!
How much mh/s I can get from R9 280(without X) on X11/X13 mining?
Big a difference in performance between R9 280 и R9 280X?
Thanks!
June 22, 2014, 06:11:39 AM
what are you guys getting with r9 270?
my stats:
~1600kh on x13
~2070kh on x11
Can you post your system and driver?my stats:
~1600kh on x13
~2070kh on x11
I am on smos, not sure which drivers are there.
June 22, 2014, 05:22:31 AM
new driver + new kernel + new bin....
2.0 -> 1.5
MSI R9 270, Windows 7 x64
Someone can tell me what is wrong?
Actually I am using bin from 14.4 + driver 14.6 Beta for 2.0....
2.0 -> 1.5
MSI R9 270, Windows 7 x64
Someone can tell me what is wrong?
Actually I am using bin from 14.4 + driver 14.6 Beta for 2.0....
Code:
{
"pools" : [
{
"poolname" : "Nicehash.com (x11)",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:3336",
}
],
"intensity" : "16",
"kernel" : "x11mod",
"worksize" : "256",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"shaders" : "1280",
"gpu-threads" : "4",
"gpu-engine" : "1110",
"gpu-memclock" : "1000",
"gpu-fan" : "0-100",
"gpu-powertune" : "0",
"gpu-vddc" : "1.1",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-target" : "75",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"auto-fan" : true,
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"api-listen" : true,
"failover-switch-delay" : "40",
"log" : "5",
"expiry" : "1",
"queue" : "0",
"scan-time" : "1",
"worktime" : true,
"tcp-keepalive" : "20",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}
June 22, 2014, 12:08:10 AM
Need help:
F-Secure keeps blocking and insisting on removal/quarantine of sgminer.exe coz it has been identified as a "generic trojan". I tried to close the antivirus window but everytime I try to run .bat it gets blocked again.
What to do?
F-Secure keeps blocking and insisting on removal/quarantine of sgminer.exe coz it has been identified as a "generic trojan". I tried to close the antivirus window but everytime I try to run .bat it gets blocked again.
What to do?
Uh... add sgminer.exe to the whitelist?
Jump to: